One document matched: draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt
Differences from draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-04.txt
Network Working Group Fatai Zhang
Internet Draft Huawei
Category: Standards Track Guoying Zhang
CATR
Sergio Belotti
Alcatel-Lucent
D. Ceccarelli
Ericsson
Expires: January 2011 July 9, 2010
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling
Extensions for the evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with
the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 9, 2011.
Abstract
Recent progress in ITU-T Recommendation G.709 standardization has
introduced new ODU containers (ODU0, ODU4, ODU2e and ODUflex) and
enhanced Optical Transport Networking (OTN) flexibility. Several
<Zhang> Expires January 2011 [Page 1]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
recent documents have proposed ways to modify GMPLS signaling
protocols to support these new OTN features.
It is important that a single solution is developed for use in GMPLS
signaling and routing protocols. This solution must support ODUk
multiplexing capabilities, address all of the new features, be
acceptable to all equipment vendors, and be extensible considering
continued OTN evolution.
This document describes the extensions to the Generalized Multi-
Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling to control the evolving
Optical Transport Networks (OTN) addressing ODUk multiplexing and new
features including ODU0, ODU4, ODU2e and ODUflex.
Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Table of Contents
1. Introduction..................................................3
2. Terminology...................................................4
3. GMPLS Extensions for the Evolving G.709 - Overview............4
4. Extensions for Traffic Parameters for the Evolving G.709......5
4.1. Usage of ODUflex Traffic Parameter.......................6
4.2. Example of ODUflex Traffic Parameter.....................7
5. Generalized Label.............................................8
5.1. New definition of ODUk Label.............................9
5.2. Examples................................................10
5.3. Label Distribution Procedure............................12
5.4. Backward Compatibility Considerations...................13
5.4.1. Control Plane Backward Compatibility Considerations13
5.4.2. Data Plane Backward Compatibility Considerations...14
6. Tributary Port Number Assignment.............................15
6.1. TPN Object..............................................15
6.2. Procedure of TPN Assignment.............................16
6.2.1. Downstream Node Assignment by Control Plane........16
6.2.2. Upstream Node Assignment by Control Plane..........16
6.3. Collision Management....................................17
7. Security Considerations......................................17
8. IANA Considerations..........................................17
9. References...................................................18
9.1. Normative References....................................18
9.2. Informative References..................................19
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 2]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
10. Authors' Addresses..........................................19
Acknowledgment..................................................21
1. Introduction
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) [RFC3945] extends
MPLS to include Layer-2 Switching (L2SC), Time-Division Multiplex
(e.g., SONET/SDH, PDH, and ODU), Wavelength (OCh, Lambdas) Switching,
and Spatial Switching (e.g., incoming port or fiber to outgoing port
or fiber). [RFC3471] presents a functional description of the
extensions to Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) signaling
required to support Generalized MPLS. RSVP-TE-specific formats and
mechanisms and technology specific details are defined in [RFC3473].
With the evolution and deployment of G.709 technology, it is
necessary that appropriate enhanced control technology support be
provided for G.709. [RFC4328] describes the control technology
details that are specific to foundation G.709 Optical Transport
Networks (OTN), as specified in the ITU-T Recommendation G.709[G709-
V1], for ODUk deployments without multiplexing.
In addition to increasing need to support ODUk multiplexing, the
evolution of OTN has introduced additional containers and new
flexibility. For example, ODU0, ODU2e, ODU4 containers and ODUflex
are developed in [G709-V3].
In addition, the following issues require consideration:
- Support for hitless adjustment of ODUflex, which is to be
specified in ITU-T G.hao.
- Support for Tributary Port Number. The Tributary Port Number
has to be negotiated on each link for flexible assignment of
tributary ports to tributary slots in case of LO-ODU over HO-
ODU (e.g., ODU2 into ODU3).
Therefore, it is clear that [RFC4328] has to be updated or superceded
in order to support ODUk multiplexing, as well as other ODU
enhancements introduced by evolution of OTN standards.
This document updates RFC4328 extending the G.709 ODUk traffic
parameters and also presents a new OTN label format which is very
flexible and scalable.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 3]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
3. GMPLS Extensions for the Evolving G.709 - Overview
New features for the evolving OTN, for example, new ODU0, ODU2e, ODU4
and ODUflex containers are specified in [G709-V3]. The corresponding
new signal types are summarized below:
- Optical Channel Transport Unit (OTUk):
. OTU4
- Optical Channel Data Unit (ODUk):
. ODU0
. ODU2e
. ODU4
. ODUflex
A new Tributary Slot (TS) granularity (i.e., 1.25 Gbps) is also
described in [G709-V3]. Thus, there are now two TS granularities for
the foundation OTN ODU1, ODU2 and ODU3 containers. The TS granularity
at 2.5 Gbps is used on legacy interfaces while the new 1.25 Gbps will
be used for the new interfaces.
In addition to the support of ODUk mapping into OTUk (k = 1, 2, 3, 4),
the evolving OTN [G.709-V3] encompasses the multiplexing of ODUj (j =
0, 1, 2, 2e, 3, flex) into an ODUk (k > j) as follows:
- ODU0 into ODU1 multiplexing (with 1.25Gbps TS granularity)
- ODU0, ODU1, ODUflex into ODU2 multiplexing (with 1.25Gbps TS
granularity)
- ODU1 into ODU2 multiplexing (with 2.5Gbps TS granularity)
- ODU0, ODU1, ODU2, ODU2e and ODUflex into ODU3 multiplexing
(with 1.25Gbps TS granularity)
- ODU1, ODU2 into ODU3 multiplexing (with 2.5Gbps TS granularity)
- ODU0, ODU1, ODU2, ODU2e, ODU3 and ODUflex into ODU4
multiplexing (with 1.25Gbps TS granularity)
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 4]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
[RFC4328] describes GMPLS signaling extensions to support the control
for G.709 Optical Transport Networks (OTN) [G709-V1]. However,
[RFC4328] needs to be updated because it does not provide the means
to signal all the new signal types and related mapping and
multiplexing functionalities. Moreover, it supports only the
deprecated auto-MSI mode which assumes that the Tributary Port Number
is automatically assigned in the transmit direction and not checked
in the receive direction.
This document extends the G.709 traffic parameters described in
[RFC4328] and presents a new OTN label format which is very flexible
and scalable. Additionally, procedures about Tributary Port Number
assignment through control plane are also provided in this document.
4. Extensions for Traffic Parameters for the Evolving G.709
The traffic parameters for G.709 are defined as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Signal Type | Tolerance | NMC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NVC | Multiplier (MT) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Bit_Rate |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Signal Type should be extended to cover the new Signal Type
introduced by the evolving OTN. The new Signal Type is extended as
follows:
Value Type
----- ----
0 Not significant
1 ODU1 (i.e., 2.5 Gbps)
2 ODU2 (i.e., 10 Gbps)
3 ODU3 (i.e., 40 Gbps)
4 ODU4 (i.e., 100 Gbps)
5 Reserved (for future use)
6 OCh at 2.5 Gbps
7 OCh at 10 Gbps
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 5]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
8 OCh at 40 Gbps
9 OCh at 100 Gbps
10~19 Reserved (for future use)
20 ODU0 (i.e., 1.25 Gbps)
21~30 Reserved (for future use)
31 ODU2e (i.e., 10Gbps for FC1200 and GE LAN)
32 ODUflex (i.e., 1.25*N Gbps)
33~255 Reserved (for future use)
In case of ODUflex(CBR), the Bit_Rate and Tolerance fields are used
together to represent the actual bandwidth of ODUflex, where:
- The Bit_Rate field indicates the nominal bit rate of ODUflex(CBR)
encoded as a 32-bit IEEE single-precision floating-point number
(referring to [RFC4506] and [IEEE]).
- The Tolerance field indicates the bit rate tolerance (part per
million, ppm) of the ODUflex(CBR) encoded as an unsigned integer.
For example, for an ODUflex(CBR) service with Bit_Rate = 2.5Gbps and
Tolerance = 50ppm, the actual bandwidth of the ODUflex is:
2.5Gbps * (1 - 50ppm) ~ 2.5Gbps * (1 + 50ppm)
In case of other ODUk signal types, the Bit_Rate and Tolerance fields
are not necessary and MUST be filled with 0.
4.1. Usage of ODUflex Traffic Parameter
In case of ODUflex(CBR), the information of Bit_Rate and Tolerance in
the ODUflex traffic parameter is used to determine the total number
of tributary slots N in the HO ODUk link to be reserved. Here:
N = Ceiling of
ODUflex(CBR) nominal bit rate * (1 + ODUflex(CBR) bit rate tolerance)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ODTUk.ts nominal bit rate * (1 - HO OPUk bit rate tolerance)
Therefore, a node receiving a Path message containing ODUflex(CBR)
traffic parameter can allocate precise number of tributary slots and
set up the cross-connection for the ODUflex service.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 6]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
The table below shows the actual bandwidth of the tributary slot of
ODUk (in Gbps), referring to [G709-V3].
ODUk Minimum Nominal Maximum
-------------------------------------------------------
ODU2 1.249 384 632 1.249 409 620 1.249 434 608
ODU3 1.254 678 635 1.254 703 729 1.254 728 823
ODU4 1.301 683 217 1.301 709 251 1.301 735 285
Note that:
Minimum bandwidth of ODUTk.ts =
ODTUk.ts nominal bit rate * (1 - HO OPUk bit rate tolerance)
Maximum bandwidth of ODTUk.ts =
ODTUk.ts nominal bit rate * (1 + HO OPUk bit rate tolerance)
Where: HO OPUk bit rate tolerance = 20ppm
For different ODUk, the bandwidths of the tributary slot are
different, and so the total number of tributary slots to be reserved
for the ODUflex(CBR) may not be the same on different HO ODUk links.
This is why the traffic parameter should bring the actual bandwidth
information other than the NMC field.
[Editors note] In case of ODUflex(GFP), the calculation of the total
number of tributary slots to be reserved along the path is now under
discussion in ITU-T. Therefore, the traffic parameters for
ODUflex(GFP) is for further study.
4.2. Example of ODUflex Traffic Parameter
This section gives an example to illustrate the usage of ODUflex(CBR)
traffic parameter.
Assume there is an ODUflex(CBR) service requesting a bandwidth of
(2.5Gbps, +/-20ppm) from node A to node C. In other words, the
ODUflex traffic parameter indicates that Signal Type is 32 (ODUflex),
Bit_Rate is 2.5Gbps and Tolerance is 20ppm.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 7]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
+-----+ +---------+ +-----+
| +-------------+ +-----+ +-------------+ |
| ===============\| ODU |/=============== |
| ===============/| flex+-=============== |
| +-------------+ | |\=============== |
| +-------------+ +-----+ +-------------+ |
| | | | | |
| | ....... | | ....... | |
| A +-------------+ B +-------------+ C |
+-----+ HO ODU4 +---------+ HO ODU2 +-----+
=========: TS occupied by ODUflex
---------: free TS
- On the HO ODU4 link between node A and B:
The maximum bandwidth of the ODUflex equals 2.5Gbps * (1 + 20ppm),
and the minimum bandwidth of the tributary slot of ODU4 equals
1.301 683 217Gbps, so the total number of tributary slots N1 to
be reserved on this link is:
N1 = ceiling (2.5Gbps * (1 + 20ppm) / 1.301 683 217) = 2
- On the HO ODU2 link between node B and C:
The maximum bandwidth of the ODUflex equals 2.5Gbps * (1 + 20ppm),
and the minimum bandwidth of the tributary slot of ODU2 equals
1.249 384 632Gbps, so the total number of tributary slots N2 to
be reserved on this link is:
N2 = ceiling (2.5Gbps * (1 + 20ppm) / 1.249 384 632) = 3
5. Generalized Label
[RFC3471] has defined the Generalized Label which extends the
traditional label by allowing the representation of not only labels
which travel in-band with associated data packets, but also labels
which identify time-slots, wavelengths, or space division multiplexed
positions. The format of the corresponding RSVP-TE Generalized Label
object is defined in the Section 2.3 of [RFC3473].
However, for different technologies, we usually need use specific
label rather than the Generalized Label. For example, the label
format described in [RFC4606] could be used for SDH/SONET, the label
format in [RFC4328] for G.709.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 8]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
According to the ODUk label format defined in [RFC4328], it could be
updated to support new signal types defined in [G709-V3] but would
hardly be further enhanced to support possible new signal types.
Furthermore such label format can face large problems related to
scalability issues due to the high number of labels needed. For
example, when ODU3 is mapped into ODU4 with 1.25G tributary slots, it
will need thirty-one labels (31*4*8=992 bits) to be allocated for one
ODU3 connection. For ODUflex into ODU4, it may need up to eighty
labels (80*4*8=2560 bits) to be allocated for one ODUflex connection.
In this document, a new ODUk label format is defined. The new ODUk
label format is very flexible and scalable.
5.1. New definition of ODUk Label
In order to be compatible with new types of ODU signal and new types
of tributary slot, the following new ODUk label format is defined:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ODUj |OD(T)Uk| T | Reserved | Bit Map |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ......... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
ODUj and OD(T)Uk (4 bits respectively): indicate that LO ODUj is
multiplexed into HO ODUk(k>j), or LO ODUj is mapped into OTUk (j=k).
ODUj field Signal type
---------- -----------
0 LO ODU0
1 LO ODU1
2 LO ODU2
3 LO ODU3
4 LO ODU4
5 LO ODU2e
6 LO ODUflex
7-15 Reserved (for future use)
OD(T)Uk field Signal type
------------- -----------
0 Reserved (for future use)
1 HO ODU1 / OTU1
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 9]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
2 HO ODU2 / OTU2
3 HO ODU3 / OTU3
4 HO ODU4 / OTU4
5-15 Reserved (for future use)
T (2 bits): indicates the type of tributary slot of HO ODUk.
Currently, two types of tributary slot are defined in [G709-V3], the
1.25Gbps tributary slot and the 2.5Gbps tributary slot.
T field TS type
------- -------
0 1.25Gbps TS granularity
1 2.5Gbps TS granularity
2-3 Reserved (for future use)
Bit Map (variable): indicates which tributary slots in HO ODUk that
the LO ODUj will be multiplexed into. The sequence of the Bit Map is
consistent with the sequence of the tributary slots in HO ODUk. Each
bit in the bit map represents the corresponding tributary slot in HO
ODUk with a value of 1 or 0 indicating whether the tributary slot
will be used by LO ODUj or not.
The size of the bit map equals to the total number of the tributary
slots of HO ODUk.
In case of an ODUk mapped into OTUk, it's no need to indicate which
tributary slots will be used, so the size of Bit Map is 0.
Padded bits are added behind the Bit Map to make the whole label a
multiple of four bytes if necessary. Padded bit MUST be set to 0 and
MUST be ignored.
5.2. Examples
The following examples are given in order to illustrate the label
format described in the previous sections of this document.
(1) ODUk into OTUk mapping:
In such conditions, the downstream node along an LSP returns a label
indicating that the ODU1 (ODU2 or ODU3 or ODU4) is directly mapped
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 10]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
into the corresponding OTU1 (OTU2 or OTU3 or ODU4). The following
example label indicates an ODU1 mapped into OTU1.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0 0 0 1|0 0 0 1|0 1| Reserved | Padded Bits (0) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
(2) ODUj into ODUk multiplexing:
In such conditions, this label indicates that an ODUj is multiplexed
into several tributary slots of OPUk and then mapped into OTUk. Some
instances are shown as follow:
- ODU0 into ODU2 Multiplexing:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0 0 0 0|0 0 1 0|0 0| Reserved |0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0|Padded Bits (0)|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This above label indicates an ODU0 multiplexed into the second
tributary slot of ODU2, wherein the type of the tributary slot is
1.25Gbps.
- ODU1 into ODU2 Multiplexing with 1.25Gbps TS granularity:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0 0 0 1|0 0 1 0|0 0| Reserved |0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0|Padded Bits (0)|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This above label indicates an ODU1 multiplexed into the 2nd and the
4th tributary slot of ODU2, wherein the type of the tributary slot is
1.25Gbps.
- ODU2 into ODU3 Multiplexing with 2.5Gbps TS granularity:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0 0 1 0|0 0 1 1|0 1| Reserved |0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 11]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
This above label indicates an ODU2 multiplexed into the 2nd, 3rd, 5th
and 7th tributary slot of ODU3, wherein the type of the tributary
slot is 2.5Gbps.
5.3. Label Distribution Procedure
This document does not change the existing label distribution
procedures [RFC4328] for GMPLS except that the new ODUk label should
be processed as follows.
When a node receives a generalized label request for setting up an
ODUj LSP from its upstream neighbor node, the node should generate an
ODU label according to the signal type of the requested LSP and the
free resources (i.e., free tributary slots of ODUk) that will be
reserved for the LSP, and send the label to its upstream neighbor
node. Note that these labels can also be specified by the source node
of the connection.
In case of ODUj to ODUk multiplexing, the node should firstly
determine the size of the Bit Map field according to the signal type
and the tributary slot type of ODUk, and then set the bits to 1 in
the Bit Map field corresponding to the reserved tributary slots.
In case of ODUk to OTUk mapping, the node only needs to fill the ODUj
and the ODUk fields with corresponding values in the label. Other
bits are reserved and MUST be set to 0.
When receiving an ODU label from its downstream neighbor node, the
node should learn which ODU signal type is multiplexed or mapped into
which ODU signal type by analyzing the ODUj and the ODUk fields.
In case of ODUj to ODUk multiplexing, the node should firstly
determine the size of the Bit Map field according to the signal type
and the tributary slot type of ODUk, and then obtain which tributary
slots in ODUk are reserved by its downstream neighbor node according
to the position of the bits that are set to 1 in the Bit Map field,
so that the node can multiplex the ODUj into the reserved tributary
slots of ODUk after the LSP is established.
In case of ODUk to OTUk mapping, the size of Bit Map field is 0 and
no additional procedure is needed.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 12]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
5.4. Backward Compatibility Considerations
5.4.1. Control Plane Backward Compatibility Considerations
Since the [RFC4328] has been deployed in the network for the nodes
that support [G709-V1] (herein we call them "legacy nodes"), backward
compatibility SHOULD be taken into consideration when the new nodes
(i.e., nodes that support [G709-V3]) and the legacy nodes are
interworking.
For backward compatibility consideration, the new node SHOULD have
the ability to generate and parse legacy labels.
o For the legacy node, it always generates and sends legacy label to
its upstream node, no matter the upstream node is new or legacy,
as described in [RFC4328].
o For the new node, it will generate and send legacy label if its
upstream node is a legacy one, and generate and send new label if
its upstream node is a new one.
One backwards compatibility example is shown below:
Path Path Path Path
+-----+ ----> +-----+ ----> +------+ ----> +------+ ----> +-----+
| | | | | | | | | |
| A +-------+ B +-------+ C +-------+ D +-------+ E |
| new | | new | |legacy| |legacy| | new |
+-----+ <---- +-----+ <---- +------+ <---- +------+ <---- +-----+
Resv Resv Resv Resv
(new label) (legacy label) (legacy label) (legacy label)
As described above, for backward compatibility considerations, it is
necessary for a new node to know whether the neighbor node is new or
legacy.
One optional method is manual configuration. But it is recommended to
use LMP to discover the capability of the neighbor node automatically,
as described in [OTN-LMP].
When performing the HO ODU link capability negotiation:
o If the neighbor node only support the 2.5Gbps TS and only support
ODU1/ODU2/ODU3, the neighbor node should be treated as a legacy
node.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 13]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
o If the neighbor node can support the 1.25Gbps TS, or can support
other LO ODU types defined in [G709-V3]), the neighbor node should
be treated as new node.
o If the neighbor node returns a LinkSummaryNack message including
an ERROR_CODE indicating nonsupport of HO ODU link capability
negotiation, the neighbor node should be treated as a legacy node.
5.4.2. Data Plane Backward Compatibility Considerations
As described in chapter 3.1 and 4.1 of [OTN-LMP], the node supporting
1.25Gbps TS can interwork with the other nodes that supporting
2.5Gbps TS by combining Specific TSs together in data plane. The
control plane MUST support this TS combination.
Take the following figure as an example. Assume that there is an ODU2
link between node A and B, where node A only supports the 2.5Gbps TS
while node B supports the 1.25Gbps TS. In this case, the TS#i and
TS#i+4 (where i<=4) of node B are combined together. When creating an
ODU1 service in this ODU2 link, node B reserves the TS#i and TS#i+4
with the granularity of 1.25Gbps. But in the label sent from B to A,
it is indicated that the TS#i with the granularity of 2.5Gbps is
reserved.
Path
+----------+ ------------> +----------+
| TS1==|===========\--------+--TS1 |
| TS2==|=========\--\-------+--TS2 |
| TS3==|=======\--\--\------+--TS3 |
| TS4==|=====\--\--\--\-----+--TS4 |
| | \ \ \ \----+--TS5 |
| | \ \ \------+--TS6 |
| | \ \--------+--TS7 |
| | \----------+--TS8 |
+----------+ <------------ +----------+
node A Resv node B
In the contrary direction, when receiving a label from node A
indicating that the TS#i with the granularity of 2.5Gbps is reserved,
node B will reserved the TS#i and TS#i+4 with the granularity of
1.25Gbps in its control plane.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 14]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
6. Tributary Port Number Assignment
As described in [G709-V3] and [G798-V3], the OPUk overhead in an OTUk
frame contains n (n = the total number of TSs of the ODUk) MSI
(Multiplex Structure Identifier) bytes (in the form of multi-frame),
each of which is used to indicate the multiplex structure of one TS,
respectively.
When an LO ODUj is multiplexed into HO ODUk occupying one or more TSs,
a Tributary Port Number (TPN) is configured at the two end of the HO
ODUk link and is put into the related MSI byte(s) in the OPUk
overhead at the (traffic) ingress end of the link, so that the other
end of the link can learn which TS(s) is/are used by the LO ODUj in
the data plane.
For HO ODU2 or ODU3 link, the TPN value (6 bits) MUST be different
from each other for one type of LO ODU. For HO ODU4 link, the TPN
value (7 bits) MUST be different from each other for all types of LO
ODUj.
TPN needs to be assigned by management plane or control plane. For
the latter case, the RSVP-TE signaling is necessary to be extended to
support the TPN assignment function.
6.1. TPN Object
A new TPN object is introduced in the PATH and RESV message to
support TPN assignment. The TPN object is optional and has the
following format:
TPN Class-Num = xx (TBD), C_Type = 1
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|D| Reserved | TPN |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
D (Downstream Assignment) (1 bit): indicates which node to assign the
TPN. When set, the TPN is assigned by the downstream node; when
cleared, the TPN is assigned by the upstream node.
TPN (16 bits): indicates the Tributary Port Number for the assigned
Tributary Slot(s).
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 15]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
- In case of LO ODUj multiplexed into HO ODU1/ODU2/ODU3, only the
lower 6 bits of TPN field is significant and the other bits of
TPN MUST be set to 0.
- In case of LO ODUj multiplexed into HO ODU4, only the lower 7
bits of TPN field is significant and the other bits of TPN MUST
be set to 0.
- In case of ODUj mapped into OTUk (j=k), the TPN is not needed
and this object SHOULD not appear in the RSVP-TE message.
6.2. Procedure of TPN Assignment
Since the TPN is not needed in case of ODU mapping, the following
sub-sessions are only applicable for the ODU multiplexing cases.
6.2.1. Downstream Node Assignment by Control Plane
In this case, the upstream node sends a PATH message, which contains
a TPN Object with the D bit set to 1, to its downstream neighbor node
to request creation of LO ODUj. The TPN field in this object is set
to 0 and MUST be ignored.
On receiving the PATH massage, the downstream neighbor node performs
a normal tributary slot selection and reservation in the selected HO
ODUk link. After that, the downstream node assigns a valid TPN, which
does not collided with other TPN value used by existing LO ODU
connections in the selected HO ODU link and configures the expected
multiplex structure identifier (ExMSI) using this TPN. Then, the
assigned TPN is filled into the TPN Object and sent to the upstream
neighbor node via the RESV message.
The upstream node, when receiving the RESV message, gets the TPN
assigned by its downstream neighbor node and fills the TPN into the
related MSI byte(s) in the OPUk overhead in the data plane, so that
the downstream neighbor node can check whether the TPN received from
the data plane is consistent with the ExMSI and determine whether
there is any mismatch defect.
6.2.2. Upstream Node Assignment by Control Plane
In this case, the upstream node performs a normal tributary slot
selection and reservation in the selected HO ODUk link for LO ODUj,
and then assigns a valid TPN, which does not collided with other TPN
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 16]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
value used by existing LO ODU connections in the selected HO ODU link,
for the reserved tributary slot(s).
Then, the upstream node sends a PATH message, which contains the
assigned TPN value in the TPN Object (D = 0) and contains the
selected tributary slots information (e.g., via the existing
LABEL_SET Object), to its downstream neighbor node to request
creation of LO ODUj.
The downstream neighbor node, based on the received tributary slots
information and the TPN value, configures the ExMSI in the data plane,
so that the data plane MSI procedure can be performed, as described
in the previous sub-session.
6.3. Collision Management
[Editors note] This chapter should indicate the procedure in case of
collision between Tributary Port Numbers and/or Tributary Slots e.g.
two different LSP setups may choose a disjoint set of Tributary Slots
but they may request the same Tributary Port Number value (same MSI
in G.709 OPUk field).
In this case the first signaling should be successful and the second
one must fail.
7. Security Considerations
This document introduces no new security considerations to the
existing GMPLS signaling protocols. Referring to [RFC3473], further
details of the specific security measures are provided. Additionally,
[GMPLS-SEC] provides an overview of security vulnerabilities and
protection mechanisms for the GMPLS control plane.
8. IANA Considerations
- TPN Object:
A new value is needed to be defined by IANA for this document:
o TPN Object (Session 6): Class-Num = xx (TBD), C-Type = 1
- G.709 SENDER_TSPEC and FLOWSPEC objects:
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 17]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
The traffic parameters, which are carried in the G.709
SENDER_TSPEC and FLOWSPEC objects, do not require any new object
class and type based on [RFC4328]:
o G.709 SENDER_TSPEC Object: Class = 12, C-Type = 5 [RFC4328]
o G.709 FLOWSPEC Object: Class = 9, C-Type = 5 [RFC4328]
- Generalized Label Object:
The new defined ODU label (session 5) is a kind of generalized
label. Therefore, the Class-Num and C-Type of the ODU label is
the same as that of generalized label described in [RFC3473],
i.e., Class-Num = 16, C-Type = 2.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4328] D. Papadimitriou, Ed. "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for G.709 Optical
Transport Networks Control", RFC 4328, Jan 2006.
[RFC3471] Berger, L., Editor, "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description", RFC
3471, January 2003.
[RFC3473] L. Berger, Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic
Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions", RFC 3473, January 2003.
[RFC3945] Mannie, E., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945, October 2004.
[OTN-LMP] Fatai Zhang, Ed., "Link Management Protocol (LMP)
extensions for G.709 Optical Transport Networks", draft-
zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g.709-lmp-discovery-02.txt, Oct 21, 2009.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 18]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
9.2. Informative References
[G709-V1] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network (OTN),"
G.709 Recommendation (and Amendment 1), February 2001
(November 2001).
[G709-V2] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network (OTN),"
G.709 Recommendation, March 2003.
[G709-V3] ITU-T, "Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network (OTN)
", G.709/Y.1331, December 2009.
[G798-V2] ITU-T, "Characteristics of optical transport network
hierarchy equipment functional blocks", G.798, December
2006.
[G798-V3] ITU-T, "Characteristics of optical transport network
hierarchy equipment functional blocks", G.798v3, consented
June 2010.
[RFC4506] M. Eisler, Ed., "XDR: External Data Representation
Standard", RFC 4506, May 2006.
[IEEE] "IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic",
ANSI/IEEE Standard 754-1985, Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers, August 1985.
[GMPLS-SEC] Fang, L., Ed., "Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS
Networks", Work in Progress, October 2009.
10. Authors' Addresses
Fatai Zhang
Huawei Technologies
F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base
Bantian, Longgang District
Shenzhen 518129 P.R.China
Phone: +86-755-28972912
Email: zhangfatai@huawei.com
Guoying Zhang
China Academy of Telecommunication Research of MII
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 19]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
11 Yue Tan Nan Jie Beijing, P.R.China
Phone: +86-10-68094272
Email: zhangguoying@mail.ritt.com.cn
Sergio Belotti
Alcatel-Lucent
Optics CTO
Via Trento 30 20059 Vimercate (Milano) Italy
+39 039 6863033
Email: sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.it
Daniele Ceccarelli
Ericsson
Via A. Negrone 1/A
Genova - Sestri Ponente
Italy
Email: daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com
Yi Lin
Huawei Technologies
F3-5-B R&D Center, Huawei Base
Bantian, Longgang District
Shenzhen 518129 P.R.China
Phone: +86-755-28972914
Email: linyi_hw@huawei.com
Yunbin Xu
China Academy of Telecommunication Research of MII
11 Yue Tan Nan Jie Beijing, P.R.China
Phone: +86-10-68094134
Email: xuyunbin@mail.ritt.com.cn
Pietro Grandi
Alcatel-Lucent
Optics CTO
Via Trento 30 20059 Vimercate (Milano) Italy
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 20]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
+39 039 6864930
Email: pietro_vittorio.grandi@alcatel-lucent.it
Diego Caviglia
Ericsson
Via A. Negrone 1/A
Genova - Sestri Ponente
Italy
Email: diego.caviglia@ericsson.com
Acknowledgment
This document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.
Intellectual Property
The IETF Trust takes no position regarding the validity or scope of
any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be
claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
described in any IETF Document or the extent to which any license
under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it
represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any
such rights.
Copies of Intellectual Property disclosures made to the IETF
Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or
the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or
permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or
users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR
repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
any standard or specification contained in an IETF Document. Please
address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
The definitive version of an IETF Document is that published by, or
under the auspices of, the IETF. Versions of IETF Documents that are
published by third parties, including those that are translated into
other languages, should not be considered to be definitive versions
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 21]
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-05.txt July 2010
of IETF Documents. The definitive version of these Legal Provisions
is that published by, or under the auspices of, the IETF. Versions of
these Legal Provisions that are published by third parties, including
those that are translated into other languages, should not be
considered to be definitive versions of these Legal Provisions.
For the avoidance of doubt, each Contributor to the IETF Standards
Process licenses each Contribution that he or she makes as part of
the IETF Standards Process to the IETF Trust pursuant to the
provisions of RFC 5378. No language to the contrary, or terms,
conditions or rights that differ from or are inconsistent with the
rights and licenses granted under RFC 5378, shall have any effect and
shall be null and void, whether published or posted by such
Contributor, or included with or in such Contribution.
Disclaimer of Validity
All IETF Documents and the information contained therein are provided
on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE
IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL
WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION THEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE
ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Zhang Expires January 2011 [Page 22]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 12:18:11 |