One document matched: draft-vixie-htcp-proto-03.txt
Differences from draft-vixie-htcp-proto-02.txt
ICP Working Group Paul Vixie
INTERNET-DRAFT Vayu
<draft-vixie-htcp-proto-03.txt> Duane Wessels
NLANR
September, 1998
Hyper Text Caching Protocol (HTCP/0.0)
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''
To view the entire list of current Internet-Drafts, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Northern
Europe), ftp.nis.garr.it (Southern Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific
Rim), ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
Abstract
This draft describes HTCP, a protocol for discovering HTTP caches and
cached data, managing sets of HTTP caches, and monitoring cache
activity.
1 - Definitions, Rationale and Scope
1.1. HTTP/1.1 (see [RFC2068]) permits the transfer of web objects from
``origin servers'', possibly via ``proxies'' (which are allowed under
some circumstances to ``cache'' such objects for subsequent reuse) to
``clients'' which consume the object in some way, usually by displaying
it as part of a ``web page.'' HTTP/1.0 and later permit ``headers'' to
be included in a request and/or a response, thus expanding upon the
HTTP/0.9 (and earlier) behaviour of specifying only a URI in the request
and offering only a body in the response.
Expires March 1999 [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
1.2. ICP (see [RFC2186]) permits caches to be queried as to their
content, usually by other caches who are hoping to avoid an expensive
fetch from a distant origin server. ICP was designed with HTTP/0.9 in
mind, such that only the URI (without any headers) is used when
describing cached content, and the possibility of multiple compatible
bodies for the same URI had not yet been imagined.
1.3. This document specifies a Hyper Text Caching Protocol (HTCP or
simply HoT CraP) which permits full request and response headers to be
used in cache management, and expands the domain of cache management to
include monitoring a remote cache's additions and deletions, requesting
immediate deletions, and sending hints about web objects such as the
third party locations of cacheable objects or the measured
uncacheability or unavailability of web objects.
2 - HTCP Protocol
2.1. All multi-octet HTCP protocol elements are transmitted in network
byte order. All RESERVED fields should be set to binary zero by senders
and left unexamined by receivers. Headers must be presented with the
CRLF line termination, as in HTTP.
2.2. Any hostnames specified should be compatible between sender and
receiver, such that if a private naming scheme (such as HOSTS.TXT or
NIS) is in use, names depending on such schemes will only be sent to
HTCP neighbors who are known to participate in said schemes. Raw
addresses (dotted quad IPv4, or colon-format IPv6) are universal, as are
public DNS names. Use of private names or addresses will require
special operational care.
2.3. UDP must be supported. HTCP agents must not be isolated from
NETWORK failures and delays. An HTCP agent should be prepared to act in
useful ways when no response is forthcoming, or when responses are
delayed or reordered or damaged. TCP is optional and is expected to be
used only for protocol debugging. The IANA has assigned port 4827 as
the standard TCP and UDP port number for HTCP.
2.4. A set of configuration variables concerning transport
characteristics should be maintained for each agent which is capable of
initiating HTCP transactions, perhaps with a set of per-agent global
defaults. These variables are:
Maximum number of unacknowledged transactions before a ``failure'' is
imputed.
Expires March 1999 [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
Maximum interval without a response to some transaction before a
``failure'' is imputed.
Should ICMP-Portunreach be treated as a failure?
Should RESPONSE=5 && MO=1 be treated as a failure?
Minimum interval before trying a new transaction after a failure
2.5. An HTCP Message has the following general format:
+---------------------+
| HEADER | tells message length and protocol versions
+---------------------+
| DATA | HTCP message (varies per major version number)
+---------------------+
| AUTH | optional authentication for transaction
+---------------------+
2.6. An HTCP/*.* HEADER has the following format:
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | LENGTH |
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
2: | LENGTH |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2: | MAJOR | MINOR |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
LENGTH is the message length, inclusive of all header and data octets,
including the LENGTH field itself. This field will be equal to
the datagam payload size (``record length'') if a datagram
protocol is in use, and can include padding, i.e., not all
octets of the message need be used in the DATA and AUTH
sections.
MAJOR is the major version number (0 for this specification). The
DATA section of an HTCP message need not be upward or downward
compatble between different major version numbers.
MINOR is the minor version number (0 for this specification). Feature
levels and interpretation rules can vary depending on this
Expires March 1999 [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
field, in particular RESERVED fields can take on new (though
optional) meaning in successive minor version numbers within the
same major version number.
2.6.1. It is expected that an HTCP initiator will know the version
number of a prospective HTCP responder, or that the initiator will probe
using declining values for MINOR and MAJOR (beginning with the highest
locally supported value) and locally cache the probed version number of
the responder.
2.6.2. Higher MAJOR numbers are to be preferred, as are higher MINOR
numbers within a particular MAJOR number.
2.7. An HTCP/0.* DATA has the following structure:
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | LENGTH |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2: | OPCODE | RESPONSE | RESERVED |F1 |RR |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4: | MSG-ID |
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
6: | MSG-ID |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8: | |
/ OP-DATA /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
LENGTH is the number of octets of the message which are reserved for
the DATA section, including the LENGTH field itself. This
number can include padding, i.e., not all octets reserved by
LENGTH need be used in OP-DATA.
OPCODE is the operation code of an HTCP transaction. An HTCP
transaction can consist of multiple HTCP messages, e.g., a
request (sent by the initiator), or a response (sent by the
responder).
Expires March 1999 [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
RESPONSE is a numeric code indicating the success or failure of a
transaction. It should be set to zero (0) by requestors and
ignored by responders. Each operation has its own set of
response codes, which are described later. The overall
message has a set of response codes which are as follows:
0 authentication wasn't used but is required
1 authentication was used but unsatisfactorily
2 opcode not implemented
3 major version not supported
4 minor version not supported (major version is ok)
5 inappropriate, disallowed, or undesirable opcode
The above response codes all indicate errors and all depend
for their visibility on MO=1 (as specified below).
RR is a flag indicating whether this message is a request (0) or
response (1).
F1 is overloaded such that it is used differently by requestors
than by responders. If RR=0, then F1 is defined as RD. If
RR=1, then F1 is defined as MO.
RD is a flag which if set to 1 means that a response is desired.
Some OPCODEs require RD to be set to 1 to be meaningful.
MO (em-oh) is a flag which indicates whether the RESPONSE code is
to be interpreted as a response to the overall message (fixed
fields in DATA or any field of AUTH) [MO=1] or as a response
to fields in the OP-DATA [MO=0].
MSG-ID is a 32-bit value which when combined with the initiator's
network address, uniquely identifies this HTCP transaction.
care should be taken not to reuse MSG-ID's within the life-
time of a UDP datagram.
OP-DATA is opcode-dependent and is defined below, per opcode.
Expires March 1999 [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
2.8. An HTCP/0.0 AUTH has the following structure:
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | LENGTH |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2: | SIG-TIME |
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
4: | SIG-TIME |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6: | SIG-EXPIRE |
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
8: | SIG-EXPIRE |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
10: | |
/ KEY-NAME /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
n: | |
/ SIGNATURE /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
LENGTH is the number of octets used by the AUTH, including the
LENGTH field itself. If the optional AUTH is not being
transmitted, this field should be set to 2 (two). LENGTH
can include padding, which means that not all octets
reserved by LENGTH will necessarily be consumed by
SIGNATURE.
SIG-TIME is an unsigned binary count of the number of seconds since
00:00:00 1-Jan-70 UTC at the time the SIGNATURE is
generated.
SIG-EXPIRE is an unsigned binary count of the number of seconds since
00:00:00 1-Jan-70 UTC at the time the SIGNATURE is
considered to have expired.
KEY-NAME is a COUNTSTR which specifies the name of a shared secret.
(Each HTCP implementation is expected to allow configuration
of several shared secrets, each of which will have a name.)
SIGNATURE is a COUNTSTR which holds the HMAC-MD5 digest (see [RFC
2104]), with a B value of 64, of the following elements,
Expires March 1999 [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
each of which is digested in its ``on the wire'' format,
including transmitted padding if any is covered by a field's
associated LENGTH:
IP SRC ADDR [4 octets]
IP SRC PORT [2 octets]
IP DST ADDR [4 octets]
IP DST PORT [2 octets]
HTCP MAJOR version number [1 octet]
HTCP MINOR version number [1 octet]
SIG-TIME [4 octets]
SIG-EXPIRE [4 octets]
HTCP DATA [variable]
KEY-NAME (the whole COUNTSTR) [variable]
2.8.1. Shared secrets should be cryptorandomly generated and should be
at least a few hundred octets in size.
3 - Data Types
HTCP/0.* data types are defined as follows:
3.1. COUNTSTR is a counted string whose format is:
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | LENGTH |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2: | |
/ TEXT /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
LENGTH is the number of octets which will follow in TEXT. This field
is *not* self-inclusive as is the case with other HTCP LENGTH
fields.
TEXT is a stream of uninterpreted octets, usually ISO8859-1
``characters''.
Expires March 1999 [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
3.2. SPECIFIER is used with the TST and CLR request messages, defined
below. Its format is:
+---------------------+
| METHOD | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
| URI | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
| VERSION | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
| REQ-HDRS | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
METHOD (Since HTCP only returns headers, methods GET and HEAD are
equivilent.)
URI (If the URI is a URL, it should always include a ``:''<port>
specifier, but in its absense, port 80 should be imputed by a
receiver.)
VERSION is an entire HTTP version string such as ``HTTP/1.1''.
VERSION strings with prefixes other than ``HTTP/'' or with
version numbers less than ``1.1'' are outside the domain of
this specification.
REQ-HDRS are those presented by an HTTP initiator. These headers
should include end-to-end but NOT hop-by-hop headers, and they
can be canonicalized (aggregation of ``Accept:'' is permitted,
for example.)
3.3. DETAIL is used with the TST response message, defined below. Its
format is:
+---------------------+
| RESP-HDRS | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
| ENTITY-HDRS | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
| CACHE-HDRS | : COUNTSTR
+---------------------+
Expires March 1999 [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
3.4. IDENTITY is used with the MON request and SET response message,
defined below. Its format is:
+---------------------+
| SPECIFIER |
+---------------------+
| DETAIL |
+---------------------+
4 - Cache Headers
HTCP/0.0 CACHE-HDRS consist of zero or more of the following headers:
Cache-Vary: <header-name> ...
The sender of this header has learned that content varies on a set of
headers different from the set given in the object's Vary: header.
If Cache-Vary: specifies the null set, then the origin server has
been found to issue identical results no matter what request headers
are given to it.
Cache-Location: <cache-hostname>:<port> ...
The sender of this header has learned of one or more proxy caches who
are holding a copy of this object. Probing these caches with HTCP
may result in discovery of new, close-by (preferrable to current)
HTCP neighbors.
Cache-Policy: [no-cache] [no-share] [cookie-ok]
The sender of this header has learned that the object's policy has
more detail than is given in its response headers.
no-cache means that it is uncacheable (no reason given),
but may be shareable between simultaneous
requestors.
no-share means that it is unshareable (no reason given),
and per-requestor tunnelling is always required).
cookie-ok means that the content is not going to change as a
result of different, missing, or even random
cookies being included in the request headers, and
that caching may be possible.
Expires March 1999 [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
Cache-Flags: [incomplete]
The sender of this header has modified the object's policy locally,
such that requesters may need to treat this response specially, i.e.,
not necessarily in accordance with the object's actual policy.
incomplete means that the response headers and/or entity
headers given in this response are not known to be
complete, and may not be suitable for use as a
cache key.
Cache-Expiry: <date>
The sender of this header has learned that this object should be
considered to have expired at a time different than that indicate by
its response headers. The format is the same as HTTP/1.1 Expires:.
Cache-MD5: <discovered content MD5>
The sender of this header has computed an MD5 checksum for this
object which is either different from that given in the object's
Content-MD5: header, or is being supplied since the object has no
Content-MD5 header. The format is the same as HTTP/1.1 Content-MD5:.
Cache-to-Origin: <origin>[,<origin>...] <rtt> <samples> <hops>
The sender of this header has measured the round trip time to a set
of origin servers (given as a comma separated list of <origin>
hostnames). The <rtt> is the average number of seconds, expressed as
decimal ASCII with arbitrary precision and no exponent. <Samples> is
the number of RTT samples which have had input to this average.
<Hops> is the number of routers between the cache and the origin,
expressed as decimal ASCII with arbitrary precision and no exponent,
or 0 if the cache doesn't know.
6 - HTCP Operations
HTCP/0.* opcodes and their respective OP-DATA are defined below:
6.1. NOP (OPCODE 0):
This is an HTCP-level ``ping.'' Responders are encouraged to process
NOP's with minimum delay since the requestor may be using the NOP RTT
(round trip time) for configuration or mapping purposes. The RESPONSE
code for a NOP is always zero (0). There is no OP-DATA for a NOP. NOP
requests with RD=0 cause no processing to occur at all.
Expires March 1999 [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
6.2. TST (OPCODE 1):
Test for the presence of a specified content entity in a proxy cache.
TST requests with RD=0 cause no processing to occur at all.
TST requests have the following OP-DATA:
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | |
/ SPECIFIER /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
RESPONSE codes for TST are as follows:
0 entity is present in responder's cache
1 entity is not present in responder's cache
TST responses have the following OP-DATA, if RESPONSE is zero (0):
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | |
/ DETAIL /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
TST responses have the following OP-DATA, if RESPONSE is one (1):
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | |
/ CACHE-HDRS /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
DETAIL is a set of cache, entity, and response headers. The cache
headers are described above. Entity and response headers are
defined by HTTP.
Expires March 1999 [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
6.3. MON (OPCODE 2):
Monitor activity in a proxy cache (adds, deletes, replacements, etc).
Since interleaving of HTCP transaction over a single pair of UDP
endpoints is not supported, it is recommended that a unique UDP endpoint
be allocated by the requestor for each concurrent MON request. MON
requests with RD=0 are equivilent to those with RD=1 and TIME=0; that
is, they will cancel any outstanding MON transaction.
MON requests have the following OP-DATA structure:
+0 (MSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | TIME |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
TIME is the number of seconds of monitoring output desired by the
initiator. Subsequent MON requests from the same initiator with
the same MSG-ID should update the time on a ongoing MON
transaction. This is called ``overlapping renew.''
RESPONSE codes for MON are as follows:
0 accepted, OP-DATA is present and valid
1 refused (quota error -- too many MON's are active)
MON responses have the following OP-DATA structure, if RESPONSE is zero
(0):
+0 (MSB) +1 (LSB)
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | TIME | ACTION | REASON |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2: | |
/ IDENTITY /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
TIME is the number of seconds remaining for this MON transaction.
ACTION is a numeric code indicating a cache population action. Codes
are:
Expires March 1999 [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
0 an entity has been added to the cache
1 an entity in the cache has been refreshed
2 an entity in the cache has been replaced
3 an entity in the cache has been deleted
REASON is a numeric code indicating the reason for an ACTION. Codes
are:
0 some reason not covered by the other REASON codes
1 a proxy client fetched this entity
2 a proxy client fetched with caching disallowed
3 the proxy server prefetched this entity
4 the entity expired, per its headers
5 the entity was purged due to caching storage limits
6.4. SET (OPCODE 3):
Inform a cache of the identity of an object. This is a ``push''
transaction, whereby cooperating caches can share information such as
updated Age/Date/Expires headers (which might result from an origin
``304 Not modified'' response) or updated cache headers (which might
result from the discovery of non-authoritative ``vary'' conditions or
from learning of second or third party cache locations for this entity.
RD is honoured.
SET requests have the following OP-DATA structure:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | |
/ IDENTITY /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
RESPONSE codes are as follows:
0 identity accepted, thank you
1 identity ignored, no reason given, thank you
SET responses have no OP-DATA.
Expires March 1999 [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
6.5. CLR (OPCODE 4):
Tell a cache to completely forget about an entity. RD is honoured.
CLR requests have the following OP-DATA structure:
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
0: | RESERVED | REASON |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2: | |
/ SPECIFIER /
/ /
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
REASON is a numeric code indicating the reason why the requestor is
asking that this entity be removed. The codes are as follows:
0 some reason not better specified by another code
1 the origin server told me that this entity does not exist
RESPONSE codes are as follows:
0 i had it, it's gone now
1 i had it, i'm keeping it, no reason given.
2 i didn't have it
CLR responses have no OP-DATA.
Clearing a URI without specifying response, entity, or cache headers
means to clear all entities using that URI.
7 - Security Considerations
If the optional AUTH element is not used, it is possible for
unauthorized third parties to both view and modify a cache using the
HTCP protocol.
8 - Acknowledgements
Mattias Wingstedt of Idonex brought key insights to the development of
this protocol. David Hankins helped clarify this document.
Expires March 1999 [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT HTCP September 1998
9 - References
[RFC1630]
T. Berners-Lee, ``Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW,'', RFC 1630,
CERN, June 1994.
[RFC2068]
R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, T. Berners-Lee,
``Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1,'' RFC 2068, UC Irvine,
DEC, MIT/LCS, January 1997.
[RFC2104]
H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R. Canetti, ``HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for
Message Authentication,'' RFC 2104, IBM and UCSD, February, 1997.
[RFC2186]
D. Wessels, K. Claffy, ``Internet Cache Protocol (ICP), version 2,''
RFC 2186, National Laboratory for Applied Network Research/UCSD,
September 1997.
10 - Author's Address
Paul Vixie
Vayu Communications
950 Charter Street
Redwood City, CA 94063
+1 650 779 7001
<vixie@vayu.net>
Duane Wessels
National Lab for Applied Network Research
USCD, 9500 Gilman Drive
La Jolla, CA 92093
+1 303 497 1822
<wessels@nlanr.net>
Expires March 1999 [Page 15]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 06:02:43 |