One document matched: draft-tsirtsis-nemov4-dynamic-00.txt
Personal G. Tsirtsis
V. Park
V. Narayanan
Internet Draft Qualcomm
K. Leung
Cisco
Document: draft-tsirtsis-nemov4-dynamic-00.txt
Expires: December 2006 June 2006
Dynamic Prefix Allocation for NEMOv4
draft-tsirtsis-nemov4-dynamic-00.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a max of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 2006.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
<Tsirtsis, Park, Narayanan, Leung> `1
<Dynamic Prefixes for NEMOv4> <June> <2006>
Abstract
The base NEMOv4 specification [NEMOv4] defines extensions to Mobile
IPv4 [MIPv4] for mobile networks. This specification defines a
dynamic prefix allocation mechanism.
INDEX
1. Introduction.......................................................3
2. Dynamic Mobile Prefix allocation...................................3
2.1 Mobile Client Considerations......................................3
2.2 Home Agent Considerations.........................................4
3. Security Considerations............................................4
4. References.........................................................5
Author's Addresses....................................................5
Intellectual Property Statement.......................................6
<Tsirtsis, Park, Narayanan, Kent> 2
<Dynamic Prefixes for NEMOv4> <June> <2006>
1. Introduction
The base NEMOv4 specification [NEMOv4] defines extensions to Mobile
IPv4 [MIPv4] for mobile networks.
This specification adds support for dynamic allocation of mobile
prefixes by the home agent.
2. Dynamic Mobile Prefix allocation
2.1 Mobile Client Considerations
[NEMOv4] defines that the prefix field of the mobile network request
extension can not be set to zero.
According to this specification, however, a mobile client MAY
include one or more mobile network request extensions with the
prefix field set to zero. Such mobile network request extensions
indicate that the mobile client requests mobile network prefix(es)
to be assigned to it by the home agent. In this case, the mobile
client MAY set the prefix length field of such extensions to zero or
to a length of its choice as a hint to the home agent. According to
this specification, mobile network request extensions with the
prefix field set to zero MAY be included in a registration request
message either during initial registration or during a subsequent
registration.
When a mobile client receives a registration reply it MUST process
it as defined in [MIPv4] and [NEMOv4]. If one or more network
acknowledgement extension are included with the Code field set to
"Success" the mobile client SHOULD treat the prefixes in the
corresponding prefix fields as allocated prefixes and create the
appropriate bindings as defined in [NEMOv4].
If in response to a registration request with a mobile network
request extension with the prefix field set to zero, a mobile client
receives a registration reply with a Code field set to 70 "poorly
formed request", it may use it as a hint that the home agent does
not support dynamic prefix allocation.
[Ed. Note: alternatively [NEMOv4] should define an appropriate Code
in the Mobile Network Acknowledgment extension e.g., "Bad Prefix"]
<Tsirtsis, Park, Narayanan, Kent> 3
<Dynamic Prefixes for NEMOv4> <June> <2006>
2.2 Home Agent Considerations
A home agent receiving a mobile network request extension with the
prefix field set to zero MAY return a mobile network acknowledgement
extension [NEMOv4] with the prefix field set to the prefix allocated
to the mobile client. The length of that prefix is at the discretion
of the home agent. The home agent MAY take into account the prefix
length hint if one is included in the mobile network request
extension. Once the home agent allocates a prefix it MUST maintain
the prefix registration table as defined in [NEMOv4]. Alternatively
the home agent MAY return a mobile network acknowledgement extension
with the Code field set to one of the negative codes defined in
[NEMOv4].
Dynamic mobile prefix allocation as defined in this specification
MAY be combined with dynamic home address allocation as defined in
[MIPv4]. In other words the home address field of the registration
request message MAY be set to zero while the message also includes
one or more mobile network request extensions with the prefix field
also set to zero.
Once the home agent allocates a prefix it MUST maintain the prefix
registration table as defined in [NEMOv4].
For dynamic prefix allocation the mobile client's home address MAY
be used to identify the client if it is not set to zero. If the home
Otherwise, as defined in [MIPv4] and [NAI], the NAI extension [NAI]
needs to be included in the registration request, in which case the
same extension SHOULD be used to identify the mobile client for
prefix allocation purposes.
3. Security Considerations
This specification operates in the security constraints and
requirements of [MIPv4], [NAI] and [NEMOv4].
Home agent implementations SHOULD take steps to prevent address
exhaustion attacks. One way to limit the effectiveness of such an
attack is to limit the number and size of prefixes any one mobile
router can be allocated.
<Tsirtsis, Park, Narayanan, Kent> 4
<Dynamic Prefixes for NEMOv4> <June> <2006>
4. References
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[MIPv4] C. Perkins, "Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC3344
[NAI] P.Calhoun, C. Perkins, "Mobile IP Network Access
Identifier Extension for IPv4", RFC2794
[NEMOv4] K. Leung, et al,, "IPv4 Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic
Support Protocol", Feb 06, draft-ietf-nemo-v4-base
Author's Addresses
George Tsirtsis
Qualcomm Inc
Phone: +908-947-7059
Email1: tsirtsis@qualcomm.com
Email2: tsirtsisg@yahoo.com
Vincent Park
Qualcomm Inc
Phone: +908-947-7084
E-mail: vpark@qualcomm.com
Vidya Narayanan
Qualcomm Inc
Phone:
E-mail:vidyan@qualcomm.com
Kent Leung
Cisco Systems
Phone: 408-526-5030
E-mail:kleung@cisco.com
<Tsirtsis, Park, Narayanan, Kent> 5
<Dynamic Prefixes for NEMOv4> <June> <2006>
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described
in this document or the extent to which any license under such
rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that
it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights.
Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC
documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on
an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
<Tsirtsis, Park, Narayanan, Kent> 6
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 15:58:43 |