One document matched: draft-thomas-sip-mime-osp-token-00.txt




Internet Engineering Task Force               Stephen Thomas, TransNexus
Internet Draft                                     Butch Anton, hereUare
draft-thomas-sip-mime-osp-token-00.txt             Richard Brennan, GRIC
July 14, 2000                                          David Oran, Cisco
Expires January 14, 2001

                  The application/osp-token MIME type

STATUS OF THIS MEMO

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as work in progress.

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

1. Abstract

   The Open Settlement Protocol (OSP)[1], an open standard from the
   European Telecommunications Standards Institute, specifies a means
   by which IP telephony equipment in one administrative domain may
   request access to IP telephony equipment (including, but not limited
   to: Gateways, Proxy Servers, Gatekeepers, etc.) in another
   administrative domain. OSP grants such access by returning
   authorization tokens, which must then be passed to the destination
   IP telephony device during call signaling. In order to support
   access control via OSP, IP telephony signaling protocols must be
   capable of carrying these authorization tokens in an interoperable
   way. This memo defines just such a method for protocols, such as the
   Session Initiation Protocol[2], that can support carriage of MIME
   types during call signaling. This memo conforms to the requirements
   for MIME type registration defined in RFC 2048[3].

2. Registration Information

   MIME media type name: application


Thomas, et al            Expires January 14, 2001                  [Page 1]

Internet Draft      The application/osp-token MIME type           July 2000



   MIME subtype name: osp-token

   Required parameters: none 

   Optional parameters: 

      osp-token-format: a value of "asn.1" indicates the token contents
         use the ASN.1 format defined in Annex D, section D.2.1 of the OSP
         specification; a value of "xml" indicates the token contents use
         the XML format defined in Annex D, section D.2.2 of the OSP
         specification, and a value of "bxml" indicates the token contents
         use the Binary XML format defined in Annex D, section D.2.3 of the
         OSP specification. In the absence of any value for this parameter,
         the token contents shall be self identifying or otherwise
         understood by appropriate parties.

      osp-token-version: a character string indicating the earliest
         revision of the OSP specification to which the token contents
         conform. In the absence of any value for this parameter, the
         token contents shall conform to version "2.1.0" of the OSP
         specification.

   Encoding considerations: OSP tokens are normally carried as binary data
      by the call signaling protocol. Call signaling protocols which cannot
      reliably transfer binary data must use alternate encodings such as
      base-64, in which case standard MIME content-encoding parameters may
      indicate the particular encoding.

   Security considerations: OSP tokens are intended to provide access
      control to resources of other administrative domains, and, as such,
      are inherently designed to address security concerns. For that
      reason, OSP tokens are digitally signed and, optionally, encrypted,
      as defined in the OSP specification.

   Interoperability considerations: The means and/or algorithms by which
      a receiving system determines whether or not an OSP token is valid
      are a local matter. However, at a minimum, receiving systems should
      verify the digital signature of the token, and they should ensure
      that any call details included in the token contents (e.g. called
      number, calling number, etc.) are appropriate for the contemplated
      call. 

   Published specification: "Telecommunications and Internet Protocol
      Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON); Open Settlement Protocol (OSP)
      for Inter-domain pricing, authorization, and usage exchange".
      Technical Specification 101 321. European Telecommunications
      Standards Institute. Version 2.1.0.



Thomas, et al            Expires January 14, 2001                  [Page 2]

Internet Draft      The application/osp-token MIME type           July 2000



   Applications which use this media type: IP telephony call signaling
      protocols that use MIME types to convey additional information during
      call setup.

   Additional information: 

   Magic number(s): none 

   File extension(s): none 

   Macintosh File Type Code(s): none 

   Person & email address to contact for further information:
       Stephen Thomas, stephen.thomas@transnexus.com 

   Intended usage: COMMON 

   Author/Change controller: European Telecommunications Standards Institute

3. References

   [1] European Telecommunications Standards Institute. "Telecommunications
       and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON); Open
       Settlement Protocol (OSP) for Inter-domain pricing, authorization,
       and usage exchange". Technical Specification 101 321. Version 2.1.0.

   [2] M. Handley, H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler, and J. Rosenberg. "SIP:
       Session Initiation Protocol". RFC 2543, March 1999.

   [3] N. Freed, J. Klensin, and J. Postel. "Multipurpose Internet Mail
       Extensions (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures". RFC 2048,
       November 1996.

4. Authors' Addresses

   For more information, the authors of this document are best
   contacted via Internet mail:

   Stephen Thomas
   TransNexus
   430 Tenth Street NW, Suite N204
   Atlanta, GA 30318
   USA

   Phone: +1 404 872 4887
   Fax:   +1 404 872 9515
   EMail: stephen.thomas@transnexus.com



Thomas, et al            Expires January 14, 2001                  [Page 3]

Internet Draft      The application/osp-token MIME type           July 2000



   Butch Anton
   hereUare Communications, Inc.
   3707 Williams Road, Suite 100
   San Jose, CA 95117
   USA

   Phone: +1 408 551 0909
   Fax:   +1 408 985 0895
   EMail: butch@hereuare.com


   Richard Brennan
   GRIC Communications Inc.
   1421 McCarthy Blvd
   Milpitas, CA 95035
   USA

   Phone: +1 408 965 1193
   Fax:   +1 408 955 1967
   EMail: rbrennan@gric.com


   David Oran
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   7 Ladyslipper Lane
   Acton, MA 01720
   USA

   Phone: +1 508 264 2048
   EMail: oran@cisco.com




















Thomas, et al            Expires January 14, 2001                  [Page 4]


PAFTECH AB 2003-20262026-04-23 20:20:56