One document matched: draft-perkins-avt-uncomp-video-ext-00.txt
Network Working Group C. Perkins
Internet-Draft University of Glasgow
Expires: January 11, 2006 July 10, 2005
RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video: Additional Colour Sampling
Modes
draft-perkins-avt-uncomp-video-ext-00.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 11, 2006.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This memo extends the RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video to
support additional RGB sampling modes.
1. Introduction
The RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video [1] defines a scheme to
packetise uncompressed, studio-quality, video streams for transport
using RTP [2]. A range of standard and high definition video formats
Perkins Expires January 11, 2006 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Uncompressed Video Extensions July 2005
are supported, and parameters are defined so sender and receiver can
signal the image size, colour space, pixel depth, etc.
A limitation of the format is that the number of bits per sample is
signalled as being the same for each colour component. For example,
it is not possible to signal transport of RGB format video using 5
bits each for the Red and Blue components and 6 bits for the Green,
packing one pixel into two octets. Such video formats can easily be
supported in the payload format, but cannot be signalled using the
parameters defined. This memo extends [1] with additional colour
sampling modes, to signal such video formats.
2. Conventions Used in this Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3].
3. Payload Format Parameters
This memo defines six new colour sampling modes that MAY be signalled
for use with [1]. The new modes are "RGB+", "RG+B", "R+GB", "BGR+",
"BG+R" and "B+GR". These sampling modes use the same packing order
of samples as do the RGB and BGR colour sampling modes respectively,
except that an additional bit of colour depth is available for the
component marked by the + symbol (i.e. when "depth=N" is signalled, N
bits are allocated to unmarked components, but N+1 bits MUST be
allocated to the marked component). All other features of the
payload format remain as defined in [1].
The primary use of these colour sampling modes is to enable efficient
packing of data into small pixel groups ("pgroups"). The most common
use case is expected to be video with five bits per sample, where the
additional bit of colour depth enables a single pixel to fit into two
octets without padding. The new colour sampling modes MAY be used
for other depths, however, should that prove useful.
4. Example
A common uncompressed video format is RGB with 5 bits for the Red and
Blue components and six bits for the Green component, for a total of
16 bits per pixel. Using the sampling modes defined in this memo,
this can be signalled in SDP according to the following example:
Perkins Expires January 11, 2006 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Uncompressed Video Extensions July 2005
v=0
o=jdoe 2890844526 2890842807 IN IP4 10.47.16.5
s=-
c=IN IP4 10.47.16.6
t=2873397496 2873404696
a=recvonly
m=video 51372 RTP/AVP 99
a=rtpmap:99 raw/90000
a=fmtp:99 sampling=RG+B; width=1024; height=768; depth=5;
colorimetry=SMPTE240M
(some of the lines in have been wrapped due to formatting constraints
on this memo).
5. Security Considerations
The security considerations of [1] apply. No additional security
considerations are introduced by support for new colour sampling
modes.
6. IANA Considerations
The video/raw media type is extended with six new values for the
"sampling" parameter according to the rules defined in section 6.2 of
[1]. The new values are "RGB+", "RG+B", "R+GB", "BGR+", "BG+R" and
"B+GR" as described in this memo.
7. Acknowledgements
Thanks to Jeremy Searle and Andrew Lee.
8. Normative References
[1] Gharai, L. and C. Perkins, "RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed
Video", draft-ietf-avt-uncomp-video-06 (work in progress),
February 2004.
[2] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64,
RFC 3550, July 2003.
[3] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Perkins Expires January 11, 2006 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Uncompressed Video Extensions July 2005
Author's Address
Colin Perkins
University of Glasgow
Department of Computing Science
17 Lilybank Gardens
Glasgow G12 8QQ
UK
Email: csp@csperkins.org
Perkins Expires January 11, 2006 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Uncompressed Video Extensions July 2005
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Perkins Expires January 11, 2006 [Page 5]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 20:23:05 |