One document matched: draft-mkhalil-ipv6-fastra-05.txt
Differences from draft-mkhalil-ipv6-fastra-04.txt
INTERNET DRAFT
Category: Standards
Title: draft-mkhalil-ipv6-fastra-05.txt James Kempf
Date: July 19, 2004 DoCoMo Labs USA
Expires: January 20, 2005 Mohamed M Khalil
Nortel Networks
Brett Pentland
CTIE, Monash University
IPv6 Fast Router Advertisement
draft-mkhalil-ipv6-fastra-05.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 20, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document specifies an amendment to the router solicitation
handling procedures in RFC 2461 that allow for improved default
router aquisition performance when an active IP host moves from
one subnet to another.
Kempf, khalil, Pentland Expires Jan 2005 [Page 1]
Internet Draft IPv6 Fast Router Advertisement Jul 2004
1.0 Introduction
RFC 2461 [RFC2461] states that a router MUST delay a response to
a Router Solicitation (RS) by a random time between 0 and
MAX_RA_DELAY_TIME seconds. The idea behind MAX_RA_DELAY_TIME is
if there is more than one router on the link, simultaneously
transmitted responses will collide if the routers try to answer
the RS immediately, and, additionally, to avoid congestion when
a link comes up and all hosts on the link solicit.
The impact of this constraint on the performance of default
router aquisition for hosts that move between subnets can be
severe. Consider a wireless link layer technology in which the
mobile host gets a trigger from the link layer when the link
comes up. The host can immediately send out a RS rather than
waiting for the periodically multicast Router Advertisement
(RA), in order to optimize default router aquisition. However,
if the router abides by RFC 2461, default router aquisition is
delayed by some random amount, increasing the amount of time
before the host comes up on the link and can get its traffic.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2.0 Fast Router Advertisement
To allow for faster response times in the processing of RSs,
at most one router on any given link SHOULD be allowed to respond
immediately to RSs sent by hosts on that link. Determination of
how this router is designated is outside the scope of this
document. An RA that is immediately unicast to the sender rather
than delayed is known as a "fast RA".
3.0 Processing Router Solicitations
A router that is configured to provide fast RAs MUST maintain a
counter, FastRACounter, of the fast RAs sent since the last
unsolicited multicast RA was sent. when an RS is received, an
RA MUST be sent immediately if:
FastRACounter <= MAX_FAST_RAS
where MAX_FAST_RAS is the maximum number of RAs returned before
rolling over to multicast.
A router SHOULD choose to unicast the response directly to the
soliciting host's address (if the solicitation's source address
Kempf, khalil, Pentland Expires Jan 2005 [Page 2]
Internet Draft IPv6 Fast Router Advertisement Jul 2004
is not the unspecified address), otherwise the router MUST schedule
a multicast Router Advertisement in accordance with RFC 2461.
When a fast RA is sent, FastRACounter MUST be incremented by one.
By default, MAX_FAST_RAS is 10, but it SHOULD be configured
based on router capacity and expected mobile host solicitation load.
When FastRACounter exceeds MAX_FAST_RAS, a multicast Router
Advertisement SHOULD be scheduled for transmission as soon as
possible subject to the restriction that the interval between
multicast Router Advertisements not be less than
MIN_DELAY_BEWTEEN_RAS. Any further Router Solicitations received
after FastRACounter exceeds MAX_FAST_RAS and before sending the
next multicast Router Advertisement MUST be discarded. The
FastRACounter MUST be reset to zero after the next multicast Router
Advertisement is sent and processing for fast Router Advertisement
recommences.
4.0 Security Considerations
RFC 2461 contains a possible vulnerability to a DoS attack from a
host that bombards the router with RSs. Though the exact timing
of the RA response is variable, the router is still required to
respond with a unicast RA. As a consequence, a malicious host could
tie a router up in responding to individually transmitted RSs. This
document addresses this security vulnerability by limiting the
upper bound of the Router Advertisement's response rate
to (MAX_FAST_RAS+1)/MIN_DELAY_BETWEEN_RAS.
5.0 IANA Considerations
This document has no actions for IANA.
6.0 Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2461] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., and Simpson, W., "Neighbor
Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December, 1998.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Erik Nordmark for his technical
feedback.
Kempf, khalil, Pentland Expires Jan 2005 [Page 3]
Internet Draft IPv6 Fast Router Advertisement Jul 2004
Authors' Contact Information
James Kempf
DoCoMo Communications Laboratories USA
180 Metro Drive
San Jose, CA
95110
Phone: +1 650 451 4711
Email: kempf@docomolabs-usa.com
Mohamed M Khalil
Nortel Networks Inc.
2201 Lakeside Blvd
Richardson, TX 75082-4399
mkhalil@nortelnetworks.com
Brett Pentland
Centre for Telecommunications and Information Engineering
PO Box 35
Monash University 3800
Australia
Phone: +61 3 9905 5245
Email: brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Kempf, khalil, Pentland Expires Jan 2005 [Page 4]
Internet Draft IPv6 Fast Router Advertisement Jul 2004
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Kempf, khalil, Pentland Expires Jan 2005 [Page 5]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-22 07:53:32 |