One document matched: draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt
Differences from draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-04.txt
INTERNET-DRAFT Lixia Zhang
Expires: May 1999 Andreas Terzis
<draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt> UCLA
Subramaniam Vincent
Cisco
Bob Braden
ISI
November 1998
RSVP Diagnostic Messages
<draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt>
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
To view the entire list of current Internet-Drafts, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Northern
Europe), ftp.nis.garr.it (Southern Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific
Rim), ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document specifies the RSVP diagnostic facility, which allows a
user to collect information about the RSVP state along the path.
This specification describes the functionality, diagnostic message
formats, and processing rules.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
1. Introduction
In the basic RSVP protocol [RSVP], error messages are the only means
for an end host to receive feedback regarding a failure in setting up
either path state or reservation state. An error message carries
back only the information from the failed point, without any
information about the state at other hops before or after the
failure. In the absence of failures, a host receives no feedback
regarding the details of a reservation that has been put in place,
such as whether, or where, or how, its own reservation request is
being merged with that of others. Such missing information can be
highly desirable for debugging purpose, or for network resource
management in general.
This document specifies the RSVP diagnostic facility, which is
designed to fill this information gap. The diagnostic facility can
be used to collect and report RSVP state information along the path
from a receiver to a specific sender. It uses Diagnostic messages
that are independent of other RSVP control messages and produce no
side-effects; that is, they do not change any RSVP state at either
nodes or hosts. Similarly, they provide not an error report but
rather a collection of requested RSVP state information.
The RSVP diagnostic facility was designed with the following goals:
- To collect RSVP state information from every RSVP-capable hop
along a path defined by path state, either for an existing
reservation or before a reservation request is made. More
specifically, we want to be able to collect information about
flowspecs, refresh timer values, and reservation merging at each
hop along the path.
- To collect the IP hop count across each non-RSVP cloud.
- To avoid diagnostic packet implosion or explosion.
The following is specifically identified as a non-goal:
- Checking the resource availability along a path. Such
functionality may be useful for future reservation requests, but
it would require modifications to existing admission control
modules that is beyond the scope of RSVP.
2. Overview
The diagnostic facility introduces two new RSVP message types:
Diagnostic Request (DREQ) and Diagnostic Reply (DREP). A DREQ
message can be originated by a client in a "requester" host, which
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
may or may not be a participant of the RSVP session to be diagnosed.
A client in the requester host invokes the RSVP diagnostic facility
by generating a DREQ packet and sending it to the starting node,
which should be on the RSVP path to be diagnosed. This DREQ packet
specifies the RSVP session and a sender host for that session. The
DREQ packet collects information hop-by-hop as it is forwarded
towards the sender (see Figure 1), until it reaches the ending node.
Specifically, each RSVP-capable hop adds to the DREQ message a
response (DIAG_RESPONSE) object containing local RSVP state for the
specified RSVP session. When the DREQ packet reaches the ending
node, the message type is changed to Diagnostic Reply (DREP) and the
completed response is sent to the original requester node. Partial
responses may also be returned before the DREQ packet reaches the
ending node if an error condition along the path, such as "no path
state", prevents further forwarding of the DREQ packet. To avoid
packet implosion or explosion, all diagnostic packets are forwarded
via unicast only.
Thus, there are generally three nodes (hosts and/or routers) involved
in performing the diagnostic function: the requester node, the
starting node, and the ending node, as shown in Figure 1. It is
possible that the client invoking the diagnosis function may reside
directly on the starting node, in which case that the first two nodes
are the same. The starting node is named "LAST-HOP", meaning the
last-hop of the path segment to be diagnosed. The LAST-HOP node can
be either a receiver node or an intermediate node along the path.
The ending node is usually the specified sender host. However, the
client can limit the length of the path segment to be diagnosed by
specifying a hop-count limit in the DREQ message.
LAST-HOP Ending
Receiver node node Sender
__ __ __ __ __
| |---------| |------>| |--> ...-->| |--> ...---->| |
|__| |__| DREQ |__| DREQ |__| DREQ |__|
^ . |
| . |
| DREQ . DREP | DREP
| . |
_|_ DREP V V
Requester | | <------------------------------------
(client) |___|
Figure 1
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
DREP packets can be unicast from the ending node back to the
requester either directly or hop-by-hop along the reverse of the path
taken by the DREQ message to the LAST-HOP, and thence to the
requester. The direct return is faster and more efficient, but the
hop-by-hop reverse-path route may be the only choice if the packets
have to cross firewalls. Hop-by-hop return is accomplished using an
optional ROUTE object, which is built incrementally to contain a list
of node addresses that the DREQ packet has passed through. The ROUTE
object is then used in reverse as a source route to forward the DREP
hop-by-hop back to the LAST-HOP node.
A DREQ message always consists of a single unfragmented IP datagram.
On the other hand, one DREQ message can generate multiple DREP
packets, each containing a fragment of the total DREQ message. When
the path consists of many hops, the total length of a DREP message
will exceed the MTU size before reaching the sender; thus, the
message has to be fragmented. Relying on IP fragmentation and
reassembly, however, can be problematic, especially when DREP
messages are returned to the requester hop-by-hop, in which case
fragmentation/reassembly would have to be performed at every hop. To
avoid such excessive overhead, we let the requester define a default
path MTU size that is carried in every DREQ packet. If an
intermediate node finds that the default MTU size is bigger than the
MTU of the outgoing link, it returns the DREQ packet with the
corresponding error bit set. If an intermediate node detects that a
DREQ packet size has reached the MTU size, it returns to the
requester (in either manner described above) a DREP fragment
containing accumulated responses. It then removes these responses
from the DREQ and continues to forward it. The requester node can
reassemble the resulting DREP fragments into a complete DREP message.
When discussing diagnostic packet handling, this document uses
direction terminology that is consistent with the RSVP functional
specification [RSVP], relative to the direction of data packet flow.
Thus, a DREQ packet enters a node through an "outgoing interface" and
is forwarded towards the sender through an "incoming interface",
because DREQ packets travel in the reverse direction to the data
flow.
Notice that DREQ packets can be forwarded only after the RSVP path
state has been set up. If no path state exists, one may resort to
the traceroute or mtrace facility to examine whether the
unicast/multicast routing is working correctly.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
3. Diagnostic Packet Format
Like other RSVP messages, DREQ and DREP messages consist of an RSVP
Common Header followed by a variable set of typed RSVP data objects.
The following sequence must be used:
+-----------------------------------+
| RSVP Common Header |
+-----------------------------------+
| Session object |
+-----------------------------------+
| DIAGNOSTIC object |
+-----------------------------------+
| (optional) DIAG_SELECT object |
+-----------------------------------+
| (optional) ROUTE object |
+-----------------------------------+
| zero or more DIAG_RESPONSE objects|
+-----------------------------------+
The session object identifies the RSVP session for which the state
information is being collected. We describe each of the other parts.
3.1. RSVP Message Common Header
The RSVP message common header is defined in [RSVP]. The following
specific exceptions and extensions are needed for DREP and DREQ.
Type field: define:
Type = 8: DREQ Diagnostic Request
Type = 9: DREP Diagnostic Reply
RSVP length:
If this is a DREP message and the MF flag in the DIAGNOSE object
(see below) is set, this field indicates the length of this single
DREP fragment rather than the total length of the complete DREP
reply message (which cannot generally be known in advance).
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
3.2. DIAGNOSTIC Object
A DIAGNOSTIC object contains the common diagnostic control
information in both DREQ and DREP messages.
o IPv4 DIAGNOSTIC object: Class = 30, C-Type = 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Max-RSVP-hops | RSVP-hop-count| Reserved |H|MF|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Request ID |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
| Path MTU | Fragment offset |
+---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
| |
| SENDER_TEMPLATE object |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| LAST-HOP Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Requester FILTER_SPEC object |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Next-Hop RSVP_HOP Object |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Here all IP addresses use the 4 byte IPv4 format, both explicitly in
the LAST-HOP Address and by using the IPv4 forms of the embedded
FILTER_SPEC and RSVP_HOP objects.
o IPv6 DIAGNOSTIC object: Class = 30, C-Type = 2
The format is the same, except all explicit and embedded IP addresses
are 16 byte IPv6 addresses.
The fields are as follows:
Max-RSVP-hops
An octet specifying the maximum number of RSVP hops over which
information will be collected. If an error condition in the
middle of the path prevents the DREQ packet from reaching the
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
specified ending node, the Max-RSVP-hops field may be used to
perform an expanding-length search to reach the point just before
the problem. If this value is 1, the LAST-HOP node and the ending
node will be the same. If it is zero, there is no hop limit.
RSVP-hop-count
Records the number of RSVP hops that have been traversed so far.
If LAST-HOP and ending nodes are the same, this value will be 1 in
the resulting DREP message.
Fragment Offset
Indicates where this DREP fragment belongs in the complete DREP
message, measured in octets. The first fragment has offset zero.
Ignored in a DREQ message.
H flag
Indicates how the reply should be returned. When H = 0, DREP
packets should be sent to the response address directly. If H =
1, DREP packets must be returned hop-by-hop along the reverse path
to the LAST-HOP node and thence to the requester node.
MF flag
Flag means "more fragments". It must be set to zero (0) in all
DREQ messages. It must be set to one (1) in all DREP packets that
carry partial results and are returned by intermediate nodes due
to the MTU limit. When the DREQ message is converted to a DREP
message in the ending node, the MF flag must remain zero.
Request ID
Identifies an individual DREQ message and the corresponding DREP
message (or all the fragments of the reply message).
One possible way to defining the Request ID would use 16 bits to
specify the ID of the process making the query and 16 bits to
distinguish different queries from this process.
Path MTU
Specifies a default MTU size in octets for DREP and DREQ messages.
SENDER_TEMPLATE object
This IPv4/IPv6 SENDER_TEMPLATE object contains the IP address and
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
the port of a sender for the session being diagnosed. The DREQ
packet is forwarded hop-by-hop towards this address.
LAST-HOP Address
The IP address of the LAST-HOP node. The DREQ message starts
collecting information at this node and proceeds toward the
sender.
Requester FILTER_SPEC Object
This IPv4/IPv6 FILTER_SPEC object contains the IP address and the
port from which the request originated and to which the DREP
message(s) should be sent.
Next-Hop RSVP_HOP Object
An RSVP_HOP object carrying the IP address and LIH of the
interface through which the DREQ will be received. This object is
updated hop-by hop. It is used for the same reasons that a RESV
message contains an RSVP_HOP object: to distinguish logical
interfaces and avoid problems caused by routing asymmetries.
3.3. DIAG_SELECT Object
o DIAG_SELECT Class = 33, C-Type = 0.
A Diagnostic message may optionally contain a DIAG_SELECT object to
specify which specific RSVP objects should be reported in a
DIAG_RESPONSE object. In the absence of a DIAG_SELECT object, the
DIAG_RESPONSE object added by the node will contain a default set of
object types (see DIAG_RESPONSE object below).
The DIAG_SELECT object contains a list of [Class, C-type] pairs, in
the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| class | C-Type | class | C-Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
// //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| class | C-Type | class | C-Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
When a DIAG_SELECT object is included in a DREQ message, each RSVP
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
node along the path will add a DIAG_RESPONSE object containing
response objects (see below) whose classes and C-Types match entries
in the DIAG_SELECT list (and are from matching path and reservation
state). A C-type octet of zero is a 'wildcard', matching any C-Type
associated with the associated class.
If the number of [Class, C-Type] pairs is odd, the last two octets of
the DIAG_SELECT object must be zero.
3.4. ROUTE Object
A diagnostic message may contain a ROUTE object, which is used to
record the route of the DREQ message and as a source route for
returning the DREP message(s) hop-by-hop.
o IPv4 ROUTE object: Class = 31, C-Type = 1.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| reserved | R-pointer |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ RSVP Node List |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
RSVP Node List
A list of RSVP node IPv4 addresses. The number of addresses in
this list can be computed from the object size.
R-pointer
Used in DREP messages only (see Section 4.2 for details), but it
is incremented as each hop adds its incoming interface address in
the ROUTE object.
o IPv6 ROUTE object: Class = 31, C-Type = 2
The same, except RSVP Node List contains IPv6 addresses.
In a DREQ message, RSVP Node List specifies all RSVP hops between the
LAST-HOP address specified in the DIAGNOSTIC object, and the last
RSVP node the DREQ message has visited. In a DREP message, RSVP Node
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
List specifies all RSVP hops between the LAST-HOP and the node that
returns this DREP message.
3.5. DIAG_RESPONSE Object
Each RSVP node attaches DIAG_RESPONSE object to each DREQ message it
receives, before forwarding the message. The DIAG_RESPONSE object
contains the state to be reported for this node. It has a fixed-
format header and then a variable list of RSVP state objects, or
"response objects".
o IPv4 DIAG_RESPONSE object: Class = 32, C-Type = 1.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| DREQ Arrival Time |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Incoming Interface Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Outgoing Interface Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Previous-RSVP-Hop Router Address |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| D-TTL |M|R-err| K | Timer value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| (optional) TUNNEL object |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
// Response objects //
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
o IPv6 DIAG_RESPONSE object: Class = 32, C-Type = 2.
This object has the same format, except that all explicit and
embedded IP addresses are IPv6 addresses.
The fields are as follows:
DREQ Arrival Time
A 32-bit NTP timestamp specifying the time the DREQ message
arrived at this node. The 32-bit form of an NTP timestamp
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
consists of the middle 32 bits of the full 64-bit form, that is,
the low 16 bits of the integer part and the high 16 bits of the
fractional part.
Incoming Interface Address
Specifies the IP address of the interface on which messages from
the sender are expected to arrive, or 0 if unknown.
Outgoing Interface Address
Specifies the IP address of the interface through which the DREQ
message arrived and to which messages from the given sender and
for the specified session address flow, or 0 if unknown.
Previous-RSVP-Hop Router Address
Specifies the node from which this node receives RSVP PATH
messages for this source, or 0 if unknown. This is also the
interface through which the DREQ will be forwarded.
D-TTL
The number of IP hops this DREQ message traveled from the down-
stream RSVP node to the current node.
M flag
A single-bit flag which indicates whether the reservation
described by the response objects, is merged with reservations
from other downstream interfaces when being forwarded upstream.
R-error
A 3-bit field that indicates error conditions at a node.
Currently defined values are:
0x00: no error
0x01: no PATH state
0x02: MTU too big
0x04: ROUTE object too big
K
The refresh timer multiple (defined in RSVP spec).
Timer value
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
The local refresh timer value in seconds.
The set of response objects to be included at the end of the
DIAG_RESPONSE object is determined by a DIAG_SELECT object, if one is
present. If no DIAG_SELECT object is present, the response objects
belong to the default list of classes:
SENDER_TSPEC object FILTER_SPEC object
FLOWSPEC object STYLE object
Any C-Type present in the local RSVP state will be used. These
response objects may be in any order but they must all be at the end
of the DIAG_RESPONSE object.
3.6. TUNNEL Object
The optional TUNNEL object should be inserted when a DREQ message
arrives at an RSVP node that acts as a tunnel exit point.
The TUNNEL object provides mapping between the end-to-end RSVP
session that is being diagnosed and the RSVP session over the tunnel.
This mapping information allows the diagnosis client to conduct
diagnosis over the involved tunnel session, by invoking a separate
Diagnostic query for the corresponding Tunnel Session and Tunnel
Sender. Keep in mind, however, that multiple end-to-end sessions may
all map to one pre-configured tunnel session that may have totally
different parameter settings.
The tunnel object is defined in the RSVP Tunnel Specification
[RSVPTUN].
4. Diagnostic Packet Forwarding Rules
4.1. DREQ Packet Forwarding
DREQ messages are forwarded hop-by-hop via unicast from the LAST-HOP
address to the Sender address, as specified in the DIAGNOSTIC object.
At each hop, the following processing is performed before the DREQ
message is forwarded to the next hop towards the sender:
1. Compute the IP hop count from the previous RSVP hop. This is
done by subtracting the value of the TTL value in the IP header
from Send_TTL in the RSVP common header. Save the result in the
D-TTL field of the DIAG_RESPONSE object.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
2. If no PATH state exists for the specified session, set R-error =
0x01 in the DIAG_RESPONSE object.
3. If the path MTU value is too large, set "MTU too large" error
bit, and change the MTU value to the MTU value of the incoming
interface for the sender.
4. Attach the DIAG_RESPONSE object to the end of the DREQ message,
and append response objects that describe the reservation in
place at the Outgoing Interface for the specified session.
If the DREQ message contains a DIAG_SELECT object, the response
object classes are those specified in the DIAG_SELECT;
otherwise, they are SENDER_TSPEC, FILTER_SPEC, STYLE, and
FLOWSPEC objects. If no reservation state exists for the
specified RSVP session, the DIAG_RESPONSE object will contain no
FILTER_SPEC or FLOWSPEC or STYLE object. If neither PATH nor
reservation state exists for the specified RSVP session, then no
response objects will be appended to the DIAG_RESPONSE object.
5. Increment the RSVP-hop-count field in the diagnostic message
header by one.
If the resulting value is equal to Max-RSVP-hops, or if the
current hop is the sender as identified by the Sender
FILTER_SPEC object field in the DIAGNOSTIC object, go to
Send_DREP(), and then return.
6. If any error bit is set, change the type field in RSVP common
header from DREQ to DREP, recompute the checksum, and send the
message back to the requester. It is sent either hop-by-hop to
the LAST-HOP address (if H = 1), or directly to the requester
address (if H = 0).
7. If the resulting DREQ message size exceeds the MTU limit, minus
some margin to hold the address list object as described below,
go to Send_DREP().
8. If no error bit set, then if the H-bit is set, append the
"Incoming Interface Address" to the end of the ROUTE object,
increment R-Pointer by one, update the Next-Hop RSVP_HOP object
to be the Previous Hop from the Path State and update the
message length field in the RSVP common header accordingly.
Finally, forward the DREQ message to the next hop towards the
source, after recomputing the checksum.
Send_DREP():
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
1. If the H flag is off in the DIAGNOSTIC object, set
target=response address given in the DREQ header, else set
target = the last address in ROUTE.
2. Make a copy of the DREQ message and change the type field in
RSVP common header from DREQ to DREP. If this host is not the
source, set the MF flag on.
If the ROUTE object is so large such that (size of ROUTE + size
of DIAG_RESPONSE object) > path MTU, then set the "route too
big" error bit, recompute the checksum, send the response
message and go to 4, else recompute the checksum and send the
response message.
3. If this host is not the source, then trim off all the
DIAG_RESPONSE objects from the original DREQ message, adjust the
"Fragment offset" value in the RSVP common header accordingly,
recompute the checksum, and forward the modified DREQ message
towards the source.
4. Return.
4.2. DREP Forwarding
When the H flag is off, DREP messages are sent directly to the
original requester. When H flag is on, however, they are forwarded
hop-by-hop towards the requester, by reversing the route as listed in
the Route object.
When a node receives a DREP message, it simply decreases R-pointer by
one (address length), and forwards the message to the address pointed
by R-pointer in the route list.
When the LAST-HOP node receives a DREP message, it sends the message
to the Response address.
4.3. MTU Selection and Adjustment
Because the DREQ message carries the allowed MTU size of previous
hops that the DREP messages will later traverse, this unique feature
allows the easy semantic fragmentation as described above. Whenever
the DREQ message grows to approach the size of MTU, it can be trimmed
before being forwarded again.
When a requester sends a DREQ message, the path MTU field in the RSVP
Diagnostic Packet header can be set to a configured default value.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
Whenever a DREQ message size approaches the specified MTU value, an
intermediate RSVP node makes a copy of the message, converts it to a
DREP message to send back, and then trims off the partial results
from DREQ message and forwards it.
It is possible that the original MTU value is chosen larger than the
actual MTU value along some portion of the path being traced.
Therefore each intermediate RSVP node must check the MTU value when
processing a DREQ message. If the specified MTU value is larger than
the MTU of the incoming interface (that the DREQ message will be
forwarded to), the node
(1) sets the R-error value,
(2) changes the MTU value in the header to the smaller value, and
(3) converts the DREQ message to a DREP and sends it back to the
requester.
In the rare case where some intermediate nodes do not check, or
enforce upon, the MTU value carried in the diagnostic messages, it is
possible that on the way back to the requester, a DREP message may
encounter a link of smaller MTU.
When this happens, the node follows steps (1) and (2) as outlined
above, and trims off the extra part of the DREP message to fit in the
smaller MTU of the link. The trimming must be done at response
object boundaries. Such trimming of messages results in information
loss. However because the requester learns what is the available MTU
size, it can either ignore the loss, or otherwise try again with the
smaller MTU value.
4.4. Errors
If an error condition prevents a DREP message from being forwarded
further, the message is simply dropped.
If an error condition, such as lack of PATH state, prevents a DREQ
message from being forwarded further, the node must change the
current message to DREP type and return it to the response address.
5. Problem Diagnosis by Using RSVP Diagnostic Facility
5.1. Across Firewalls
Firewalls may cause problems in diagnostic message forwarding. Let
us look at two different cases.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
First, let us assume that the querier resides on a receiving host of
the session to be examined. In this case, firewalls should not
prevent the forwarding of the diagnostic messages in a hop-by-hop
manner, assuming that proper holes have been punched on the firewall
to allow hop-by-hop forwarding of other RSVP messages. The querier
may start by setting the H flag off, which can give a faster response
delivery and reduced overhead at intermediate nodes. However if no
response is received, the querier may resend the DREQ message with H
flag turned on.
If the requester is a third party host and is separated from the
LAST-HOP address by a firewall (either the requester is behind a
firewall, or the LAST-HOP is a node behind a firewall, or both), at
this time we do not know any other solution but to change the LAST-
HOP to a node that is on the same side of the firewall as the
requester.
5.2. Examination of RSVP Timers
One can easily collect information about the current timer value at
each RSVP hop along the way. This will be very helpful in situations
when the reservation state goes up and down frequently, to find out
whether the state changes are due to improper setting of timer
values, or K values (when across lossy links), or frequent routing
changes.
5.3. Discovering Non-RSVP Clouds
The D-TTL field in each DIAG_RESPONSE object shows the number of
routing hops between adjacent RSVP nodes. Therefore any value
greater than one indicates a non-RSVP clouds in between. Together
with the arrival timestamps (assuming NTP works), this value can also
give some vague, though not necessarily accurate, indication of how
big that cloud might be. One might also find out all the
intermediate non-RSVP nodes by running either unicast or multicast
trace route.
5.4. Discovering Reservation Merges
The flowspec value in a DIAG_RESPONSE object specifies the amount of
resources being reserved for the data stream defined by the filter
spec in the same data block. When this value of adjacent
DIAG_RESPONSE objects differs, that is, a downstream node Rd has a
smaller value than its immediate upstream node Ru, it indicates a
merge of reservation with RSVP request(s) from other down stream
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
interface(s) at Rd. Further, in case of SE style reservation, one
can examine how the different SE scopes get merged at each hop.
In particular, if a receiver sends a DREQ message before sending its
own reservation, it can discover (1) how many RSVP hops there are
along the path between the specified sender and itself, (2) how many
of the hops already have some reservation by other receivers, and (3)
possibly a rough prediction of how its reservation request might get
merged with other existing ones.
5.5. Error Diagnosis
In addition to examining the state of a working reservation, RSVP
diagnostic messages are more likely to be invoked when things are not
working correctly. For example, a receiver has reserved an adequate
pipe for a specified incoming data stream, yet the observed delay or
loss ratio is much higher than expected. In this case the receiver
can use the diagnostic facility to examine the reservation state at
each RSVP hop along the way to find out whether the RSVP state is set
up correctly, whether there is any blackhole along the way that
caused RSVP message losses, or whether there are non-RSVP clouds, and
where they are, that may have caused the performance problem.
5.6. Crossing "Legacy" RSVP Routers
Since this diagnosis facility was developed and added to RSVP after a
number of RSVP implementations were in place, it is possible, or even
likely, that when performing RSVP diagnosis, one may encounter one or
more RSVP-capable nodes that do not understand diagnostic messages
and drop them. When this happens, the invoking client will get no
response from its requests.
One way to by-pass such "legacy" RSVP nodes is to perform RSVP
diagnosis repeatedly, guided by information from traceroute, or
mtrace in case of multicast. When an RSVP diagnostic query times out
(see next section), one may first use traceroute to get the list of
nodes along the path, and then gradually increase the value of Max-
RSVP-hops field in the DREQ message, starting from a low value until
one no longer receives a response. One can then try RSVP diagnosis
again by starting with the first node (which is further upstream
towards the sender) after the unresponding one.
There are two problem with the method mentioned above in the case of
unicast sessions. Both problems are related to the fact that
traceroute information provides the path from the requester to the
sender. The first problem is that the LAST_HOP may not on the path
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
from the requester to the sender. In this case we can get information
only from the portion of the path from the LAST_HOP to the sender
which intersects with the path from the requester to the sender. If
routers that are not on the intersection of the two paths don't have
PATH state for the session being diagnosed then they will reply with
R-error=0x01. The requester can overcome this problem by sending a
DREQ to every router on the path (from itself to the sender) until it
reaches the first router that belongs to the path from the sender to
the LAST_HOP.
The second problem is that traceroute provides the path from the
requester to the sender which, due to routing asymmetries, may be
different than the path traffic from the sender to the LAST_HOP uses.
There are (at least) one case where this asymmetry will cause the
diagnosis to fail. We present this case below.
Downstream Path Sender
__ __ __ __
Receiver +------| |<------| |<-- ...---| |-----| |
__ __ / |__| |__| |__| |__|
| |--....--|X |_/ ^
|__| |__| Router B |
Black __ |
Hole +----->| |---->---+
|__| Upstream Path
Router A
Figure 2
Here the first hop upstream of the black hole is different on the
upstream path and the downstream path. Traceroute will indicate
router A as the previous hop (instead of router B which is the right
one). Sending a DREQ to router A will result in A responding with R-
error 0x01 (No PATH State). If the two paths converge again then the
requester can use the solution proposed above to get any (partial)
information from the rest of the path.
We don't have, for the moment, any complete solutions for the
problematic scenarios described here.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
6. Comments on Diagnostic Client Implementation.
Following the design principle that nodes in the network should not
hold more than necessary state, RSVP nodes are responsible only for
forwarding Diagnostic messages and filling DIAG_RESPONSE objects.
Additional diagnostic functionality should be carried out by the
diagnostic clients. Furthermore, if the diagnostic function is
invoked from a third-party host, we should not require that host be
running RSVP daemon to perform the function. Below we sketch out the
basic functions that a diagnostic client daemon should carry out.
1. Take input from the user about the session to be diagnosed, the
last-hop and the sender address, the Max-RSVP-hops, and possibly
the DIAG_SELECT list, create a DREQ message and send to the
LAST-HOP RSVP node using raw IP message with protocol number 46
(RSVP). The port of the UDP socket on which the Diagnostic
Client is listening for replies should be included in the
Requester FILTER_SPEC object.
2. Set a retransmission timer, waiting for the reply (one or more
DREP messages). Listen to the specified UDP port for responses
from the LAST-HOP RSVP node.
The LAST-HOP RSVP node, upon receiving DREP messages, sends them
to the the Diagnostic Client as UDP packets, using the port
supplied in the Requester FILTER_SPEC object.
3. Upon receiving a DREP message to an outstanding diagnostic
request, the client should clear the retransmission timer, check
to see if the reply contains the complete result of the
requested diagnosis. If so, it should pass the result up to the
invoking entity immediately.
4. Reassemble DREP fragments. If the first reply to an outstanding
diagnostic request contains only a fragment of the expected
result, the client should set up a reassembly timer in a way
similar to IP packet reassembly timer. If the timer goes off
before all fragments arrive, the client should pass the partial
result to the invoking entity.
5. Use retransmission and reassembly timers to gracefully handle
packet losses and reply fragment scenarios.
In the absence of response to the first diagnostic request, a
client should retransmit the request a few times. If all the
retransmissions also fail, the client should invoke traceroute
or mtrace to obtain the list of hops along the path segment to
be diagnosed, and then perform an iteration of diagnosis with
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
increasing hop count as suggested in Section 5.6 in order to
cross RSVP-capable but diagnosis-incapable nodes.
6. If all the above efforts fail, the client must notify the
invoking entity.
7. Security Considerations
RSVP Diagnostics, as any other diagnostic tool, can be a security
threat since it can reveal possibly sensitive RSVP state information
to unwanted third parties.
We feel that the threat is minimal, since as explained in the
Introduction Diagnostics messages produce no side-effects and
therefore they cannot change RSVP state in the nodes. In this respect
RSVP Diagnostics is less a security threat than other diagnostic
tools and protocols such as SNMP.
Furthermore, processing of Diagnostic messages can be disabled if it
is felt that is a security threat.
8. Acknowledgments
The idea of developing a diagnostic facility for RSVP was first
suggested by Mark Handley of UCL. Many thanks to Lee Breslau of
Xerox PARC and John Krawczyk of Baynetworks for their valuable
comments on the first draft of this memo. Lee Breslau, Bob Braden,
and John Krawczyk contributed further comments after March 1996 IETF.
Steven Berson provided valuable comments on various drafts of the
memo. We would also like to acknowledge Intel for providing a
research grant as a partial support for this work. Subramaniam
Vincent did most of this work while a graduate research assistant at
the USC Information Sciences Institute (ISI).
9. References
[RSVPTUN] A. Terzis, J. Krawczyk, J. Wroclawski, L. Zhang. "RSVP
Operation Over IP Tunnels ", Internet Draft draft-ietf-rsvp-tunnel-
03.txt, August, 1998.
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 20]
INTERNET-DRAFT May 1999
10. Authors' Addresses
Lixia Zhang
UCLA
4531G Boelter Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Phone: 310-825-2695
EMail: lixia@cs.ucla.edu
Andreas Terzis
UCLA
4677 Boelter Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Phone: 310-267-2190
Email: terzis@cs.ucla.edu
Subramaniam Vincent
Cisco Systems
275, E Tasman Drive, MS SJC04/2/1
San Jose, CA 95134.
Phone: 408 525 3474
Email: svincent@cisco.com
Bob Braden
USC Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Phone: 310 822-1511
EMail: braden@isi.edu
draft-ietf-rsvp-diagnostic-msgs-05.txt [Page 21]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 00:26:46 |