One document matched: draft-ietf-l2tpext-ppp-discinfo-01.txt

Differences from draft-ietf-l2tpext-ppp-discinfo-00.txt







Network Working Group                                        Rohit Verma
INTERNET-DRAFT                                       Deloitte Consulting
Expires July 2001                                           Madhvi Verma
                                                        3Com Corporation
                                                           James Carlson
                                                        Sun Microsystems
                                                            January 2001


                   L2TP Disconnect Cause Information
                <draft-ietf-l2tpext-ppp-discinfo-01.txt>

Status of this Memo

   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

Abstract

   The Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (``L2TP'') defines a mechanism for
   tunneling PPP sessions.  This protocol lacks a mechanism for the LNS
   to provide PPP related disconnect cause information to the LAC.  This
   information, provided by the extension described in this document,
   can be useful for accounting and debugging purposes.


1.  Introduction

   L2TP [1] defines a general-purpose mechanism for tunneling PPP over
   various media.  By design, it insulates L2TP operation from the
   details of the PPP session that is being encapsulated by L2TP.  There
   are, however, cases where it may be desirable for PPP-specific



Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 1]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   disconnect information to be provided to an L2TP host (LAC or LNS) in
   a descriptive format.  The lack of this information is especially a
   problem when the LAC and LNS are not owned or managed by the same
   entities.

   The Result and Error Codes defined for L2TP specify only L2TP-
   specific disconnect information.  This document provides an addi-
   tional AVP that MAY be used by an L2TP host to provide PPP-specific
   disconnect information to its peer for accounting and debugging pur-
   poses.  This AVP should be used in conjunction with, and not as a
   replacement for, the Result and Error Code AVPs.

   The PPP Disconnect Cause Code AVP can also be used to provide a
   human-readable disconnect reason to the user.  The following AVP
   should not have any effect on either the functioning of the tunnel or
   the functioning of the PPP session; it is for informational and log-
   ging purposes only.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [2].


2.  PPP Disconnect Cause Code AVP

   The AVP is valid in the L2TP Call-Disconnect-Notify (CDN) message
   only, and it MUST NOT be marked Mandatory.

   The PPP Disconnect Cause Code AVP is encoded with Vendor ID 0 and an
   Attribute Type of PPP Disconnect Cause Code (TBD).  The length of the
   Value field MUST be at least 11 octets.  If the length is more than
   11 octets, the additional octets SHOULD contain a descriptive text in
   UTF-8 [3] format that can be displayed to the user or in a log file.
   The format of the AVP is shown below.

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |M|H| rsvd  |      Length       |          Vendor ID          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |         Attribute Type        |       Disconnect Code       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    Control Protocol Number    |   Direction   | Message...
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
                  Figure 1: PPP Disconnect Cause Code AVP

   Mandatory (M) bit: MUST be 0.




Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 2]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   Hidden (H) bit: MAY be 1 if the attribute is hidden.

   Length: The length of the entire attribute in octets, expressed as a
   single octet.  The length MUST be at least 11.

   Vendor ID: A two octet value in network byte order; set to 0 to indi-
   cate that this is an IETF-assigned attribute.

   Attribute Type: A two octet value in network byte order; set to TBD
   (PPP Disconnect Cause Code).

   Disconnect Code: A two octet value in network byte order.  (Described
   in this document.)

   Control Protocol Number: The PPP Control Protocol number of the pri-
   mary protocol known to have caused the error, if any.  This field may
   be 0 unless mentioned otherwise in the description of the Disconnect
   Codes in section 3.

   Direction: A single octet value; specifies the direction in which the
   Disconnect Code applies.

           The valid values of this field are:

                   0: global error
                   1: at peer
                   2: at local
                   3-255: Reserved

   This field SHOULD be 0 unless documented otherwise in the description
   of the specific Disconnect Code.


3.  Disconnect Codes

   This section contains the list of well-known values of the Disconnect
   Code field in the PPP Disconnect Cause Code AVP.  The IANA will main-
   tain a registry of the up-to-date values (see section 5 of this docu-
   ment).  These values should be used in conjunction with the Direction
   value and the Control Protocol Number field to interpret the specific
   error condition.

   Unless documented otherwise for a specific Disconnect Code, the
   Direction value SHOULD be 0.







Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 3]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


3.1.  Global Errors

   The global error codes, given in the list below, are Disconnect Codes
   that do not relate to one particular PPP Control Protocol.  The Con-
   trol Protocol Number for these errors thus MUST be set to 0.

   0    No information available.

   1    Administrative disconnect.

   2    LCP renegotiation at LNS disabled; LNS expects proxy LCP
        information, LAC did not send it.

   3    Normal Disconnection, LCP Terminate-Request sent.

        Valid Direction values are:

           1: By peer
           2: By local

   4    Compulsory encryption required by a PPP peer was refused by the
        other.

        Valid Direction values are:

           1: Required by local; refused by peer
           2: Required by peer; refused by local


3.2.  LCP Errors

   The LCP error codes, listed below, are disconnect reasons that are
   directly related to the failure of PPP peers to negotiate mutually
   agreeable link parameters.  The Control Protocol Number for these
   errors MUST be set to C021 hexadecimal (LCP).

   5    FSM (Finite State Machine) Timeout error.  (PPP event "TO-".)

   6    No recognizable LCP packets were received.

   7    LCP failure: Magic Number error; link possibly looped back.

   8    LCP link failure: Echo Request timeout.

   9    Peer has unexpected Endpoint-Discriminator for existing MP
        bundle.

   10   Peer has unexpected MRRU for existing MP bundle.



Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 4]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   11   Peer has unexpected Short-Sequence-Number option for existing
        MP bundle.

   12   Compulsory call-back required by a PPP peer was refused by the
        other.

        Valid Direction value are:

           1: Required by local; refused by peer
           2: Required by peer; refused by local


3.3.  Authentication Errors

   The authentication error codes, listed below, are disconnect reasons
   that are directly related to authentication failures between the PPP
   peers.  The Control Protocol Number for such errors MUST correspond
   to the PPP Control Protocol number for the authentication protocol in
   use.

   13   FSM Timeout error.

   14   Peer has unexpected authenticated name for existing MP bundle.

   15   PPP authentication failure: Authentication protocol
        unacceptable.

        Valid Direction values are:

           1: All local authentication protocols were rejected by the
              peer.

           2: All authentication protocols requested by peer were
              unacceptable or unimplemented locally.

   16   PPP authentication failure: Authentication failed (bad name,
        password, or secret).

        Valid Direction values are:

           1: Authentication of peer identity by local system.
           2: Authentication of local identity by peer system.


3.4.  Network Control Protocol (NCP) Errors

   NCP Errors are disconnect reasons that are directly related to the
   failure of PPP peers to negotiate a mutually agreeable set of



Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 5]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   parameters for the network protocols.  The Control Protocol Number
   for such errors MUST correspond to the PPP Network Control Protocol
   number in use.  Where multiple network protocols are in use, multiple
   copies of this AVP MAY be given to indicate failure reasons for each
   NCP.  Otherwise, if only one copy of the AVP is given, the Control
   Protocol Number SHOULD correspond to the last failing NCP.

   17   FSM Timeout error.

   18   No NCPs available (all disabled or rejected); no NCPs went to
        Opened state.

   19   NCP failure: failed to converge on acceptable addresses.

        Valid Direction values are:

           1: Too many Configure-Naks received from peer.
           2: Too many Configure-Naks sent to from peer.

   20   NCP failure: user not permitted to use any addresses.

        Valid Direction values are:

           1: Local link address not acceptable to peer.
           2: Remote link address not acceptable to local system.


4.  Notes

   This AVP MAY may be sent by either the LNS or LAC.  It is generally
   expected that this AVP will be most useful in sending notification
   from the LNS to LAC in the compulsory tunneling case, although it is
   not precluded from use in any other case.

   A draft form of this AVP used Vendor ID 43 (3Com Corporation) and
   vendor-specific Attribute Type 46.  Implementations MAY accept AVPs
   with these values as equivalent to the message described in this
   document, but MUST NOT transmit an AVP using these values.


5.  IANA Considerations

   This AVP includes an enumerated cause code value, called the "Discon-
   nect Code."  Values 0 through 20 are described in this document.
   Values 21 through 32767 (inclusive) are assigned by the IANA subject
   to IESG Approval.  Values 32768 through 65279 (inclusive) are
   assigned by the IANA on a First Come First Served basis, and are
   intended for vendor-specific features.  Values 65280 through 65535



Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 6]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   (inclusive) are allocated for Private or Experimental Use, and no
   assignment through the IANA is expected.


6.  References

   [1] W. Townsley, A. Valencia, A. Rubens, G. Pall, G. Zorn, B. Palter,
       ``Layer 2 Tunnel Protocol (L2TP)'', RFC 2661, August 1999

   [2] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
       Levels," BCP 14 and RFC 2119, March 1997

   [3] F. Yergeau, "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO
       10646," RFC 2044, Alis Technologies, October 1996


7.  Acknowledgments

   The authors thank W. Mark Townsley and Thomas Narten for their com-
   ments and help.


8.  Contacts


8.1.  L2TP Working Group Chair

   W. Mark Townsley
   Cisco Systems
   7025 Kit Creek Road
   PO Box 14987
   Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
   Email:  <townsley@cisco.com>


8.2.  Authors

   Rohit Verma
   180 N. Stetson Avenue
   Chicago IL 60601
   Phone: +1 312 374 2475
   Fax:   +1 312 870 2475
   Email:  <rverma@dc.com>








Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 7]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   Madhvi Verma
   1800 W. Central Road
   Mount Prospect IL 60056
   Phone: +1 847 797 6528
   Fax:   +1 847 222 2424
   Email:  <Madhvi_Verma@3com.com>

   James Carlson
   Sun Microsystems
   1 Network Drive MS UBUR02-212
   Burlington MA  01803-2757
   Email:  <james.d.carlson@sun.com>
   Phone:  +1 781 442 2084
   Fax:    +1 781 442 1677


9.  Standard Notices


9.1.  IETF Intellectual Property Statement

   "The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to per-
   tain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this
   document or the extent to which any license under such rights might
   or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made
   any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the IETF's
   procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-
   related documentation can be found in BCP-11.  Copies of claims of
   rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses
   to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a
   general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights
   by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from
   the IETF Secretariat.

   "The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights, which may cover technology that, may be required to practice
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive
   Director."


9.2.  ISOC Copyright Statement

   "Copyright (C) The Internet Society 2001. All Rights Reserved.

   "This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it



Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 8]

INTERNET-DRAFT     L2TP Disconnect Cause Information        January 2001


   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of develop-
   ing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights
   defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as
   required to translate it into languages other than English.

   "The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   "This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MER-
   CHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
































Verma, Verma, Carlson      expires July 2001                    [Page 9]

PAFTECH AB 2003-20262026-04-22 15:08:10