One document matched: draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt

Differences from draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-02.txt


 


Network Working Group                                         G. Bourdon 
Internet Draft                                        France Telecom R&D 
Document: draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt                     March 2003 
Category: Experimental                                                   
 
                        L2TP Multicast Extension 
                   <draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt> 
 
 
Status of this Memo 
 
   This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions 
   of Section 10 of RFC2026. 
    
   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other 
   groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.  
    
   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 
   time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". 
    
   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 
    
   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 
    
    
Abstract 
    
   The Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) provides a standard method 
   for tunneling PPP packets.  This document describes an extension to 
   L2TP, in order to have an efficient use of L2TP tunnels within the 
   context of deploying multicast services whose data will have to be 
   conveyed by such tunnels. 
    
Table of Contents 
    
   1.      Introduction................................................2 
   1.1.    Conventions used in this document...........................3 
   1.2.    Terminology.................................................3 
   2.      Motivation for a session-based solution.....................4 
   3.      Control Connection establishment............................4 
   3.1.    Negotiation phase...........................................4 
   3.2.    Multicast Capability AVP (SCCRQ, SCCRP).....................4 
   4.      L2TP multicast session establishment decision...............5 
   4.1.    IGMP states in LNS..........................................5 
   4.2.    Triggering..................................................6 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 1] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   5.      L2TP multicast session opening process......................6 
   5.1.    Multicast-Session-Request (MSRQ)............................7 
   5.2.    Multicast-Session-Response (MSRP)...........................8 
   5.3.    Multicast-Session-Established (MSE).........................8 
   6.      Session maintenance and management..........................9 
   6.1.    Multicast-Session-Information (MSI).........................9 
   6.2.    Outgoing Sessions List updates.............................10 
   6.2.1.  New Outgoing Sessions AVP (MSI)............................10 
   6.2.2.  New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement AVP (MSI)............11 
   6.2.3.  Withdraw Outgoing Sessions AVP (MSI).......................12 
   6.3.    Multicast Packets Priority AVP (MSI).......................12 
   6.3.1.  Global configuration.......................................14 
   6.3.2.  Individual configuration...................................14 
   6.3.3.  Priority...................................................14 
   7.      Multicast session teardown.................................14 
   7.1.    Operations.................................................15 
   7.2.    Multicast-Session-End-Notify (MSEN)........................15 
   7.3.    Result Codes...............................................16 
   8.      Traffic merging............................................16 
   9.      IANA Considerations........................................17 
   10.     Security Considerations....................................17 
   11.     References.................................................18 
   12.     Acknowledgments............................................18 
   13.     Author's Addresses.........................................18 
    
    
1. Introduction 
    
   The deployment of IP multicast-based services may have to deal with 
   L2TP tunnel engineering. From this perspective, the forwarding of 
   multicast data within L2TP sessions may impact the throughput of L2TP 
   tunnels. This proposal aims to reduce this impact by applying 
   replication mechanism of multicast traffic only when necessary. 
   The solution described herein provides a mechanism for transmitting 
   multicast data only once for all the L2TP sessions that have been 
   established in a tunnel, each multicast group having a dedicated L2TP 
   session. 
   Within the context of deploying IP multicast-based services, it is 
   assumed that the routers of the IP network that embed a L2TP Network 
   Server (LNS) capability may be involved in the forwarding of 
   multicast data, towards users who access the network through an L2TP 
   tunnel. Then the LNS is in charge of replicating the multicast data 
   for a multicast group G for each L2TP session that is used by a 
   receiver who has actually subscribed to group G. The solution 
   described here gives the ability for a LNS to send multicast data 
   once and make the L2TP Access Concentrator (LAC) perform the traffic 
   replication. By doing so, it is expected to spare transmission 
   resources in the core network that supports L2TP tunnels. This 
   multicast extension to L2TP is designed so that it does not affect 
   the behavior of L2TP equipment under normal conditions. A solution to 
   carry multicast data once in a L2TP tunnel is interesting for service 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 2] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   providers since edge devices are aggregating more and more users. 
   This is particularly true for operators who are deploying xDSL 
   (Digital Subscriber Line) and cable infrastructures. Therefore, L2TP 
   tunnels that may be supported by the network will have to carry 
   multiple redundant multicast data more often. The solution described 
   in this document applies to downstream traffic exclusively, i.e. data 
   coming from the LNS towards end-users connected to the LAC. This 
   downstream multicast traffic is not framed by the LNS but by the LAC, 
   thus ensuring compatibility for all users in a common tunnel whatever 
   their framing scheme is. 
    
    
1.1. Conventions used in this document 
    
   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 
    
1.2. Terminology 
    
Unicast session 
 
   This term refers to the definition of "Session", as it is described 
   in the terminology section of [RFC2661]. (Also: L2TP unicast session)  
    
Multicast session 
 
   This term refers to a connection between the LAC and the LNS. 
   Additional Control Messages and Attribute-Value-Pairs (AVPs) are 
   defined in this document to open and maintain this connection for the 
   particular purpose of multicast traffic transportation. This 
   connection between the LAC and the LNS is intended to convey 
   multicast traffic only. (Also: L2TP multicast session) 
    
Session 
 
   This term is used when there is no need to dissociate multicast from 
   unicast sessions, and thus designates both. (Also: L2TP session) 
    
M-IGP 
 
   Designates a Multicast Interior Gateway Protocol. 
    
(*, G) 
    
   Designates a multicast group state, considering the group G and all 
   sources sending to this group G. 
    
(S, G) 
 

 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 3] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   Designates a multicast group state, considering the group G and the 
   source S sending to this group G. 
    
    
2. Motivation for a session-based solution 
    
   Multicast data have to be seen as a singular flow that potentially 
   concerns all L2TP sessions already existing in a tunnel. It means 
   that a given L2TP session can be dedicated for the forwarding of a 
   unique multicast flow that is addressed to multiple receivers. A 
   session carrying IP multicast data is independent from the framing 
   scheme and is therefore compatible with any new framing scheme that 
   may be supported by the L2TP protocol. 
        
   Using a single L2TP session per multicast group G to carry multicast 
   data is motivated by the following arguments:  
        
      - The administrator of the LNS is presumably in charge of the IP 
   multicast-based services and the related engineering aspects. As 
   such, he must be capable of filtering multicast flows on a multicast 
   source basis, on a multicast group basis, and on a user basis (users 
   who access the network using a L2TP session that terminates in this 
   LNS).  
      - Having a L2TP session dedicated for a multicast group gives the 
   ability to have distinct policies for each group. For instance, it is 
   possible to allow more bandwidth for some groups, or change the 
   priority treatment for multicast packets against unicast packets.  
      - It is not always acceptable nor possible to have multicast 
   forwarding performed within the network between the LAC and the LNS. 
   Having the multicast traffic conveyed within a L2TP tunnel ensures a 
   multicast service between the LNS and end-users, without necessity of 
   having a multicast capability in the underlying network. 
    
    
3. Control Connection establishment  
    
3.1. Negotiation phase 
    
   The multicast extension capability is negotiated between the LAC and 
   the LNS during the control connection establishment phase. However, 
   establishment procedures defined in [RFC2661] remain unchanged. A LAC 
   indicates its multicast extension capability by using a new AVP, the 
   "Multicast Capability" AVP. There is no explicit acknowledgement from 
   the LNS during the control connection establishment phase. Instead, 
   the LNS is granted to use multicast extension messages to open and 
   maintain multicast session(s).  
    
3.2. Multicast Capability AVP (SCCRQ, SCCRP) 
    
   In order to inform the LNS that a LAC has the ability to handle 
   multicast sessions, the LAC sends a Multicast Capability AVP during 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 4] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   the control connection establishment phase.  
   This AVP is sent either in a SCCRQ or a SCCRP control message by the 
   LAC towards the LNS.  
        
   Upon receipt of the Multicast Capability AVP, a LNS may adopt two 
   distinct behaviors:  
        
   1) The LNS does not implement the L2TP multicast extension: the 
   Multicast Capability AVP is ignored, and the LNS will not initiate 
   any L2TP-based multicast action.  
   2) The LNS implements L2TP multicast extensions, and therefore 
   supports the Multicast Capability AVP: the LNS is granted to send 
   L2TP specific commands for conveying multicast traffic towards the 
   LAC.  
    
   The multicast capability exclusively refers to the tunnel for which 
   the AVP has been received during control connection establishment 
   phase. It SHOULD be possible for a LNS administrator to shut down 
   L2TP multicast extension features towards one or a set of LAC(s). In 
   this case, the LNS behavior is similar to 1). 
    
   The AVP has the following format:  
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA1 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute = TBA1 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
       0                   1                   2                   3  
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |M|H|0|0|0|0|      Length       |          Vendor ID            | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |              TBA1             | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the AVP MAY be hidden (H-bit set to 0 or 
   1). 
    
   The length of this AVP is 6 octets. 
    
    
4. L2TP multicast session establishment decision 
    
4.1. IGMP states in LNS 
    
   The LNS MUST always be at the origin of the creation of a multicast 
   L2TP session dedicated for the forwarding of IP multicast datagrams 
   destined to a multicast group.  
    
   The router that embeds the LNS feature MUST support IGMPv1 
   ([RFC1112]) or IGMPv2 ([RFC2236]) or IGMPv3 ([RFC3376]) and acts as 
   an IGMP Querier for every logical interface represented by a L2TP 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 5] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   session. However, the L2TP Multicast Extension is not designed to 
   take advantage of IGMPv3 source filtering, and is restricted to 
   multicast group operations.  
   As a multicast router, the equipment that embeds the LNS function 
   will be involved in the state maintenance related to the multicast 
   groups for which receivers have subscribed to, i.e. the maintenance 
   of an OIL (Outgoing Interface List) for every multicast group G 
   defined by (*, G) and (S, G) states. The OIL for a given multicast 
   group G will be partly composed by logical interfaces. All or some of 
   these logical interfaces will correspond to L2TP unicast sessions in 
   this context.  
    
   Implementing IGMP requires the LNS-capable equipment to create and 
   maintain OILs. Using these tables, the LNS can build for each 
   subscribed group within a tunnel a list of the associated L2TP 
   sessions: the Outgoing Sessions List (OSL). An OSL gives the ability 
   to identify which L2TP sessions connect users interested in receiving 
   the traffic corresponding to a given multicast group, and this for 
   each L2TP tunnel. There is one OSL maintained per L2TP multicast 
   session (i.e. per multicast group) within an L2TP tunnel. Whenever 
   the OSL gets empty, the LNS MUST stop sending multicast traffic over 
   the L2TP multicast session. Then the L2TP multicast session MUST be 
   torn down as described in Section 7 of this document. 
    
   The LAC does not have any IGMP activity; IGMP processing is performed 
   by the LNS. The LAC is a layer-2 equipment, and is not supposed to 
   track IGMP messages between users and the LNS in this context. 
   In order for the LAC to forward the multicast traffic received 
   through the L2TP multicast session to end-users, the LNS sends to the 
   LAC the OSL for the related multicast session (see Section 6). 
    
4.2. Triggering 
    
   The rules to be enforced by the LNS so as to decide when to open a 
   dedicated L2TP multicast session for a multicast group SHOULD be 
   configurable by the LNS administrator. This would typically happen 
   whenever a number of MULTICAST_SESSION_THRESHOLD receivers/sessions 
   is reached. This threshold value SHOULD be valued at 2 by default, if 
   we consider that it is worth opening a dedicated L2TP multicast 
   session for a multicast group subscribed by two receivers (which 
   means that two L2TP unicast sessions are concerned). 
   Reception by the LNS of multicast traffic requested by end-users can 
   also be taken into account to decide if the associated L2TP multicast 
   session has to be opened.  
    
    
5. L2TP multicast session opening process 
    
   The opening of an L2TP multicast session is initiated by the LNS. A 
   three-message exchange is utilized to set up the session. Following 
   is a typical sequence of events: 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 6] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
    
       LAC              LNS 
       ---              --- 
                        (multicast session  
                        triggering) 
                         
                        <- MSRQ 
       MSRP -> 
    
       (Ready to  
        replicate) 
    
       MSE  ->           
                        <- ZLB ACK 
    
    
   ZLB ACK is sent if there are no further messages waiting in queue for 
   that peer. 
    
    
5.1. Multicast-Session-Request (MSRQ) 
    
   Multicast-Session-Request (MSRQ) is a control message sent by the LNS 
   to the LAC to indicate that a multicast session can be created. The 
   LNS initiates this message according to the rules mentioned in 
   section 4.2. It is the first in a three-message exchange used for 
   establishing a multicast session within a L2TP tunnel. 
    
   A LNS MUST NOT send a MSRQ control message if the remote LAC did not 
   open the L2TP tunnel with the Multicast Capability AVP. The LAC MUST 
   close the session if it receives a MSRQ control message, while the 
   L2TP tunnel was not opened with a Multicast Capability AVP. 
       
   The following AVPs MUST be present in MSRQ:  
        
      Message Type  
      Assigned Session ID  
        
   The following AVP MAY be present in MSRQ:        
             
      Random Vector 
      Maximum BPS  
    
   The Maximum BPS value is set by the LNS administrator. However, this 
   value should be chosen in accordance with the line capabilities of 
   the end-users. The Maximum BPS value SHOULD NOT be higher than the 
   highest speed connection for all end-users within the L2TP tunnel.  
    
   The associated Message Type AVP is encoded with the values: 
    

 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 7] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA2 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute Type = 0  
      Attribute Value = TBA2 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the H-bit MUST be set to 0.  
    
    
5.2. Multicast-Session-Response (MSRP) 
    
   Multicast-Session-Response (MSRP) is a control message sent by the 
   LAC to the LNS in response to a received MSRQ message. It is the 
   second in a three-message exchange used for establishing a multicast 
   session within a L2TP tunnel.   
    
   MSRP is used to indicate that the MSRQ was successful and the LAC 
   will attempt to reserve appropriate resources to perform multicast 
   replication for unicast sessions managed in the pertaining control 
   connection. 
    
   The following AVPs MUST be present in MSRP:  
    
      Message Type  
      Assigned Session ID  
    
   The following AVP MAY be present in MSRP:        
             
      Random Vector 
    
   The associated Message Type AVP is encoded with the values: 
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA3 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute Type = 0  
      Attribute Value = TBA3 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the H-bit MUST be set to 0.  
    
    
5.3. Multicast-Session-Established (MSE) 
    
   Multicast-Session-Established (MSE) is a control message sent by the 
   LAC to the LNS to indicate that the LAC is ready to receive necessary 
   multicast information (Section 6) for the group using the newly 
   created multicast session. It is the third message in the three-
   message sequence used for establishing a multicast session within a 
   L2TP tunnel. 
    
   The following AVP MUST be present in MSE:  
    
      Message Type  
    
   The following AVP MAY be present in MSE:  
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 8] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
    
      Sequencing Required 
    
   Sequencing will occur only from the LNS to the LAC since a 
   multicast session is used for downstream purposes only.  
    
   The associated Message Type AVP is encoded with the values: 
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA4 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute Type = 0  
      Attribute Value = TBA4 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the H-bit MUST be set to 0.  
    
    
6. Session maintenance and management 
       
   Once the multicast session is established, the LAC has to be informed 
   of the L2TP unicast sessions interested in getting the traffic from 
   the newly-created multicast session, as well as a related optional 
   priority parameter defined in Section 6.3. To achieve this, a new 
   control message type is defined: Multicast-Session-Information (MSI). 
    
    
6.1. Multicast-Session-Information (MSI) 
    
   Multicast-Session-Information (MSI) control messages carry AVPs to 
   keep the OSL synchronised between the LNS and the LAC and to set 
   optional priority parameter for multicast traffic versus unicast 
   traffic. MSI may be extended to update the multicast session with 
   additional parameters as needed. 
    
   Each MSI message is specific to a particular multicast session. 
   Therefore, the control message MUST use the assigned session ID 
   associated to the multicast session (assigned by the LAC), except for 
   the case mentioned in 6.3.2. 
    
   The associated Message Type AVP is encoded with the values:  
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA5 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute Type = 0  
      Attribute Value = TBA5 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the H-bit MUST be set to 0.  
    
   The following AVPs MUST be present in MSI:  
        
      Message Type  
        
   The following AVP MAY be present in MSI:        
             
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                 [Page 9] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
      Random Vector 
      New Outgoing Sessions 
      New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement 
      Withdraw Outgoing Sessions 
      Multicast Packets Priority    
    
   New Outgoing Sessions, New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement, 
   Withdraw Outgoing Sessions and Multicast Packets Priority are new 
   AVPs defined in sections 6.2 and 6.3. 
    
    
6.2. Outgoing Sessions List updates 
        
   Whenever a change occurs in the Outgoing Sessions List, the LNS MUST 
   inform the LAC of that change. The OSL is built upon subscription 
   reports recorded by the IGMP process running in the LNS (Section 
   4.1).  
   The LAC maintains an OSL as a per-group local table transmitted by 
   the LNS. As for the LNS, the LAC has to maintain an OSL for each L2TP 
   multicast session within a L2TP tunnel. To update the LAC OSL, the 
   LNS sends a New Outgoing Sessions AVP for additional(s) session(s) or 
   sends a Withdraw Outgoing Sessions AVP to remove session(s). All 
   sessions mentioned in these AVPs MUST be added or removed by the LAC 
   from the pertaining OSL. The Outgoing Sessions List is identified by 
   the tunnel ID and the multicast session ID the updating AVP is 
   referring to.  
   To update the OSL, the following AVPs are used:  
        
      Additional session(s): New Outgoing Sessions AVP  
      Session(s) removal: Withdraw Outgoing Sessions AVP  
    
   These new AVPs MUST be sent in a MSI message.  
    
6.2.1. New Outgoing Sessions AVP (MSI) 
    
   The New Outgoing Sessions AVP can only be carried within a MSI 
   message type. This AVP piggybacks every Session ID to which the 
   multicast traffic has to be forwarded.   
    
   The AVP has the following format:  
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA6 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute = TBA6 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
       0                   1                   2                   3  
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |M|H|0|0|0|0|      Length       |          Vendor ID            | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |              TBA6             |         Session ID 0          | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 10] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
      |              ...              |         Session ID N          | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
    
    
   There can be from 1 to N Session IDs present in the New Outgoing 
   Sessions AVP. This AVP must be placed in a MSI message and sent after 
   the establishment of the multicast session to indicate the LAC what 
   are the initial outgoing sessions, and at any time when one or more 
   outgoing sessions appear during the multicast session lifetime. Upon 
   reception of this AVP, the LAC sends a New Outgoing Sessions 
   Acknowledgment AVP to the LNS to notify that the LAC is ready to 
   replicate the multicast traffic towards the indicated sessions. 
    
   Usage of this AVP is incremental: only new outgoing sessions have to 
   be listed in the AVP. 
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 1, the AVP MAY be hidden (H-bit set to 0 or 
   1).  
    
6.2.2. New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement AVP (MSI) 
    
   The New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement AVP can only be carried 
   within a MSI message type. This AVP informs the LNS that the LAC is 
   ready to replicate traffic for every Session ID listed within. 
    
   The AVP has the following format:  
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA7 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute = TBA7 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
       0                   1                   2                   3  
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |M|H|0|0|0|0|      Length       |          Vendor ID            | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |              TBA7             |         Session ID 0          | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |              ...              |         Session ID N          | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
    
    
   This AVP must be placed in a MSI message and sent by the LAC towards 
   the LNS to acknowledge reception of a New Outgoing Sessions list 
   received in a New Outgoing Sessions AVP from the LNS. 
    
   A LNS is allowed to send multicast traffic within the L2TP multicast 
   session as soon as a New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement AVP is 
   received for the related L2TP multicast session. 
    
   A LNS is allowed to stop sending multicast traffic for the related 
   group within L2TP unicast sessions only when it receives a MSI 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 11] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   message with the New Outgoing Session Acknowledgement AVP, and only 
   for the unicast Session IDs mentioned in the AVP. The multicast 
   traffic can use L2TP unicast sessions again when the L2TP multicast 
   session goes down. From this standpoint, multicast traffic related to 
   this group SHOULD NOT be conveyed within the L2TP unicast sessions 
   mentioned in the AVP to avoid duplicate multicast packets.  
    
   There can be from 1 to N Session IDs present in the New Outgoing 
   Sessions Acknowledgement AVP. Session IDs mentioned in this AVP that 
   have not been listed in a previous New Outgoing Sessions AVP should 
   be ignored. Non-acknowledged Session IDs MAY be listed in future New 
   Outgoing Sessions AVPs, but multicast traffic MUST be sent to logical 
   interfaces associated to these Session IDs as long as these Session 
   IDs are not acknowledged for replication by the LAC. 
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 1, the AVP MAY be hidden (H-bit set to 0 or 
   1). 
    
6.2.3. Withdraw Outgoing Sessions AVP (MSI) 
        
   The Withdraw Outgoing Sessions AVP is sent whenever there is one or 
   more withdrawn subscriptions for the related multicast group 
   (designated by the session ID on which the MSI is sent).  
   The LAC can stop forwarding multicast traffic to users mentioned in 
   the AVP for the related group as soon as it receives the MSI message 
   embedding this Withdraw Target Session AVP.  
     
   The AVP has the following format:  
        
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA8 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute = TBA8 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by the IANA)  
        
       0                   1                   2                   3  
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |M|H|0|0|0|0|      Length       |          Vendor ID            | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |              TBA8             |         Session ID 0          | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
      |              ...              |         Session ID N          | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 
        
    
   There can be from 1 to N Session IDs present in the Withdraw Outgoing 
   Sessions AVP. The M-bit MUST be set to 1, the AVP MAY be hidden (H-
   bit set to 0 or 1).      
    
6.3. Multicast Packets Priority AVP (MSI) 
        
   The Multicast Packets Priority AVP is an optional AVP intended to 
   provide the LAC with an indication on how to process multicast 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 12] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   traffic against unicast traffic. Even though the LAC behavior is 
   partially described here, the nature of the traffic (layer-2 frames 
   for unicast traffic and pure IP packets for multicast traffic) is not 
   a criteria for enforcing a traffic prioritisation policy. Traffic 
   processing for the provisioning of a uniformly-framed traffic for the 
   final user is described is section 8.  
    
   Three different behaviors can be adopted:  
        
   1) Best effort: the traffic is forwarded from the LAC to the end-user 
   in the order it comes from the LNS, whatever the type of traffic.  
   2) Unicast traffic priority: traffic coming down the L2TP unicast 
   session has priority over traffic coming down the L2TP multicast 
   session.   
   3) Multicast traffic priority: traffic coming down the L2TP multicast 
   session has priority over traffic coming down the L2TP unicast 
   session.  
        
   The priority is encoded as a 16-bit quantity, which can take the 
   values:  
        
      0: Best effort (default)  
      1: Unicast traffic priority  
      2: Multicast traffic priority  
    
   The AVP has the following format:  
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA9 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute = TBA9 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by the IANA)  
        
       0                   1                   2                   3  
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
      |M|H|0|0|0|0|      Length       |          Vendor ID            |  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
      |              TBA9             |        Priority Value         |  
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
        
   It is important to note that the multicast traffic rate can reach up 
   to Maximum BPS (as indicated in MSRQ). This rate can exceed the 
   maximum rate allowed for a particular final user. This means that 
   even with a priority value = 0, the final user might receive 
   multicast traffic only: unicast packets might be dropped because the 
   multicast flow overwhelms the LAC forwarding buffer.  
    
   The default Priority Value is 0. The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the AVP  
   MAY be hidden (H-bit set to 0 or 1).  
    
   There are two ways of using this AVP: global configuration and 
   individual configuration.      
    
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 13] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
6.3.1. Global configuration 
        
   The Multicast Priority Packet AVP is sent for all L2TP unicast 
   sessions concerned by a specific multicast group represented by a 
   L2TP multicast session.  
   In this case, the AVP is sent in a L2TP MSI control message for the 
   corresponding multicast session ID (Session ID = L2TP session for the 
   corresponding multicast group). The priority value applies to all 
   L2TP unicast sessions to which the multicast group designated by the 
   L2TP multicast session is intended, as soon as this AVP is received. 
    
6.3.2. Individual configuration 
    
   The Multicast Priority Packet AVP is sent for a specific L2TP unicast 
   session concerned by adopting a specific behavior for both unicast 
   and multicast traffic. In this case, the AVP is sent in a L2TP MSI 
   control message for the L2TP unicast session (Session ID = L2TP 
   session for the concerned user). The priority value applies to the 
   individual session only, and doesn't affect other individual 
   sessions. It is important to note that in this case, all multicast 
   groups carried in L2TP multicast sessions are treated by the LAC the 
   same way for the concerned user. 
   This is the only case where a MSI control message can be sent for a 
   L2TP unicast session. 
    
6.3.3. Priority 
    
   It is the responsibility of the network administrator to decide which 
   behavior to adopt between global or individual configuration, if the 
   AVP is sent twice (one for a multicast group and one for an 
   individual user). By default, only the individual configurations 
   SHOULD be taken into consideration in that case.  
   Support of the Multicast Packets Priority AVP is optional and SHOULD 
   be configurable by the LAC administrator if available. 
    
    
7. Multicast session teardown 
    
   A L2TP multicast session should be torn down whenever there are no 
   longer users interested in. More generally, we can consider that a 
   multicast session becomes useless as soon as the related OSL has less 
   than a predefined number of entries, this number being defined by a 
   threshold. 
   Multicast session flapping may occur when the number of OSL entries 
   is oscillating around the threshold, if the same value is used to 
   trigger the creation or the deletion of an L2TP multicast session.  
   To avoid this behavior, two methods can be used: 
    
      - The threshold value used to determine if the L2TP multicast 
   session has to be torn down is lower than the 
   MULTICAST_SESSION_THRESHOLD value; 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 14] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
      - The MULTICAST_SESSION_THRESHOLD value is used to determine if 
   the L2TP multicast session has to be torn down. A multicast session 
   SHOULD be killed after a period of MULTICAST_SESSION_HOLDTIME seconds 
   if the corresponding OSL maintains less than 
   MULTICAST_SESSION_THRESHOLD entries. The MULTICAST_SESSION_HOLDTIME 
   value is 10 seconds by default, and SHOULD be configurable either by 
   the LAC or the LNS administrator. 
     
   The multicast session can be torn down for multiple reasons, 
   including specific criteria not described here (can be vendor-
   specific).   
   A multicast session teardown can be initiated either by the LAC or 
   the LNS. However, multicast session teardown MUST be initiated by the 
   LNS if the termination decision is motivated by the number of users 
   interested in receiving the traffic corresponding to a multicast 
   group.  
      
      
7.1. Operations 
    
   The effective termination of a multicast session is initiated with a 
   new Multicast-Session-End-Notify (MSEN) control message, sent either 
   by the LAC or by the LNS. 
           
   Following is an example of control messages exchange to terminate a 
   multicast session: 
    
        LAC or LNS      LAC or LNS 
        ----------      ---------- 
                        (multicast session  
                        termination) 
                         
                        <- MSEN 
                        (Clean up) 
        ZLB ACK -> 
        (Clean up)               
    
    
7.2. Multicast-Session-End-Notify (MSEN) 
    
   The Multicast-Session-End-Notify (MSEN) is an L2TP control message 
   sent by either the LAC or the LNS to request termination of a 
   specific multicast session within the tunnel. Its purpose is to 
   inform the peer of the termination and the reason why the termination 
   occurred. The peer MUST clean up any resources, and does not send 
   back any indication of success or failure. 
    
   As defined in [RFC2661], termination of a control connection will 
   terminate all sessions managed within, including multicast sessions 
   if any. 
    
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 15] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   The MSEN message carries a Result Code AVP with an optional Error 
   Code.  
       
   The following AVPs MUST be present in a MSEN message:  
        
      Message Type  
      Result Code  
      Assigned Session ID  
    
   The associated Message Type AVP is encoded with the values: 
    
      Vendor ID = to be defined (0 once TBA10 assigned by IANA) 
      Attribute Type = 0  
      Attribute Value = TBA10 (16 bits) (Note: to be assigned by IANA)  
    
   The M-bit MUST be set to 0, the H-bit MUST be set to 0.  
    
         
7.3. Result Codes 
    
   The following values are the defined result codes for MSEN control 
   messages:  
      
      TBA11 (16 bits) - Session terminated for the reason indicated in  
                        the error code 
      TBA12 (16 bits) - No multicast traffic for the group  
      TBA13 (16 bits) - No more receivers  
      (Note: TBA11, TBA12 and TBA13 to be defined by the IANA)  
        
      o The code TBA11 refers to General Error Codes maintained by the 
   IANA for L2TP.  
      o The code TBA12 may be used when the LAC detects that no traffic 
   is coming down the multicast session, or when the LNS doesn't receive 
   multicast traffic for the related group during a certain period of 
   time.  
      o The code TBA13 may be used by the LAC or the LNS when the OSL is 
   empty.  
        
    
8. Traffic merging 
        
   Both unicast and multicast traffics have to be merged by the LAC in 
   order to provide properly framed data to the end-user. Multicast 
   packets are framed by the LAC and transmitted towards the proper end-
   user. Methods to achieve this function are not described here, since 
   it is mostly an implementation specific issue. 
   All frames conveyed from the LAC to the end-users have to follow the 
   framing scheme applied for the considered peer to which the traffic 
   is destined (e.g. the LAC is always aware of the PPP link parameters, 
   as described in [RFC2661], Section 6.14). It has to be noted that 
   using L2TP Multicast Extension features is not appropriate for end-
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 16] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   users who have negotiated a sequenced layer-2 connection with the 
   LNS: while inserting PPP-encapsulated multicast packets in a session, 
   the LAC cannot modify PPP sequencing performed by the LNS for each 
   PPP session. 
    
    
9. IANA Considerations 
    
   This document defines: 
      - 5 new Message Type (Attribute Type 0) Values:  
           o Multicast-Session-Request (MSRQ)      : TBA2  
           o Multicast-Session-Response (MSRP)     : TBA3 
           o Multicast-Session-Establishment (MSE) : TBA4   
           o Multicast-Session-Information (MSI)   : TBA5 
           o Multicast-Session-End-Notify (MSEN)   : TBA10 
      - 5 new Control Message Attribute Value Pairs: 
           o Multicast Capability                  : TBA1 
           o New Outgoing Sessions                 : TBA6  
           o New Outgoing Sessions Acknowledgement : TBA7 
           o Withdraw Outgoing Sessions            : TBA8 
           o Multicast Packets Priority            : TBA9 
      - 3 Result Codes for the MSEN message: 
           o Session terminated for the reason indicated in the  
             error code                            : TBA11 
           o No multicast traffic for the group    : TBA12 
           o No more receivers                     : TBA13 
    
   IANA will assign, register and maintain values for these new 
   attributes ([RFC3438]). 
    
    
10. Security Considerations 
    
   The extension described in this document does not introduce any 
   additional security issues as far as the activation of the L2TP 
   protocol is concerned. 
 
   Injecting appropriate control packets in the tunnel towards a LAC to 
   modify Outgoing Session List and flood end-users with unwanted 
   multicast traffic is only possible if the control connection is 
   hacked. As for any reception of illegitimate L2TP control message: 
    
      - If the spoofed control message embeds consistent sequence 
   numbers, next messages will appear out of synch bringing the control 
   connection to terminate.  
      - If sequence numbers are inconsistent with current control 
   connection states, the spoofed control message will be queued or 
   discarded, as described in [RFC2661] section 5.8. 
    
   The activation of the L2TP multicast capability on a LAC could make 
   the equipment more sensitive to Denial of Service attacks if the 
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 17] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   control connection or the related LNS is hacked. The LAC might also 
   be sensitive to the burden generated by the additional replication 
   work.  
    
   As mentioned in [RFC2661] section 9.2, securing L2TP requires that 
   the underlying transport makes encryption, integrity and 
   authentication services available for all L2TP traffic, including 
   L2TP multicast traffic (control and data). 
     
        
11. References 
        
   [RFC1112]    S. Deering, "Host Extensions for IP Multicasting",   
                RFC 1112, August 1989.  
        
   [RFC1661]    W. Simpson, "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", STD  
                51, RFC 1661, July 1994.  
        
   [RFC2119]    S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate  
                Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.  
        
   [RFC2236]    W. Fenner, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version  
                2", RFC 2236, November 1997.  
        
   [RFC2661]    W. Townsley, A. Valencia, A. Rubens, G. Pall, G. Zorn,  
                B. Palter, "Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol "L2TP" ",  
                RFC2661, August 1999.     
    
   [RFC3376]    B. Cain et. al., "Internet Group Management Protocol,   
                Version 3", RFC 3376, October 2002. 
    
   [RFC3438]    W. Townsley, "Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)  
                Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)  
                Considerations Update", RFC 3438, December 2002. 
    
    
12. Acknowledgments 
        
   Thanks to Christian Jacquenet for all the corrections done on this 
   document and his precious advice, Pierre Levis for his contribution 
   about IGMP, Francis Houllier for PPP considerations and Xavier Vinet 
   for his input about thresholds. Many thanks to W. Mark Townsley for 
   his highly valuable input on protocol definition.  
 
 
13. Author's Addresses 
    
   Gilles Bourdon  
   France Telecom R&D  
   38-40, rue du General Leclerc  
   92794 Issy les Moulineaux Cedex 9 - FRANCE  
 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 18] 
 
 
Internet Draft      draft-ietf-l2tpext-mcast-03.txt          March 2003 
                                     
                                     
   Phone: +33 1 4529-4645  
   Email: gilles.bourdon@francetelecom.com  
    
    
    
    
Full Copyright Statement 
    
   "Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. 
    
   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to 
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it 
   or assist its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and 
   distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, 
   provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are 
   included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this 
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing 
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other 
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of 
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for 
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be 
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than 
   English. 
    
   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be 
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. 
    
   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an 
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING 
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING 
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION 
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF 
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 
    
    
    
    














 
Bourdon                  Expires September 2003                [Page 19] 
 
 

PAFTECH AB 2003-20262026-04-22 15:11:42