One document matched: draft-ietf-l2tpext-ds-00.txt
INTERNET DRAFT Pat R. Calhoun
Category: Informational Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Title: draft-ietf-l2tpext-ds-00.txt Ken Peirce
Date: March 2000 Malibu Networks, Inc.
Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"
IP Differentiated Services Extension
Status of this Memo
This document is a submission by the L2TP Extensions Working Group of
the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Comments should be
submitted to the l2tp@ipsec.org mailing list.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at:
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
The L2TP document [1] defines the base protocol which describes the
method of tunneling PPP data. The L2TP base protocol does not address
any Differentiated Services extensions.
The ability to outsource dial access with Quality of Service
assurances is important to internet applications development. This
Calhoun, Peirce expires September 2000 [Page 1]
INTERNET DRAFT March 2000
draft addresses this issue by allowing each L2TP Data Session to be
assigned an appropriate differentiated services indicator.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Conventions
2.0 Differentiated Services Negotiation
2.1 Differentiated Sevices Code Point Exchange
2.2 Error Reporting
3.0 References
4.0 Acknowledgements
5.0 Authors' Addresses
1.0 Introduction
The L2TP protocol specification does not discuss Quality of
Service/Differentiated Services in any way.
This document will describe how two L2TP peers negotiate a
differentiated services (Diff Serv) indicator for a dial-in user.
Note that each individual session within a tunnel can have its own
Diff Serv Indicator.
The mechanism defined in this document assumes that the Tunnel
Initiator determines what the user's appropriate service type is and
sends the value in either the ICRQ or OCRQ messages. The Tunnel
Terminator can respond to the message by stating what it believes is
the user's appropriate service type. The values of the indicator
supplied by the Tunnel Terminator will supercede those provided by
the Tunnel Initiator if a difference is found.
In the case where the Tunnel Terminator does not propose ANY
indicator (which is infered by the absence of the QOS AVPs in either
the ICRP or OCRP) the Tunnel Initiator will assume no QOS is assigned
to the session.
1.1 Conventions
The following language conventions are used in the items of
specification in this document:
o MUST, SHALL, or MANDATORY -- This item is an absolute
requirement of the specification.
o SHOULD or RECOMMEND -- This item should generally be followed
Calhoun, Peirce expires September 2000 [Page 2]
INTERNET DRAFT March 2000
for all but exceptional circumstances.
o MAY or OPTIONAL -- This item is truly optional and may be
followed or ignored according to the needs of the implementor.
2.0 Differentiated Services Negotiation
This section will define the new AVPs which are required for the
Quality of Service extension of the L2TP protocol. The AVPs allow
designation of a Quality of Service type for a specific data channel.
2.1 Differentiated Services Code Point AVP
The Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) occupies either the
IPv4 header's TOS octet[2] or the IPv6 Traffic Class octet[2]. The
actual bit interpretation of the IP Precedence and Type of Service
bit fields is left to the appropriate documentation[2][3][4]. This
document is concerned only with defining a uniform exchange mechanism
for the DSCP AVP.
The DSCP AVP MAY be present in ICRQ, ICRP, OCRQ and OCRP. This
message is used to inform the tunnel peer that a DSCP value SHOULD be
used for all packets related to the data channel associated with the
Tunnel and Call Identifiers in the L2TP header [1].
The presence of this AVP in the ICRQ or OCRQ indicates that the
tunnel initiator wishes to use a specific DSCP on all data packets.
However, the value found in the ICRP or OCRP indicate the value which
the Tunnel Terminator is willing to accept.
A tunnel peer which exceeds the negotiated DSCPD, depending upon the
SLS, MAY have it's tunnel shutdown.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|1|1|0|0| Length | 43 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 1 | DSCP Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This AVP MAY be present in the messages shown above. It is encoded
with a Vendor ID of 43 (3Com Corporation) with the attribute set
to 1, marked as optional, with the indicator value as data. This
AVP SHOULD NOT be hidden and is optional. When present, the L2TP
peer is indicating that the specified DSCP is to be used on IP
Calhoun, Peirce expires September 2000 [Page 3]
INTERNET DRAFT March 2000
packets within the session's data channel.
2.2 Error Reporting
In the event that the peer did not accept the DSCP provided, or is
unable to support the DSCP, a Call-Disconnect-Notify is returned to
the peer.
If the DSCP provided cannot be used by the peer, the Call-
Disconnect-Notify message will include the DSCP AVP as provided in
the message that caused the Call-Disconnect-Notify.
3.0 References
[1] W.M. Townsley, A. J. Valencia, A. Rubens, G.S. Pall, G. Zorn,
B. Palter. "Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)", RFC 2661.
August 1999.
[2] K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black. "Definition of the
Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6
Headers", RFC 2474. December 1998.
[3] S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss.
"An Architecture for Differentiated Services", RFC 2475.
December 1998.
[4] Y. Bernet, A. Smith, S. Blake. "A Conceptual Model for DiffServ
Routers", draft-ietf-diffserv-model-01.txt, IETF Work in
Progress. October 1999.
4.0 Acknowledgements
The Authors would like to acknowledge John Shriver for his useful
comments to an earlier version of this document.
5.0 Authors' Addresses
Questions about this memo can be directed to:
Pat R. Calhoun
Network and Security Research Center, Sun Labs
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
15 Network Circle
Menlo Park, California, 94025
USA
Phone: 1-650-786-7733
Calhoun, Peirce expires September 2000 [Page 4]
INTERNET DRAFT March 2000
Fax: 1-650-786-6445
E-mail: pcalhoun@eng.sun.com
Ken Peirce
Malibu Networks
1035 Suncast Lane, Suite 130
El Dorado Hills, CA, 95762
Phone: 1-916-941-8814
Fax: 1-916-941-8850
E-mail: Ken@malibunetworks.com
Calhoun, Peirce expires September 2000 [Page 5]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-22 15:17:29 |