One document matched: draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-01.txt
Differences from draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-00.txt
IPFIX working group
Internet Draft EDITORS: B. Claise
draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-01.txt Cisco Systems
Expires: April 2004 Mark Fullmer
OARnet
Paul Calato
Riverstone Networks
Reinaldo Penno
Nortel Networks
October 2003
IPFIX Protocol Specifications
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of
six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsolete by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
This document discusses the IPFIX protocol that provides network
administrators with access to IP flows information. This document
focuses on how IPFIX flow record data, options record data and
control information is carried (via a congestion-aware transport
protocol) from IPFIX exporting process to IPFIX collecting process.
Conventions used in this document
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 1]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
Table of Contents
1. Points of Discussion........................................3
1.1 Open Issues................................................3
1.2 Action Items...............................................4
2. Introduction................................................4
2.1 Overview...................................................4
3. Terminology.................................................4
3.1 Terminology Summary Table..................................9
4. The Metering Process........................................9
4.1 Flow Expiration............................................9
5. Transport Protocol.........................................10
5.1 TCP.......................................................10
5.2 STCP......................................................10
5.2.1 Congestion Avoidance..................................11
5.2.2 Reliability...........................................11
5.2.3 Exporting Process.....................................11
5.2.3.1 MTU size.............................................11
5.2.3.2 Source ID............................................11
5.2.3.3 Association..........................................12
5.2.3.4 Template.............................................12
5.2.3.5 Template.............................................12
5.2.4 Collecting Process....................................13
5.2.5 SCTP Partially Reliable...............................13
6. Failover...................................................14
6.1 Simple Failover based on the transport protocol...........14
6.2 Something else?...........................................14
7. Packet Layout..............................................14
8. Export Packet Format.......................................16
8.1 Header Format.............................................16
8.2 Template FlowSet Format...................................17
8.3 Data FlowSet Format.......................................19
9. Options....................................................20
9.1 Options Template FlowSet Format...........................20
9.2 Options Data Record Format................................22
10. Variable Length Data Type.................................24
11. Template Management.......................................25
12. The Collecting Process's Side.............................26
13. Examples..................................................27
13.1 Packet Header Example....................................28
13.2 Template FlowSet Example.................................28
13.3 Data FlowSet Example.....................................29
13.4 Options Template FlowSet Example.........................30
13.5 Data FlowSet with Options Data Records Example...........31
14. References................................................31
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 2]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
15. Acknowledgments...........................................32
1. Points of Discussion
1.1 Open Issues
This section covers the open issues, still to be resolved/updated in
this draft:
- The proposal on the table is to send a IPFIX Sync (this would be
an Options Data Records) message periodically (periodicity is
configurable), with the following information (aside the standard
IPFix header)
* Number of flow records sent (for each template?)
* Packets and bytes sent (for each template?)
Question: Per observation domain?
Question: Do we need a specific FlowSet ID?
- Template don't need lifetimes with connection oriented protocol.
We guess this is the consensus from the Working Group.
- No periodic retransmission of templates is needed, with a reliable
transport protocol.
Remark: the template management will vary with TCP, SCTP, etcà
Must have both sections updated: transport updated and template
management sections (BTW, this is the same for the failover
section).
- There seems to be a consensus that having a length field in the
Export Packet header.
Related question: what about the count field then in the NetFlow
version 9 header? But no consensus yet. So no consensus whether the
current count should simply be replaced by the length or the length
field be added.
- Sub-second timestamps
- Export ID (ie IP address of exporter) sent to the collector. This
can be done once with an options template.
- Metering process stats: for example packets / flows dropped at the
metering process due to resource exhaustion, etcà This can be done
with an options template.
- Error recovery, for example what to do if a collector receives a
message it can't decode. Per protocol issue, ie TCP reset the
session because it's a stream protocol and can't recover.
- If we tackle reliablilty a state diagram is needed.
- Talk a little bit about extensibility, for example make some
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 3]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
decisions now about the reserved template ID's 2-254 for future
work.
1.2 Action Items
This section covers the action items for this draft
- change the abstract: done, to be reviewed
-> Reinaldo
- introduction to be completed: introduction + references to other
drafts + applications for the protocol.
-> Reinaldo
- ôtransport protocolö section to be updated.
-> TCP, Reinaldo
Note: each transport protocol (TCP/SCTP) should have at least the
following subsections: Reliability, Failover, Template Management
- Review the requirements draft to see what we miss!
-> Benoit
- variable length data types
-> Text and packet format to be worked on. Benoit
- field types information -> should we have basic type in the
protocol draft, like Jeff suggested.
-> Mark: will send an abstract
- add references to the IPFIX drafts, when published
2. Introduction
2.1 Overview
Will be completed.
It will cover an introduction, pointers/explanation towards/of the
other drafts, and the applications for the IPFIX protocol
3. Terminology
The definitions of IP Traffic Flow, Metering Process, Exporting
Process and Collecting Process are the definitions as found in the
IPFIX requirement document [IPFIX-REQ]. Note nevertheless that,
even if the Observation Point definition has been also been
completely copied over from the IPFIX requirement document [IPFIX-
REQ], this definition has been expanded.
The terminology summary table in Section 3.1 gives a quick overview
of the relationships between some of the different terms defined.
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 4]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Observation Point
The Observation Point is a location in the network where IP packets
can be observed. Examples are a line to which a probe is attached,
a shared medium such as an Ethernet-based LAN, a single port of a
router, or a set of interfaces (physical or logical) of a router.
An Observation Domain is associated with every Observation Point.
Note that one Observation Point may be a superset of several
other Observation Points. For example one Observation Point can be
an entire line card. This would be the superset of the
individual Observation Points at the line card's interfaces.
Observation Domain
The set of Observation Points, which is the largest aggregatable set
of Flow information at the Metering Process is termed an Observation
Domain. Each Observation Domain presents itself as a unique ID to
the Collecting Process for identifying the Export Packets it
generates.
For example, a router line card composed of several interfaces with
each interface being an Observation Point.
IP Traffic Flow or Flow
There are several definitions of the term 'flow' being used by the
Internet community. Within this document we use the following one:
A Flow is defined as a set of IP packets passing an Observation
Point in the network during a certain time interval. All packets
belonging to a particular Flow have a set of common properties. Each
property is defined as the result of applying a function to the
values of:
1. one or more packet header field (e.g. destination IP
address), transport header field (e.g. destination port
number), or application header field (e.g. RTP header fields
[RFC1889])
2. one or more characteristics of the packet itself (e.g.
number of MPLS labels, etc...)
3. one or more of fields derived from packet treatment (e.g.
next hop IP address, the output interface, etc...)
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 5]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
A packet is defined to belong to a Flow if it completely satisfies
all the defined properties of the Flow.
This definition covers the range from a Flow containing all packets
observed at a network interface to a Flow consisting of just a
single packet between two applications with a specific sequence
number. Please note that the Flow definition does not necessarily
match a general application-level end-to-end stream. However, an
application may derive properties of application-level streams by
processing measured Flow data. Also, please note that although
packet properties may depend on application headers, there is no
requirement defined in this document related to application headers.
Flow Record
A Flow Record provides information about an IP Traffic Flow observed
at an Observation Point.
Metering Process
The Metering Process generates Flow Records. Input to the process
are packet headers observed at an Observation Point and packet
treatment at the Observation Point, for example the selected output
interface.
The Metering Process consists of a set of functions that includes
packet header capturing, timestamping, sampling, classifying, and
maintaining Flow Records.
The maintenance of Flow Records may include creating new records,
updating existing ones, computing Flow statistics, deriving further
Flow properties, detecting Flow expiration, passing Flow Records to
the Exporting Process, and deleting Flow Records.
The sampling function and the classifying function may be applied
more than once with different parameters. Figure 1 shows the
sequence in which the functions are applied. Sampling is not
illustrated in the figure, it may be applied before any other
function.
packet header capturing
|
timestamping
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 6]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
|
v
+----->+
| |
| classifying
| |
+------+
|
maintaining Flow Records
|
v
Figure 1: Functions of the Metering Process
Exporting Process
The Exporting Process sends Flow Records to one or more Collecting
Processes. The Flow Records are generated by one or more Metering
Processes.
Collecting Process
The Collecting Process receives Flow Records from one or more
Exporting Processes. The Collecting Process might store received
Flow Records or further process them, but these actions are out of
the scope of this document.
Export Packet
An Export Packet is a packet originating at the Exporting Process
that carries the Flow Records of this Exporting Process and whose
destination is the Collecting Process.
Packet Header
The Packet Header is the first part of an Export Packet, which
provides basic information about the packet such as the IPFIX
version, number of records contained within the packet, sequence
numbering, etc.
Template Record
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 7]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
A Template Record defines the structure and interpretation of fields
in a Flow Data Record.
Flow Data Record
A Flow Data Record is a data record that contains values of the Flow
parameters corresponding to a Template Record. In this document, the
Flow Data Record is also referred to as Flow Record.
Options Template Record
An Options Template Record defines the structure and interpretation
of fields in an Options Data Record, including defining how to scope
the applicability of the Options Data Record.
Options Data Record
The Options Data Record is a data record that contains values and
scope information of the Flow measurement parameters, corresponding
to an Options Template Record.
FlowSet
FlowSet is a generic term for a collection of records that have a
similar structure. In an Export Packet, one or more FlowSets follow
the Packet Header.
There are three different types of FlowSets: Template FlowSet,
Options Template FlowSet, and Data FlowSet.
Template FlowSet
A Template FlowSet is a collection of one or more Template Records
that have been grouped together in an Export Packet.
Options Template FlowSet
An Options Template FlowSet is a collection of one or more Options
Template Records that have been grouped together in an Export
Packet.
Data FlowSet
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 8]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
A Data FlowSet is one or more records, of the same type, that are
grouped together in an Export Packet. Each record is either a Flow
Data Record or an Options Data Record previously defined by a
Template Record or an Options Template Record.
3.1 Terminology Summary Table
FlowSet Template Record Data Record
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| | | Flow Data Record(s) |
| Data FlowSet | / | or |
| | | Options Data Record(s) |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Template FlowSet | Template Record(s) | / |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Options Template | Options Template | / |
| FlowSet | Record(s) | |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
A Data FlowSet is composed of an Options Data Record(s) or Flow Data
Record(s). No Template Record is included. A Template Record defines
the Flow Data Record, and an Options Template Record defines the
Options Data Record.
A Template FlowSet is composed of Template Record(s). No Flow or
Options Data Record is included.
An Options Template FlowSet is composed of Options Template
Record(s). No Flow or Options Data Record is included.
4. The Metering Process
The description of the Metering Process (for example, sampled or
not, aggregation or not), which is the way in which Flows are
created from the observed IP packets, is beyond the scope of this
document. Nevertheless, some aspects of the Metering Process have
some influences on the IPFIX protocol
4.1 Flow Expiration
A Flow is considered to be inactive if no packets belonging to the
Flow have been observed at the Observation Point for a given
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 9]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
timeout. If any packet is seen within the timeout, the flow is
considered an active Flow.
A Flow can be exported under the following conditions:
1. If the Metering Process can detect the end of a Flow. For
example, if the FIN or RST bit is detected in a TCP [3]
connection, the Flow Record is exported.
2. If the Flow has been inactive for a certain period of time.
This inactivity timeout SHOULD be configurable at the Metering
Process, with a minimum value of 0 for an immediate expiration.
3. For long-lasting Flows, the Exporting Process SHOULD export
the Flow Records on a regular basis. This timeout SHOULD be
configurable at the Metering Process.
4. If the Metering Process experiences internal constraints, a
Flow MAY be forced to expire prematurely; for example, counters
wrapping or low memory.
5. Transport Protocol
The IPFIX Protocol Specifications have been designed to be transport
protocol independent. It can operate over congestion-aware protocols
such as TCP [3] or SCTP [RFC2960].
Note that the Exporter can export to multiple Collecting Processes,
using independent transport protocols.
5.1 TCP
To be completed.
TCP [3]
5.2 STCP
This section describes how IPFIX can be transported over SCTP
[RFC2960] using traditional reliable mode.
IPFIX can also be transported over the partial reliable or
unreliable mode [PR-SCTP]. These last 2 modes will be briefly
discussed, while waiting for [PR-SCTP] to become a standard.
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 10]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
5.2.1 Congestion Avoidance
The SCTP transport protocol provides the required level of
congestion avoidance by design.
5.2.2 Reliability
The SCTP transport protocol is by default reliable, but has the
capability to operate in unreliable and partially reliable modes
[PR-SCTP].
Using reliable SCTP streams for the IPFIX export is not in itself a
guarantee that all records are delivered. If there is congestion on
the link from the exporter to the collector, or if a significant
amount of retransmissions are needed, the send queues on the
Exporting Process may fill up. In that case it's up to the Exporting
Process to decide what to do. It may either halt export (buffer the
data until there is space in the send queues again) or just throw
Export Packets away instead of inserting them into the send queue.
If any data is not inserted into the send queues, the sequence
numbers used for export must reflect the loss of data.
5.2.3 Exporting Process
5.2.3.1 MTU size
Each IPFIX Export Packet should be equal to or less than the local
MTU in size. When an IPFIX Export Packet is transmitted over a
network with an MTU smaller than the local MTU, IP fragmentation may
be used.
5.2.3.2 Source ID
The Export Packet must contain a Packet Header, which includes a
source id (SID). The SID indicates from which Observation Domain the
data is being exported, and should be kept unique for each such
domain.
If a Metering Process consists of a single Observation Domain, a
single SID value must be used for all Export Packets. The Exporting
Process will typically open one association to the collector, but
more are possible, in which one or more streams can be used. The
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 11]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Exporting Process has the choice of transmitting parts of the export
data in separate streams or all data in one stream.
If a Metering Process consists of multiple Observation Domains, one
SID value for each Observation Domain must be used. The Exporting
Process will typically open one association, but more are possible,
in which at least one stream per Observation Domain is used.
The Exporting Process has the choice of using more than one stream
per Observation Domain, but data from multiple Observation Domains
should not be transmitted over the same stream.
5.2.3.3 Association
The Exporting Process may create one or more associations
(connection "bundle" in SCTP terminology) to the Collecting Process.
The Collecting Process may not initiate the connection. Inside each
association one or more streams may be requested by the Exporting
Process. If the Collecting Process can not support the requested
number of streams, it may choose to refuse the connection and the
Exporting Process should try to reduce, if possible, the number of
streams needed to perform the export.
5.2.3.4 Template
An Observation Domain must use at least one stream, but may use
multiple streams, to export data records. The Observation Domain
must use the same SID value for all streams used.
An Exporting Process must not transmit packets with different SID
values in one stream, the Collecting Process should however verify
that the SID values are the expected values.
5.2.3.5 Template
Since the SCTP association is connection oriented the available
Template Records must be transmitted from each Observation Domain to
the Collecting Process immediately after the association is
established.
As a minimum the Template Records must be transmitted immediately
after they start to exist on the Metering Process and should
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 12]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
preferably be transmitted before any data, using the new Template
Record, have been transmitted. The Collecting Process should however
accept data without a Template Record.
When using a reliable mode for Template Record export, or if the
exporter knows that the Export Packet containing the templates was
positively acknowledged by the SCTP layer, it is not necessary to
periodically export the Template Records.
5.2.4 Collecting Process
The Collecting Process should listen for a new association request
from the Exporting Process. The Collecting Process will request a
number of streams to use for export. If the Collecting Process
doesn't support the number of streams inside the association, the
Collecting Process must refuse the connection and continue listen
for a new request.
When data is received from an association, the Collecting Process
must correlate data, with the same SID value, from multiple streams
into one export Flow from an Observation Domain. This allows the
Observation Domain to use separate streams for different types of
information.
The Collecting Process should verify that the received Export
Packets inside one stream does not have diverting SID values. The
Exporting Process must not export packets inside one stream with
multiple SID values. The correlated Flow Records are then treated
like a normal export Flow.
5.2.5 SCTP Partially Reliable
This mode will not be discussed any further until [PR-SCTP] becomes
a standard, even if this mode offers a few advantages:
freedom to use SCTP as a reliable, single stream transport, as well
as multiple streams with different properties, for example in terms
of reliability, carrying different data types dependant on their
importance for the system.
Unreliable or partial reliability may be chosen for one or more
streams inside an association. Unreliable transport may be preferred
where large amount of data is to be exported and keeping send queues
is either an unnecessary overhead or impractical. Partial
reliability may be chosen where a small amount of queuing is
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 13]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
possible.
Naturally it is better to send templates over a reliable stream and
send the data on an unreliable (or partial reliable) stream. When an
exporter handles data with different properties it might even be
preferable to send them over different streams according to those
properties.
Example: an Exporting Process can use two streams per Observation
Domain. A reliable stream could be used for exporting templates, to
reduce the likelihood of loss and to remove the need for blind
retransmissions, and a partial or unreliable stream for data, to
avoid buffering of large amounts of data.
6. Failover
When to fail over?
How to fail back?
How to ensure stability of the failover mechanism (prevent
oscillations)?
Does the exporter open connections to all the potential collectors
and keep them primed with template info?
6.1 Simple Failover based on the transport protocol
In case the transport protocol is connection oriented.
So in case of TCP [3] or SCTP [RFC2960].
To be completed.
6.2 Something else?
Potentially based on some application level ACK from the exporter?
7. Packet Layout
An Export Packet consists of a Packet Header followed by one or more
FlowSets. The FlowSets can be any of the possible three types:
Template, Data, or Options Template.
Export Packet:
+--------+-------------------------------------------+
| | +----------+ +---------+ +----------+ |
| Packet | | Template | | Data | | Options | |
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 14]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
| Header | | FlowSet | | FlowSet | | Template | ... |
| | | | | | | FlowSet | |
| | +----------+ +---------+ +----------+ |
+--------+-------------------------------------------+
A FlowSet ID is used to distinguish the different types of FlowSets.
FlowSet IDs lower than 256 are reserved for special FlowSets, such
as the Template FlowSet (ID 0) and the Options Template FlowSet (ID
1). The Data FlowSets have a FlowSet ID greater than 255.
The format of the Template, Data, and Options Template FlowSets will
be discussed later in this document. The Exporter MUST code all
fields of the different FlowSets in network byte order (big-endian).
Following are some examples of export packets:
1. An Export Packet consisting of interleaved Template, Data, and
Options Template FlowSets-A newly created Template is exported as
soon as possible. So if there is already an Export Packet with a
Data FlowSet that is being prepared for export, the Template and
Option FlowSets are also interleaved with this information, subject
to availability of space.
Export Packet:
+--------+--------------------------------------------------------+
| | +----------+ +---------+ +-----------+ +---------+ |
| Packet | | Template | | Data | | Options | | Data | |
| Header | | FlowSet | | FlowSet | ... | Template | | FlowSet | |
| | | | | | | FlowSet | | | |
| | +----------+ +---------+ +-----------+ +---------+ |
+--------+--------------------------------------------------------+
2. An Export Packet consisting entirely of Data FlowSets-After the
appropriate Template Records have been defined and transmitted to
the NetFlow Collector device, the majority of Export Packets
consists solely of Data FlowSets.
Export Packet:
+--------+----------------------------------------------+
| | +---------+ +---------+ +---------+ |
| Packet | | Data | ... | Data | ... | Data | |
| Header | | FlowSet | ... | FlowSet | ... | FlowSet | |
| | +---------+ +---------+ +---------+ |
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 15]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
+--------+----------------------------------------------+
3. An Export Packet consisting entirely of Template and Options
Template FlowSets-The Exporter MAY transmit a packet containing
Template and Options Template FlowSets periodically to help ensure
that the NetFlow Collector has the correct Template Records and
Options Template Records when the corresponding Flow Data records
are received.
Export Packet:
+--------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ |
| Packet | | Template | | Template | | Options | |
| Header | | FlowSet | ... | FlowSet | ... | Template | |
| | | | | | | FlowSet | |
| | +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ |
+--------+-------------------------------------------------+
8. Export Packet Format
8.1 Header Format
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version Number | Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| sysUpTime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| UNIX Secs |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Source ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Packet Header Field Descriptions
Version
Version of Flow Record format exported in this packet. The
value of this field is 0x0009 for the current version.
Count
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 16]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
The total number of records in the Export Packet, which is
the sum of Options FlowSet records, Template FlowSet
records, and Data FlowSet records.
SysUpTime
Time in milliseconds since this device was first booted.
Refer to [1].
UNIX Secs
Seconds since 0000 UTC 1970.
Sequence Number
Incremental sequence counter of all Export Packets sent from
the current Observation Domain by the Exporting Process.
This value MUST be cumulative, and SHOULD be used by the
Collector to identify whether any Export Packets have been
missed.
Source ID
A 32-bit value that identifies the Exporter Process
Observation Domain. Collecting Process SHOULD use the
combination of the source IP address and the Source ID field
to separate different export streams originating from the
same Exporting Process.
8.2 Template FlowSet Format
One of the essential elements in the IPFIX format is the Template
FlowSet. Templates greatly enhance the flexibility of the Flow
Record format because they allow the Collecting Process to process
Flow Records without necessarily knowing the interpretation of all
the data in the Flow Record.
The format of the Template FlowSet is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = 0 | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID 1 | Field Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Type 1 | Field Length 1 |
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 17]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Type 2 | Field Length 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Type N | Field Length N |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID 2 | Field Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Type 1 | Field Length 1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Type 2 | Field Length 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Type M | Field Length M |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID K | Field Count |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Template FlowSet Field Descriptions
FlowSet ID
FlowSet ID value of 0 is reserved for the Template FlowSet.
Length
Total length of this FlowSet. Because an individual Template
FlowSet MAY contain multiple Template Records, the Length
value MUST be used to determine the position of the next
FlowSet record, which could be any type of FlowSet. Length
is the sum of the lengths of the FlowSet ID, the Length
itself, and all Template Records within this FlowSet.
Template ID
Each of the newly generated Template Records is given a
unique Template ID. This uniqueness is local to the
Observation Domain that generated the Template ID.
Template IDs 0-255 are reserved for Template FlowSets,
Options FlowSets, and other reserved FlowSets yet to be
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 18]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
created. Template IDs of Data FlowSets are numbered from 256
to 65535.
Field Count
Number of fields in this Template Record. Because a Template
FlowSet usually contains multiple Template Records, this
field allows the Collecting Process to determine the end of
the current Template Record and the start of the next.
Field Type
A numeric value that represents the type of the field. Refer
to the "Field Type Definitions" section.
Field Length
The length of the corresponding Field Type, in bytes. Refer
to the "Field Type Definitions" section.
8.3 Data FlowSet Format
The format of the Data FlowSet is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = Template ID | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 1 - Field Value 1 | Record 1 - Field Value 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 1 - Field Value 3 | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 2 - Field Value 1 | Record 2 - Field Value 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 2 - Field Value 3 | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 3 - Field Value 1 | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... | Padding |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Data FlowSet Field Descriptions
FlowSet ID = Template ID
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 19]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Each Data FlowSet is associated with a FlowSet ID. The
FlowSet ID maps to a (previously generated) Template ID. The
Collecting Process MUST use the FlowSet ID to find the
corresponding Template Record and decode the Flow Records
from the FlowSet.
Length
The length of this FlowSet.
Length is the sum total of lengths of FlowSet ID, Length
itself, all Flow Records within this FlowSet, and the
padding bytes, if any.
Record N - Field Value M
The remainder of the Data FlowSet is a collection of Flow
Data Record(s), each containing a set of field types and
values. The Type and Length of the fields have been
previously defined in the Template Record referenced by the
FlowSet ID or Template ID.
Padding
The Exporting Process SHOULD insert some padding bytes so
that the subsequent FlowSet starts at a 4-byte aligned
boundary. It is important to note that the Length field
includes the padding bits.
Interpretation of the Data FlowSet format can be done only if the
Template FlowSet corresponding to the Template ID is available at
the Collecting Process.
9. Options
9.1 Options Template FlowSet Format
The Options Template Record (and its corresponding Options Data
Record) is used to supply information about the Metering Process
configuration or Metering Process specific data, rather than
supplying information about IP Flows.
For example, the Options Template FlowSet can report the sample rate
of a specific interface, if sampling is supported, along with the
sampling method used.
The format of the Options Template FlowSet follows.
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 20]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = 1 | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID | Option Scope Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option Length | Scope 1 Field Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope 1 Field Length | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope N Field Length | Option 1 Field Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option 1 Field Length | ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option M Field Length | Padding |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Options Template FlowSet Field Definitions
FlowSet ID = 1
A FlowSet ID value of 1 is reserved for the Options
Template.
Length
Total length of this FlowSet. Each Options Template FlowSet
MAY contain multiple Options Template Records. Thus, the
Length value MUST be used to determine the position of the
next FlowSet record, which could be either a Template
FlowSet or Data FlowSet.
Length is the sum total of lengths of FlowSet ID, the Length
itself, and all Options Template Records within this FlowSet
Template ID.
Template ID
Template ID of this Options Template. This value is greater
than 255.
Option Scope Length
The length in bytes of any Scope fields definition contained
in the Options Template Record (The use of "Scope" is
described below).
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 21]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Option Length
The length (in bytes) of any options field definitions
contained in this Options Template Record.
Scope 1 Field Type
The relevant portion of the Exporting Process/Metering
Process to which the Options Template Record refers.
Currently defined values are:
1 System
2 Interface
3 Line Card
4 Cache
5 Template
For example, the Metering Process can be implemented on a
per-interface basis, so if the Options Template Record were
reporting on how the NetFlow process is configured, the
Scope for the report would be 2 (interface). The associated
interface ID would then be carried in the associated Options
Data FlowSet. The Scope can be limited further by listing
multiple scopes that all must match at the same time. Note
that the Scope fields always precede the Option fields.
Scope 1 Field Length
The length (in bytes) of the Scope field, as it would appear
in an Options Data Record.
Option 1 Field Type
A numeric value that represents the type of field that would
appear in the Options Template Record. Refer to the Field
Type Definitions section.
Option 1 Field Length
The length (in bytes) of the Option Field.
Padding
The Exporting Process SHOULD insert some padding bytes so
that the subsequent FlowSet starts at a 4-byte aligned
boundary. It is important to note that the Length field
includes the padding bits.
9.2 Options Data Record Format
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 22]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
The Options Data Records are sent in Data FlowSets, on a regular
basis, but not with every Flow Data Record. How frequently these
Options Data Records are exported is configurable. See the Templates
Management" section for more details.
The format of the Data FlowSet containing Options Data Records
follows.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = Template ID | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 1 - Scope 1 Value |Record 1 - Option Field 1 Value|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Record 1 - Option Field 2 Value| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 2 - Scope 1 Value |Record 2 - Option Field 1 Value|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Record 2 - Option Field 2 Value| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Record 3 - Scope 1 Value |Record 3 - Option Field 1 Value|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Record 3 - Option Field 2 Value| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... | Padding |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Options Data Records of the Data FlowSet Field Descriptions
FlowSet ID = Template ID
A FlowSet ID precedes each group of Options Data Records
within a Data FlowSet. The FlowSet ID maps to a previously
generated Template ID corresponding to this Options Template
Record. The Collecting Process MUST use the FlowSet ID to
map the appropriate type and length to any field values that
follow.
Length
The length of this FlowSet.
Length is the sum of the lengths of the FlowSet ID, Length
itself, all the Options Data Records within this FlowSet,
and the padding bytes, if any.
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 23]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Record N - Option Field M Value
The remainder of the Data FlowSet is a collection of Flow
Records, each containing a set of scope and field values.
The type and length of the fields were previously defined in
the Options Template Record referenced by the FlowSet ID or
Template ID.
Padding
The Exporting Process SHOULD insert some padding bytes so
that the subsequent FlowSet starts at a 4-byte aligned
boundary. It is important to note that the Length field
includes the padding bits.
The Data FlowSet format can be interpreted only if the Options
Template FlowSet corresponding to the Template ID is available at
the Collecting Process.
10. Variable Length Data Type
Note: this section reflects the mailing list ideas but the wording
should be worked on.
In the Template Flowset (template definition), let's put FFFF for
the length of the variable length data types. Then, the actual
length is encoded in data Flowset (Flow Records) as follows:
- if length is < 255 bytes, the length is stored in 1 byte
- if length is >=255 bytes, 255 is stored in the first byte, and the
actual 16 bits length is stored in the next 2 bytes.
The cases of length of >= 255 will be very rear. And even in these
cases, one extra byte will represent <= 1/255-th part of data
record.
Why FFFF and not 0?
The reason for this is that FFFF is a truly invalid value which
should be caught in collectors, by good implementations, today. For
0 this isn't necessary the case as it's meaning is "just" pointless,
but not a course of concern for the collectors.
Basically FFFF should make the Collecting Process (current
implementations) discard the template as being invalid.
Note also that some option templates data types could potentially
have a length of 0.
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 24]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
So the advantages of this proposal are:
- code the length on 1 byte for most of the cases; in that case, we
use the 8 bits to code the length, so with a max of 254 bytes
(because 255 is reserved)
- if the length is above 254, we use 3 bytes, the last 2 bytes could
transport a length of max 64 k - 7 bytes (in the Data FlowSet, 2 for
the FlowSet ID + 2 for the FlowSet Length + 1 byte for "0xff" + 2
for the variable length)
11. Template Management
Flow Data records that correspond to a Template Record MAY appear in
the same and/or subsequent Export Packets. The Template Record is
not necessarily carried in every Export Packet. As such, the
Collecting Process MUST store the Template Record to interpret the
corresponding Flow Data Records that are received in subsequent data
packets.
A Collecting Process that receives Export Packets from several
Observation Domains from the same Exporter MUST be aware that the
uniqueness of the Template ID is not guaranteed across Observation
Domains.
The Template IDs must remain constant for the life of the Metering
Process and the Exporting Process. If the Exporting Process or the
Metering Process restarts for any reason, all information about
Templates will be lost and new Template IDs will be created.
Template IDs are thus not guaranteed to be consistent across an
Exporting Process or Metering Process restart.
A newly created Template record is assigned an unused Template ID
from the Exporter. If the template configuration is changed, the
current Template ID is abandoned and SHOULD NOT be reused until the
Metering Process. If a Collecting Process should receive a new
definition for an already existing Template ID, it MUST discard the
previous template definition and use the new one.
If a configured Template Record on the Exporting Process is deleted,
and re-configured with exactly the same parameters, the same
Template ID COULD be reused.
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 25]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
The Exporting Process sends the Template FlowSet and Options
Template FlowSet under the following conditions:
1. After a NetFlow process restarts, the Exporting Process MUST NOT
send any Data FlowSet without sending the corresponding Template
FlowSet and the required Options Template FlowSet in a previous
packet or including it in the same Export Packet. It MAY
transmit the Template FlowSet and Options Template FlowSet,
without any Data FlowSets, in advance to help ensure that the
Collector will have the correct Template Record before receiving
the first Flow or Options Data Record.
2. In the event of configuration changes, the Exporting Process
SHOULD send the new template definitions at an accelerated rate.
In such a case, it MAY transmit the changed Template Record(s)
and Options Template Record(s), without any data, in advance to
help ensure that the Collector will have the correct template
information before receiving the first data.
3. On a regular basis, the Exporting Process MUST send all the
Template Records and Options Template Records to refresh the
Collecting Process. Template IDs have a limited lifetime at the
Collecting Process and MUST be periodically refreshed.
Two approaches are taken to make sure that Templates get
refreshed at the Collecting Process:
* Every N number of Export Packets.
* On a time basis, so every N number of minutes.
Both options MUST be configurable by the user on the Exporting
Porcess.
When one of these expiry conditions is met, the Exporting
Process MUST send the Template FlowSet and Options Template.
12. The Collecting Process's Side
The Collecting Process receives Template Records from the Exporting
Process, normally before receiving Flow Data Records (or Options
Data Records). The Flow Data Records (or Options Data Records) can
then be decoded and stored locally on the devices. If the Template
Records have not been received at the time Flow Data Records (or
Options Data Records) are received, the Collecting Process SHOULD
store the Flow Data Records (or Options Data Records) and decode
them after the Template Records are received. A Collecting Process
device MUST NOT assume that the Data FlowSet and the associated
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 26]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Template FlowSet (or Options Template FlowSet) are exported in the
same Export Packet.
The Collecting Process MUST NOT assume that one and only one
Template FlowSet is present in an Export Packet.
The life of a template at the Collecting Process is limited to a
fixed refresh timeout. Templates not refreshed from the Exporting
Process within the timeout are expired at the Collecting Process.
The Collecting Process MUST NOT attempt to decode the Flow or
Options Data Records with an expired Template. At any given time the
Collecting Process SHOULD maintain the following for all the current
Template Records and Options Template Records: <Exporting Process,
Observation Domain, Template ID, Template Definition, Last Received>
Note that the Observation Domain is identified by the Source ID
field from the Export Packet.
Template IDs are unique per Exporting Process and per Observation
Domain.
If the Collecting Process receives a new Template Record (for
example, in the case of an Exporter restart) it MUST immediately
override the existing Template Record.
Finally, note that the Collector MUST accept padding in the Data
FlowSet and Options Template FlowSet, which means for the Flow Data
Records, the Options Data Records and the Template Records.
Refer to the terminology summary table in Section 3.1.
13. Examples
Let's consider the example of an Export Packet composed of a
Template FlowSet, a Data FlowSet (which contains three Flow Data
Records), an Options Template FlowSet and a Data FlowSet (which
contains 2 Options Data Records).
Export Packet:
+--------+---------------------------------------------. . .
| | +--------------+ +-----------------------+
| Packet | | Template | | Data |
| Header | | FlowSet | | FlowSet | . . .
| | | (1 Template) | | (3 Flow Data Records) |
| | +--------------+ +-----------------------+
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 27]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
+--------+---------------------------------------------. . .
. . .+-------------------------------------------------+
+------------------+ +--------------------------+ |
| Options | | Data | |
. . .| Template FlowSet | | FlowSet | |
| (1 Template) | | (2 Options Data Records) | |
+------------------+ +--------------------------+ |
. . .--------------------------------------------------+
13.1 Packet Header Example
The Packet Header is composed of:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Version = 0x0009 | Count = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| sysUpTime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| UNIX Secs |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Source ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
13.2 Template FlowSet Example
We want to report the following Field Types:
- The source IP address (IPv4), so the length is 4
- The destination IP address (IPv4), so the length is 4
- The next-hop IP address (IPv4), so the length is 4
- The number of bytes of the Flow
- The number of packets of the Flow
Therefore, the Template FlowSet will be composed of the following:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = 0 | Length = 28 bytes |
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 28]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID 256 | Field Count = 5 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| IP_SRC_ADDR = 0x0008 | Field Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| IP_DST_ADDR = 0x000C | Field Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| IP_NEXT_HOP = 0x000F | Field Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| IN_PKTS = 0x0002 | Field Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| IN_BYTES = 0x0001 | Field Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
13.3 Data FlowSet Example
In this example, we report the following three Flow records:
Src IP addr. | Dst IP addr. | Next Hop addr. | Packet | Bytes
| | | Number | Number
---------------------------------------------------------------
198.168.1.12 | 10.5.12.254 | 192.168.1.1 | 5009 | 5344385
192.168.1.27 | 10.5.12.23 | 192.168.1.1 | 748 | 388934
192.168.1.56 | 10.5.12.65 | 192.168.1.1 | 5 | 6534
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = 256 | Length = 64 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 198.168.1.12 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 10.5.12.254 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 192.168.1.1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 5009 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 5344385 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 192.168.1.27 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 10.5.12.23 |
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 29]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 192.168.1.1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 748 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 388934 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 192.168.1.56 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 10.5.12.65 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 192.168.1.1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 5 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 6534 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note that padding was not necessary in this example.
13.4 Options Template FlowSet Example
Per line card (the router being composed of two line cards), we want
to report the following Field Types:
- Total number of Export Packets
- Total number of exported Flows
The format of the Options Template FlowSet is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = 1 | Length = 24 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID 257 | Option Scope Length = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option Length = 8 | Scope 1 Field Type = 0x0003 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope 1 Field Length = 2 | TOTAL_EXP_PKTS_SENT = 41 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 | TOTAL_FLOWS_EXP = 42 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 | Padding |
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 30]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
13.5 Data FlowSet with Options Data Records Example
In this example, we report the following two records:
Line Card ID | Export Packet| Export Flow
------------------------------------------
Line Card 1 | 345 | 10201
Line Card 2 | 690 | 20402
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| FlowSet ID = 257 | Length = 14 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 1 | 345 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 10201 | 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 2 | 690 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 20402 | Padding |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
14. References
[1] R. Presuhn et al, "Management Information Base (MIB) for the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)" RFC 3418, December 2002
[2] J. Postel, "User Datagram Protocol" RFC 768, August 1980
[3] "TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL DARPA INTERNET PROGRAM PROTOCOL
SPECIFICATION" RFC 793, September 1981
[IPFIX-REQ] J. Quittek, T. Zseby, B. Claise, S. Zander,
"Requirements for IP Flow Information Export" draft-ietf-ipfix-reqs-
10.txt, June 2003
[IPFIX-ARCH] Sadasivan, G, Brownlee, N. "Architecture Model for IP
Flow Information Export" draft-ietf-ipfix-arch-01.txt", June 2003
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 31]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
[IPFIX-INFO] Calato, P, Meyer, J, Quittek, J, "Information Model for
IP Flow Information Export" draft-ietf-ipfix-info-01, August 2003
[IPFIX-PROTO] Claise, B, Fullmer, M, Calato, P, Penno, R, "IPFIX
Protocol Specifications", draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-00.txt, June
2003
[RFC2960] Stewart, R. (ed.) "Stream Control Transmission Protocol",
RFC 2960, October 2000
[PR-SCTP] Stewart, R, "SCTP Partial Reliability Extension", draft-
stewart-tsvwg-prsctp-04.txt
[NETFLOW9] Claise, B, et al "Cisco Systems NetFlow Services Export
Version 9", draft-claise-netflow-9-06.txt, October 2003
5. Acknowledgments
To be completed.
uthors Addresses
Benoit Claise
Cisco Systems
De Kleetlaan 6a b1
1831 Diegem
Belgium
Phone: +32 2 704 5622
E-mail: bclaise@cisco.com
Mark Fullmer
OARnet
2455 North Star Rd.
Columbus, Ohio 43221
Phone: +1 (614) 728-8100
Email: maf@eng.oar.net
Reinaldo Penno
Nortel Networks
2305 Mission College Blvd
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone: +1 408.565.3023
Email: rpenno@nortelnetworks.com
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 32]
IPFIX Protocol Specifications October 2003
Paul Calato
Riverstone Networks, Inc.
5200 Great America Parkway
Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
Phone: +1 (603) 557-6913
Email: calato@riverstonenet.com
Claise, et. al Standard Track [Page 33]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 08:36:29 |