One document matched: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-multisession-03.txt
Differences from draft-ietf-idr-bgp-multisession-02.txt
Network Working Group John G Scudder
Internet Draft Juniper Networks
Expiration Date: June 2007 Chandra Appanna
File name: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-multisession-03.txt Cisco Systems
January 2007
Multisession BGP
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-multisession-03.txt
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that
any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
Abstract
This specification augments "Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4" [MP-
BGP] by proposing a mechanism to allow multiple sessions to be used
between a given pair of BGP speakers. Each session is used to
transport routes for one or more AFI/SAFI. This provides an
alternative to the current [MP-BGP] approach of multiplexing routes
for all AFI/SAFI onto a single connection.
Use of this approach is expected to increase the robustness of the
BGP protocol as it is used to support more and more diverse AFI/SAFI.
Expires July 2007 [Page 1]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
1. Introduction
Most BGP [BGP, BGP-DRAFT] implementations only permit a single
ESTABLISHED connection to exist with each peer. More precisely, they
only permit a single ESTABLISHED connection for any given pair of IP
endpoints.
Multiprotocol BGP [MP-BGP] extends BGP to allow information for
multiple NLRI families and sub-families to be transported in BGP.
Routes for different families are distinguished by AFI and SAFI.
Routes for different families are commonly multiplexed onto a single
BGP session.
A common criticism of BGP is the fact that most malformed messages
cause the session to be terminated. While this behavior is necessary
for protocol correctness, one may observe that the protocol machinery
of a given implementation may only be defective with respect to a
given AFI/SAFI. Thus, it would be desirable to allow the session
related to that family to be terminated while leaving other AFI/SAFI
unaffected. As BGP is commonly deployed, this is not possible.
In this specification, we propose a mechanism by which multiple
transport sessions may be established between a pair of peers.
Each transport session can be used for one or more AFI/SAFI.
While AFI/SAFI based sessions is one way to group data being exchanged
between BGP peers it is also possible to concieve of sessions being
based on other characteristics of the BGP data. In this draft we also
propose a scheme for creating multiple BGP sessions between BGP peers
based on criteria other than AFI/SAFI. However, the definition of specific
criteria for grouping exchanged data into sessions is beyond the scope of
this proposal. The goal of this proposal is to provide a mechanism for
doing that if such criteria is available. For ease of understandability
and readability, AFI/SAFI will be used as an illustrative grouping
criteria through out the document.
Each session is distinct from a BGP protocol point of view; an error
or other event on one session has no implications for any other session.
All protocol modifications proposed by this specification take place
during the OPEN exchange phase of the session, there are no
modifications to the operation of the protocol once a session reaches
ESTABLISHED state.
Expires July 2007 [Page 2]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
Routers implementing this specification MUST also implement the base
criteria that is used to define sessions. For example if AFI/SAFI based
sessions are desired then peers implementing this specification MUST
also implement [MP-BGP].
2. Definitions
"MP-BGP capability" refers to the capability [BGP-CAP] with code 1,
specified in [MP-BGP] section 10.
A BGP speaker is said to "support" some feature or functionality (for
example, to support this specification, or to support a particular
AFI/SAFI) when the BGP implementation supports the feature AND the
feature has not been disabled by configuration.
The Session Identifier is a capability or group of capabilities that
will be used to differentiate individual BGP sessions between two IP
endpoints. When the AFI/SAFI is used to distinguish sessions, the MP-BGP
capability is the session identifier.
In this document the MP-BGP capability is used as a Session Identifier
for illustrative and explanatory purpose, i.e as the capability whose
values differentiates the multiple session between two IP endpoints.
MP-BGP and AFI/SAFI can be replaced by any other capability and the
values of that capability to setup multiple sessions, without any
modifications to the procedures described.
A pair of session indentifiers are said to conflict when considering the
two groups as two sets, there is an intersection between the groups either
in the capabilities or the values in the capabilities, but neither session
group is a subset of the other. For example, a pair of AFI/SAFI is said
to "conflict" when considering the two groups as two sets, there is an
intersection between the groups but neither group is a subset of the other.
Expires July 2007 [Page 3]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
3. Use of BGP Capability Advertisement
This specification defines the Multisession capability [BGP-CAP]:
Capability code (1 octet): TBD
Capability length (1 octet): variable
Capability value (1 octet): Flags followed by the list of capabilities
that define a session.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|G| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| One or more list of Capability codes (1 octet each) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The most significant bit is defined as the Grouping Support (G) bit.
It can be used to indicate support for the ability to group multiple
capabilty values into one session. When set (value 1) this bit indicates
that the BGP speaker supports grouping.
The remaining bits are reserved, and should be set to zero by the
sender and ignored by the receiver.
Following the reserved bits is a list of one or more Capability codes
defined in BGP. The capabilities listed here represent the session
identifier for sessions between the BGP speakers.
For example peers wishing to establish sessions based on AFI/SAFI would
exchange the Multiprotocol Extensions capability code (1) only in the
list. In this case the Multisession capability would have a length of
2 octets.
4. New NOTIFICATION Subcodes
[BGP, BGP-DRAFT] Section 4.5 provides a number of subcodes to the
NOTIFICATION message, and Section 6.2 elaborates on the use of those
subcodes.
Expires July 2007 [Page 4]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
This specification introduces two new subcodes:
OPEN Message Error subcodes:
7 - No Supported Capability Value.
8 - Grouping Conflict
9 - Grouping Required
The No Supported Capability Value code MAY be used when an OPEN message
contains one or more capabilities, none of which list an
capability supported by the local BGP speaker. It is observed that
this subcode may be useful for BGP speakers in general, even if
they do not (otherwise) implement this specification.
The Grouping Conflict code MAY be used when an OPEN message contains
several capabilities whose values conflict with one or more
capability groups configured on the local BGP speaker. The Data field
SHOULD indicate one of the conflicting locally-configured capability
groups, encoded as theh appropriate capabilities.
The Grouping Required code MAY be used when a BGP speaker which is
configured to require grouping attempts to establish a connection
with a BGP speaker which does not support grouping. (While it is
true that it might be possible to communicate much the same
information using the Unsupported Capability NOTIFICATION message,
this more explicit method is felt to be more transparent.)
If MP-BGP capability is used as the session identifier, the notification
codes could be used as follows:
The No Supported Capability Value code MAY be used when an OPEN message
contains one or more MP-BGP capabilities, none of which list an
AFI/SAFI supported by the local BGP speaker. It is observed that
this subcode may be useful for MP-BGP speakers in general, even if
they do not (otherwise) implement this specification.
The Grouping Conflict code MAY be used when an OPEN message contains
Expires July 2007 [Page 5]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
several MP-BGP capabilities whose AFI/SAFI conflict with one or more
AFI/SAFI groups configured on the local BGP speaker. The Data field
SHOULD indicate one of the conflicting locally-configured AFI/SAFI
groups, encoded as MP-BGP capabilities.
The Grouping Required code MAY be used when a BGP speaker which is
configured to require grouping attempts to establish a connection
with a BGP speaker which does not support grouping. (While it is
true that it might be possible to communicate much the same
information using the Unsupported Capability NOTIFICATION message,
this more explicit method is felt to be more transparent.)
The use of these subcodes is further elaborated below.
5. Overview of Operation
The operation section is divided into two main subsections.
The "Using Multisession" sections below discuss the BGP speaker's
behavior when the peer does support this specification or is assumed
to. The "Backward Compatibility" section discusses the BGP speaker's
behavior when the peer does not support this specification, or is
assumed not to. Both sections also discuss how to switch to the other
mode.
A BGP speaker which supports this specification SHOULD always
advertise the Multisession capability, regardless of its peer's known
or presumed capability set.
In all cases until a BGP speaker has initiated or accepted one connection
from a given peer, it is unknown whether the peer supports this
specification or not. Two strategies can be considered for making
this initial determination -- either the BGP speaker can initially
assume that the peer does not support this specification, and switch
modes if it is discovered that it does, or vice-versa. Either
approach is acceptable.
Again for illustration, section 5.0 describes the operation from the
point of view of the MP-BGP capability and the associated AFI/SAFI
values as the session identifier. It can be replaced with any other
capability or groups of capabilties without any changes to the behaviour
described below.
Expires July 2007 [Page 6]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
Note that if a BGP speaker only wishes to support a single AFI/SAFI
in its communications with a given peer only one session is needed in
any case, and so the "multisession" feature is moot. In such a case
the behavior required would be indistinguishable from that given in
the "backward compatibility" section below. In the illustrative examples
in the following sections, it is generally assumed that a BGP speaker
does wish to support multiple AFI/SAFI in its communications with a
given peer.
5.1. Using Multisession:
The following subsections discuss a BGP speaker's behavior towards a
peer which is known or assumed to support this specification.
5.1.1. Initiating Connections:
When a BGP speaker attempts BGP communication with its peer, it
initiates one connection per group of AFI/SAFI it wishes to support.
(This implies that a new local TCP port will be allocated for each
new connection.) The OPEN sent on each connection MUST include the
Multisession capability and one or more MP-BGP capabilities
indicating the AFI/SAFI to be supported on that session. If a non-
trivial group of AFI/SAFI (i.e., a group of two or more) is proposed,
the BGP speaker MUST also set the G bit of the Multisession
capability. Even if a trivial group of AFI/SAFI is proposed, the G
bit SHOULD be set if grouping is supported.
Note that any "group of AFI/SAFI" may be a singleton group, i.e. the
speaker may wish to use a separate BGP connection for each AFI/SAFI.
If the peer also supports this specification and also wishes to
support the AFI/SAFI in question, it will respond with an OPEN which
includes the Multisession capability and the AFI/SAFI included in the
active speaker's OPEN. If the active speaker's OPEN included a non-
trivial group of AFI/SAFI which the peer supports, then the peer's
Multisession capability will have the G bit set.
If the peer also supports this specification and wishes to support
some but not all of the AFI/SAFI in question, it will respond with an
OPEN which includes the Multisession capability and a subset of
Expires July 2007 [Page 7]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
AFI/SAFI included in the active speaker's OPEN. The reason for
listing only a subset may be because some of the AFI/SAFI are simply
not supported, or because the peer does not wish to support the
AFI/SAFI as a group (i.e. it may be configured to use a smaller
group). In this case, the BGP speaker MAY consider the set of
AFI/SAFI which were not included in the peer's OPEN to form a new
group, and MAY try to initiate a new session using that group.
If the peer also supports this specification but does not support
grouping, and a non-trivial group of AFI/SAFI has been proposed, then
it will respond as given in the previous paragraph but with the
additional proviso that the G bit will be clear. In this case, the
BGP speaker MAY accept the connection as given in the previous
paragraph, or it MAY reply with a NOTIFICATION message with ERROR
Code OPEN Message Error and Error Subcode Grouping Required, and the
connection will be closed.
If the peer does not wish to support the AFI/SAFI in question, it
will reply with a NOTIFICATION message with Error Code OPEN Message
Error, and Error Subcode No Supported Capability value, and the connection
will be closed.
A BGP speaker SHOULD NOT attempt to initiate connections for any
AFI/SAFI for which a connection already exists.
If the peer does not support this specification, it will respond with
an OPEN which does not include the Multisession capability. In this
case the connection SHOULD be terminated, and future connections to
the peer should be attempted in the "backward compatibility" mode
discussed below.
5.1.2. Accepting Connections:
When processing a connection attempt, the BGP speaker MUST wait until
the peer's OPEN message has been received before proceeding. This is
at variance with the behavior specified in the finite state machine
(FSM) of [BGP-DRAFT], but is interoperable with that FSM. The FSM
changes are specified in a later section.
Once the peer's OPEN message has been received, if it includes the
Multisession capability and one or more MP-BGP capabilities
indicating a group of AFI/SAFI which the BGP speaker wishes to
Expires July 2007 [Page 8]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
support, then the BGP speaker responds with an OPEN message which
includes the Multisession capability and one or more MP-BGP
capabilities indicating the same AFI/SAFI.
If the OPEN includes the Multisession capability and one or more MP-
BGP capabilities indicating a group of AFI/SAFI which conflicts with
an AFI/SAFI grouping that has been configured on the BGP speaker then
the BGP speaker MAY reply with an OPEN listing a set of AFI/SAFI
which intersect with those proposed by the peer (in effect overriding
the locally configured set) or it MAY close the connection with a
NOTIFICATION message with Error Code OPEN Message Error and Error
Subcode Grouping Conflict. The former behavior is suggested as the
default if grouping is supported.
If the BGP speaker does not support AFI/SAFI grouping it MAY reply
with an OPEN listing one of the AFI/SAFI out of those proposed by the
peer. It SHOULD also set the G bit in the Multisession capability to
zero.
If the received OPEN message does not include any MP-BGP capability
indicating an AFI/SAFI the BGP speaker wishes to support, it should
close the connection with a NOTIFICATION message with Error Code OPEN
Message Error and Error Subcode No Supported Capability Value.
If the received OPEN message does not include the Multisession
capability, then the peer does not support this specification. The
connection MAY be continued in the "backward compatibility" mode
discussed below, or it MAY be terminated and future connections to
the peer attempted in the "backward compatibility" mode.
5.1.3. Collision Detection, Graceful Restart:
[BGP, BGP-DRAFT] Section 6.8 (BGP connection collision detection)
considers a pair of connections to have collided if the source and
destination IP addresses of both connections match. With respect to
peers which support this specification, the AFI/SAFI groups
associated with the connections must also intersect for them to be
considered to have collided.
This consideration also applies to Section 6.2 of [BGP-GR], when
determining whether a new connection should be considered equivalent
to a reset of a previous TCP session.
Expires July 2007 [Page 9]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
5.2. Backward Compatibility:
This subsection discusses a BGP speaker's behavior towards a peer
which is known or assumed not to support this specification. In
short, the BGP speaker's behavior towards such a peer should be as
otherwise defined for the BGP protocol, according to [BGP, BGP-DRAFT]
and any other extension supported by the BGP speaker.
As previously mentioned, the BGP speaker SHOULD always advertise the
Multisession capability in its OPEN message, even towards "backward
compatibility" peers.
If, in opening a BGP connection with such a peer, an OPEN which
includes the Multisession capability is received from the peer, then
the peer SHOULD be changed to "multisession" mode. How this is done
depends on whether the BGP speaker has already sent an OPEN or not --
If the BGP speaker has not yet sent an OPEN to the peer, then the
connection MAY be continued in the "multisession" mode discussed
above, or it MAY be terminated and future connections to the peer
attempted in "multisession" mode.
If the BGP speaker has sent an OPEN to the peer, then the current
session SHOULD be terminated and future connections to the peer
attempted in "multisession" mode.
Use of techniques such as [BGP-DYN-CAP] for on-the-fly switching of
session modes are beyond the scope of this document.
6. State Machine
As mentioned under "accepting connections" above, this specification
modifies the BGP finite state machine, albeit in a backward-
compatible fashion.
In addition, note that one state machine is considered to exist for
each of the connections which may exist to a given peer. This
implies that, for example, any session flap dampening that may exist
is performed per session indetifier.
The specific state machine modifications to [BGP-DRAFT] Section 8.2.2
are as follows.
Expires July 2007 [Page 10]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
6.1. Modifications to Connect State and Active State
In the actions in response to the events Open Delay timer expires
[Event 12] and TCP connection succeeds [Event 16 or Event 17], an
OPEN is not sent and the state changes to WaitForOpen and not to
OpenSent.
6.2. Addition of WaitForOpen State, Deletion of OpenSent State
The WaitForOpen state is the same in all respects to OpenSent, except
for the action in response to reception of a valid OPEN message
[Event 19]. In that event, the local system sends an OPEN message
prior to sending a KEEPALIVE message.
The OpenSent state is deleted. All references to OpenSent are
replaced by references to WaitForOpen.
7. Discussion
Note that many BGP implementations already permit multiple sessions
to be used between a given pair of routers, typically by configuring
multiple IP addresses on each router and configuring each session to
be bound to a different IP address. The principal contribution of
this specification is to allow multiple sessions to be created
automatically, without additional configuration overhead or address
consumption.
The specification supports the simple case of one capability being used
as the session identifier and one connection per session identifier value.
It also permits connections be established based on the multiple
capabilties as a sessio identifier with multiple values per capability
grouped together per connection.
In the context of MP-BGP based connections, which we believe may be the
most prevalent use of this specification it permits supporting one
AFI/SAFI per connection, and also permits arbitrary grouping of AFI/SAFI
onto BGP connections. For such grouping to function pleasingly, both
peers participating in a connection need to agree on what AFI/SAFI
groupings will be used. If conflicting groupings are configured, the
connections may not establish, or more connections may be established
than were expected (in the degenerate case, one connection per AFI/SAFI
Expires July 2007 [Page 11]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
could be established despite configured groupings). We observe that
the potential for misbehavior in the presence of conflicting configuration
is not unusual in BGP, and that support for, and configuration of grouping
is purely optional.
8. Acknowledgements
To be supplied.
9. References
[BGP4]
Rekhter, Y. and T. Li, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)," RFC
1771, March 1995.
[BGP-DRAFT]
Rekhter, Y., T. Li and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4
(BGP-4)," Work in Progress (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-20), April 2003.
[MP-BGP]
Bates, T., R. Chandra, D. Katz, Y. Rekhter, "Multiprotocol Exten-
sions for BGP-4," Work in Progress (draft-ietf-idr-rfc2858bis-03),
July 2003.
[BGP-GR]
Sangli, S., Y. Rekhter, R. Fernando, J. Scudder, E. Chen, "Graceful
Restart Mechanism for BGP," Work in Progress (draft-ietf-idr-
restart-06), January 2003.
[BGP-CAP]
Chandra, R., J. Scudder, "Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4,"
RFC 2842, May 2000.
[BGP-DYN-CAP]
Chen, E. and S. Sangli, "Dynamic Capability for BGP-4," Work in
Progress (draft-ietf-idr-dynamic-cap-03), December 2002.
Expires July 2007 [Page 12]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
10. Security Considerations
This document introduces no new security vulnerabilities to BGP or
other specifications referenced in this document.
11. IANA Considerations
TBD
12. Authors' Addresses
John G. Scudder
Juniper Networks
Email: jgs@juniper.net
Chandrashekhar (Chandra) Appanna
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
e-mail: achandra@cisco.com
13. Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
Expires July 2007 [Page 13]
INTERNET DRAFT Multisession BGP January 2007
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
14. Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein
are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE
ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE
INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM
ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT
INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
15. Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2007). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except
as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Expires July 2007 [Page 14]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 01:44:50 |