One document matched: draft-ietf-avt-text-red-02.txt
Differences from draft-ietf-avt-text-red-01.txt
AVT Working Group
Internet Draft P. Jones
<draft-ietf-avt-text-red-02.txt> Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: August 2004 March 2004
Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed
and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
RFC 3668 (BCP 79).
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I accept the provisions of Section
3 of RFC 3667 (BCP 78).
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This document is a submission of the IETF AVT WG. Comments should be
directed to the AVT WG mailing list, avt@ietf.org.
[Note to RFC Editor: All references to RFC XXXX are to be replaced by
references to the RFC number of this memo when published.]
Abstract
This document defines the text/red MIME sub-type. The actual RTP
packetization for this MIME type is specified in RFC 2198.
1. Introduction
Text is an important component of any multimedia communication
system. Like audio, the transport of text can benefit from the use
Jones Expires - August 2004 [Page 1]
Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type March 2004
of redundancy in order to improve reliability and end-user
experience.
RFC 2198 [1] defines an RTP [2] payload format for redundant audio
data. The format defined in that document is quite suitable for
providing redundancy for text, as well as audio.
RFC 2793 [7] specifies one usage of RFC 2198 and the text/red MIME
type for the transport of redundant text data.
This memo provides the MIME sub-type registration information for
text/red. While this document focuses on the use of this MIME sub-
type in SDP [5], the application of this MIME sub-type is not
restricted to SDP.
2. Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3].
3. IANA Considerations
One new MIME sub-type is to be registered, as described below:
MIME media type name: text
MIME subtype name: RED
Required parameters:
rate: the RTP clock rate of the payload carried within the RTP
packet. Typically, this rate is 1000, but other rates MAY be
specified. This parameter MUST be set equal to the text
payload format carried as the primary encoding.
pt: a comma-separated ordered list of RTP payload types
enumerating the primary, secondary, etc., in accordance with
RFC 2198. Because comma is a special character, the list MUST
be a quoted-string (enclosed in double quotes). For static
payload types, each list element is simply the type number.
For dynamic payload types, each list element is a mapping of
the dynamic payload type number to an embedded MIME content-
type specification for the payload format corresponding to the
dynamic payload type. The format of the mapping is:
dynamic-payload-type "=" content-type
If the content-type string includes a comma, then the content-
type string MUST be a quoted-string. If the content-type
Jones Expires - August 2004 [Page 2]
Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type March 2004
string does not include a comma, it MAY still be quoted. Since
it is part of the list which must itself be a quoted-string,
that means the quotation marks MUST be quoted with backslash
quoting as specified in RFC 2045 [4]. If the content-type
string itself contains a quoted-string, then the requirement
for backslash quoting is recursively applied.
Optional parameters: ptime, maxptime
Encoding considerations:
This type is only defined for transfer via RTP.
Security considerations: Refer to section 5 of RFC XXXX.
Interoperability considerations: none
Published specification: RFC 2198
Applications which use this media type:
Text streaming and conferencing tools.
Additional information: none
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Paul E. Jones
E-mail: paulej@packetizer.com
Intended usage: COMMON
Author / Change controller:
Paul E. Jones | IETF avt WG
paulej@packetizer.com |
4. Mapping to SDP Parameters
The information carried in the MIME media type specification has a
specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
[5], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions. When SDP is
used to specify sessions employing the RFC 2198 in a text session,
the mapping is as follows:
- The MIME type ("text") goes in SDP "m=" as the media name.
- The value of the parameter "rate" goes in SDP "a=rtpmap".
- The MIME subtype (RED) goes in SDP "a=rtpmap"
as the encoding name.
- The parameters "ptime" and "maxptime" go in the SDP "a=ptime"
Jones Expires - August 2004 [Page 3]
Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type March 2004
and "a=maxptime" attributes, respectively.
- The pt parameter is mapped to an a=fmtp attribute by eliminating
the parameter name (pt) and changing the commas to slashes. For
example, 'pt="101,102"' maps to 'a=fmtp:99 101/102', where '99' is
the payload type of the redundancy frames. Note that the single
quote marks (') used in this example is not present in the
actual message encoding, but is present here only for readability.
Any dynamic payload type in the list MUST NOT include its content-
type only the payload type number. The mapping of payload types to
the content-type is done using the normal SDP procedures with
"a=rtpmap".
An example of SDP is:
m=text 11000 RTP/AVP 98 100
a=rtpmap:98 t140/1000
a=rtpmap:100 red/1000
a=fmtp:100 98/98
For each redundancy payload type defined, the ordering of the primary
and redundancy encoding(s) is fixed. If more than one combination of
primary and redundancy encoding(s) is desired, multiple redundancy
payload types needs to be defined.
5. Security Considerations
The security considerations listed in RFC 2198 apply. Further, it
should be understood that text data, perhaps even more so than audio
data, is susceptible to unwanted modification that may lead to
undesired results. To prevent modification of the primary, secondary
or header information, payload integrity protection over at least the
complete RTP packet is RECOMMENDED, for example using SRTP [8].
6. Normative References
[1] Perkins, C., et al., "RTP Payload for Redundant Audio Data", RFC
2198, September 1997.
[2] Schulzrinne, et al., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
Applications", RFC 3550, July 2003.
[3] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", RFC 2119, March 1997.
[4] Freed, N., Borenstein, N., "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies",
RFC 2045, November 1996.
Jones Expires - August 2004 [Page 4]
Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type March 2004
[5] Handley, M., Jackson, V., "SDP: Session Description Protocol",
RFC 2327, April 1998.
[6] Casner, S., Hoschka, P., "MIME Type Registration of RTP Payload
Formats", RFC 3555, July 2003.
7. Informative References
[7] Hellstrom, G., "RTP Payload for Text Conversation", RFC 2793,
May 2000.
[8] Baugher, et al., "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol", RFC
3711, March 2004.
8. Author's Address
Paul E. Jones
Cisco Systems, Inc.
7025 Kit Creek Rd.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Phone: +1 919 392 6948
Email: paulej@packetizer.com
9. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
Disclaimer
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
Jones Expires - August 2004 [Page 5]
Registration of the text/red MIME Sub-Type March 2004
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Jones Expires - August 2004 [Page 6]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-21 21:20:23 |