One document matched: draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-protocol-04.txt
Differences from draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-protocol-03.txt
Network Working Group M. Wahl
INTERNET-DRAFT Critical Angle Inc.
Replaces: RFC 1777 T. Howes
Netscape Communications Corp.
S. Kille
Isode Limited
Expires in six months from 25 March 1997
Intended Category: Standards Track
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3)
<draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-protocol-04.txt>
Table of Contents - see end of document.
1. Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and
its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working
documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ds.internic.net (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim).
2. Abstract
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access
to directories supporting the X.500 models, while not incurring the
resource requirements of the X.500 Directory Access Protocol (DAP). This
protocol is specifically targeted at management applications and browser
applications that provide read/write interactive access to directories.
When used with a directory supporting the X.500 protocols, it is
intended to be a complement to the X.500 DAP.
Key aspects of this version of LDAP are:
- All protocol elements of LDAPv2 (RFC 1777) are supported. The protocol
is carried directly over TCP or other transport, bypassing
much of the session/presentation overhead of X.500 DAP.
- Most protocol data elements can be encoded as ordinary strings
(e.g., Distinguished Names).
- Referrals to other servers may be returned.
- SASL and SSL mechanisms may be used with LDAP to provide connection
security services.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 1
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
- Attribute values and Distinguished Names have been internationalized
through the use of the ISO 10646 character set.
- The protocol can be extended to support new operations, and controls
may be used to extend existing operations.
- Schema may be published in the directory for use by clients.
3. Models
Interest in X.500 [1] directory technologies in the Internet has led to
efforts to reduce the high cost of entry associated with use of these
technologies. This document continues the efforts to define directory
protocol alternatives, updating the LDAP [2] protocol specification.
3.1. Protocol Model
The general model adopted by this protocol is one of clients
performing protocol operations against servers. In this model, a
client transmits a protocol request describing the operation to be
performed to a server. The server is then responsible for performing
the necessary operation(s) in the directory. Upon completion of
the operation(s), the server returns a response containing any results
or errors to the requesting client.
In keeping with the goal of easing the costs associated with use of
the directory, it is an objective of this protocol to minimize the
complexity of clients so as to facilitate widespread deployment of
applications capable of using the directory.
Note that although servers are required to return responses whenever
such responses are defined in the protocol, there is no requirement
for synchronous behavior on the part of either clients or servers.
Requests and responses for multiple operations may be exchanged
between a client and server in any order, provided the client
eventually receives a response for every request that requires one.
In LDAP versions 1 and 2, no provision was made for protocol servers
returning referrals to clients. However, for improved performance and
distribution this version of the protocol permits servers to return to
clients referrals to other servers. This allows servers to offload the
work of contacting other servers to progress operations.
Note that the core protocol operations defined in this document can be
mapped to a strict subset of the X.500(1997) directory abstract service,
so it can be cleanly provided by the DAP. However there is not a
one-to-one mapping between LDAP protocol operations and DAP operations:
server implementations acting as a gateway to X.500 directories may need
to make multiple DAP requests.
3.2. Data Model
This section provides a brief introduction to the X.500 data model, as
used by LDAP.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 2
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
The LDAP protocol assumes there are one or more servers which jointly
provide access to a Directory Information Tree (DIT). The tree is made
up of entries. Entries have names: one or more attribute values from the
entry form its relative distinguished name (RDN), which MUST be unique
among all its siblings. The concatenation of the relative distinguished
names of the sequence of entries from a particular entry to an immediate
subordinate of the root of the tree forms that entry's Distinguished
Name (DN), which is unique in the tree. An example of a Distinguished
Name is
CN=Steve Kille, O=Isode Limited, C=GB
Some servers may hold cache or shadow copies of entries, which can be
used to answer search and comparison queries, but will return referrals
or contact other servers if modification operations are requested.
Servers which perform caching or shadowing MUST ensure that they do not
violate any access control constraints placed on the data by the
originating server.
The largest collection of entries, starting at an entry that is mastered by
a particular server, and including all its subordinates and their
subordinates, down to the entries which are mastered by different servers,
is termed a naming context. The root of the DIT is a DSA-specific Entry
(DSE) and not part of any naming context: each server has different
attribute values in the root DSE.
3.2.1. Attributes of Entries
Entries consist of a set of attributes. An attribute is a type with
one or more associated values. The attribute type is identified by a
short descriptive name and an OID (object identifier). The attribute
type governs the maximum number of values permissible for an attribute of
that type in an entry, the syntax to which the values must conform, the
kinds of matching which can be performed on values of that attribute, and
other functions.
An example of an attribute is "mail". There may be one or more values
of this attribute, they must be IA5 strings, and they are case
insensitive (e.g. "foo@bar.com" will match "FOO@BAR.COM").
Each entry MUST have an objectClass attribute. The objectClass
attribute specifies the object classes of an entry, which along with
the system and user schema determine the permitted attributes of an entry.
Values of this attribute may be modified by clients, but the objectClass
attribute cannot be removed. Servers may restrict the modifications of
this attribute to prevent the basic structural class of the entry from
being changed (e.g. one cannot change a person into a country).
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 3
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Some attributes, termed operational attributes, are used by servers for
administering the directory system itself. They are not returned in
search results unless explicitly requested by name. Attributes which
are not operational, such as "mail", will have their schema and syntax
constraints enforced by servers, but servers will generally not make use
of their values.
Servers MUST NOT permit clients to add attributes to an entry unless
those attributes are permitted by the object class definitions, the
schema controlling that entry (specified in the subschema - see
below), or are operational attributes known to that server and used for
administrative purposes. Note that there is a particular objectClass
'extensibleObject' defined in [5] which permits all user attributes
to be present in an entry.
Entries may contain, among others, the following operational attributes,
defined in [5]. These attributes are maintained automatically by the
server and are not modifiable by clients:
- creatorsName: the Distinguished Name of the user who added this entry
to the directory.
- createTimestamp: the time this entry was added to the directory.
- modifiersName: the Distinguished Name of the user who last modified
this entry.
- modifyTimestamp: the time this entry was last modified.
- subschemaSubentry: the Distinguished Name of the subschema entry
which controls the schema for this entry.
Servers may implement other operational attributes.
3.2.2. Subschema Entries
Subschema entries are used for administering information about the
directory schema, in particular the object classes and attribute types
supported by directory servers. A single subschema entry contains
all schema definitions used by entries in a particular part of the
directory tree.
A server which masters entries and permits clients to modify these
entries MUST implement and provide access to these subschema entries,
so that its clients may discover the attributes and object classes which
are permitted to be present. It is strongly recommended that all other
servers implement this as well.
The following four attributes MUST be present in all subschema entries:
- cn: this attribute MUST be used to form the RDN of the subschema
entry.
- objectClass: the attribute MUST have at least the values "top" and
"subschema".
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 4
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
- objectClasses: each value of this attribute specifies an object class
known to the server.
- attributeTypes: each value of this attribute specifies an attribute
type known to the server.
These are defined in [5]. Other attributes may be present in subschema
entries, to reflect additional supported capabilities. These include
matchingRules, matchingRuleUse, dITStructureRules, dITContentRules
and nameForms.
Servers SHOULD provide the attributes createTimestamp and modifyTimestamp
in subschema entries, in order to allow clients to maintain their caches of
schema information.
Servers which follow X.500(93) models may implement subschema using the
X.500 subschema mechanisms. LDAP clients MUST NOT assume that servers
implement any of the other aspects of X.500 subschema.
Clients MUST only retrieve attributes from a subschema entry by requesting
a base object search of the entry, where the search filter is
"(objectClass=subschema)". (This will allow LDAPv3 servers which gateway
to X.500 to detect that subentry information is being requested.)
3.3. Relationship to X.500
This document defines LDAP in terms of X.500 as an X.500 access
mechanism. An LDAP server MUST act in accordance with the
X.500(1993) series of ITU recommendations when providing the service.
However, it is not required that an LDAP server make use of any X.500
protocols in providing this service, e.g. LDAP can be mapped onto any
other directory system so long as the X.500 data and service model as
used in LDAP is not violated in the LDAP interface.
3.4. Server-specific Data Requirements
An LDAP server MUST provide information about itself and other
information that is specific to each server. This is represented as a
number of attributes located in the root DSE (DSA-Specific Entry),
which is named with the zero-length LDAPDN. These attributes
are retrievable if a client performs a base object search of the
root with filter "(objectClass=*)", however they are subject to
access control restrictions.
The root DSE MUST NOT be included if the client performs a subtree search
starting from the root.
Servers may allow clients to modify these attributes.
The following attributes of the root DSE are defined in section 5.1.3 of
[5]. Additional attributes may be defined in later documents.
- namingContexts: naming contexts held in the server. Naming contexts
are defined in section 17 of X.501 [6].
- subschemaSubentry: subschema subentries known by this server.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 5
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
- altServer: alternative servers in case this one is later unavailable.
- supportedExtension: list of supported extended operations.
- supportedControl: list of supported controls.
- supportedSASLMechanisms: list of supported SASL security features.
- supportedLDAPVersion: LDAP versions implemented by the server.
If the server does not master entries and does not know the locations of
schema information, the subschemaSubentry attribute is not present
in the root DSE. If the server masters directory entries under one or
more schema rules, there may be any number of values of the
subschemaSubentry attribute in the root DSE.
4. Elements of Protocol
The LDAP protocol is described using Abstract Syntax Notation 1 (ASN.1) [3],
and is typically transferred using a subset of ASN.1 Basic Encoding Rules
[11]. In order to support future extensions to this protocol, clients and
servers MUST ignore elements of SEQUENCEs whose tags they do not
recognize.
Note that unlike X.500, each change to the LDAP protocol other than through
the extension mechanisms will have a different version number. A client
will indicate the version it supports as part of the bind request,
described in section 4.2. If a client has not sent a bind, the server
MUST assume that version 3 is supported in the client (since version 2
required that the client bind first).
Clients may determine the protocol version a server supports by reading
the supportedLDAPVersion attribute from the root DSE. Servers which
implement version 3 or later versions MUST provide this attribute.
Servers which only implement version 2 may not provide this attribute.
4.1. Common Elements
This section describes the LDAPMessage envelope PDU format, as well as
data type definitions which are used in the protocol operations.
4.1.1. Message Envelope
For the purposes of protocol exchanges, all protocol operations are
encapsulated in a common envelope, the LDAPMessage, which is defined
as follows:
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 6
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
LDAPMessage ::= SEQUENCE {
messageID MessageID,
protocolOp CHOICE {
bindRequest BindRequest,
bindResponse BindResponse,
unbindRequest UnbindRequest,
searchRequest SearchRequest,
searchResEntry SearchResultEntry,
searchResDone SearchResultDone,
searchResRef SearchResultReference,
modifyRequest ModifyRequest,
modifyResponse ModifyResponse,
addRequest AddRequest,
addResponse AddResponse,
delRequest DelRequest,
delResponse DelResponse,
modDNRequest ModifyDNRequest,
modDNResponse ModifyDNResponse,
compareRequest CompareRequest,
compareResponse CompareResponse,
abandonRequest AbandonRequest,
extendedReq ExtendedRequest,
extendedResp ExtendedResponse },
controls [0] Controls OPTIONAL }
MessageID ::= INTEGER (0 .. maxInt)
maxInt INTEGER ::= 2147483647 -- (2^^31 - 1) --
The function of the LDAPMessage is to provide an envelope containing
common fields required in all protocol exchanges. At this time the
only common fields are the message ID and the controls.
If the server receives a PDU from the client in which the LDAPMessage
SEQUENCE tag cannot be recognized, the messageID cannot be parsed,
the tag of the protocolOp is not recognized as a request, or the
encoding structures or lengths of data fields are found to be incorrect,
then the server MUST return the notice of disconnection described in
section 4.4.1, with resultCode protocolError, and immediately close the
connection. In other cases that the server cannot parse the request
received by the client, the server MUST return an appropriate response to
the request, with the resultCode set to protocolError.
If the client receives a PDU from the server which cannot be parsed,
the client may discard the PDU, or may abruptly close the connection.
The ASN.1 type Controls is defined in section 4.1.12.
4.1.1.1. Message ID
All LDAPMessage envelopes encapsulating responses contain the messageID
value of the corresponding request LDAPMessage.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 7
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
The message ID of a request MUST have a value different from the values of
any other requests outstanding in the LDAP session of which this message
is a part.
A client MUST NOT send a second request with the same message ID as an
earlier request on the same connection if the client has not received the
final response from the earlier request. Otherwise the behavior is
undefined. Typical clients increment a counter for each request.
A client MUST NOT reuse the message id of an abandonRequest or of the
abandoned operation until it has received a response from the server for
another request invoked subsequent to the abandonRequest, as the
abandonRequest itself does not have a response.
4.1.2. String Types
The LDAPString is a notational convenience to indicate that, although
strings of LDAPString type encode as OCTET STRING types, the ISO 10646
[13] character set (a superset of Unicode) is used, encoded following the
UTF-8 algorithm [14]. Note that in the UTF-8 algorithm characters which
are the same as ASCII (0x0000 through 0x007F) are represented as that same
ASCII character in a single byte. The other byte values are used to form
a variable-length encoding of an arbitrary character.
LDAPString ::= OCTET STRING
The LDAPOID is a notational convenience to indicate that the permitted
value of this string is a (UTF-8 encoded) dotted-decimal representation of
an OBJECT IDENTIFIER.
LDAPOID ::= OCTET STRING
For example,
1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.1.2.3
4.1.3. Distinguished Name and Relative Distinguished Name
An LDAPDN and a RelativeLDAPDN are respectively defined to be the
representation of a Distinguished Name and a Relative Distinguished
Name after encoding according to the specification in [4], such that
<distinguished-name> ::= <name>
<relative-distinguished-name> ::= <name-component>
where <name> and <name-component> are as defined in [4].
LDAPDN ::= LDAPString
RelativeLDAPDN ::= LDAPString
Only Attribute Types can be present in a relative distinguished name
component; the options of Attribute Descriptions (next section)
MUST NOT be used in specifying distinguished names.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 8
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.1.4. Attribute Type
An AttributeType takes on as its value the textual string associated
with that AttributeType in its specification.
AttributeType ::= LDAPString
Each attribute type has a unique OBJECT IDENTIFIER which has been
assigned to it. This identifier may be written as decimal digits
with components separated by periods, e.g. "2.5.4.10".
A specification may also assign one or more textual names for an
attribute type. These names MUST begin with a letter, and only
contain ASCII letters, digit characters and hyphens. They are case
insensitive. (These ASCII characters are identical to ISO 10646
characters whose UTF-8 encoding is a single byte between 0x00 and 0x7F.)
If the server has a textual name for an attribute type, it MUST use
that name for attributes returned in search results. The dotted-decimal
OBJECT IDENTIFIER is only used if there is no textual name for an
attribute type.
Attribute type names are non-unique, as two different specifications
may choose the same name.
A server which masters or shadows entries SHOULD list all the attribute
types it supports in the subschema entries, using the attributeTypes
attribute. Servers which support an open-ended set of attributes
SHOULD include at least the attributeTypes value for the 'objectClass'
attribute. Clients MAY retrieve the attributeTypes value from subschema
entries in order to obtain the OBJECT IDENTIFIER and other information
associated with attribute types.
Some attribute type names which are used in this version of LDAP are
described in [5]. Servers may implement additional attribute types.
4.1.5. Attribute Description
An AttributeDescription is a superset of the definition of the
AttributeType. It has the same ASN.1 definition, but allows additional
options to be specified. They are also case insensitive.
AttributeDescription ::= LDAPString
A value of AttributeDescription is based on the following BNF:
<AttributeDescription> ::= <AttributeType> [ ";" <options> ]
<options> ::= <option> | <option> ";" <options>
<option> ::= <opt-char> <opt-char>*
<opt-char> ::= ASCII-equivalent letters, numbers and hyphen
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 9
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Examples of valid AttributeDescription:
cn
userCertificate;binary
One option, "binary", is defined in this document. Additional documents
may define other options.
An AttributeDescription with one or more options is treated as a subtype
of the attribute without any options. Options present in an
AttributeDescription are never mutually exclusive. Implementations
should generate the <options> list sorted in ascending order, and servers
MUST treat any two AttributeDescription with the same AttributeType and
options as equivalent. A server will treat an AttributeDescription with
any options it does not implement as an unrecognized attribute type.
The data type "AttributeDescriptionList" describes a list of 0 or more
attribute types. (A list of zero elements has special significance in
the Search request.)
AttributeDescriptionList ::= SEQUENCE OF
AttributeDescription
4.1.5.1. Binary Option
If the "binary" option is present in an AttributeDescription, it overrides
any string-based encoding representation defined for that attribute in [5].
Instead the attribute is to be transferred as a binary value encoded using
the Basic Encoding Rules [11]. The syntax of the binary value is an
ASN.1 data type definition which is referenced by the "SYNTAX" part of the
attribute type definition.
The presence or absence of the "binary" option only affects the transfer
of attribute values in protocol; servers store any particular attribute
in a single format. If a client requests that a server return an attribute
in the binary format, but the server cannot generate that format, the
server MUST treat this attribute type as an unrecognized attribute type.
Similarly, clients MUST NOT expect servers to return an attribute in
binary format if the client requested that attribute by name without the
binary option.
This option is intended to be used with attributes whose syntax is a
complex ASN.1 data type, and the structure of values of that type is
needed by clients. Examples of this kind of syntax are "Certificate" and
"CertificateList".
4.1.6. Attribute Value
A field of type AttributeValue takes on as its value either a string
encoding of a AttributeValue data type, or an OCTET STRING containing
an encoded binary value, depending on whether the "binary" option is
present in the companion AttributeDescription to this AttributeValue.
The definition of string encodings for different syntaxes and types may
be found in other documents, and in particular [5].
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 10
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
AttributeValue ::= OCTET STRING
Note that there is no defined limit on the size of this encoding; thus
PDUs including multi-megabyte attributes (e.g. photographs) may be
returned.
Attributes may be defined which have arbitrary and non-printable syntax.
Implementations MUST NEITHER simply display nor attempt to decode as
ASN.1 a value if its syntax is not known. The implementation may attempt
to discover the subschema of the source entry, and retrieve the values of
attributeTypes from it.
4.1.7. Attribute Value Assertion
The AttributeValueAssertion type definition is similar to the one in
the X.500 directory standards. It contains an attribute description
and an equality matching rule assertion value suitable for that type.
AttributeValueAssertion ::= SEQUENCE {
attributeDesc AttributeDescription,
assertionValue AssertionValue }
AssertionValue ::= OCTET STRING
If the "binary" option is present in attributeDesc, this signals to the
server that the assertionValue is a binary encoding of the assertion
value.
For all the string-valued user attributes described in [5], the assertion
value syntax is the same as the value syntax. Clients may use
attribute values as assertion values in compare requests and search
filters.
Note however that the assertion syntax may be different from the value
syntax for operational attributes or for non-equality matching rules.
These attributes may have an assertion syntax which contains only part
of the value. See section 20.2.1.8 of X.501 [6] for examples.
4.1.8. Attribute
An attribute consists of a type and one or more values of that type.
(Though attributes MUST have at least one value when stored, due to
access control restrictions the set may be empty when transferred
in protocol. This is described in section 4.5.2, concerning the
PartialAttributeList type.)
Attribute ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
The order of attribute values within the vals set is undefined and
implementation-dependent, and MUST NOT be relied upon.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 11
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.1.9. Matching Rule Identifier
An X.501(1993) Matching Rule is identified in the LDAP protocol by the
printable representation of its OBJECT IDENTIFIER, either as one of the
strings given in [5], or as decimal digits with components separated by
periods, e.g. "caseIgnoreIA5Match" or "1.3.6.1.4.1.453.33.33".
MatchingRuleId ::= LDAPString
Servers which support matching rules for use in extensibleMatch MUST
list the matching rules they implement in subschema entries. This is
done with the matchingRules and matchingRuleUse attributes.
4.1.10. Result Message
The LDAPResult is the construct used in this protocol to return
success or failure indications from servers to clients. In response
to various requests servers will return responses containing fields
of type LDAPResult to indicate the final status of a protocol
operation request.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 12
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
LDAPResult ::= SEQUENCE {
resultCode ENUMERATED {
success (0),
operationsError (1),
protocolError (2),
timeLimitExceeded (3),
sizeLimitExceeded (4),
compareFalse (5),
compareTrue (6),
authMethodNotSupported (7),
strongAuthRequired (8),
-- 9 reserved --
referral (10), -- new
adminLimitExceeded (11), -- new
unavailableCriticalExtension (12), -- new
-- 13-15 unused --
noSuchAttribute (16),
undefinedAttributeType (17),
inappropriateMatching (18),
constraintViolation (19),
attributeOrValueExists (20),
invalidAttributeSyntax (21),
-- 22-31 unused --
noSuchObject (32),
aliasProblem (33),
invalidDNSyntax (34),
-- 35 reserved for undefined isLeaf --
aliasDereferencingProblem (36),
-- 37-47 unused --
inappropriateAuthentication (48),
invalidCredentials (49),
insufficientAccessRights (50),
busy (51),
unavailable (52),
unwillingToPerform (53),
loopDetect (54),
-- 55-63 unused --
namingViolation (64),
objectClassViolation (65),
notAllowedOnNonLeaf (66),
notAllowedOnRDN (67),
entryAlreadyExists (68),
objectClassModsProhibited (69),
-- 70 reserved for CLDAP --
affectsMultipleDSAs (71), -- new
-- 72-79 unused --
other (80) },
-- 81-90 reserved for APIs --
matchedDN LDAPDN,
errorMessage LDAPString,
referral [3] Referral OPTIONAL }
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 13
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
All the result codes with the exception of success, compareFalse and
compareTrue are to be treated as meaning the operation could not be
completed in its entirety.
Most of the result codes are based on problem indications from X.511
error data types. Result codes from 16 to 21 indicate an AttributeProblem,
codes 32, 33, 34 and 36 indicate a NameProblem, codes 48, 49 and 50
indicate a SecurityProblem, codes 51 to 54 indicate a ServiceProblem,
and codes 64 to 69 and 71 indicates an UpdateProblem.
If a client receives a result code which is not listed above, it is to be
treated as an unknown error condition.
The errorMessage field of this construct may, at the server's option,
be used to return a string containing a textual, human-readable (terminal
control and page formatting characters should be avoided) error diagnostic.
As this error diagnostic is not standardized, implementations MUST NOT rely
on the values returned. If the server chooses not to return a textual
diagnostic, the errorMessage field of the LDAPResult type MUST contain a
zero length string.
For result codes of noSuchObject, aliasProblem, invalidDNSyntax
and aliasDereferencingProblem, the matchedDN field is set to
the name of the lowest entry (object or alias) in the directory that was
matched. If no aliases were dereferenced while attempting to locate
the entry, this will be a truncated form of the name provided, or if
aliases were dereferenced, of the resulting name, as defined in section 12.5
of X.511 [15]. The matchedDN field is to be set to a zero length string
with all other result codes.
4.1.11. Referral
The referral field is present in an LDAPResult if the
LDAPResult.resultCode field value is referral, and absent with all other
result codes. It contains a reference to another server (or set of
servers) which may be accessed via LDAP or other protocols. Referrals
can be returned in responses to any operation request (except unbind and
abandon which do not have responses). At least one LDAPURL MUST be
present in the reference.
Referral ::= SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL
LDAPURL ::= LDAPString -- limited to characters permitted in URLs
The client MUST contact one of the listed URLs [7] of servers to
continue the request. Each server in the list MUST be capable of
processing the operation and presenting a consistent view of the directory
to the client, so the client may choose any URL in the list. (The
mechanisms for how servers achieve this are outside the scope of this
document.)
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 14
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
URLs for servers implementing the LDAP protocol are written according
to [9]. If an alias was dereferenced, the <dn> part of the URL MUST
be present, with the new target object name. If this is present,
the client MUST use this name in its next request to progress the operation,
and if it is not present the client will use the same name as in the
original request. Some servers (e.g. participating in distributed indexing)
may provide an different filter in a referral for a search operation. If
the filter part of the URL is present in an LDAPURL, the client MUST use
this filter in its next request to progress this search, and if it is not
present the client MUST use the same filter as it used for that search.
Note that UTF-8 characters appearing in a DN or search filter may not
be legal for URLs (e.g. spaces) and MUST be escaped using the % method
in RFC 1738.
Other kinds of URLs may be returned, so long as the operation could be
performed using that protocol.
4.1.12. Controls
A control is a way to specify extension information. Controls which are
sent as part of a request apply only to that request and are not saved.
Controls ::= SEQUENCE OF Control
Control ::= SEQUENCE {
controlType LDAPOID,
criticality BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
controlValue OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
The controlType field MUST be a UTF-8 encoded dotted-decimal representation
of an OBJECT IDENTIFIER which uniquely identifies the control. This
prevents conflicts between control names.
The criticality field is either TRUE or FALSE.
If the server recognizes the control type and it is appropriate for the
operation, the server will make use of the control when performing the
operation.
If the server does not recognize the control type and the criticality
field is TRUE, the server MUST NOT perform the operation, and MUST instead
return the resultCode unsupportedCriticalExtension.
If the control is not appropriate for the operation and criticality field
is TRUE, the server MUST NOT perform the operation, and MUST instead
return the resultCode unsupportedCriticalExtension.
If the control is unrecognized or inappropriate but the criticality field
is FALSE, the server MUST ignore the control.
The controlValue contains any information associated with the control,
and its format is defined for the control. The server MUST be prepared
to handle arbitrary contents of the controlValue octet string, including
zero bytes. It is absent only if there is no value information which
is associated with a control of its type.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 15
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
This document does not define any controls. Controls may be defined in
later documents. The definition of a control consists of:
- the OBJECT IDENTIFIER assigned to the control,
- whether the control is always noncritical, always critical, or
critical at the client's option,
- the format of the controlValue contents of the control.
Servers list the controls which they recognize in the supportedControl
attribute in the root DSE.
4.2. Bind Operation
The function of the Bind Operation is to allow authentication information
to be exchanged between the client and server.
The Bind Request is defined as follows:
BindRequest ::= [APPLICATION 0] SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER (1 .. 127),
name LDAPDN,
authentication AuthenticationChoice }
AuthenticationChoice ::= CHOICE {
simple [0] OCTET STRING,
-- 1 and 2 reserved
sasl [3] SaslCredentials }
SaslCredentials ::= SEQUENCE {
mechanism LDAPString,
credentials OCTET STRING }
Parameters of the Bind Request are:
- version: A version number indicating the version of the protocol to
be used in this protocol session. This document describes version
3 of the LDAP protocol. Note that there is no version negotiation,
and the client just sets this parameter to the version it desires.
If the client requests protocol version 2, a server that supports
the version 2 protocol as described in [2] will not return any
v3-specific protocol fields. (Note that not all LDAP servers will
support protocol version 2, since they may be unable to generate
the attribute syntaxes associated with version 2.)
- name: The name of the directory object that the client wishes to
bind as. This field may take on a null value (a zero length
string) for the purposes of anonymous binds, when authentication
has been performed at a lower layer, or when using SASL credentials
with a mechanism that includes the LDAPDN in the credentials.
- authentication: information used to authenticate the name, if any,
provided in the Bind Request.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 16
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Upon receipt of a Bind Request, a protocol server will authenticate
the requesting client, if necessary. The server will then return a
Bind Response to the client indicating the status of the authentication.
4.2.1. Sequencing of the Bind Request
For some authentication mechanisms, it may be necessary for the client
to invoke the BindRequest multiple times. If at any stage the client
wishes to abort the bind process it MAY unbind and MUST drop the underlying
connection. Clients MUST NOT invoke operations between two Bind requests
made as part of a multi-stage bind.
Unlike LDAP v2, the client need not send a Bind Request in the first
PDU of the connection. The client may request any operations and the
server MUST treat these as unauthenticated (unless authentication has
already occurred at a lower layer). If the server requires that the
client bind first, the server MUST reject any request other than
binding or unbinding with the "operationsError" result.
If the client did not bind before sending a request and receives an
operationsError, it may then send a Bind Request. If this also fails
or the client chooses not to bind on the existing connection, it will
close the connection, reopen it and begin again by first sending a PDU
with a Bind Request. This will aid in interoperating with servers
implementing other versions of LDAP.
Clients MAY send multiple bind requests on a connection to change
their credentials. A subsequent bind process has the effect of abandoning
all operations outstanding on the connection. (This simplifies server
implementation.) Authentication from earlier binds are subsequently
ignored, and so if the bind fails, the connection will be treated as
anonymous. If a SASL transfer encryption or integrity mechanism has been
negotiated, and that mechanism does not support the changing of
credentials from one identity to another, then the client MUST instead
establish a new connection.
4.2.2. Authentication and Other Security Services
The simple authentication option provides minimal authentication
facilities, with the contents of the authentication field consisting
only of a cleartext password. Note that the use of cleartext passwords
is not recommended over open networks when there is no authentication or
encryption being performed by a lower layer; see the "Security
Considerations" section.
If no authentication is to be performed, or has been performed at a
lower layer, then the simple authentication option MUST be chosen,
and the password be of zero length. (This is often done by LDAPv2
clients.)
The sasl choice allows for any mechanism defined for use with SASL [12]
The mechanism field contains the name of the mechanism. The credentials
field contains the arbitrary data used for authentication, inside an
OCTET STRING wrapper. Note that unlike some Internet application protocols
where SASL is used, LDAP is not text-based, thus no base64 transformations
are performed on the credentials.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 17
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
If any SASL-based integrity or confidentiality services are enabled, they
take effect following the transmission by the server and reception by
the client of the final BindResponse with resultCode success.
If the connection has been authenticated at a lower layer, the client
can override this by sending a bind request in which the
AuthenticationChoice includes a non-empty password or SASL credentials.
4.2.3. Bind Response
The Bind Response is defined as follows.
BindResponse ::= [APPLICATION 1] SEQUENCE {
COMPONENTS OF LDAPResult,
serverCreds [7] SaslCredentials OPTIONAL }
A BindResponse consists simply of an indication from the server of
the status of the client's request for authentication.
If the bind was successful, the resultCode will be success,
otherwise it will be one of:
- operationsError (server encountered an internal error)
- protocolError (unrecognized version number or incorrect PDU structure)
- authMethodNotSupported (unrecognized SASL mechanism name)
- strongAuthRequired (e.g. server does not accept cleartext password)
- referral (this server cannot accept this bind, try another)
- inappropriateAuthentication (server requires the client to provide
credentials or use a different authentication mechanism)
- invalidCredentials (e.g. wrong password supplied or bad signature)
- unavailable (e.g. server is shutting down)
If the server does not support the client's requested protocol version,
it MUST set the resultCode to protocolError.
If the client receives a BindResponse response where the resultCode was
protocolError, it MUST close the connection as the server will be
unwilling to accept further operations. (This is for compatibility with
earlier versions of LDAP, in which the bind was always the first operation,
and there was no negotiation.)
The serverCreds are used as part of a SASL-defined bind mechanism to
allow the client to authenticate the server to which it is communicating,
or to perform "challenge-response" authentication. If the client
bound with the password choice, or the SASL mechanism does not require
the server to return information to the client, then this field is not
to be included in the result.
4.3. Unbind Operation
The function of the Unbind Operation is to terminate a protocol
session. The Unbind Operation is defined as follows:
UnbindRequest ::= [APPLICATION 2] NULL
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 18
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
The Unbind Operation has no response defined. Upon transmission of an
UnbindRequest, a protocol client may assume that the protocol session
is terminated. Upon receipt of an UnbindRequest, a protocol server
may assume that the requesting client has terminated the session and
that all outstanding requests may be discarded, and may close the
connection.
4.4. Unsolicited Notification
An unsolicited notification is an LDAPMessage sent from the server to the
client which is not in response to any LDAPMessage received by the server.
It is used to signal an extraordinary condition in the server or in the
connection between the client and the server. The notification is of an
advisory nature, and the server will not expect any response to be
returned from the client.
The unsolicited notification is structured as an LDAPMessage in which the
messageID is 0 and protocolOp is of the extendedResp form. The
responseName field of the ExtendedResponse is present. The LDAPOID
value MUST be unique for this notification, and not be used in any other
situation.
One unsolicited notification is defined in this document.
4.4.1. Notice of Disconnection
This notification may be used by the server to advise the client that
the server is about to close the connection due to an error condition.
Note that this notification is NOT a response to an unbind requested by
the client: the server MUST follow the procedures of section 4.3. This
notification is intended to assist clients in distinguishing between an
error condition and a transient network failure. As with a connection
close due to network failure, the client MUST NOT assume that any
outstanding requests which modified the directory have succeeded or failed.
The responseName is 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20036, the response field is absent,
and the resultCode is used to indicate the reason for the disconnection.
The following resultCode values are to be used in this notification:
- protocolError: The server has received data from the client in which
the LDAPMessage structure could not be parsed.
- strongAuthRequired: The server has detected that an established
underlying security association protecting communication between the
client and server has unexpectedly failed or been compromised.
- unavailable: This server will stop accepting new connections and
operations on all existing connections, and be unavailable for an
extended period of time. The client may make use of an alternative
server.
After sending this notice, the server MUST close the connection. After
receiving this notice, the client MUST NOT transmit any further on the
connection, and may abruptly close the connection.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 19
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.5. Search Operation
The Search Operation allows a client to request that a search be
performed on its behalf by a server. This can be used to read attributes
from a single entry, from entries immediately below a particular entry,
or a whole subtree of entries.
4.5.1. Search Request
The Search Request is defined as follows:
SearchRequest ::= [APPLICATION 3] SEQUENCE {
baseObject LDAPDN,
scope ENUMERATED {
baseObject (0),
singleLevel (1),
wholeSubtree (2) },
derefAliases ENUMERATED {
neverDerefAliases (0),
derefInSearching (1),
derefFindingBaseObj (2),
derefAlways (3) },
sizeLimit INTEGER (0 .. maxInt),
timeLimit INTEGER (0 .. maxInt),
typesOnly BOOLEAN,
filter Filter,
attributes AttributeDescriptionList }
Filter ::= CHOICE {
and [0] SET OF Filter,
or [1] SET OF Filter,
not [2] Filter,
equalityMatch [3] AttributeValueAssertion,
substrings [4] SubstringFilter,
greaterOrEqual [5] AttributeValueAssertion,
lessOrEqual [6] AttributeValueAssertion,
present [7] AttributeDescription,
approxMatch [8] AttributeValueAssertion,
extensibleMatch [9] MatchingRuleAssertion }
SubstringFilter ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
-- at least one must be present
substrings SEQUENCE OF CHOICE {
initial [0] LDAPString,
any [1] LDAPString,
final [2] LDAPString } }
MatchingRuleAssertion ::= SEQUENCE {
matchingRule [1] MatchingRuleId OPTIONAL,
type [2] AttributeDescription OPTIONAL,
matchValue [3] AssertionValue,
dnAttributes [4] BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE }
Parameters of the Search Request are:
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 20
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
- baseObject: An LDAPDN that is the base object entry relative to
which the search is to be performed.
- scope: An indicator of the scope of the search to be performed. The
semantics of the possible values of this field are identical to the
semantics of the scope field in the X.511 Search Operation.
- derefAliases: An indicator as to how alias objects are to be
handled in searching. The semantics of the possible values of
this field are:
neverDerefAliases: do not dereference aliases in searching
or in locating the base object of the search;
derefInSearching: dereference aliases in subordinates of
the base object in searching, but not in locating the
base object of the search;
derefFindingBaseObj: dereference aliases in locating
the base object of the search, but not when searching
subordinates of the base object;
derefAlways: dereference aliases both in searching and in
locating the base object of the search.
- sizelimit: A sizelimit that restricts the maximum number of entries
to be returned as a result of the search. A value of 0 in this
field indicates that no sizelimit restrictions are in effect for
the search.
- timelimit: A timelimit that restricts the maximum time (in seconds)
allowed for a search. A value of 0 in this field indicates that no
timelimit restrictions are in effect for the search.
- typesOnly: An indicator as to whether search results will contain
both attribute types and values, or just attribute types. Setting
this field to TRUE causes only attribute types (no values) to be
returned. Setting this field to FALSE causes both attribute types
and values to be returned.
- filter: A filter that defines the conditions that must be fulfilled
in order for the search to match a given entry. The 'and', 'or' and
'not' choices may be used to form boolean combinations of filters. At
least one filter element MUST be present in an 'and' or 'or'
choice. The others match against individual attribute values of
entries in the scope of the search.
(Implementor's note: the 'not' filter is an example of a tagged
choice in an implicitly-tagged module. In BER this is treated as
if the tag was explicit.)
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 21
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
The extensibleMatch is new in this version of LDAP. If the
matchingRule field is absent, the type field MUST be present, and
the equality match is performed for that type. If the type field is
absent and matchingRule is present, the matchValue is compared
against all attributes in an entry which support that matchingRule,
and the matchingRule determines the syntax for the assertion value.
If the type field is present and matchingRule is present, the
matchingRule MUST be one permitted for use with that type.
If the dnAttributes field is set to TRUE, the match is applied
against all the attributes in an entry's distinguished name as
well. (Editors note: The dnAttributes field is present so that there
does not need to be multiple versions of generic matching rules such as
wordMatch, one to apply to entries and another to apply to entries and
dn attributes as well).
Servers MUST ignore parts of filters which use unrecognized attribute
types (that part of the filter does not match any entry). If the entire
filter is ignored, no entries match. A server may return the error
inappropriateMatching if it does not permit a particular form of matching
(e.g. substrings match on an integer value). Servers may return the
error invalidAttributeSyntax if the value part of a search filter is
improperly specified. More details of filter processing are given in
section 7.8 of X.511 [15].
- attributes: A list of the attributes from each entry found as a
result of the search to be returned. An empty list signifies that
all user attributes from each entry found in the search are to be
returned, as does the special attribute description string "*". (the
latter technique allows the client to request all user attributes
along with selected operational attributes). If the client does not
want any attributes returned, it can request only the attribute with
OID "1.1" (this OID is arbitrary). Attributes MUST be named at most
once in the list, and are returned at most once in an entry.
Servers MUST ignore requests for unrecognized attribute types. If
no attributes specified by the client are recognized, then no attributes
will be included in the result entries.
Client implementors should note that even if all user attributes are
requested, some attributes of the entry may not be included in search
results due to access control or other restrictions. Furthermore,
servers will not return operational attributes, such as objectClasses or
attributeTypes, unless they are listed by name, since there may be
extremely large number of values for certain operational attributes.
(A list of operational attributes for use in LDAP is given in [5].)
Note that an X.500 "list"-like operation can be emulated by the client
requesting a one-level LDAP search operation with a filter checking for
the existence of the objectClass attribute, and that an X.500 "read"-like
operation can be emulated by a base object LDAP search operation with
the same filter. A server which provides a gateway to X.500 is not
required to use the Read or List operations, although it may choose to
do so.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 22
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.5.2. Search Result
The results of the search attempted by the server upon receipt of a
Search Request are returned in Search Responses, which are LDAP
messages containing either SearchResultEntry, SearchResultReference,
ExtendedResponse or SearchResultDone data types.
SearchResultEntry ::= [APPLICATION 4] SEQUENCE {
objectName LDAPDN,
attributes PartialAttributeList }
PartialAttributeList ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
-- implementors should note that the PartialAttributeList may have
-- zero elements (if none of the attributes of that entry were
-- requested, or could be returned), and that the vals set may also
-- have zero elements (if types only was requested, or all values were
-- excluded from the result.)
SearchResultReference ::= [APPLICATION 19] SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL
-- at least one LDAPURL element must be present
SearchResultDone ::= [APPLICATION 5] LDAPResult
Upon receipt of a Search Request, a server will perform the necessary
search of the DIT.
If the LDAP session is operating over a connection-oriented transport
such as TCP, the server will return to the client a sequence of
responses in separate LDAP messages. There may be zero or more
responses containing SearchResultEntry, one for each entry found
during the search. There may also be zero or more responses
containing SearchResultReference, one for each area not explored by
this server during the search. The SearchResultEntry and
SearchResultReference PDUs may come in any order. Following all the
SearchResultReference responses and all SearchResultEntry responses
to be returned by the server, the server will return a response containing
the SearchResultDone, which contains an indication of success, or
detailing any errors that have occurred.
Each entry returned in a SearchResultEntry will contain all attributes,
complete with associated values if necessary, as specified in the
attributes field of the Search Request. Return of attributes is subject
to access control and other administrative policy. Some attributes may
be returned in binary format (indicated by the AttributeDescription in the
response having the binary option present).
Some attributes may be constructed by the server and appear in a
SearchResultEntry attribute list, although they are not stored attributes
of an entry. Clients MUST NOT assume that all attributes can be modified,
even if permitted by access control.
Response LDAPMessages of the ExtendedResponse form are reserved for
returning information associated with a control requested by the client.
These may be defined in future versions of this document.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 23
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.5.3. Continuation References in the Search Result
If the server was able to locate the entry referred to by the
baseObject but was unable to search all the entries in the scope at
and under the baseObject, the server may return one or more
SearchResultReference, each containing a reference to another set of
servers for continuing the operation. The server will return
a SearchResultReference for each new base object with a
particular scope and filter. A server MUST NOT return any
SearchResultReference if it has not located the baseObject and
thus has not searched any entries; in this case it would return a
SearchResultDone containing a referral resultCode.
The SearchResultReference is of the same data type as the Referral.
URLs for servers implementing the LDAP protocol are written according
to [9]. The <dn> part MUST be present in the URL, with the new target
object name. The client MUST use this name in its next request.
Some servers (e.g. part of a distributed index exchange system) may provide
a different filter in the URLs of the SearchResultReference. If the
filter part of the URL is present in an LDAP URL, the client MUST use the
new filter in its next request to progress the search, and if the filter
part is absent the client will use again the filter from the original
search.
Other kinds of URLs may be returned so long as the operation could be
performed using that protocol.
The name of an unexplored subtree in a SearchResultReference need not be
subordinate to the base object.
In order to complete the search, the client MUST issue a new search
operation for each SearchResultReference that is returned. Note that the
abandon operation described in section 4.11 applies only to a particular
operation sent on a connection between a client and server, and if the
client has multiple outstanding search operations to different servers,
it MUST abandon each operation individually.
4.5.3.1. Example
For example, suppose the contacted server (hosta) holds the entry
"O=MNN,C=WW" and the entry "CN=Manager,O=MNN,C=WW". It knows that either
LDAP-capable servers (hostb) or (hostc) hold "OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW" (one
is the master and the other server a shadow), and that LDAP-capable
server (hostd) holds the subtree "OU=Roles,O=MNN,C=WW". If a subtree
search of "O=MNN,C=WW" is requested to the contacted server, the
server may return the following responses:
SearchResultEntry for O=MNN,C=WW
SearchResultEntry for CN=Manager,O=MNN,C=WW
SearchResultReference {
ldap://hostb/OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW
ldap://hostc/OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW
}
SearchResultReference {
ldap://hostd/OU=Roles,O=MNN,C=WW
}
SearchResultDone (success)
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 24
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Client implementors should note that when following a
SearchResultReference, additional SearchResultReference may be
generated. Continuing the example, if the client contacted the
server (hostb) and issued the search for the subtree
"OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW", the server might respond as follows:
SearchResultEntry for OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW
SearchResultReference {
ldap://hoste/OU=Managers,OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW
}
SearchResultReference {
ldap://hostf/OU=Consultants,OU=People,O=MNN,C=WW
}
SearchResultDone (success)
If the contacted server does not hold the base object for the search,
then it will return a referral to the client. For example, if the
client requests a subtree search of "O=XYZ,C=US" to hosta, the server
may return only a SearchResultDone containing a referral.
SearchResultDone (referral) {
ldap://hostg/O=XYZ,C=US
}
4.6. Modify Operation
The Modify Operation allows a client to request that a modification
of an entry be performed on its behalf by a server. The Modify
Request is defined as follows:
ModifyRequest ::= [APPLICATION 6] SEQUENCE {
object LDAPDN,
modification SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
operation ENUMERATED {
add (0),
delete (1),
replace (2) },
modification AttributeTypeAndValues } }
AttributeTypeAndValues ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
Parameters of the Modify Request are:
- object: The object to be modified. The value of this field contains the
DN of the entry to be modified. The server will not perform any alias
dereferencing in determining the object to be modified.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 25
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
- modification: A list of modifications to be performed on the entry.
The entire list of entry modifications MUST be performed
in the order they are listed, as a single atomic operation. While
individual modifications may violate the directory schema, the
resulting entry after the entire list of modifications is performed
MUST conform to the requirements of the directory schema. The
values that may be taken on by the 'operation' field in each
modification construct have the following semantics respectively:
add: add values listed to the given attribute, creating
the attribute if necessary;
delete: delete values listed from the given attribute,
removing the entire attribute if no values are listed, or
if all current values of the attribute are listed for
deletion;
replace: replace all existing values of the given attribute
with the new values listed, creating the attribute if it
did not already exist. A replace with no value will delete
the entire attribute.
The result of the modify attempted by the server upon receipt of a
Modify Request is returned in a Modify Response, defined as follows:
ModifyResponse ::= [APPLICATION 7] LDAPResult
Upon receipt of a Modify Request, a server will perform the necessary
modifications to the DIT.
The server will return to the client a single Modify Response
indicating either the successful completion of the DIT modification,
or the reason that the modification failed. Note that due to the
requirement for atomicity in applying the list of modifications in
the Modify Request, the client may expect that no modifications of
the DIT have been performed if the Modify Response received indicates
any sort of error, and that all requested modifications have been
performed if the Modify Response indicates successful completion of
the Modify Operation. If the connection fails, whether the modification
occurred or not is indeterminate.
Note that due to the simplifications made in LDAP, there is not a direct
mapping of the modifications in an LDAP ModifyRequest onto the
EntryModifications of a DAP ModifyEntry operation, and different
implementations of LDAP-DAP gateways may use different means of
representing the change. If successful, the final effect of the
operations on the entry MUST be identical.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 26
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.7. Add Operation
The Add Operation allows a client to request the addition of an entry
into the directory. The Add Request is defined as follows:
AddRequest ::= [APPLICATION 8] SEQUENCE {
entry LDAPDN,
attributes AttributeList }
AttributeList ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
Parameters of the Add Request are:
- entry: the Distinguished Name of the entry to be added. Note that
all components of the name except for the last RDN component MUST
exist for the add to succeed. Note also that the server will not
dereference any aliases in locating the entry to be added, and that
servers may enforce restrictions on where entries may be located.
- attributes: the list of attributes that make up the content of the
entry being added. Clients MUST include distinguished values (those
forming the entry's own RDN) in this list, the objectClass attribute,
and values of any mandatory attributes of the listed object classes.
The result of the add attempted by the server upon receipt of a Add
Request is returned in the Add Response, defined as follows:
AddResponse ::= [APPLICATION 9] LDAPResult
Upon receipt of an Add Request, a server will attempt to perform the
add requested. The result of the add attempt will be returned to the
client in the Add Response.
4.8. Delete Operation
The Delete Operation allows a client to request the removal of an
entry from the directory. The Delete Request is defined as follows:
DelRequest ::= [APPLICATION 10] LDAPDN
The Delete Request consists of the Distinguished Name of the
entry to be deleted. Note that the server will not dereference aliases
while resolving the name of the target entry to be removed, and that only
leaf entries (those with no subordinate entries) may be deleted with this
operation.
The result of the delete attempted by the server upon receipt of a
Delete Request is returned in the Delete Response, defined as follows:
DelResponse ::= [APPLICATION 11] LDAPResult
Upon receipt of a Delete Request, a server will attempt to perform
the entry removal requested. The result of the delete attempt will be
returned to the client in the Delete Response.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 27
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.9. Modify DN Operation
The Modify DN Operation allows a client to change the last component
of the name of an entry in the directory, or to move a subtree of
entries to a new location in the directory.
The Modify DN Request is defined as follows:
ModifyDNRequest ::= [APPLICATION 12] SEQUENCE {
entry LDAPDN,
newrdn RelativeLDAPDN,
deleteoldrdn BOOLEAN,
newSuperior [0] LDAPDN OPTIONAL }
Parameters of the Modify DN Request are:
- entry: the Distinguished Name of the entry to be changed. This entry
may or may not have subordinate entries.
- newrdn: the RDN that will form the last component of the new name.
- deleteoldrdn: a boolean parameter that controls whether the old RDN
attribute values are to be retained as attributes of the entry, or
deleted from the entry.
- newSuperior: if present, this is the Distinguished Name of the entry
which becomes the immediate superior of the existing entry.
The result of the name change attempted by the server upon receipt of
a Modify DN Request is returned in the Modify DN Response, defined
as follows:
ModifyDNResponse ::= [APPLICATION 13] LDAPResult
Upon receipt of a ModifyDNRequest, a server will attempt to
perform the name change. The result of the name change attempt will
be returned to the client in the Modify DN Response.
If the deleteoldrdn parameter is TRUE, the values forming the old
RDN are deleted from the entry. If the deleteoldrdn parameter is
FALSE, the values forming the old RDN will be retained as
non-distinguished attribute values of the entry. The server may
not perform the operation and return an error code if the setting of
the deleteoldrdn parameter would cause a schema inconsistency in the
entry.
Note that X.500 restricts the ModifyDN operation to only affect entries
that are contained within a single server. If the LDAP server is mapped
onto DAP, then this restriction will apply, and the resultCode
affectsMultipleDSAs will be returned if this error occurred. In general
clients must not expect to be able to perform arbitrary movements of
entries and subtrees between servers.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 28
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
4.10. Compare Operation
The Compare Operation allows a client to compare an assertion
provided with an entry in the directory. The Compare Request is
defined as follows:
CompareRequest ::= [APPLICATION 14] SEQUENCE {
entry LDAPDN,
ava AttributeValueAssertion }
Parameters of the Compare Request are:
- entry: the name of the entry to be compared with.
- ava: the assertion with which an attribute in the entry is to be
compared.
The result of the compare attempted by the server upon receipt of a
Compare Request is returned in the Compare Response, defined as
follows:
CompareResponse ::= [APPLICATION 15] LDAPResult
Upon receipt of a Compare Request, a server will attempt to perform
the requested comparison. The result of the comparison will be
returned to the client in the Compare Response. Note that errors and
the result of comparison are all returned in the same construct.
Note that some directory systems may establish access controls which
permit the values of certain attributes (such as userPassword) to be
compared but not read. In a search result, it may be that an attribute
of that type would be returned, but with an empty set of values.
4.11. Abandon Operation
The function of the Abandon Operation is to allow a client to request
that the server abandon an outstanding operation. The Abandon
Request is defined as follows:
AbandonRequest ::= [APPLICATION 16] MessageID
The MessageID MUST be that of a an operation which was requested earlier
in this connection.
(The abandon request itself has its own message id. This is distinct
from the id of the earlier operation being abandoned.)
There is no response defined in the Abandon Operation. Upon
transmission of an Abandon Operation, a client may expect that the
operation identified by the Message ID in the Abandon Request has
been abandoned. In the event that a server receives an Abandon
Request on a Search Operation in the midst of transmitting
responses to the search, that server MUST cease transmitting entry
responses to the abandoned request immediately, and MUST NOT send the
SearchResponseDone. Of course, the server MUST ensure that only properly
encoded LDAPMessage PDUs are transmitted.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 29
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Clients MUST NOT send abandon requests for the same operation multiple
times, and MUST also be prepared to receive results from operations it
has abandoned (since these may have been in transit when the abandon was
requested).
Servers MUST discard abandon requests for message IDs they do not
recognize, for operations which cannot be abandoned, and for operations
which have already been abandoned.
4.12. Extended Operation
An extension mechanism has been added in this version of LDAP, in order to
allow additional operations to be defined for services not available
elsewhere in this protocol, for instance digitally signed operations and
results.
The extended operation allows clients to make requests and receive
responses with predefined syntaxes and semantics. These may be
defined in RFCs or be private to particular implementations. Each
operation MUST have a unique OBJECT IDENTIFIER assigned to it.
ExtendedRequest ::= [APPLICATION 23] SEQUENCE {
requestName [0] LDAPOID,
requestValue [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
The requestName is a dotted-decimal representation of the
OBJECT IDENTIFIER corresponding to the request.
The requestValue is information in a form defined by that request,
encapsulated inside an OCTET STRING.
The server will respond to this with an LDAPMessage containing the
ExtendedResponse.
ExtendedResponse ::= [APPLICATION 24] SEQUENCE {
COMPONENTS OF LDAPResult,
responseName [10] LDAPOID OPTIONAL,
response [11] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
If the server does not recognize the request name, it MUST return
only the response fields from LDAPResult, containing the protocolError
result code.
5. Protocol Element Encodings and Transfer
Two underlying services are defined here. At a minimum, clients and
servers SHOULD implement the mapping of LDAP over TCP described in 5.2.1.
5.1. Mapping Onto BER-based Transport Services
The protocol elements of LDAP are encoded for exchange using the
Basic Encoding Rules (BER) [11] of ASN.1 [3]. However, due to the
high overhead involved in using certain elements of the BER, the
following additional restrictions are placed on BER-encodings of LDAP
protocol elements:
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 30
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
(1) Only the definite form of length encoding will be used.
(2) OCTET STRINGs will be encoded in the primitive form only.
(3) If the value of a BOOLEAN type is true, the encoding MUST have
its contents octets set to hex "FF".
(4) If a value of a type is its default value, it MUST be absent.
Only some BOOLEAN and INTEGER types have default values in this
protocol definition.
These restrictions do not apply to ASN.1 types encapsulated inside of
OCTET STRINGs, such as attribute values, unless otherwise noted.
5.2. Transfer Protocols
This protocol is designed to run over connection-oriented, reliable
transports, with all 8 bits in an octet being significant in the data
stream.
5.2.1. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
The LDAPMessage PDUs are mapped directly onto the TCP bytestream.
It is recommended that server implementations running over the TCP MAY
provide a protocol listener on the assigned port, 389. Servers may
instead provide a listener on a different port number. Clients MUST
support contacting servers on any valid TCP port.
5.2.2. Secure Socket Layer over TCP (SSL)
LDAP is an application protocol which may be carried inside of a
Secure Sockets Layer connection [8]. After establishing the SSL
connection over TCP, the LDAPMessage PDUs are mapped directly onto
the bytestream to be encoded by SSL. Server implementations running over
SSL/TCP MAY provide a protocol listener on the assigned port for LDAPS,
port 636.
SSL may be used to provide to the server the authenticated identity of the
client, as a distinguished name, and the server MAY use this information
when making access control decisions. This authentication is unaffected if
the client binds and specifies no value for the password nor a SASL
mechanism. The client may override the authentication by binding with a
distinguished name and a non-empty password or a SASL mechanism. Note
that it is expected that future versions of this document will reference
an IETF specification for equivalent transport layer security services,
when one becomes available.
6. Implementation Guidelines
This document describes an Internet protocol. Terms are defined in [10].
6.1. Server Implementations
The server MUST be capable of recognizing all the mandatory attribute
type names and implement the syntaxes specified in [5]. Servers may also
recognize additional attribute type names.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 31
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
6.2. Client Implementations
Clients which request referrals MUST ensure that they do not loop
between servers.
They MUST NOT repeatedly contact the same server for the same request
with the same target entry name, scope and filter.
Some clients may be using a counter that is incremented each time
referral handling occurs for an operation, and these kind of clients MUST
be able to handle a DIT with at least ten layers of naming contexts
between the root and a leaf entry.
7. Security Considerations
When used with a connection-oriented transport, this version of the
protocol provides facilities for the LDAP v2 authentication mechanism,
simple authentication using a cleartext password, as well as any SASL
mechanism [12].
It is also permitted that the server can return its credentials to the
client, if it chooses to do so.
This document also defines a mapping of LDAP over the Secure Sockets
Layer (SSL), which can provide strong authentication, integrity and
privacy of the connection.
Use of cleartext password is strongly discouraged where the underlying
transport service cannot guarantee confidentiality and may result in
disclosure of the password to unauthorized parties.
When used with SASL, it should be noted that the name field of the
BindRequest is not protected against modification. Thus if there is a
client name (LDAPDN) agreed through the negotiation of the credentials,
it takes precedence over any value in the unprotected name field.
Implementations which cache attributes and entries obtained via LDAP
MUST ensure that access controls are maintained if that information is
to be provided to multiple clients.
8. Acknowledgements
This document is an update to RFC 1777, by Wengyik Yeong, Tim
Howes, and Steve Kille. Design ideas included in this document are
based on those discussed in ASID and other IETF Working Groups. The
contributions of individuals in these working groups is gratefully
acknowledged.
9. Bibliography
[1] ITU-T Rec. X.500, "The Directory: Overview of Concepts, Models and
Service", 1993.
[2] W. Yeong, T. Howes, S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access
Protocol", RFC 1777, March 1995.
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 32
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
[3] ITU-T Rec. X.680, "Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) -
Specification of Basic Notation", 1994.
[4] S. Kille, M. Wahl, "A UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished
Names", INTERNET-DRAFT <draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-dn-01.txt>.
[5] M. Wahl, A. Coulbeck, T. Howes, S. Kille, W. Yeong, C. Robbins,
"Lightweight X.500 Directory Access Protocol Attribute Syntax
Definitions", INTERNET-DRAFT
<draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-attributes-04.txt>, March 1997.
[6] ITU-T Rec. X.501, "The Directory: Models", 1993.
[7] T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, M. McCahill, "Uniform Resource
Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, Dec. 1994.
[8] A. Freier, P. Karlton, P. Kocher, "The SSL Protocol Version 3.0",
INTERNET-DRAFT <draft-ietf-tls-ssl-version3-00.txt>, Nov. 1996.
[9] T. Howes, M. Smith, "An LDAP URL Format", RFC 1959, June 1996.
[10] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", INTERNET-DRAFT <draft-bradner-key-words-03.txt>.
[11] ITU-T Rec. X.690, "Specification of ASN.1 encoding rules: Basic,
Canonical, and Distinguished Encoding Rules", 1994.
[12] J. Meyers, "Simple Authentication and Security Layer",
INTERNET-DRAFT <draft-myers-auth-sasl-04.txt>, July 1996.
[13] Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - Architecture
and Basic Multilingual Plane, ISO/IEC 10646-1 : 1993.
[14] F. Yergeau, "UTF-8, a transformation format of Unicode and ISO
10646", RFC 2044, October 1996.
[15] ITU-T Rec. X.511, "The Directory: Abstract Service Definition",
1993.
10. Authors' Address
Mark Wahl
Critical Angle Inc.
4815 W Braker Lane #502-385
Austin, TX 78759
USA
EMail: M.Wahl@critical-angle.com
Tim Howes
Netscape Communications Corp.
501 E. Middlefield Rd.
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 33
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Phone: +1 415 254-1900
EMail: howes@netscape.com
Steve Kille
Isode Limited
The Dome, The Square
Richmond
TW9 1DT
UK
Phone: +44-181-332-9091
EMail: S.Kille@isode.com
Appendix A - Complete ASN.1 Definition
Lightweight-Directory-Access-Protocol-V3 DEFINITIONS
IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
LDAPMessage ::= SEQUENCE {
messageID MessageID,
protocolOp CHOICE {
bindRequest BindRequest,
bindResponse BindResponse,
unbindRequest UnbindRequest,
searchRequest SearchRequest,
searchResEntry SearchResultEntry,
searchResDone SearchResultDone,
searchResRef SearchResultReference,
modifyRequest ModifyRequest,
modifyResponse ModifyResponse,
addRequest AddRequest,
addResponse AddResponse,
delRequest DelRequest,
delResponse DelResponse,
modDNRequest ModifyDNRequest,
modDNResponse ModifyDNResponse,
compareRequest CompareRequest,
compareResponse CompareResponse,
abandonRequest AbandonRequest,
extendedReq ExtendedRequest,
extendedResp ExtendedResponse },
controls [0] Controls OPTIONAL }
MessageID ::= INTEGER (0 .. maxInt)
maxInt INTEGER ::= 2147483647 -- (2^^31 - 1) --
LDAPString ::= OCTET STRING
LDAPOID ::= OCTET STRING
LDAPDN ::= LDAPString
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 34
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
RelativeLDAPDN ::= LDAPString
AttributeType ::= LDAPString
AttributeDescription ::= LDAPString
AttributeDescriptionList ::= SEQUENCE OF
AttributeDescription
AttributeValue ::= OCTET STRING
AttributeValueAssertion ::= SEQUENCE {
attributeDesc AttributeDescription,
assertionValue AssertionValue }
AssertionValue ::= OCTET STRING
Attribute ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
MatchingRuleId ::= LDAPString
LDAPResult ::= SEQUENCE {
resultCode ENUMERATED {
success (0),
operationsError (1),
protocolError (2),
timeLimitExceeded (3),
sizeLimitExceeded (4),
compareFalse (5),
compareTrue (6),
authMethodNotSupported (7),
strongAuthRequired (8),
-- 9 reserved --
referral (10), -- new
adminLimitExceeded (11), -- new
unavailableCriticalExtension (12), -- new
-- 13-15 unused --
noSuchAttribute (16),
undefinedAttributeType (17),
inappropriateMatching (18),
constraintViolation (19),
attributeOrValueExists (20),
invalidAttributeSyntax (21),
-- 22-31 unused --
noSuchObject (32),
aliasProblem (33),
invalidDNSyntax (34),
-- 35 reserved for undefined isLeaf --
aliasDereferencingProblem (36),
-- 37-47 unused --
inappropriateAuthentication (48),
invalidCredentials (49),
insufficientAccessRights (50),
busy (51),
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 35
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
unavailable (52),
unwillingToPerform (53),
loopDetect (54),
-- 55-63 unused --
namingViolation (64),
objectClassViolation (65),
notAllowedOnNonLeaf (66),
notAllowedOnRDN (67),
entryAlreadyExists (68),
objectClassModsProhibited (69),
-- 70 reserved for CLDAP --
affectsMultipleDSAs (71), -- new
-- 72-79 unused --
other (80) },
-- 81-90 reserved for APIs --
matchedDN LDAPDN,
errorMessage LDAPString,
referral [3] Referral OPTIONAL }
Referral ::= SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL
LDAPURL ::= LDAPString -- limited to characters permitted in URLs
Controls ::= SEQUENCE OF Control
Control ::= SEQUENCE {
controlType LDAPOID,
criticality BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
controlValue OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
BindRequest ::= [APPLICATION 0] SEQUENCE {
version INTEGER (1 .. 127),
name LDAPDN,
authentication AuthenticationChoice }
AuthenticationChoice ::= CHOICE {
simple [0] OCTET STRING,
-- 1 and 2 reserved
sasl [3] SaslCredentials }
SaslCredentials ::= SEQUENCE {
mechanism LDAPString,
credentials OCTET STRING }
BindResponse ::= [APPLICATION 1] SEQUENCE {
COMPONENTS OF LDAPResult,
serverCreds [7] SaslCredentials OPTIONAL }
UnbindRequest ::= [APPLICATION 2] NULL
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 36
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
SearchRequest ::= [APPLICATION 3] SEQUENCE {
baseObject LDAPDN,
scope ENUMERATED {
baseObject (0),
singleLevel (1),
wholeSubtree (2) },
derefAliases ENUMERATED {
neverDerefAliases (0),
derefInSearching (1),
derefFindingBaseObj (2),
derefAlways (3) },
sizeLimit INTEGER (0 .. maxInt),
timeLimit INTEGER (0 .. maxInt),
typesOnly BOOLEAN,
filter Filter,
attributes AttributeDescriptionList }
Filter ::= CHOICE {
and [0] SET OF Filter,
or [1] SET OF Filter,
not [2] Filter,
equalityMatch [3] AttributeValueAssertion,
substrings [4] SubstringFilter,
greaterOrEqual [5] AttributeValueAssertion,
lessOrEqual [6] AttributeValueAssertion,
present [7] AttributeDescription,
approxMatch [8] AttributeValueAssertion,
extensibleMatch [9] MatchingRuleAssertion }
SubstringFilter ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
-- at least one must be present
substrings SEQUENCE OF CHOICE {
initial [0] LDAPString,
any [1] LDAPString,
final [2] LDAPString } }
MatchingRuleAssertion ::= SEQUENCE {
matchingRule [1] MatchingRuleId OPTIONAL,
type [2] AttributeDescription OPTIONAL,
matchValue [3] AssertionValue,
dnAttributes [4] BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE }
SearchResultEntry ::= [APPLICATION 4] SEQUENCE {
objectName LDAPDN,
attributes PartialAttributeList }
PartialAttributeList ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
SearchResultReference ::= [APPLICATION 19] SEQUENCE OF LDAPURL
SearchResultDone ::= [APPLICATION 5] LDAPResult
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 37
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
ModifyRequest ::= [APPLICATION 6] SEQUENCE {
object LDAPDN,
modification SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
operation ENUMERATED {
add (0),
delete (1),
replace (2) },
modification AttributeTypeAndValues } }
AttributeTypeAndValues ::= SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
ModifyResponse ::= [APPLICATION 7] LDAPResult
AddRequest ::= [APPLICATION 8] SEQUENCE {
entry LDAPDN,
attributes AttributeList }
AttributeList ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
type AttributeDescription,
vals SET OF AttributeValue }
AddResponse ::= [APPLICATION 9] LDAPResult
DelRequest ::= [APPLICATION 10] LDAPDN
DelResponse ::= [APPLICATION 11] LDAPResult
ModifyDNRequest ::= [APPLICATION 12] SEQUENCE {
entry LDAPDN,
newrdn RelativeLDAPDN,
deleteoldrdn BOOLEAN,
newSuperior [0] LDAPDN OPTIONAL }
ModifyDNResponse ::= [APPLICATION 13] LDAPResult
CompareRequest ::= [APPLICATION 14] SEQUENCE {
entry LDAPDN,
ava AttributeValueAssertion }
CompareResponse ::= [APPLICATION 15] LDAPResult
AbandonRequest ::= [APPLICATION 16] MessageID
ExtendedRequest ::= [APPLICATION 23] SEQUENCE {
requestName [0] LDAPOID,
requestValue [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
ExtendedResponse ::= [APPLICATION 24] SEQUENCE {
COMPONENTS OF LDAPResult,
responseName [10] LDAPOID OPTIONAL,
response [11] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL }
END
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 38
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
Table of Contents
1. Status of this Memo .................................... 1
2. Abstract ............................................... 1
3. Models ................................................. 2
3.1. Protocol Model ........................................ 2
3.2. Data Model ............................................ 2
3.2.1. Attributes of Entries ............................... 3
3.2.2. Subschema Entries ................................... 4
3.3. Relationship to X.500 ................................. 5
3.4. Server-specific Data Requirements ..................... 5
4. Elements of Protocol ................................... 6
4.1. Common Elements ....................................... 6
4.1.1. Message Envelope .................................... 6
4.1.1.1. Message ID ........................................ 7
4.1.2. String Types ........................................ 8
4.1.3. Distinguished Name and Relative Distinguished Name .. 8
4.1.4. Attribute Type ...................................... 9
4.1.5. Attribute Description ............................... 9
4.1.5.1. Binary Option ..................................... 10
4.1.6. Attribute Value ..................................... 10
4.1.7. Attribute Value Assertion ........................... 11
4.1.8. Attribute ........................................... 11
4.1.9. Matching Rule Identifier ............................ 12
4.1.10. Result Message ..................................... 12
4.1.11. Referral ........................................... 14
4.1.12. Controls ........................................... 15
4.2. Bind Operation ........................................ 16
4.2.1. Sequencing of the Bind Request ...................... 17
4.2.2. Authentication and Other Security Services .......... 17
4.2.3. Bind Response ....................................... 18
4.3. Unbind Operation ...................................... 18
4.4. Unsolicited Notification .............................. 19
4.4.1. Notice of Disconnection ............................. 19
4.5. Search Operation ...................................... 20
4.5.1. Search Request ...................................... 20
4.5.2. Search Result ....................................... 23
4.5.3. Continuation References in the Search Result ........ 24
4.5.3.1. Example ........................................... 24
4.6. Modify Operation ...................................... 25
4.7. Add Operation ......................................... 27
4.8. Delete Operation ...................................... 27
4.9. Modify DN Operation ................................... 28
4.10. Compare Operation .................................... 29
4.11. Abandon Operation .................................... 29
4.12. Extended Operation ................................... 30
5. Protocol Element Encodings and Transfer ................ 30
5.1. Mapping Onto BER-based Transport Services ............. 30
5.2. Transfer Protoocols ................................... 31
5.2.1. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) ................. 31
5.2.2. Secure Socket Layer over TCP (SSL) .................. 31
6. Implementation Guidelines .............................. 31
6.1. Server Implementations ................................ 31
6.2. Client Implementations ................................ 32
Wahl, Howes, Kille Page 39
INTERNET-DRAFT Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3) March 1997
7. Security Considerations ................................ 32
8. Acknowledgements ....................................... 32
9. Bibliography ........................................... 32
10. Authors' Address ....................................... 33
Appendix A - Complete ASN.1 Definition ..................... 34
<draft-ietf-asid-ldapv3-protocol-04.txt> Expires: September 25, 1997
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 03:58:15 |