One document matched: draft-heinanen-mpls-splsp-00.txt
Internet Engineering Task Force Juha Heinanen
INTERNET DRAFT Telia Finland
Expires August 2000 February, 2000
Soft Permanent LSPs for CR-LDP
<draft-heinanen-mpls-splsp-00.txt>
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document extends CR-LDP with capability to establish Soft
Permanent LSPs (SPLSPs). A SPLSP is an LSP which originates or
terminates at a label switched interface of an MPLS node.
1. Introduction
A Soft Permanent LSP (SPLSP) is an LSP, which originates, terminates,
or both originates and terminates at a label switched interface of an
MPLS node. SPLSPs are useful, for example, in cases where an MPLS
domain does not want to dynamically exchange MPLS control information
with another MPLS domain or where an MPLS node, such as a CPE node,
does not implement an MPLS control protocol. SPLSPs are also useful
for the dynamic reestablishment of LSPs following node or trunk
failures if the MPLS network does not support other protection
Heinanen Soft Permanent LSPs for CR-LDP [Page 1]
INTERNET DRAFT February, 2000
mechanisms. In this case, the originating MPLS node would detect
when an established SPLSP fails, and would then automatically reissue
the required Label Request Message to reestablish the SPLSP.
This document defines the SPLSP capability for CR-LDP [1].
2. Messages
The MPLS node where an SPLSP originates from "owns" the SPLSP and is
responsible for establishing and (in case of failure) reestablishing
it.
If an SPLSP terminates at an interface of an MPLS node, the
originating MPLS node initiates the SPLSP establishment by a CR-LDP
Label Request Message. In the Label Request Message the terminating
interface is identified by an IP host address carried in the last ER-
Hop of the ER-TLV, whereas the label to be used at that interface for
the SPLSP is carried in the Label TLV.
If an SPLSP terminates at an MPLS node itself, the originating MPLS
node initiates the SPLSP establishment using a normal CR-LDP Label
Request Message, where the terminating MPLS node is identified by an
IP host address carried in the last ER-Hop of the ER-TLV.
In the originating MPLS node the method of identifying the origin of
the SPLSP (the node itself or one of its interfaces as well as the
label to be used for the SPLSP at the possible interface) is a local
matter and thus outside the scope of this document.
3. Procedures
If a CR-LDP Label Request Message includes a Label TLV, it is a Label
Request Message for SPLSP establishment. The procedures of Label
Request Message for SPLSP establishment are as follows.
A Label Request Message for SPLSP establishment is processed at the
originating MPLS node and at all intermediate nodes according to
normal CR-LDP rules except that the normally nonexistent Label TLV is
forwarded opaquely.
At the terminating MPLS node, a Label Request Message for SPLSP
establishment is processed according to the normal CR-LDP rules
except that the last ER-Hop of the ER-TLV identifies the interface
where the SPLSP terminates and the Label TLV contains the value of
the label to be used for the SPLSP at that interface. If the
requested label value is not available at the terminating interface,
the terminating MPLS node sends a Notification message to the
originating MPLS node with Status Code "Label Value Not Available".
Heinanen Soft Permanent LSPs for CR-LDP [Page 2]
INTERNET DRAFT February, 2000
4. Security Considerations
SPLSPs share the security concerns of regular CR-LDP LSPs. It is
also worth noting that when an SPLSP originates or terminates at an
interface of an MPLS node, the entity using the SPLSP at that
interface is dependent on the provider of the SPLSP for routing of
the SPLSP to or from the correct other entity.
5. Acknowledgements
The author thanks Eric Gray and Andrew Malis both from Lucent for
their comments on an earlier version of this document.
5. Author Address
Juha Heinanen
Telia Finland, Inc.
Myyrmaentie 2
01600 Vantaa, Finland
Email: jh@telia.fi
Heinanen Soft Permanent LSPs for CR-LDP [Page 3]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-22 23:34:45 |