One document matched: draft-giaretta-mip6-authorization-eap-01.txt
Differences from draft-giaretta-mip6-authorization-eap-00.txt
MIP6 Working Group G. Giaretta
Internet Draft I. Guardini
Expires: January 14, 2005 E. Demaria
TILab
J. Bournelle
M. Laurent-Maknavicius
GET/INT
July 16, 2004
MIPv6 Authorization and Configuration based on EAP
<draft-giaretta-mip6-authorization-eap-01.txt>
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance
with RFC 3668.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://
www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 14, 2005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This draft defines an architecture, and related protocols, for
performing dynamic Mobile IPv6 authorization and configuration
relying on a AAA infrastructure. The necessary interaction between
the AAA server of the home provider and the mobile node is realized
using EAP, exploiting the capability of some EAP methods to convey
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
generic information items together with authentication data. This
approach has the advantage that the access equipment acts as a simple
pass-through for EAP messages and therefore does not play any active
role in the Mobile IPv6 negotiation procedure, which makes the
solution easier to deploy and maintain.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction................................................2
2. Terminology.................................................3
3. Protocol Overview...........................................3
4. Requirements on EAP methods.................................8
5. Detailed Description of the Protocol........................9
5.1 Mobile Node bootstrap....................................9
5.2 Management of reauthentication events...................14
6. Home Agent considerations..................................15
6.1 Requirements on AAAH-HA communication...................15
6.2 Management of MIPv6 authorization state.................16
7. New EAP TLVs...............................................17
8. Security Considerations....................................22
Acknowledgments.................................................22
References......................................................22
Authors' Addresses..............................................24
Intellectual Property Statement.................................25
1. Introduction
Mobile IPv6 [1] requires that Mobile Nodes (MNs) and Home Agents
(HAs) share a set of configuration parameters: the MN must know its
Home Address, the Home Agent Address and the cryptographic material
needed to protect MIPv6 signaling (e.g. shared keys or certificates
to setup an IPsec security association). MIPv6 base protocol does not
specify any method to automatically acquire this information; which
means that network administrators are normally required to manually
set configuration data on MNs and HAs.
Manual configuration of Home Agents and Mobile Nodes also works as an
implicit method for Mobile IPv6 authorization, because only the users
that have been administratively enabled on a specific Home Agent are
allowed to exploit Mobile IPv6 and its features.
However, in a large network (e.g. the network of a mobile operator),
which may include millions of users and many Home Agents, the
operational and administrative burden of this procedure may easily
become overwhelming. In addition, the extensive use of manual and
static configurations limits the flexibility and reliability of the
system, in that it is not possible to dynamically assign the HA when
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
the user enters the network, which would help to optimize performance
and resource utilization (e.g. assignment of the HA closest to the
MN's point of attachment).
This is generally referred as the Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping problem.
As discussed in [2], several bootstrapping scenarios can be
identified depending on the relationship between the network operator
providing IP services to the MN (Access Service Provider, ASP) and
the service provider managing the HA (Mobility Service Provider,
MSP). This document describes a solution to the bootstrapping problem
that is applicable in a scenario where the ASP and the MSP are the
same provider (Integrated ASP, IASP).
The proposed solution performs dynamic Mobile IPv6 authorization and
configuration together with MN authentication for network access.
MIPv6 negotiation and bootstrapping is controlled by the AAA server
of the home provider (IASP), that interacts with the mobile node
relying on AAA routing and EAP, exploiting the capability of some EAP
methods (e.g. PEAPv2 [4], EAP-FAST [5]) to convey generic information
items together with authentication data.
2. Terminology
General mobility terminology can be found in [3]. The following
additional terms are used here:
ASP Access Service Provider
IASP Integrated Access Service Provider
MSP Mobility Service Provider
AAA Authentication Authorization Accounting
AAAH AAA server of the Home domain
3. Protocol Overview
The basic idea behind the solution proposed herewith is to perform
Mobile IPv6 authorization and configuration during the authentication
procedure undertaken by the Mobile Node to gain network access.
In particular, this draft defines a method to:
- explicitly authorize the use of Mobile IPv6 based on the service
profile of the user, its position within the network, etc.
- dynamically allocate a Home Agent to the Mobile Node;
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
- dynamically configure Mobile IPv6 start-up parameters (i.e. MIPv6
bootstrapping) on both the Home Agent and the Mobile Node. These
parameters include the Home Address and the cryptographic material
needed to set-up the IPsec Security Association used to protect
Mobile IPv6 signaling (i.e. Binding Updates and Binding
Acknowledgements);
- allow the MN to negotiate additional Mobile IPv6 service options,
such as the assignment of a HA within the visited domain.
Figure 1 shows the overall architecture of the solution proposed in
this draft. The central element of the architecture is the AAA server
of the Home Domain (i.e. AAAH), which interacts with both the MN and
the selected HA to perform service authorization and configuration.
AAA
Client
IEEE 802.1x +------+ RADIUS
or PANA | | or Diameter
+--------+ /--------------EAP Exchange-----------------\ +--------+
| Mobile |/ <------------Authentication---------------> \| AAAH |
| Node |\ <--MIPv6 authorization and configuration--> /| Server |
+--------+ \-------------------------------------------/ +--------+
| | /\
+------+ /||\
Router ||
or AP AAAH-HA ||
(pass through) Protocol ||
\||/
\/
+--------+
| Home |
| Agent |
+--------+
Figure 1 - Solution architecture
The solution is applicable to any access network relying on EAP [6]
for user authentication and works with all EAP methods supporting the
exchange of general purpose information elements, in the form of TLVs
or AVPs, between EAP peers. Exploiting this capability, MN and AAAH
can embed MIPv6 negotiation signaling within the same EAP
conversation used to carry out user authentication.
This kind of operation is already supported by several tunneled (e.g.
PEAPv2 [4]) and non tunneled (e.g. EAP-IKEv2 [8]) EAP methods, that
also include native support for encryption, authentication and
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
integrity protection of exchanged configuration information (e.g. HA
address).
Figure 2 shows an overview of the procedure defined to handle MIPv6
bootstrap on the Mobile Node. For the sake of simplicity it is
assumed that the employed AAA protocol is Diameter, but obviously
RADIUS is suitable as well.
The whole procedure can be divided in six steps:
1.EAP identity exchange (i.e. exchange of EAP Request Identity and
EAP Response Identity messages);
2.set-up of a protected channel (e.g. TLS tunnel) for the delivery
of subsequent EAP signaling. This is an optional step that is
present only if the EAP method provides confidentiality support.
It is mandatory only if the MIPv6 negotiation procedure involves
the exchange of sensible information;
3.authentication phase. The actual authentication procedure and its
security properties depend on the selected EAP method. In tunneled
EAP methods (e.g. PEAPv2) this step may involve one or more
complete EAP conversations occurring within a previously
negotiated TLS session. Each EAP conversation may accomplish user
authentication relying on any available EAP method (e.g. EAP-MD5,
EAP-SIM, EAP-AKA);
4.Mobile IPv6 service authorization and configuration. MN and AAAH
exchange a sequence of signaling messages to authorize and
configure Mobile IPv6. Those messages are encapsulated in TLVs (or
AVPs) delivered as part of the on-going EAP session. If the EAP
method provides confidentiality this protocol handshake is
encrypted using the previously negotiated ciphersuite. During this
phase, AAAH selects a suitable Home Agent for the MN and exchanges
authorization and configuration data with it using a AAAH-HA
protocol (e.g. SNMPv3 [16], COPS-PR [15], a new Diameter
application), whose specification is out of the scope of the
present document. At the end of this phase, the MN knows its own
Home Address, the address of the correspondent Home Agent and the
cryptographic material (i.e. pre-shared key) needed to set-up an
IPsec security association with IKE [12]. The IKE pre-shared key
can be either constructed by AAAH and then delivered to MN in a
proper TLV or can be independently derived by MN and AAAH from the
EAP key hierarchy;
5.EAP session termination. Assuming the mobile node has been
successfully authenticated, the AAAH server sends a Diameter EAP
Answer message with Result-Code equal to SUCCESS and, optionally,
other authorization AVPs containing some filtering rules to be
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
enforced on the NAS (e.g. the AP if the access network is a WLAN,
or the Enforcement Point in case of an IP network running the PANA
[13] protocol). Then the NAS extracts the EAP Success message from
the Diameter EAP Answer and forwards it to the MN terminating the
EAP session;
6.set-up of IPsec Security Association and MIPv6 registration. At
the end of the EAP communication, the MN gains network access and
acquires a valid Care-of Address within the visited subnet (e.g.
via stateless autoconfiguration); then, using the cryptographic
material collected during the MIPv6 negotiation phase (step 4), it
performs an IKE exchange to establish the IPsec Security
Association with the HA. Finally, the MN performs MIPv6
registration, sending a Binding Update (protected with IPsec) to
the HA.
EAP over
IEEE 802.1x EAP over Diameter AAAH-HA
or PANA AAA (or RADIUS) AAAH Protocol
MN +---------+ Client +----------------+ Server +-------------+ HA
1) <--Req. Id.---
--Identity---> --Diameter EAP Req.-->
/-------------------------------------\
2) / Set-up of protected channel \
\ e.g. TLS Tunnel (optional) /
\-------------------------------------/
/-------------------------------------\
3) / Authentication \
\ Phase /
\-------------------------------------/
/-------------------------------------\ +-+ /--------------\ +-+
4) / Mobile IPv6 service \| |/ HoA selection \| |
\ authorization and configuration /| |\ and HA config. /| |
\-------------------------------------/ +-+ \--------------/ +-+
Home Agent State
Selection Set-up
5) <-----EAP----- <-----Diameter EAP----
Success/Failure Answer (Success/Failure
and authorization AVPs)
/----------------------------------------------------------\
6) / Set-up Security Association MN-HA and \
\ Mobile IPv6 registration (exchange of BU and BA) /
\----------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2 - Overview of Mobile IPv6 bootstrap procedure
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
This draft also defines the procedures to handle re-authentication
events and to manage the termination of the Mobile IPv6 session.
In summary, the proposed architecture has the following advantages:
- allows the operator to maintain a centralized management (on the
AAA server) of the user profiles and the authentication,
authorization and accounting procedures for any type of service,
including Mobile IPv6;
- improves the reliability and performance of the Mobile IPv6
protocol, in that the HA to be dynamically assigned to the MN can
be freely chosen among those that are closest to the user's point
of attachment, thus optimizing network usage and reducing the
transfer delay for data traffic in bi-directional tunneling;
- can be deployed, or extended with new features, without having to
update the access equipment and the AAA protocols in use. Only
minor changes in the AAA servers, the Home Agents and the mobile
terminals are required, in that the AAA client does not play any
active role in MIPv6 negotiation (i.e. it is a pass-through for
EAP signaling). This reduces the deployment costs and makes the
solution easy to use even when a Mobile Node is roaming with a
provider different from its own;
- allows the usage of any AAA protocol supporting the transport of
EAP messages for the communication between the AAA client and
server (i.e. not just Diameter, but also RADIUS). This
significantly simplifies the deployment of MIPv6 in existing
communication networks, where support for Diameter protocol in
access equipment is not so extensive.
As a whole, the solution adds a maximum of 2 RTTs (see the detailed
protocol description in section 5) to the EAP conversation carried
out by the mobile node to authenticate itself and gain network
access. The number of extra RTTs can be reduced if the employed EAP
method has the capability of transporting MIPv6 negotiation TLVs (or
AVPs) together with authentication data. Nonetheless, it should be
noted that the full negotiation procedure can be undertaken by the MN
only during its initial bootstrap, and therefore the performance
requirements are not so strict.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
4. Requirements on EAP methods
In EAP methods, the EAP peer and EAP server exchange data in order
to authenticate the EAP peer and eventually the EAP server (mutual
authentication). This draft proposes the use of these exchanges to
transport MIPv6 parameters, as part of an handshake that requires at
maximum 2 RTTs. Thus, the main requirement for the applicability of
our proposal is:
- the EAP method must provide a way to carry arbitrary parameters
during or after the authentication phase. This implies that the
EAP method must provide messages and mechanisms for this purpose.
Then, for security reasons, the EAP method must provide the following
properties:
- mutual authentication: the EAP method must provide mutual
authentication. The access network must authenticate users
before granting them Mobile IPv6 service and the EAP peer should
authenticate the access network before delivering sensitive
data;
- integrity: the exchanged MIPv6 parameters must be protected
against any alteration and thus the EAP method must provide
integrity protection;
- replay protection: the EAP messages containing MIPv6 parameters
must be protected against Replay Attack, so that an attacker is
not able to get previous given data by replaying an old request;
- confidentiality: depending on which data the AAA server provides
to the mobile node (e.g. an IKE pre-shared key), it may be
necessary to protect the message exchange against eavesdropping.
The table below checks some existing EAP methods against the
requirements listed above.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
M-A: Mutual Authentication
R-P: Replay Protection
+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| | | | | Exchange |
|M-A| Integrity|R-P|Confidentiality| of arbitrary|
| | | | | Parameters |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| PEAPv2 | x | x | x | x | x |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-FAST | x | x | x | x | x |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-TTLS | x | x | x | x | x |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-IKEv2 | x | x | x | x | x |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-SIM | x | x | x | x | x |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-AKA | x | x | x | x | x |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-TLS | x | x | x | x | |
+------------+---+----------+---+---------------+-------------+
| EAP-MD5 | | | | | |
+------------+---|----------|---|---------------|-------------|
In summary, it is possible to note that the procedure described in
this draft can be successfully undertaken with several tunneled
(PEAPv2, EAP-FAST and EAP-TTLS) and non tunneled EAP methods (EAP-
IKEv2, EAP-SIM, EAP-AKA, EAP-TLS), that all support the transport of
arbitrary parameters in the form of TLVs or AVPs.
5. Detailed Description of the Protocol
This section details the procedures and message exchanges that can be
adopted by the network operator to explicitly authorize the
activation of Mobile IPv6 support for a specific user as well as
enable dynamic bootstrapping of MIPv6 protocol parameters (e.g. Home
Address, Home Agent Address).
5.1 Mobile Node bootstrap
If EAP is used for access control, when the MN enters the network it
is immediately polled for its identity, by means of an EAP Request
Identity message. This message is used to start the EAP
communication. The MN replies sending its identity, in the form of a
NAI (Network Access Identifier), within an EAP Response Identity
message, that is received by a local attendant (e.g. the Access Point
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
in the case of a Wireless LAN) and forwarded via AAA routing to the
AAAH server using the Diameter EAP Application (or the RADIUS EAP
extensions). Then the AAAH server selects an EAP method (e.g. based
on the user service profile) and proposes it to the MN in subsequent
EAP messages. In order to enable the Mobile IPv6 negotiation
procedure defined in this document, the EAP method chosen by the AAAH
server must be an EAP method supporting the transport of general
purpose and variable length information elements, in the form of TLVs
(or AVPs), together with authentication data (see section 4).
After this initial handshake, MN and AAAH undertake the actual
authentication phase, that may require the exchange of a variable
number of EAP Request/Response messages. In many EAP methods, like
PEAPv2 or EAP-IKEv2, the authentication phase is preceded by the
establishment of an encrypted channel between MN and AAAH that
provides protection capabilities (i.e. privacy, integrity protection,
etc.) for all the messages exchanged during the rest of the EAP
conversation.
As soon as the authentication phase is completed, the procedure for
MIPv6 bootstrapping may take place. In order to do that, the MN and
the AAAH server exploit the on-going EAP communication to exchange a
sequence of signaling messages encapsulated in a new TLV, called
MIPv6-Authorization-TLV. This TLV is used as a generic container for
other, more specific, TLVs.
The whole bootstrapping procedure is depicted in Figure 3.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
AAAH
MN +----------------------------+ Server +----------------+ HA
<---------------------
MIPv6-Authorization-TLV(
Service-Status,
[Service-Options])
----------------------->
MIPv6-Authorization-TLV(
Service-Selection, [Service-Options],
[Home-Agent-Address], [Home-Address],
[Interface-Identifier])
+-+ +-+
| |/----------------\| |
| |\----------------/| |
+-+ +-+
Home Agent HA
Selection Conf.
<---------------------
MIPv6-Authorization-TLV(
Home-Address, HA-Address,
[IKE-PSK])
----------------------->
MIPv6-Authorization-TLV(
Negotiation-Result)
Figure 3 - MIPv6 bootstrapping procedure
AAAH starts the MIPv6 negotiation phase sending to the MN a MIPv6-
Authorization-TLV including the following TLVs:
- Service-Status-TLV: used to communicate whether the home domain is
willing to provide Mobile IPv6 service to the MN. This might
depend on the user service profile or on other administrative
rules (e.g. service accountability);
- Service-Options-TLV (optional): used to specify other service
options the MN can ask for (e.g. allocation of a HA in the visited
domain).
MN replies to this first message confirming its intention to start
Mobile IPv6 and, optionally, providing a set of hints on the desired
service capabilities; this is achieved delivering a MIPv6-
Authorization-TLV including the following TLVs:
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
- Service-Selection-TLV: used by the MN to specify if it is willing
to activate Mobile IPv6 protocol operation;
- Service-Options-TLV (optional): used by the MN to communicate
which service options, among those previously advertised by AAAH,
it would like make use of;
- Home-Agent-Address-TLV (optional): used by the MN to suggest a
preferred Home Agent. This can be a HA with whom the MN has a pre-
configured Security Association or a HA acquired through dynamic
HA address discovery. The AAAH server treats this indication just
as a hint, which means that, for administrative reasons, the MN
may be assigned a Home Agent different from the one previously
requested;
- Home-Address-TLV (optional): used by the MN to suggest a preferred
Home Address (e.g. an address pre-configured on one of its network
interfaces); like the previous TLV, this indication is considered
only as a hint by the AAAH server;
- Interface-Identifier-TLV (optional): through this TLV, the MN can
suggest a preferred Interface Identifier (selected according to
[9] or following other criteria) to be used by the AAA
infrastructure to build the Home Address starting from the
selected home prefix. Also in this case, this information, if
present, is treated as a pure hint by AAAH.
If in the Service-Selection-TLV the MN has chosen not to make use of
Mobile IPv6, AAAH terminates the EAP communication sending an EAP
Success message, since the authentication procedure has been
accomplished successfully.
Otherwise, if the MN has confirmed its willingness to start MIPv6
service, AAAH selects a suitable Home Agent through a Home Agent
Selection Algorithm. Possible parameters to be taken into account by
this algorithm include: current load of available HAs (e.g. number of
active bindings), location of the MN and, eventually, the preferences
provided by the MN itself in the previous message exchange (i.e.
Service-Options-TLV, Home-Agent-Address-TLV, Home-Address-TLV). For
example, based on the knowledge of the MN's current point of
attachment (i.e. the current NAS), the AAAH server may select, among
the HAs available in the home domain, the one that is closest to the
MN in terms of IP routing hops. This approach is normally expected to
improve performance. However, the detailed definition of a Home Agent
Selection Algorithm is out of the scope of this document.
After a suitable HA has been identified, AAAH interacts with it to
dynamically configure all the state needed to enable subsequent MIPv6
protocol operations, including the authorization lifetime of the
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
MIPv6 service granted to the MN. Possible protocols that can be used
for this purpose include Diameter (through a new Diameter
Application), SNMPv3 or COPS-PR. Further details about this
communication are provided in section 6. Anyway, the detailed
specification of the interface between AAAH and HA is out of the
scope of this document.
As soon as the AAAH server has configured the state on the HA, it
continues the EAP session communicating to the MN all the MIPv6
configuration data it is waiting for. This is achieved delivering to
the MN an EAP Request containing a MIPv6-Authorization-TLV and the
following sub-TLVs: Home-Address-TLV (i.e. the home address) and
Home-Agent-Address-TLV (i.e. the address of the HA).
The pre-shared key needed to bootstrap the IKE session with the Home
Agent, and set-up the correspondent IPsec Security Association, can
be derived by the MN from the keying material exported by the
employed EAP method. This approach provides excellent security
guarantees but requires the definition of a specific Application
Master Session Key (AMSK) [14] bound to MIPv6. Alternatively, if the
on-going EAP session provides confidentiality support, the AAAH
server can override the default behaviour by explicitly delivering a
valid PSK to the MN within an IKE-PSK-TLV.
After the MN has received all the configuration data from the AAAH
server (i.e. HA address, Home Address and optionally the PSK), it
sends back an EAP Response containing a Negotiation-Result-TLV,
stating whether it accepts, or refuses, the proposed arrangement. If
the MN refuses the configuration, the AAAH server should immediately
release the resources previously allocated on the Home Agent.
After the completion of the EAP session, MN holds all data needed to
perform Mobile IPv6 registration: the MN knows its Home Address, the
address of the correspondent Home Agent and all cryptographic data
needed to establish the IPsec security association with it;
furthermore, since it has been successfully authenticated, the MN can
acquire an IPv6 address to be used as Care-of Address.
The first operation carried out by the MN after the acquisition of
the Care-of Address is the establishment of the IPsec Security
Association with the HA, that is mandated by [1] to protect MIPv6
location update signaling. Set-up of the IPsec SA can be accomplished
following the procedure detailed in [11]. In this regard, it is
important to note that:
- since the mutual authentication in IKE Phase 1 is based on a Pre-
Shared Key (PSK), Aggressive Mode must be used. This is because
Aggressive Mode is the only way to use PSK authentication with a
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
NAI as peer identifier [12]. Indeed, the NAI of the MN is the only
identity information stored in the HA (see section 6.2);
- in IKE phase 1 messages, the source address used by the MN has to
be the Care-of Address, as described in [11]; the Home Address is
used only in IKE phase 2;
- in IKE phase 2 (Quick Mode), while still using the CoA as source
address of IKE messages, the MN has to use the Home Address as its
peer identifier, so that the HA can correctly set the MN entries
in its Security Policy Database (SPD) and in the Security
Association Database (SAD).
As soon as the IPsec Security Association is established, MN can send
a Binding Update to the HA, thus starting up Mobile IPv6 service.
5.2 Management of reauthentication events
At the expiration of AAA session time-outs or after a change in the
point of attachment to the network (e.g. change of Access Point), a
re-authentication procedure is performed leading to the user identity
to be checked again along with its right to continue exploitation of
network resources. To that purpose the AAAH server may repeat a full
authentication or, alternatively, decide to use optimizations in
order to make the procedure faster. Once this phase is completed the
AAAH server also undertakes the re-negotiation of the MIPv6 service.
Since the MIPv6 bootstrapping procedure is assumed to be completely
stateless, when a re-authentication event occurs the AAAH server may
not know the state of the MIPv6 service on the MN. For this reason
the AAAH server starts the MIPv6 negotiation as in the bootstrap
case: it delivers a MIPv6-Authorization-TLV containing a Service-
Status-TLV and optionally a Service-Options-TLV.
If the MIPv6 service is not active on the MN the procedure continues
as described in section 5.1. Otherwise, the MN replies with a MIPv6-
Authorization-TLV containing a Service-Selection-TLV indicating that
the MIPv6 service is already in use. Furthermore, the MN inserts the
Home-Agent-Address-TLV and the Home-Address-TLV to inform the AAAH
server about its current state. The AAAH server can then get in touch
with the HA to check the integrity of the state and eventually renew
the MIPv6 authorization lifetime. If this procedure is accomplished
successfully, the AAAH server terminates the EAP communication
sending an EAP Success message. Otherwise, the AAAH server should
continue the EAP communication renegotiating the MIPv6 service (i.e.
allocation of a new HA and related Home Address).
This solution can be easily deployed even within a network including
several AAA servers, each one managing a subset of the available
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Network Access Servers (NASs). This is because the re-negotiation
procedure does not assume to have any long term state related to
Mobile IPv6 stored on the AAAH server. In this way, everything works
correctly even if, due to MN's movements within the network, the AAAH
server that handles the re-authentication is not the same server that
authenticated the MN for the first time and performed the MIPv6
bootstrapping procedure.
6. Home Agent considerations
This section provides further thougths about the AAAH-HA
communication and lists specific features that have to be supported
by the Home Agent to allow dynamic negotiation of Mobile IPv6
protocol parameters.
6.1 Requirements on AAAH-HA communication
This draft details only the message exchange between the MN and the
AAAH server. Obviously a complete Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping solution
requires also the definition of a mechanism for the communication
between the Home Agent and the AAAH server. Possible protocols that
may be used for this purpose include SNMPv3, COPS-PR or Diameter.
The selected protocol should allow the AAAH server to:
- verify if the selected HA is available to serve the MN (e.g. based
on current traffic load and on the number of active bindings);
- send to the HA the MN's NAI, the authorization lifetime of the
Mobile IPv6 service granted to the MN, the IKE PSK to be used to
bootstrap the IPsec Security Association and, optionally, a set of
hints for the construction of the Home Address (i.e. a preferred
Home Address or a preferred Interface Identifier);
- obtain from the selected Home Agent a valid Home Address to be
assigned to the MN;
- force the termination of the Mobile IPv6 service for a specific MN
removing the state stored on the correspondent HA;
- manage the extension of the authorization lifetime for a specific
MN;
- retrieve the state associated to a specific MN from the
correspondent HA.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Moreover, the protocol selected to implement the communication
between the AAAH server and the HA should fulfill the following
general requirements:
- inactive peer detection: the AAAH server should be able to
promptly detect an HA failure. This may be useful to aid the HA
selection algorithm;
- mutual-authentication: the AAAH server and the HA must be able to
authenticate each other in order to prevent the installation of
unauthorized state on the HA;
- confidentiality: since the IKE pre-shared key is derived by the
AAAH server and then delivered to the HA, the correspondent
message exchange must be protected against eavesdropping. This
implies that confidentiality is one of the main requirements;
- integrity: the exchanged configuration parameters must be
protected against any alteration and thus the protocol must
provide integrity protection.
6.2 Management of MIPv6 authorization state
The Home Agent is required to store some authorization data for each
of the MNs it is serving. A new data structure may be used for this
purpose and it should include at least the following fields:
- NAI of the user;
- Home Address assigned to the MN;
- Cryptographic Data: this field includes all the information to be
used for bootstrapping IKE, that is the PSK value and its
lifetime;
- Authorization Lifetime: it is the lifetime of the Mobile IPv6
service granted to the MN;
At the expiration of the Authorization Lifetime the HA should check
if there is an active entry for the MN in its Binding Cache in order
to verify if the MN is still using Mobile IPv6. If the entry is
available the Home Agent should negotiate with the AAAH server an
extension of the Authorization Lifetime granted to the MN. Otherwise,
the HA should immediately release the authorization state associated
to that MN and eventually notify the session termination to the AAAH
server (e.g. by means of a Session Termination Request if the
employed AAAH-HA protocol is Diameter).
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Moreover, the release of the resources previously allocated on the
Home Agent can be undertaken at any time by the AAAH server.
Typically this happens at credit exhaustion or when the MN
disconnects from the network.
The policies adopted by the AAAH server to release the resources
allocated to the MN may vary depending on the user service profile.
For instance, the AAAH server may decide to postpone the release of
the resources on the HA in order to allow the MN to continue using
the Mobile IPv6 service even if it has moved to an access network for
which no roaming agreements are in place (e.g. a corporate network or
a network providing cost-free access). In that case, the MN can
continue to rely on the IPsec SA previously negotiated with the HA
and the respective authorization is managed through the Mobile IPv6
Authorization Lifetime.
7. New EAP TLVs
The general format of an EAP-TLV is depicted below.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|M|R| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Value...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
TLVs defined in this draft are:
- MIPv6-Authorization-TLV. This is a generic TLV which carries all
TLVs related to MIPv6 authorization and configuration. It is
defined as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|M|R| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Value...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
M
0 - Non-mandatory TLV
R
Reserved, set to zero (0)
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Type
TBD - MIPv6-Authorization
Length
The length of the Value field in octets
Value
This field carries the subsequent TLVs
- Service-Status-TLV. This TLV is sent by the AAAH to inform the MN
about the status of Mobile IPv6 service. It is defined as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=Service-Status | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD - Service-Status
Length
1
Code
0 = MIPv6 service is available
1 = MIPv6 service is not available
- Service-Selection-TLV. This TLV is sent by the MN to inform the
AAAH whether it wants to activate MIPv6 service or whether the
service is already active.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=Service-Selection | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Type
TBD - Service-Selection
Length
1
Code
0 = activate MIPv6 service
1 = MIPv6 service already active
2 = do not activate MIPv6 service
- Service-Options-TLV. This TLV is used by the AAAH server to
advertise the service options the MN can ask for. It is also used
by the MN to communicate its selection to the AAAH. So far only
the HA in visited domain option has been defined. The TLV has the
following format:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=Service-Options | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|V| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD - Service-Options
Length
2
V
from AAAH to MN:
0 = AAAH cannot provide a HA in the visited domain
1 = AAAH can provide a HA in the visited domain
from MN to AAAH:
0 = MN does not specify any preference on HA location
1 = MN is requesting a HA in the visited domain
Reserved
15 bit reserved set to 0
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
- Home-Agent-Address-TLV. It is defined as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=HA-Address | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Home Agent Address |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD - Home-Agent-Address
Length
16
Value
Home Agent Address
- Home-Address-TLV. It is defined as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=Home-Address | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| Home Address |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD - Home-Address
Length
16
Value
Home Address
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
- IKE-PSK-TLV. This TLV carries data related to IKE bootstrap; the
value field contains the PSK lifetime and the PSK value.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=IKE-PSK | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Key Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Key Value...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD - IKE-PSK
Length
4 + Key length
Value
Key Lifetime - the lifetime of the PSK in seconds. A value of
all ones means infinite
Key Value - the value of the PSK
- Negotiation-Result-TLV. It is defined as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=Negotiation-Result | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Result-Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Type
TBD - Result
Length
1
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Value
0 = Success
128 = Failure
8. Security Considerations
The Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping procedure described in this document
assumes the MN and the AAA server of the home domain exchange the
necessary parameters exploiting the EAP communication established for
network access authentication. Therefore, to secure the bootstrapping
procedure, the employed EAP method must support mutual authentication
as well as integrity and replay protection. Moreover, if the pre-
shared key needed to bootstrap the IPsec SA with the Home Agent is
not derived from the EAP key hierarchy but explicitly delivered to
the MN by the AAAH server, the EAP method must also provide
confidentiality. Several tunneled and non tunneled EAP methods, like
PEAPv2 and EAP-IKEv2, fulfill all of these security requirements.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Simone Ruffino, Tom Hiller, Hannes
Tschofening, Rafael Marin Lopez, Hiroyuki Ohnishi, Mayumi Yanagiya
and Yoshihiro Ohba for their valuable comments.
References
[1] Johnson, D., Perkins, C. and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in
IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.
[2] Patel, A. et al. "Problem Statement for bootstrapping Mobile
IPv6", draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrap-ps-00 (work in progress), July
2004.
[3] Manner, J., Kojo, M. "Mobility Related Terminology", RFC 3753,
June 2004.
[4] Palekar, A. et al., "Protected EAP Protocol (PEAP) Version 2",
draft-josefsson-pppext-eap-tls-eap-07 (work in progress),
October 2003.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
[5] N.Cam-Winget, D. McGrew, J. Salowey, H.Zhou, "EAP Flexible
Authentication via Secure Tunneling (EAP-FAST)", draft-cam-
winget-eap-fast-00.txt (work in progress), February 2004
[6] B. Aboba, L. Blunk, J. Vollbrecht, J. Carlson, H. Levkowetz,
"Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)", RFC 3748, June
2004.
[7] Funk, P., Blake-Wilson, S., "EAP Tunneled TLS Authentication
Protocol (EAP-TTLS)", draft-ietf-pppext-eap-ttls-04 (work in
progress), April 2004.
[8] Tschofenig, H., Kroeselberg, D., Ohba, Y., "EAP IKEv2 Method",
draft-tschofenig-eap-ikev2-03, February 2004.
[9] Narten, T., Draves, R., "Privacy Extensions for Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6", RFC 3041, January 2001.
[10] Faccin, S., Perkins, C., Le, F., Patil, B., "Diameter Mobile
IPv6 Application", draft-le-aaa-diameter- mobileipv6-03
(expired), April 2003.
[11] Arkko, J., Devarapalli, V., Dupont, F., "Using IPsec to Protect
Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents",
RFC 3776, June 2004.
[12] Harkins, D., Carrel, D., "The Internet Key Exchange (IKE)", RFC
2409, November 1998.
[13] Forsberg, D. et al., "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for
Network Access (PANA)", draft-ietf-pana-pana-04 (work in
progress), May 2004.
[14] Aboba, B., Simon, D., Arkko, J., Levkowetz, H., "EAP Key
Management Framework", draft-ietf-eap-keying-02 (work in
progress), July 2004.
[15] K. Chan, D. Durham, S. Gai, S. Herzog, K. McCloghrie, F.
Reichmeyer, J. Seligson, A. Smith, R. Yavatkar, "COPS Usage for
Policy Provisioning,", RFC 3084, March 2001.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
[16] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction
and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management
Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002.
Authors' Addresses
Gerardo Giaretta
Telecom Italia Lab
via G. Reiss Romoli, 274
10148 TORINO
Italy
Phone: +39 011 2286904
Email: gerardo.giaretta@tilab.com
Ivano Guardini
Telecom Italia Lab
via G. Reiss Romoli, 274
10148 TORINO
Italy
Phone: +39 011 2285424
Email: ivano.guardini@tilab.com
Elena Demaria
Telecom Italia Lab
via G. Reiss Romoli, 274
10148 TORINO
Italy
Phone: +39 011 2285403
Email: elena.demaria@tilab.com
Julien Bournelle
GET/INT
9 rue Charles Fourier
Evry 91011
France
Email: julien.bournelle@int-evry.fr
Maryline Maknavicius-Laurent
GET/INT
9 rue Charles Fourier
Evry 91011
France
Email: maryline.maknavicius@int-evry.fr
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft MIPv6 Authorization based on EAP July 2004
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Giaretta, et al. Expires - January 2005 [Page 25] | PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-22 03:56:39 |