One document matched: draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs-02.txt
Differences from draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs-01.txt
DCCP Working Group Gorry Fairhurst
Internet-Draft Arjuna Sathiaseelan
Intended status: Experimental University of Aberdeen
Expires: May 31, 2008 November 12, 2007
Quick-Start for Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)
draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs-02.txt
Status of this Draft
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of
six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 31, 2008.
Abstract
This document specifies the use of the Quick-Start mechanism by the
Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP). DCCP is a transport
protocol that allows the transmission of congestion-controlled,
unreliable datagrams. DCCP is intended for applications such as
streaming media, Internet telephony, and on-line games. In DCCP, an
application has a choice of congestion control mechanisms, each
specified by a Congestion Control Identifier (CCID). This document
specifies general procedures applicable to all DCCP CCIDs and
specific procedures for the use of Quick-Start with DCCP CCID-2 and
CCID-3. Quick-Start enables a DCCP sender to cooperate with any
Quick-Start routers along the end-to-end path to determine an
allowed sending rate at the start and, at times, in the middle of a
DCCP connection (e.g., after an idle or application-limited period).
The present specification is provided for use in controlled
environments, and not as a mechanism that would be intended or
appropriate for ubiquitous deployment in the global Internet.
Expires August 2007 [Page 1]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Quick-Start for DCCP
2.1 Sending a Quick-Start Request for a DCCP flow
2.2 The Quick-Start Interval
2.3 Receiving a Quick-Start Request for a DCCP flow
2.3.1 The Quick-Start Response Option
2.4 Receiving a Quick-Start Response
2.5 Procedure when no response to a Quick-Start Request
2.6 Procedure when a Quick-Start Packet is dropped
2.7 Interactions with Path MTU Discovery
2.8 Interactions with Middle boxes
3. Mechanisms for Specific CCIDs
3.1 Quick-Start for CCID-2
3.1.1 The Quick-Start Request for CCID-2
3.1.2 Sending a Quick-Start Response with CCID-2
3.1.3 Using the Quick-Start Response with CCID-2
3.1.4 Reported Loss during Quick-Start Mod
3.1.5 CCID-2 Feedback Traffic on the Reverse Path
3.2 Quick-Start for CCID-3
3.2.1 The Quick-Start Request for CCID-3
3.2.2 Sending a Quick-Start Response with CCID-3
3.2.3 Using the Quick-Start Response with CCID-3
3.2.4 The Quick-Start Validation Phase
3.2.5 Reported Loss during Quick-Start Mode or Validation Phase
3.2.6 An Example Quick-Start Scenario with CCID-3
3.2.7 CCID-3 Feedback Traffic on the Reverse Path
3.3 Quick-Start for CCID-4
3.3.1 The Quick-Start Request for CCID-4
3.3.2 Sending a Quick-Start Response with CCID-4
3.3.3 Using the Quick-Start Response with CCID-4
3.3.4 CCID-4 Feedback Traffic on the Reverse Path
4. Discussion of Issues
4.1 Over-run and Quick-Start Validation
4.2 Experimental Status
5. IANA Considerations
6. Acknowledgments
7. Security Considerations
8. References
8.1 Normative References
8.2 Informative References
9. Authors' Addresses
10. IPR Notices
10.1 Intellectual Property Statement
10.2 Disclaimer of Validity
11. Copyright Statement
Expires May 2008 [Page 2]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
1. Introduction
The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) [RFC4340] is a
transport protocol for congestion-controlled, unreliable datagrams,
intended for applications such as streaming media, Internet
telephony, and on-line games.
In DCCP, an application has a choice of congestion control
mechanisms, each specified by a Congestion Control Identifier (CCID)
[RFC4340]. There are general procedures applicable to all DCCP CCIDs
that are described in Section 2, and details that relate to how
individual CCIDs should operate, which are described in Section 3.
This separation of CCID-specific and DCCP general functions is in
the spirit of the modular approach adopted by DCCP.
Quick-Start [RFC4782] is an Experimental mechanism for transport
protocols specified for use in controlled environments. The current
specification of this mechanism is not intended or appropriate for
ubiquitous deployment in the global Internet.
Quick-Start is designed for use between end hosts within the same
network or on Internet paths that include IP routers. It works in
cooperation with any routers, allowing a sender to determine an
allowed sending rate at the start and at times in the middle of a
data transfer (e.g., after an idle or application-limited period).
This document assumes that the reader is familiar with RFC4782
[RFC4782], which specifies the use of Quick-Start with IP and with
TCP. Section 7 of RFC4782 also provides guidelines for the use of
Quick-Start with other transport protocols, including DCCP. This
document answers some of the issues that were raised by RFC4782 and
provides a definition of how Quick-Start must be used with DCCP.
In using Quick-Start, the sending DCCP end host indicates the
desired sending rate in bytes per second, using a Quick-Start option
in the IP header of a DCCP packet. Each Quick-Start capable router
along the path could, in turn, either approve the requested rate,
reduce the requested rate, or indicate that the Quick-Start Request
is not approved.
If the Quick-Start Request is approved by all the routers along the
path, then the DCCP receiver returns an appropriate Quick-Start
Response. On receipt of this, the sending end host can send at up to
the approved rate for one round-trip time. Subsequent transmissions
will be governed by the default CCID congestion control mechanisms
for the connection. If the Quick-Start Request is not approved, then
the sender must use the default congestion control mechanisms.
Expires May 2008 [Page 3]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
2. Quick-Start for DCCP
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Unless otherwise specified, DCCP end hosts follow the procedures
specified in Section 4 of [RFC4782], following the use specified for
Quick-Start with TCP.
2.1 Sending a Quick-Start Request for a DCCP flow
A DCCP sender MAY use a Quick-Start Request during the start of a
connection, when the sender would prefer to have a larger initial
rate than allowed by [RFC3390].
A Quick-Start Request MAY be also used once a DCCP flow is connected
(in the middle of a DCCP flow). In standard operation, DCCP CCIDs
can constrain the sending rate (or window) to less than that desired
(e.g. when an application increases the rate at which it wishes to
send). A DCCP sender that has data to send after an idle period or
application-limited period (i.e. where the sender transmits at less
than the allowed sending rate) can send a Quick-Start Request using
the procedures defined in Section 3.
Quick-Start Requests will be more effective if the Quick-Start Rate
is not larger than necessary. Each requested Quick-Start Rate that
has been approved, but was not fully utilized, takes away from the
bandwidth pool maintained by Quick-Start routers that would be
otherwise available for granting successive requests [RFC4782].
In contrast to most TCP applications, many DCCP applications have
the notion of a natural media rate that they wish to achieve. For
example, during the initial connection, a host may request a Quick-
Start rate equal to the media rate of the application.
When sending a Quick-Start Request, the DCCP sender SHOULD send the
Quick-Start Request using a packet that requires an acknowledgement,
such as a DCCP-Request, DCCP-Response, or DCCP-Data.
2.2 The Quick-Start Interval
Excessive use of the Quick-Start mechanism is undesirable. This
document therefore introduces the concept of the Quick-Start
Interval. End hosts therefore MUST NOT make a subsequent Quick-Start
Request within a period specified as the Quick-Start Interval.
When the connection is established, the Quick-Start Interval is
initialized to a value of 6 seconds.
Whenever a Quick-Start Request is sent, the Quick-Start Interval is
recalculated as max(6s, max (QSPrev_Interval * 2, 4*RTT)), where the
QSPrev_Interval is the value of the previous Quick-Start Interval.
Expires May 2008 [Page 4]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
The previous Quick-Start Interval (QSPrev_Interval) is set to zero
at initiation of a connection and whenever a Quick-Start Request is
approved.
Each unsuccessful Quick-Start Request, results in the Quick-Start
Interval being doubled (resulting in an exponential back-off). The
maximum time the sender can back-off is 64 seconds, after which a
sender ceases using Quick-Start and MUST NOT send any further Quick-
Start Requests for the remainder of the DCCP connection.
2.3 Receiving a Quick-Start Request for a DCCP flow
The procedure for processing a received Quick-Start Request is
normatively defined in [RFC4782], and summarised in this paragraph.
An end host that receives an IP packet containing a Quick-Start
Request passes the Quick-Start Request, along with the value in the
IP TTL field, to the receiving DCCP layer. If the receiving host is
willing to permit the Quick-Start Request, it SHOULD respond
immediately by sending a packet that carries the Quick-Start
Response option in the DCCP header of the corresponding feedback
packet (e.g. using a DCCP-Ack packet or in a DCCP-DataAck packet).
The Rate Request in the Quick-Start Response option is set to the
received value of the Rate Request in the Quick-Start option or to a
lower value if the DCCP receiver is only willing to allow a lower
Rate Request. Where information is available (e.g. knowledge of the
local layer 2 interface speed), a QS receiver SHOULD verify that the
received rate does not exceed its expected receive link capacity.
The TTL Diff in the Quick-Start Response is set to the difference
between the IP TTL value and the Quick-Start TTL value. The Quick-
Start Nonce in the Response is set to the received value of the
Quick-Start Nonce in the Quick-Start option.
If an end host receives an IP packet with a Quick-Start Request with
a request rate of zero, then this host SHOULD NOT send a Quick-Start
Response [RFC4782].
The Quick-Start Response MUST NOT be resent if it is lost in the
network [RFC4782]. Packet loss could be an indication of congestion
on the return path, in which case it is better not to approve the
Quick-Start Request.
2.3.1 The Quick-Start Response Option
The Quick-Start Response message must be carried by the transport
protocol using Quick-Start. This section defines a DCCP Header
option used to carry the Quick-Start response. This header option is
REQUIRED for end hosts to utilise the Quick-Start mechanism with
DCCP flows. The format resembles that defined for TCP [RFC4782].
Expires May 2008 [Page 5]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type=xQSOx | Length=8 | Resv. | Rate | TTL Diff |
| | | |Request| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Quick-Start Nonce | R |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1. The Quick-Start Response option.
### IANA ACTION, PLEASE REPLACE xQSOx with the assigned value in the
figure above.###
### IANA ACTION, PLEASE ALSO REPLACE xQSOx with the assigned value
in the paragraph below.###
The first byte of the Quick-Start Response option contains the
option kind, identifying the DCCP option (xQSOx).
The second byte of the Quick-Start Response option contains the
option length in bytes. The length field MUST be set to 8 bytes.
The third byte of the Quick-Start Response option contains a four-
bit Reserved field, and the four-bit allowed Rate Request, formatted
as in the IP Quick-Start Rate Request option [RFC4782].
The fourth byte of the DCCP Quick-Start Response option contains the
TTL Diff. The TTL Diff contains the difference between the IP TTL
and Quick-Start TTL fields in the received Quick-Start Request
packet, as calculated in [RFC4782].
Bytes 5-8 of the DCCP option contain the 30-bit Quick-Start Nonce
and a two-bit Reserved field.
2.4 Receiving a Quick-Start Response
Reception of a Quick-Start Response packet results in the sender
entering the Quick-Start Mode. The procedure following reception of
a Quick-Start Response packet is CCID-specific and described in
Section 3.
2.5 Procedure when no response to a Quick-Start Request
As in TCP, if a Quick-Start Request is dropped (i.e., the Request or
Response is not delivered by the network) the DCCP sender MUST
revert to the congestion control mechanisms it would have used if
the Quick-Start Request had not been approved. The connection is not
Expires May 2008 [Page 6]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
permitted to send a subsequent Quick-Start Request before expiry of
the current Quick-Start Interval (section 2.1).
2.6 Procedure when a Quick-Start Packet is dropped
While the sender is in the Quick-Start Mode, all sent packets are
known as Quick-Start Packets [RFC4782]. Loss of a Quick-Start
Packet is an indication of potential network congestion. The
behaviour of a DCCP sender following the loss of a Quick-Start
Packet is specific to a particular CCID (see section 3).
2.7 Interactions with Path MTU Discovery
DCCP implementations are encouraged to support Path MTU Discovery
(PMTUD) when applications are able to use a DCCP packet size that
exceeds the default Path MTU [RFC4340], [RFC4821]. Quick-Start
Requests SHOULD NOT be sent with packets that are used as a PMTUD
Probe Packet, since these packets could be lost in the network
increasing the probability of loss. It may therefore be preferable
to separately negotiate the PMTU and the use of Quick-Start.
The DCCP protocol is datagram-based and therefore the size of the
segments that are sent is a function of application behaviour as
well as being constrained by the largest supported Path MTU.
2.8 Interactions with Middle boxes
A Quick-Start Request is carried in an IP packet option [RFC4782].
Interactions with network devices (middleboxes) that inspect or
modify IP options could therefore lead to discard, ICMP error, or
DCCP-Reset when attempting to forward packets carrying a Quick-Start
Request.
If a DCCP sender sends a DCCP-Request that also carries a Quick-
Start Request, and does not receive a DCCP-Response to the packet,
the DCCP sender SHOULD resend the DCCP-Request packet without
including a Quick-Start Request.
Similarly, if a DCCP sender receives a DCCP-Reset in response to a
DCCP-Request packet that also carries a Quick-Start Request, then
the DCCP sender SHOULD resend DCCP-Request packet without the
Quick-Start Request.
The DCCP sender then ceases to use the Quick-Start Mechanism for the
remainder of the connection.
A DCCP sender that uses a Quick-Start Request within an established
connection, and does not receive a response will treat this as non-
approval of the request. Successive unsuccessful attempts will
result in an exponential increase in the Quick-Start Interval
(section 2.1). If this grows to a value exceeding 64 seconds the
DCCP sender ceases to use the Quick-Start Mechanism for the
remainder of the connection.
Expires May 2008 [Page 7]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
3. Mechanisms for Specific CCIDs
This section specifies the use of Quick-Start with DCCP CCID-2,
CCID-3, and CCID-4.
3.1 Quick-Start for CCID-2
This section describes the Quick-Start mechanism to be used with
DCCP CCID-2 [RFC4341]. CCID-2 uses a TCP-like congestion control
mechanism.
3.1.1 The Quick-Start Request for CCID-2
A Quick-Start Request MAY be sent to allow the sender to determine
if it is safe to use a larger initial cwnd. This permits a faster
start-up of a new DCCP CCID-2 flow.
A Quick-Start Request MAY also be sent for an established connection
to request a higher sending rate after an idle period or
application-limited period (described in section 2.1). This allows a
receiver to use a larger cwnd than allowed with standard operation.
A sender that has additional information that the network path has
changed (e.g. a mobile IP binding update [RFC3344], [RFC3775]) MAY
use Quick-Start to determine a new safe transmission rate. This use
of Quick-Start MUST be constrained by section 2.1, including
observing the Quick-Start Interval.
A Quick-Start Request that follows a loss or congestion event MUST
NOT request a Quick-Start rate that exceeds the largest congestion
window achieved by the CCID-2 connection since the last packet drop
(translated to a sending rate. The Quick-Start Request SHOULD NOT be
send a within a period less than the Quick-Start Interval following
the reported loss or congestion, unless it is sent as a result of a
network path change (subject to the rules above).
3.1.2 Sending a Quick-Start Response with CCID-2
A receiver processing a Quick-Start Request uses the method
described in Section 2.2. On receipt of a Quick-Start Request, the
receiver MUST send a Quick-Start Response (even if a receiver is
constrained by the ACK Ratio).
3.1.3 Using the Quick-Start Response with CCID-2
On receipt of a valid Quick-Start Response option, the sender MUST
send a Quick-Start Approved option [RFC4782] as an IP option using
the first Quick-Start Packet or send this as an option using a DCCP
control packet if there are no DCCP-Data packets pending
transmission.
Expires May 2008 [Page 8]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
If the approved Quick-Start rate is less than current sending rate,
the sender does not enter the Quick-Start Mode, and continues using
the procedure defined in CCID-2.
If the approved Quick-Start the sender exceeds the current sending
rate, the sender enters the Quick-Start Mode and continues in the
Quick-Start Mode for a maximum period of 1 RTT. While in the Quick-
Start Mode, all DCCP packets that it sends are known as "Quick-Start
Packets".
The sender sets its Quick-Start cwnd (QS_cwnd) as follows:
QS_cwnd = (R * T) / (s + H) (1)
where R the Rate Request in bytes per second, s is the packet size,
and H the estimated DCCP/IP header size in bytes (e.g., 32 bytes for
DCCP layered directly over IPv4).
A CCID-2 sender MAY then increase its cwnd to the QS_cwnd, if the
QS_cwnd is greater than cwnd. The cwnd SHOULD NOT be reduced (i.e.,
a QS_cwnd lower than cwnd should be ignored, since the CCID-2
congestion control method already permits this rate). CCID-2 is not
a rate-paced protocol. Therefore, if the QS_cwnd is used, the
sending host MUST implement a suitable method to pace the rate at
which the Quick-Start Packets are sent until it receives an ACK for
a packet sent during the Quick-Start Mode [RFC4782]. The sending
host SHOULD also record the previous cwnd and note that the new cwnd
has been determined by Quick-Start, rather by other means (e.g. by
setting a flag to indicate that it is in Quick-Start Mode).
When the sender receives the first ACK to a packet sent in the
Quick-Start Mode, the sender MUST reduce the cwnd to the actual
flight size (the current amount of unacknowledged data sent)
[RFC4782].
3.1.4 Reported Loss during Quick-Start Mode
A sender in the Quick-Start Mode or Validation Phase that detects
congestion (e.g. receives a feedback packet that reports new packet
loss or a packet with a congestion marking), MUST immediately leave
the Quick-Start Mode or Validation Phase and enter the congestion
avoidance phase [RFC4341].
3.1.5 CCID-2 Feedback Traffic on the Reverse Path
A CCID-2 receiver sends feedback for groups of received packets
[RFC4341]. Approval of a higher transmission rate using Quick-Start
will increase control traffic on the reverse path. A return path
that becomes congested could have a transient negative impact on
other traffic flows sharing the return link. The lower rate of
feedback will then limit the achievable rate in the forward
direction.
Expires May 2008 [Page 9]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
3.2 Quick-Start for CCID-3
This section describes the Quick-Start mechanism to be used with
DCCP CCID-3 [RFC4342]. The rate-based congestion control mechanism
used by CCID-3, leads to specific issues that are addressed by
Quick-Start in this section, and include the introduction of a
Quick-Start Validation Phase.
3.2.1 The Quick-Start Request for CCID-3
A Quick-Start Request MAY be sent to allow the sender to determine
if it is safe to use a larger initial sending sate. This permits a
faster start-up of a new DCCP flow.
A Quick-Start Request MAY also be sent to request a higher sending
rate after an idle period (in which the nofeedback timer expires
[ID.DCCP-FR]) or an application-limited period (described in section
2.1). This allows a receiver to increase the sending rate faster
than allowed with standard operation (i.e. faster than twice the
rate reported by a CCID-3 receiver in the most recent feedback
message).
A sender that has additional information that the network path has
changed (e.g. a mobile IP binding update [RFC3344], [RFC3775]) MAY
use Quick-Start to determine a new safe transmission rate. This use
of Quick-Start MUST be constrained by section 2.1, including
observing the Quick-Start Interval.
The requested rate specified in a Quick-Start Request must consider
the current loss event rate (if any), either from calculation at the
sender or from feedback received from the receiver. CCID-3 requires
that a sender must not send more than the upper bound dictated by
the loss event rate. This rate offers a safe response in the
presence of expected congestion. In addition, a sender SHOULD NOT
send a Quick-Start Request within a period less than the Quick-Start
Interval following reported loss or congestion, unless it is as a
result of a network path change (subject to the rules above).
3.2.2 Sending a Quick-Start Response with CCID-3
When processing a received Quick-Start Request, the receiver uses
the method described in Section 2.2. In addition, if a CCID-3
receiver uses the window counter to send periodic feedback messages,
then the receiver sets its local variable last_counter to the value
of the window counter reported by the segment containing the Quick-
Start Request. The next feedback message would then be sent when the
window_counter is greater or equal to last_counter + 4. If the CCID-
3 receiver uses a feedback timer to send period feedback messages,
then the DCCP receiver MUST reset the CCID-3 feedback timer, causing
the feedback to be sent as soon as possible. This helps to align the
timing of feedback to the start and end of the period in which
Quick-Start Packets are sent, and will normally result in feedback
Expires May 2008 [Page 10]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
at a time that is approximately the end of the period when Quick-
Start Packets are received.
3.2.3 Using the Quick-Start Response with CCID-3
On receipt of a valid Quick-Start Response option, the sender enters
the Quick-Start Mode. The sender MUST send a Quick-Start Approved
option [RFC4782] as an IP option using the first Quick-Start Packet
or send this as an option using a DCCP control packet if there are
no DCCP-Data packets pending transmission.
If the approved Quick-Start rate is less than current sending rate,
the sender does not enter the Quick-Start Mode, and continues using
the procedure defined in CCID-3. While in the Quick-Start Mode, all
DCCP packets that it sends are known as "Quick-Start Packets".
If the approved Quick-Start the sender exceeds the current sending
rate, the sender enters the Quick-Start Mode and continues in the
Quick-Start Mode for a maximum period of 1 RTT. The sender sets its
Quick-Start sending rate (QS_sendrate) as follows:
QS_sendrate = R * s/(s + H) (2)
where R the Rate Request in bytes per second, s is the packet size,
and H the estimated DCCP/IP header size in bytes (e.g., 32 bytes).
A CCID-3 host MAY then increase its sending rate (sendrate) to the
QS_sendrate, if the QS_sendrate is greater than sendrate. The rate
SHOULD NOT be reduced (i.e., a QS_sendrate lower than sendrate
should be ignored). CCID-3 is a rate-paced protocol. Therefore, if
the QS_sendrate is used, the sending host MUST pace the rate at
which the Quick-Start Packets are sent over the next RTT. The
sending host SHOULD also record the previous congestion-controlled
rate and note that the new rate has been determined by Quick-Start
rather by other means (e.g. by setting a flag to indicate that it is
in Quick-Start Mode).
The sender exits the Quick-Start Mode after either:
* receipt of a feedback packet acknowledging one or more Quick-Start
Packets,
* A period of 1 RTT after receipt of a Quick-Start Response,
or
* Detection of a loss or congestion event (see Section 3.2.5).
3.2.4 The Quick-Start Validation Phase
After transmitting a set of Quick-Start Packets (and providing that
no loss or ECN marking is reported), the sender enters the Quick-
Start Validation Phase. This phase persists for a period during
which the sender seeks to affirm that the capacity used by the
Quick-Start Packets did not introduce congestion. (This phase is
introduced, because unlike TCP (and CCID-2), CCID-3 does not receive
frequent feedback that would indicate the congestion state of the
forward path). While in the Quick-Start Validation Phase, the sender
Expires May 2008 [Page 11]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
is tentatively permitted to continue sending at the QS_sendrate. On
conclusion of the Validation Phase, the sender expects to receive
assurance that it may safely use the current rate.
A sender that receives feedback that reports a loss or congestion
event must follow the procedures described in Section 3.2.5.
The sender SHOULD exit the Quick-Start Validation Phase on receipt
of feedback that acknowledges all packets sent in the Quick-Start
Mode (i.e. all Quick-Start Packets). It MUST exit this phase on
expiry of the Quick-Start validation time. The Quick-Start
Validation Phase is limited to the Quick-Start Validation Time (a
maximum of 1.5 RTTs).
A sender that completes the Quick-Start Validation phase with no
reported packet loss or congestion, stops using the QS_sendrate and
MUST recalculate a suitable sending rate using the standard
congestion control mechanisms [RFC4342]. For example, if the DCCP
sender was in slow-start prior to the Quick-Start Request, and no
packets were lost or marked since that time, then the sender
continues in slow-start after exiting Quick-Start Mode until the
sender sees a packet loss, or congestion is reported.
If no feedback is received within the Quick-Start Validation Phase,
the sender MUST return to the minimum of the original rate (at the
start of the Quick-Start Mode) and one half of the QS_sendrate.
3.2.5 Reported Loss during Quick-Start Mode or Validation Phase
A sender in the Quick-Start Mode or Validation Phase that detects
congestion (e.g. receives a feedback packet that reports new packet
loss or a packet with a congestion marking) MUST immediately leave
the Quick-Start Mode or Validation Phase and enter the congestion
avoidance phase [RFC4342]. This implies re-calculating the send
rate, X, as required by RFC4342:
X = max(min(X_calc, min(2*X_recv, 2* QS_recv-rate)), s/t_mbi);
where X_recv is the previously cached receiver rate and QS recv-rate
is the receiver rate reported by the feedback due to the arrival of
Quick-Start Packets.
3.2.6 An Example Quick-Start Scenario with CCID-3
DCCP Sender DCCP Receiver
Quick-Start +----------------------------------------------+
Request/Response | Quick-Start Request --> |
| <-- Quick-Start Response |
| Quick-Start Approve --> |
+----------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------+
Quick-Start | Quick-Start Packets --> |
Expires May 2008 [Page 12]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
Mode | |
| <-- Feedback from Receiver|
+----------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------
Quick-Start | Packets --> |
Validation Phase | |
| <-- Feedback from Receiver|
+----------------------------------------------+
CCID-3 | Packets --> |
Congestion | |
Control | <-- Feedback from Receiver |
Figure 2. The Quick-Start Mode and Validation Phase.
Figure 2 shows an example of the use of Quick-Start with CCID-3.
3.2.7 CCID-3 Feedback Traffic on the Reverse Path
A CCID-3 receiver sends feedback at least once each RTT [RFC4342].
Use of Quick-Start is therefore not expected to significantly
increase control traffic on the reverse path.
3.3 Quick-Start for CCID-4
This section describes the Quick-Start mechanism to be used with
DCCP CCID-4 [ID.CCID4]. CCID-4 is similar to CCID-3 except that a
sender using CCID-4 is limited to a maximum of 100 packets/second.
The Quick-Start procedure defined below therefore resembles that for
CCID-3.
3.3.1 The Quick-Start Request for CCID-4
The procedure for sending a Quick-Start Request using CCID-4 is the
same as for CID-3, defined in section 3.2.1. In addition, the
requested rate specified MUST be less than or equal to the
equivalent of sending rate of 100 packet per second [ID.CCID4].
3.3.2 Sending a Quick-Start Response with CCID-4
This procedure is the same as for CCID-3, defined in section 3.2.2.
3.3.3 Using the Quick-Start Response with CCID-4
This procedure is the same as for CCID-3, defined in sections 3.2.3,
3.2.4, and 3.2.5, except that the congestion control procedures
defined in [ID.CCID4] and used in place of those defined in
[RFC4342]
3.3.4 CCID-4 Feedback Traffic on the Reverse Path
A CCID-4 receiver sends feedback at least once each RTT (defined in
[RFC4342]). Use of Quick-Start is therefore not expected to
significantly increase control traffic on the reverse path.
Expires May 2008 [Page 13]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
4. Discussion of Issues
The considerations for using Quick-Start with DCCP are not
significantly different to those for Quick-Start with TCP
4.1 Over-run and Quick-Start Validation
CCID-3 raises an issue in that a sender using Quick-Start may
continue to use the rate specified by a Quick-Start Response for a
period that exceeds one path round trip time (i.e. what TCP would
have used). This over-run is a result of the less frequent feedback
interval used by TFRC (i.e. CCID-3 provides feedback once per RTT,
rather than once for a few packets). In the method specified by this
document, the over-run is bounded by the Quick-Start Validation Time
to not more than an additional 1.5 RTTs.
The currently selected method is chosen as a compromise that
reflects the need to terminate quickly following the loss of a
feedback packet, and the need to allow sufficient time for end host
and router processing as well as the different perceptions of the
path RTT held at the sender and receiver. Any reported loss or
congestion results in immediate action without waiting for
completion of the Quick-Start Validation period.
4.2 Experimental Status
There are many cases in which Quick-Start Requests would not be
approved [RFC4782]. These include communication over paths
containing routers, IP tunnels, MPLS paths, and the like that do not
support Quick-Start. These paths also include paths with routers or
middleboxes that drop packets containing IP options. Quick-Start
Requests could be difficult to approve over paths that include
multi-access layer-two networks.
Transient effects could arise when the transport protocol packets
associated with a connection are multiplexed over multiple parallel
(sometimes known as alternative) link or network-layer paths, and
Quick-Start is used, since it will be effective on only one of the
paths, but could lead to increased traffic on all paths.
A CCID-2 sender using Quick-Start can increase the control traffic
on the reverse path, which could have a transient negative impact on
other traffic flows sharing the return link (section 3.1.5). The
lower rate of feedback will then limit the achievable rate in the
forward direction.
[RFC4782] also describes environments where the Quick-Start
mechanism could fail with false positives, with the sender
incorrectly assuming that the Quick-Start Request had been approved
by all of the routers along the path. As a result of these
concerns, and as a result of the difficulties and seeming absence of
motivation for routers, such as core routers, to deploy Quick-Start,
Expires May 2008 [Page 14]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
Quick-Start has been proposed as a mechanism that could be of use in
controlled environments, and not as a mechanism that would be
intended or appropriate for ubiquitous deployment in the global
Internet.
Further experimentation would be required to confirm the deployment
of Quick-Start and to investigate performance issues that may arise,
prior to any recommendation for use over the general Internet.
5. IANA Considerations
This document requires IANA involvement for the assignment of a DCCP
Option Type from the DCCP Option Types Registry. This Option is
applicable to all CCIDs and is known as the "Quick-Start Response"
Option and is defined in Section 2.2.1. It specifies a length value
in the format used for options numbered 32-128.
6. Acknowledgments
The author gratefully acknowledges the previous work by Sally Floyd
to identify issues that impact Quick-Start for DCCP, and her
comments to improve this document. We also acknowledge comments and
corrections from Pasi Sarolahti, Mark Allman and others in the IETF
DCCP WG.
7. Security Considerations
Security issues are discussed in [RFC4782]. Middlebox deployment
issues are also highlighted in section 2.7. No new security issues
are raised within this document.
8. References
8.1 Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, 1997.
[RFC4340] Kohler, E., Handley, M., and S. Floyd, "Datagram
Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)", RFC 4340, March 2006.
[RFC4341] Floyd, S. and E. Kohler, "Profile for Datagram Congestion
Control Protocol (DCCP) Congestion Control ID 2: TCP-like Congestion
Control", RFC 4341, March 2006.
[RFC4342] Floyd, S., Kohler, E., and J. Padhye, "Profile for
Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) Congestion Control ID 3:
TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC)", RFC 4342, March 2006.
Expires May 2008 [Page 15]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
[RFC4782] Floyd, S., Allman, M., Jain, A., and P. Sarolahti, "Quick-
Start for TCP and IP", RFC 4782, January 2007.
[ID.CCID4] Floyd, S., Kohler, E., "Profile for Datagram Congestion
Control Protocol (DCCP) Congestion ID 4: TCP-Friendly Rate Control
for Small Packets (TFRC-SP)", IETF Work In Progress, 2007.
8.2 Informative References
[RFC3344] Perkins, C., Ed., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC
3344, August 2002.
[RFC3775] Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support
in IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.
[RFC3390] Allman, M., Floyd, S., Partridge, C., "Increasing TCP's
Initial Window", RFRC 3390, October 2002.
[RFC4821] Mathis, M. and J. Heffner, "Packetization Layer Path MTU
Discovery", RFC 4821, March 2007.
[ID.DCCP-FR] Kohler, E., Floyd, F., "Faster Restart for TCP
Friendly Rate Control (TFRC) ", IETF Work In Progress, 2007.
9. Authors' Addresses
Godred Fairhurst
School of Engineering
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen, AB24 3UE
UK
Email: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Web: http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry
Arjuna Sathiaseelan
School of Engineering
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen, AB24 3UE
UK
Email: arjuna@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Web: http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/arjuna
10. IPR Notices
10.1 Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described
Expires May 2008 [Page 16]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
in this document or the extent to which any license under such
rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that
it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights.
Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC
documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
ipr@ietf.org.
10.2 Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on
an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE
IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL
WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE
ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
11. Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Expires May 2008 [Page 17]
INTERNET DRAFT Quick-Start for DCCP November 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[RFC EDITOR NOTE:
This section must be deleted prior to publication]
DOCUMENT HISTORY
Individual Draft 00
This is the first presentation of this document.
Individual Draft 01
This includes fixes for NiTs (thanks Pasi)
It also includes a note on initial rates in 2.1
All mention of packet loss now qualified with loss/congestion.
It adds supports for CCID-2.
It also defines the Quick-Start Interval as a way of controlling the
rate at which hosts may issue Quick-Start requests.
Individual Draft 02 - Draft intended for more general review
Resolution of many minor outstanding editorial issues.
Includes feedback on a longer Quick-Start period from Mark Allman.
Includes new section on the interaction with middleboxes.
CCID-2 and CCID-3 text now use the same style.
Added description for CCID-4, based on CCID-3.
Added clarification of PMTUD interaction.
Reorganised to create a section on the QS Interval
Rewritten sections on what to do after loss/congestion
Clarified path change triggers (e.g. from mobility binding updates)
There are no currently known remaining issues to be addressed.
[END of RFC EDITOR NOTE]
Expires May 2008 [Page 18] | PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 11:34:37 |