One document matched: draft-ema-vpim-clid-00.txt
Internet Draft D. Dunne
Document: draft-ema-vpim-clid-00.txt Nortel Networks
Category: Standards Track
Expires in Six Months July 14, 2000
Calling Line Identification for VPIM Messages
STATUS OF THIS MEMO:
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
This document describes a method for identifying the originating
party of a VPIM message.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Calling Line Identification Field
2.1 Internal Call
2.2 External Call
3. Caller Name Field
4. Syntax
4.1 Calling Line Identification Syntax
4.2 Caller Name Syntax
4.3 Example
5. IANA Registration
6. Security Considerations
7. References
8. Author's Address
9. Full Copyright Statement
Dunne Standards Track [Page 1]
Internet Draft Calling Line ID for VPIM Messages July 2000
1. Introduction
There is currently a need for a mechanism to identify the
originating party of a VPIM message, outside of the "FROM" header
information. The telephone number and name of the caller are
typically available from the telephone network, but where to store
these in an Internet message is not obvious.
This information is intended for use when the VPIM message format is
used for storing "Call Answer" messages, i.e. the calling party
leaves a voice message for the recipient, who was unable to answer
the call.
The VPIM specification [3] suggests the originating number be
included as an Internet address, using the first method shown below.
There are several other ways to store this information, but they
all involve some manipulation of the "From" field. For example:
1. From: "416 555 1234" <non-mail-user@host>
2. From: "Unknown" <4165551234@host>
3. From:
As a result, it is useful to be able to store the calling party's
name and number as-is without manipulation. This would allow future
generation of the proper Internet address, and also display of this
information to the recipient.
RFC2076 "Common Internet Message Headers" [4] currently lists
"phone" as an Internet message header which would hold the
originating party's telephone number, but it is listed as "non-
standard", i.e. usage of this header is not in general recommended.
It also has no defined format, making the information unparsable.
There is no similar entry for the originator's name.
It is proposed that two new message header fields be included to
hold this information, namely the Calling Line Identification
("Caller-ID"), and Caller Name ("Caller-Name").
2. Calling Line Identification Field
The Calling Line Identification header ("Caller-ID") is to hold
sufficient information for the recipient to call back, or reply to,
the sender of the message. This leads to two distinct possibilities:
internal and external calling.
Note that for both possibilities, this field contains ONLY the
digits of the number; it does not include any separating character
(e.g. "-").
2.1 Internal Call
For an internal call (e.g. between two extensions within the same
Dunne Standards Track [Page 2]
Internet Draft Calling Line ID for VPIM Messages July 2000
company), it is sufficient to relay only the extension of the
calling party, based on the company dialling plan.
2.2 External Call
For an international call, the CLID must be the full international
number as described in E.164 [2], i.e. Country Code (CC), National
Destination Code (NDC) and Subscriber Number (SN). No other
information, such as prefixes or symbols (e.g. "+"), should be
included. This requires provisioning for up to 15 digits.
For a call within North America, it is sufficient to only include 10
digits as described in GR-31-CORE Issue 1 [1]. Though it is
desirable that an international number NOT be truncated to 10 digits
if it contains more, it is recognized that this will happen due to
limitations of various systems.
Also note that the GR-31-Core document also specifies how to include
the date and time with the originating telephone number. This need
not be followed, as there is an existing "Date" Internet header
intended to hold this information. It is a local implementation
decision whether this time or the local system time be recorded in
the "Date" header.
3. Caller Name Field
The name of the person sending the message is also important. It is
to be included whether the call is internal or external. The name
should be representable using the American Standard Code for
Information Interchange (ASCII) character set.
The length of the name field should also not exceed 15 characters,
as defined in TR-NWT-001188 [6]. It may contain punctuation or
white spaces as appropriate.
4. Syntax
The syntax of both the Calling Line Identification and Caller Name
according to ABNF [5] is as follows.
4.1 Calling Line Identification Syntax
"Caller-ID" ":" 1*15DIGIT CRLF
4.2 Caller Name Syntax
"Caller-Name" ":" 1*15CHAR CRLF
4.3 Example
To: +19725551212@vm1.mycompany.com
Caller-ID: 6137684087
Dunne Standards Track [Page 3]
Internet Draft Calling Line ID for VPIM Messages July 2000
Caller-Name: Derrick Dunne
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 93 10:20:20 -0700 (CDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Voice 2.0)
Content-type: Multipart/Voice-Message; Version=2.0;
Boundary="MessageBoundary"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 123456789@VM2.mycompany.com
Sensitivity: Private
Importance: High
5. IANA Registration
The values corresponding to the "Caller-ID" and "Caller-Name" fields
are not fixed, and need not be registered.
6. Security Considerations
There are two scenarios that must be considered. The first is
mentioned in section 2.2 - the truncation of an international number
to 10 digits. This could result in a misinterpretation of the
resulting number. For instance, an international number (e.g. from
Ireland) of the form "353 91 73 3307" could be truncated to "53 91
73 3307" if received in North America, and interpreted as "539 112
3456" - a seemingly "North American" style number. Thus leaving the
recipient with the incorrect information to reply to the message.
The second scenario is the possibility of sending an internal
extension to an external recipient when a Call Answer message is
forwarded. This poses two problems, the recipient is given the
wrong phone number, and the company's dialling plan could be exposed.
7. References
1. Telcordia Technologies, "Class Feature: Calling Number Delivery
Generic Requirements", GR-31-CORE Issue 1, June 2000
2. International Telecommunications Union - Standardization Sector,
"Recommendation E.164, The International Public Telecommunication
Numbering Plan", June 1997
3. Parsons, Vaudreuil, "Voice Profile for Internet Mail - version 2",
draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-00.txt, July 2000
4. Palme, "Common Internet Message Headers", RFC2076, February 1997
5. Crocker and Overell (Editors), "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, Internet Mail Consortium and Demon
Internet Ltd., November 1997
6. Telcordia Technologies, "CLASS Feature: Calling Name Delivery
Generic Requirements", TR-NWT-001188, Issue 1, December 1991
Dunne Standards Track [Page 4]
Internet Draft Calling Line ID for VPIM Messages July 2000
7. Resnick (Editor), "Internet Message Format", draft-ietf-drums-msg-
fmt-08.txt, January 2000
8. Author's Address
Derrick Dunne
Nortel Networks
P.O. Box 3511, Station
Ottawa, ON K1Y 4H7
Canada
Phone: +1-613-768-4087
Fax: +1-613-763-4461
email: dunned@nortelnetworks.com
9. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Dunne Standards Track [Page 5]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 06:02:39 |