One document matched: draft-chiu-network-wnfs-sec-nego-01.txt

Differences from draft-chiu-network-wnfs-sec-nego-00.txt

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


        RFC 2755

        Title:      Security Negotiation for WebNFS
        Author(s):  A. Chiu, M. Eisler, B. Callaghan
        Status:     Informational
        Date:       January 2000
        Mailbox:    alex.chiu@Eng.sun.com, michael.eisler@Eng.sun.com,
                    brent.callaghan@Eng.sun.com
        Pages:      12
        Characters: 23493
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
        I-D Tag:    draft-chiu-network-wnfs-sec-nego-01.txt

        URL:        ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2755.txt


This document describes a protocol for a WebNFS client [RFC2054] to
negotiate the desired security mechanism with a WebNFS server
[RFC2055] before the WebNFS client falls back to the MOUNT v3 protocol
[RFC1813].  This document is provided so that people can write
compatible implementations.

This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG.  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body 
help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:

        To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo 
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.