One document matched: draft-caron-aaa-cost-advertisement-00.txt
Jacques Caron
INTERNET-DRAFT IP Sector Technologies
Expires: December 2002 June 2002
AAA cost advertisement extensions
<draft-caron-aaa-cost-advertisement-00.txt>
1 Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
2 Abstract
In many roaming scenarios, it is necessary to be able to carry cost
information between the different parties in order to facilitate
credit checking, real-time accounting, cost presentation to the
user. It is also necessary that this information be interpretable by
automated systems, that these systems be able to modify it to take
commissions into account, and that non-repudiation mechanisms be
available. This document proposes such a system to be used with AAA
architectures.
Table of Contents
1 Status of this Memo..............................................1
2 Abstract.........................................................1
3 Introduction.....................................................2
4 Terminology......................................................3
5 Conventions used in this document................................3
6 Description of the overall setup.................................3
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 1
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
7 Billing formats..................................................4
8 AAA attributes...................................................7
8.1 Cost advertisement attribute...................................7
8.2 Cost acceptance attribute.....................................10
9 Examples........................................................12
9.1 Fixed visited network cost....................................12
9.2 Fixed end-user cost...........................................14
10 Security Considerations........................................15
11 References.....................................................15
12 Author's Address...............................................17
3 Introduction
In many roaming contexts, in particular public WLAN roaming, costs
incurred for connection to foreign networks can vary significantly.
Costs can also vary according to the user's subscription plan, and
to the exact relationship (possibly multi-level) between the visited
network and the commercial operator that bills the end-user, in such
a manner that it is difficult to determine these costs in advance.
For these reasons, it appears necessary to be able to:
- verify that a user can use such a connection, based on its
subscription plan and any credit-checking that could be needed;
- present costs to the user during connection setup time;
- be able to carry billing and accounting information in real time
between the different parties involved (the visited network, the
commercial operator, and eventually one or many roaming operators in
between).
This billing and accounting information is not necessarily the same
over the whole chain, since intermediate roaming operators are
likely to take a commission on transaction they handle and for which
they manage compensation.
It is also important for all parties to be sure that they will get
payment for the services provided, and hence non-repudiation
mechanisms are needed on all commercial relationships involved:
- between the end-user and its home network (out of the scope of
this document)
- between each pair of operators along the path between the visited
network and the home network, via possible one or many roaming
operators.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 2
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
Finally, cost information can be expressed in many different ways,
ranging from a simple fixed cost per connection to complex variable
costs based on duration or volume. Similarly, the commissions can be
either added to the cost requested by the visited network (the cost
to the end-user being then higher), or accounted separately (the
cost to the end-user being exactly what the visited network
proposes, but the home network getting a smaller share of the
total). Any specification must account for this variety of different
formats.
This document aims to describe such a specification for carrying
cost information within AAA protocols, more specifically RADIUS
[1,2,3] or Diameter [4].
4 Terminology
WISP Wireless Internet Service Provider. An organization which
provides access to the Internet via Wireless LAN
infrastructure.
WLAN Wireless LAN, using e.g. IEEE 802.11 protocols.
5 Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [5].
6 Description of the overall setup
To help in the understanding of the specification, we will use a
typical example of a multi-level roaming scenario, in which two
roaming operators are intermediaries between the visited network and
the home network:
+----+ +----+ +-----+ +-----+ +----+
|USER| ---> |WISP| ---> |ROAM1| ---> |ROAM2| ---> |HOME|
+----+ +----+ +-----+ +-----+ +----+
/ / |
+----+ <-----------------------------------------------+
In this scenario, the USER attempts to connect to WISP. It provides
an identity in the form of a NAI [6], which the WISP uses to route
(using a method like that described in [7]) an authentication and/or
authorization request towards the HOME network. Given the various
bi-lateral agreements in place, it actually sends the AA request to
ROAM1, which in turn sends it to ROAM2, and this one finally sends
it to HOME. Optionally, HOME may send a request (using an other
protocol not described here) to USER to verify that USER agrees to
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 3
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
the costs associated with this connection. These requests follow the
direction of the top arrows in the above diagram.
AA responses are sent along the same path in the reverse direction,
and match money flows: HOME will pay ROAM2, who will pay ROAM1
(after deducting its commission), ROAM1 will do the same to WISP.
Obviously, though, WISP will not pay USER, but USER will pay HOME.
For this reason, these responses need to have non-repudiation
mechanisms (digital signatures) to guarantee payment in exchange for
the service provided.
7 Billing formats
This specifications aims to take into account a wide variety of
billing formats, in order to accommodate various business models.
They are described using the following structures.
The format begins with a header structure:
+---------------+--------------------------------------------+
| Decimals | Currency |
+---------------+---------------+----------------------------+
| Number of types | Reserved |
+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
- Decimals in the number of decimals in the decimal representation
of currency units. For instance, if Decimals is 2, then a value of
150 means 1.50 of the currency unit.
- Currency is the ISO 4217 code of the currency used. It is expected
that on any given relationship, only one currency will be used (the
currency used for the actual billing between the two entities), and
that roaming operators will perform conversion between currencies if
they have relationships with entities using different currencies.
This information is used for confirmation purposes, and for events
of currency changes (like the switch from national currencies to the
Euro).
- Number of types is the number of different billing types
following, as described further.
After the cost header, comes the type header, which describes the
type of billing to be performed:
+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Type | Number of units |
+-------------------------------+----------------------------+
- Type describes what is counted to perform billing. Possible values
are:
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 4
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
1 Transaction: this is a one-off cost
2 Duration: billing is based on duration in seconds
3 Bytes in: billing is based on bytes received
4 Bytes out: billing is based on bytes sent
5 Bytes total: billing is based on total bytes
- Number of units indicates the number of billing units that follow.
Must be 1 for Type 1.
Billing units are described using the following format:
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Amount |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Quantity |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Repeat |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
- Amount is the amount of money that should be billed. The value
stored here should be divided by 10^decimals to get the number of
currency units.
- Quantity is the number of seconds or bytes that this amount will
cover. 0 means none, and all ones means unlimited. This field is
ignored for a Type of Transaction.
- Repeat is the number of times this unit will be repeated before
moving on to the next one. 0 means unlimited. This field is ignored
for a Type of Transaction.
Here are some examples:
00 'E' 'U' 'R'
00 01 00 00
00 01 00 01
00 00 00 0A
00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00
This indicates we bill in Euros (EUR), and amounts are given with no
decimals (0). There is one billing type, which is a transaction,
with only one unit, indicating an amount of 10.
In short: a cost of 10 euros for the transaction.
The same information could be represented as follows:
00 'E' 'U' 'R'
00 01 00 00
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 5
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
00 02 00 01
00 00 00 0A
FF FF FF FF
00 00 00 00
The difference being that billing is based on duration, but the
first (and only) duration billing unit is unlimited (FFFFFFFF).
An example of volume billing:
04 'U' 'S' 'D'
00 01 00 00
00 05 00 01
00 00 00 0F
00 00 04 00
00 00 00 00
Here we bill in US dollars (USD), with 4 decimals. There is one
billing type, which is based on total volume, and one unit, which
indicates that each kilobytes (0x400 = 1024 bytes) is billed 0.0015
USD (the value is 15 but we have 4 decimals). Measured quantities
should be rounded up to the next billing quantity.
An example of billing with an initial payment for a long period,
then smaller increments for additional time:
02 'E' 'U' 'R'
00 01 00 00
00 02 00 02
00 00 01 F4
00 00 03 84
00 00 00 01
00 00 00 32
00 00 00 3C
00 00 00 00
In this case we bill in euros with 2 decimals. There is one billing
type, which is based on duration, and two units. The first unit
indicates a cost of 5.00 EUR (0x1F4 = 500) for the first 15 minutes
(0x384 = 900 seconds). This unit is used once, after which
additional time is billed 0.50 EUR (0x32 = 50) per minute (0x3C = 60
seconds), indefinitely.
This last examples describes a scenario where we bill based on two
different quantities (here volume in and volume out):
02 'E' 'U' 'R'
00 02 00 00
00 03 00 01
00 00 00 0A
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 6
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
00 00 04 00
00 00 00 00
00 04 00 01
00 00 00 14
00 00 04 00
00 00 00 00
In this scenario we still bill in euros with 2 decimals, and there
are two billing types. The first one is based on volume in, and has
one unit of 0.10 EUR per kilobyte received, indefinitely. The second
billing type is based on volume out, and has one unit of 0.20 EUR
per kilobyte sent, indefinitely.
Many other combinations are possible, such as billing based on
duration and volume, free initial periods, discounts after a certain
time or volume, etc.
8 AAA attributes
In order to support the required functionality, the following new
attributes are required:
- a cost advertisement attribute
- a cost acceptance attribute
8.1 Cost advertisement attribute
The cost advertisement attribute Cost-Advertisement (code TBD) is
used in authorization requests, or in protocols such as RADIUS that
do not make a distinction between authentication and authorization
requests, in Access-Request packets.
In this last case, and if authentication takes several round-trips
(with Access-Challenge responses for authentication protocols such
as CHAP, ARAP, or EAP), the cost advertisement attribute should be
ignored by the AAA server until authentication is complete.
Intermediate proxies not being able to determine in advance whether
an Access-Request will be the final one, should handle all requests
the same.
The attribute format (excluding code and length portions which are
specific to the AAA protocol), is defined below:
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Flags |
+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Type | Length |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Cost data |
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 7
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
. ... .
+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Type | Length |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Cost data |
. ... .
+------------------------------------------------------------+
- Flags is a bitmap of global flags. Currently, all bits are
reserved, and should be set to 0.
- Type indicates the type of cost information following. It can have
the following values:
- 0 indicates this is the cost requested. Further parties along
the authorization chain should increment this cost to include their
commission or charges. In this case, there should be only one cost
element (type, length, cost data) present in the packet.
- 1 indicates this is the cost that the visited network (the
party originating the request) wants to charge the end-user. Further
parties along the authorization chain should leave this cost
unchanged, but add or increment a cost information element with type
2. The initial request (from the visited network to the first
roaming operator along the path) might contain only one cost element
(type, length, cost data). Further along the path, there should be
two elements, one with type 1 representing the cost the user should
be charged, and one with type 2 representing commissions and charges
of other parties. Only per-connection costs (i.e. with no variable
duration-based or volume-based costs) are allowed.
- 2 indicates this is the added cost that intermediate parties
want to charge for this transaction. Only per-connection costs (i.e.
with no variable duration-based or volume-based costs) are allowed.
- Length is the length of the cost data (excluding type and length)
- Cost data is cost information encoded as specified in section 7.
There can be one or two cost elements (type, length, cost data) in
the request. There can be one of type 0 or 1, or two of types 1 and
2 respectively. It is illegal to have a request containing:
- a cost element of type 0 and another cost element;
- more than one cost element of the same type;
- a cost element of type 2 with no cost element of type 1.
Such requests should be rejected with code TBD.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 8
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
Upon reception of a request containing a Cost-Advertisement
attribute, roaming operators should:
- store cost elements received for this request;
- if there is a cost element of type 0, increment it with their
charges;
- if there is a cost element of type 1 and no cost element of type
2, create one cost element of type 2 with their charges;
- if there is a cost element of type 1 and one of type 2, increment
this last one with their charges;
- find which other party the request should be sent to, either via
static tables, or using a dynamic protocol as described in [7];
- convert all cost information to the appropriate currency.
Note that a roaming operator might use several AAA proxies or
relays. In such a case, some of the nodes might carry the attribute
transparently, while others will perform the above functions.
Upon reception of an authorization request containing a Cost-
Advertisement attribute, and after successful authentication and
other authorization is performed, the home server should:
- store cost elements received for this request;
- if there is a cost element of type 0 or of type 1, use it for
credit-checking purposes and optional end-user cost advertisement;
- if the user does not pass credit-check tests, or rejects the cost,
authorization can be rejected, and none of the attributes defined in
this document need to be present;
- if there is a cost element of type 0, send it back in a Cost-
Accept attribute (defined below), with a proper digital signature;
- if there is a cost element of type 1, deduct cost information from
cost element of type 2 and any local costs that should be deducted,
and send the result back in a Cost-Accept attribute (defined below),
with a proper digital signature.
- if there is a maximum amount a user can be billed (e.g. pre-paid
users), then information from the Cost-Advertisement attributes can
be used to compute a maximum amount of time the user is allowed to
be connected, and sent back to the requestor in appropriate AAA
attributes.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 9
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
Discussion:
One might want to be able to carry cost information of type 1
in the original currency, for inclusion on the end user's bill.
However, since this information is used to compute compensation
between the different parties, which happens in fixed currencies,
the information must also be converted. An extra informational cost
element might need to be introduced to address this issue, but it
might make inconsistencies in currency conversion (which would
otherwise be "hidden" in the commissions/charges) a bit too obvious.
Discussion:
One might want to be able to support a maximum commission that
can be deducted from the amount billed to the end-user to compute
the amount paid back to the visited network, and further charges
would be added the amount billed to the end-user (reproducing what
happens with credit cards, where merchants pay a fixed commission,
but international transactions incur additional fees for the end-
user). This would require using the cost element types differently:
0 would be the base amount, 1 would be commissions charged to the
visited network, and 2 commissions charged to the end-user, for
instance.
Discussion:
Using maximum credit to give a maximum connection time works
only for duration-based billing. In other situations, a maximum cost
information might be needed instead, with the usual options when
that amount is used up: terminate, re-authenticate...
8.2 Cost acceptance attribute
The cost acceptance attribute Cost-Accept (code TBD) is used in
positive authorization responses, when the corresponding request
contained a Cost-Advertisement attribute. A client that submits a
request with a Cost-Advertisement attribute, but does not receive a
Cost-Accept attribute in the associated positive response, knows
that at least one node on the AAA path does not support these
extensions, and can drop the connection.
The cost acceptance attribute is used to carry:
- for requests that used cost elements with types 1 and 2,
information the charges that will be levied off the cost billed to
the user by intermediate parties;
- for all requests, digital signatures from the upstream operator
confirming that the costs are accepted.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 10
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
The cost acceptance attribute (excluding code and length information
that is specific to the AAA protocol used) has the following format:
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Flags |
+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Cost Data Type | Cost Data Length |
+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Signature Type | Signature Length |
+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Cost Data |
. ... .
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Signature Data |
. ... .
+------------------------------------------------------------+
- Flags is a bitmap of global flags. Currently, all bits are
reserved, and should be set to 0.
- Cost Data Type indicates the type of cost information following.
It can have the following values:
- 0 indicates that this is the net cost that is accepted for
this transaction. It should be the same as the cost in a type 0 cost
element submitted in a Cost-Advertisement attribute in the
corresponding request, or value lower than that submitted in a type
1 Cost-Advertisement attribute;
- no other values are defined yet.
- Cost Data length is the length of the cost data information, in
bytes, excluding types, lengths, and signature data.
- Signature type indicates the type of signature. The following
values are defined:
- 0 indicates a signature of type MD5
- 1 indicates a signature of type SHA-1
- Signature length is the length of the signature data field.
- Cost data is encoded as described in section 7.
- Signature data contains a signature of the type described in the
Signature type field, computed over the Cost Data field, using the
key of the sender of the attribute.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 11
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
Transmission of key or certificate information between roaming
partners is outside the scope of this specification.
9 Examples
To illustrate the use of the attributes defined in this document, we
will describe some examples of scenarios using the setup defined in
section 6.
9.1 Fixed visited network cost
In this scenario, the visited network wants to be paid a fixed
amount (1 EUR per minute), whatever the cost may be for the end-
user. The first roaming operator takes a 10% commission, and
converts to USD before sending to the second roaming operator. This
operator adds a 1 USD per connection + 0.15 USD per minute charge,
and converts to AUD before sending to the home server, which charges
the end-user whatever amount they want.
Totally fictitious currency rates used are:
- 1 EUR = 1.2 USD
- 1 USD = 2 AUD
A single-roundtrip EAP method is used here, to illustrate how Cost
advertisement extensions are handled in this case. When using an EAP
method with more roundtrips, subsequent roundtrips are exactly
similar to the first one regarding cost information.
WISP --> ROAM1
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
Cost-Advertisement
Type 0=1 EUR/mn
ROAM1 --> ROAM2
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
Cost-Advertisement
Type0=1.32 USD/mn
ROAM2 --> HOME
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
Cost-Advertisement
Type0=2 AUD + 2.94 AUD/mn
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 12
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
ROAM2 <-- HOME
Access-Challenge
EAP-Message=EAP/Request/Method
ROAM1 <-- ROAM2
Access-Challenge
EAP-Message=EAP/Request/Method
WISP <-- ROAM1
Access-Challenge
EAP-Message=EAP/Request/Method
WISP --> ROAM1
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
EAP-Message=EAP/Response/Method
Cost-Advertisement
Type 0=1 EUR/mn
ROAM1 --> ROAM2
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
EAP-Message=EAP/Response/Method
Cost-Advertisement
Type0=1.32 USD/mn
ROAM2 --> HOME
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
EAP-Message=EAP/Response/Method
Cost-Advertisement
Type0=2 AUD + 2.94 AUD/mn
ROAM2 <-- HOME
Access-Accept
EAP-Message=EAP/Success
Cost-Accept
Type0=2 AUD + 2.94 AUD/mn
Signature by HOME
ROAM1 <-- ROAM2
Access-Accept
EAP-Message=EAP/Success
Cost-Accept
Type0=1.32 USD/mn
Signature by ROAM2
WISP <-- ROAM1
Access-Challenge
EAP-Message=EAP/Success
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 13
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
Cost-Accept
Type0=1 EUR/mn
Signature by ROAM1
9.2 Fixed end-user cost
In this scenario, the visited network wants to set the cost for the
end-user (10 EUR), and will receive this less the commissions
charged by intermediaries. ROAM1 wants 10% of the total (which is
different from what happens in the first scenario), and converts to
USD before sending to ROAM2. This one in turn wants 1 USD per
connection, and converts to AUD before sending to HOME. HOME wants
20% of the total cost.
The initial EAP roundtrips are not shown here.
WISP --> ROAM1
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
EAP-Message=EAP/Response/Method
Cost-Advertisement
Type 1=10 EUR
ROAM1 --> ROAM2
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
EAP-Message=EAP/Response/Method
Cost-Advertisement
Type1=12 USD
Type2=1.2 USD
ROAM2 --> HOME
Access-Request
User-Name=toto@home
EAP-Message=EAP/Response/Method
Cost-Advertisement
Type1=24 USD
Type2=4.4 USD
ROAM2 <-- HOME
Access-Accept
EAP-Message=EAP/Success
Cost-Accept
Type0=19.2 AUD
Signature by HOME
ROAM1 <-- ROAM2
Access-Accept
EAP-Message=EAP/Success
Cost-Accept
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 14
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
Type0=8.6 USD
Signature by ROAM2
WISP <-- ROAM1
Access-Challenge
EAP-Message=EAP/Success
Cost-Accept
Type0=6.45 EUR
Signature by ROAM1
10 Security Considerations
In a roaming environment, where AAA transactions result in money
exchanges, it is important that security of these transactions is
guaranteed. For this reason, one should:
- use only secure AAA mechanisms, such as Diameter or RADIUS over
IPsec.
- ensure that strong authentication mechanisms (such as EAP-SRP [8],
EAP-TLS [9]...) are used.
Also, to ensure non-repudiation of cost acceptance, this
specification introduces digital signature of Cost-Accept
attributes. Proper security measures to protect the keys used should
be put in place to ensure the validity of these signatures.
11 References
1 RFC 2865, C. Rigney, Willens, S., Rubens, A., Simpson, W.,
"Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865,
June 2000.
2 RFC 2866, C. Rigney, "RADIUS Accounting", RFC 2866, June 2000.
3 RFC 2869, C. Rigney, Willats, W., Calhoun, P., "RADIUS
Extensions", RFC 2869, June 2000.
4 <draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-10-2.txt>, P. Calhoun, Arkko, J.,
Guttman, E., Zorn, G., Louhhney, J., "Diameter Base Protocol",
work in progress, April 2002.
5 RFC 2119 Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997
6 RFC 2486, B. Aboba, Beadles, M., "The Network Access Identifier",
RFC 2486, January 1999.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 15
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
7 <draft-caron-dns-based-roaming-00.txt>, Caron, J., "DNS-Based
Roaming", April 2000, work in progress.
8 <draft-ietf-pppext-eap-srp-03.txt>, Carlson, J., B. Aboba, H.
Haverinen, "EAP SRP-SHA1 Authentication Protocol", July 2001,
work in progress.
9 RFC 2716, Aboba, B., D. Simon, "PPP EAP TLS Authentication
Protocol", October 1999.
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 16
INTERNET-DRAFT AAA Cost Advertisement Extensions June 2002
12 Author's Address
Jacques Caron
IP Sector Technologies
Ecluse 36c
2000 Neuchatel
Switzerland
Phone: +41 79 699 8389
Email: jcaron@ipsector.com
Caron Informational - Expires December 2002 17 | PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-21 19:29:39 |