About this blog…

I am employed by Netnod as head of engineering, research and development and am among other things chair of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee at ICANN. You can find CV and photos of me at this page.

As I wear so many hats, I find it being necessary to somewhere express my personal view on things. This is the location where that happens. Postings on this blog, or at Facebook, Twitter etc, falls under this policy.

The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of Netnod or any other of the organisations I have connections to.

IPv6 better than IPv4 at IETF-77

At the IETF meeting in Anaheim, USA, the internet access this morning was broken for IPv4, while IPv6 works like a charm.

I think we will see more and more of this in the future. It is interesting sitting here surfing around, making phone calls etc, and see what services work. Some do not, and that is of course because they only have IPv4 access.

paf$ ping -c 4 stupid.domain.name
PING stupid.domain.name (85.30.129.39): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
--- stupid.domain.name ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
paf$ ping6 -c 4 stupid.domain.name
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:df8::24:226:bbff:fe15:8d13 --> 2a02:80:3ffe::39
16 bytes from 2a02:80:3ffe::39, icmp_seq=0 hlim=59 time=191.714 ms
16 bytes from 2a02:80:3ffe::39, icmp_seq=1 hlim=59 time=190.497 ms
16 bytes from 2a02:80:3ffe::39, icmp_seq=2 hlim=59 time=194.374 ms
16 bytes from 2a02:80:3ffe::39, icmp_seq=3 hlim=59 time=189.594 ms
--- stupid.domain.name ping6 statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 189.594/191.545/194.374/1.798 ms

Comments are closed.