One document matched: draft-ellermann-idnabis-test-tlds-00.txt




Network Working Group                                       F. Ellermann
Internet-Draft                                                     xyzzy
Obsoletes: 2606 (if approved)                               June 5, 2008
Intended status: BCP
Expires: December 7, 2008


                      Reserved Top Level DNS Names
                  draft-ellermann-idnabis-test-tlds-00

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on December 7, 2008.

Abstract

   To reduce the likelihood of conflict and confusion, a few top level
   domain names are reserved for use in private testing, as examples in
   documentation, and the like.  In addition, a few second level domain
   names reserved for use as examples are documented.

Editorial note

   This note and the document history (Appendix A) should be removed
   before publication.





Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft        Reserved Top Level DNS Names             June 2008


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  TLDs for Testing, & Documentation Examples  . . . . . . . . . . 3
     2.1.  ".example"  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     2.2.  ".invalid"  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     2.3.  ".localhost"  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     2.4.  ".test" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   3.  Reserved Example Second Level Domain Names  . . . . . . . . . . 4
   4.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   5.  Internationalization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   6.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   7.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Appendix A.  Document History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements  . . . . . . . . . . 7
































Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft        Reserved Top Level DNS Names             June 2008


1.  Introduction

   The global Internet Domain Name System is documented in [RFC1034],
   [RFC1035], [RFC1591], [RFC3696], and numerous additional Requests for
   Comments.  It defines a tree of names starting with root, ".",
   immediately below which are top level domain names such as ".com" and
   ".us".  Below top level domain names there are normally additional
   levels of names.

   The key words "MAY", "RECOMMENDED", and "SHOULD" in this memo are to
   be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].


2.  TLDs for Testing, & Documentation Examples

   There is a need for top level domain (TLD) names that can be used for
   creating names which, without fear of conflicts with current or
   future actual TLD names in the global DNS, can be used for private
   testing of existing DNS related code, examples in documentation, DNS
   related experimentation, invalid DNS names, or other similar uses.

   For example, without guidance, a site might set up some local
   additional unused top level domains for testing of its local DNS code
   and configuration.  Later, these TLDs might come into actual use on
   the global Internet.  As a result, local attempts to reference the
   real data in these zones could be thwarted by the local test
   versions.  Or test or example code might be written that accesses a
   TLD that is in use with the thought that the test code would only be
   run in a restricted testbed net or the example never actually run.
   Later, the test code could escape from the testbed or the example be
   actually coded and run on the Internet.  Depending on the nature of
   the test or example, it might be best for it to be referencing a TLD
   permanently reserved for such purposes.

   To safely satisfy these needs, four domain names are reserved as
   listed and described below.

2.1.  ".example"

   ".example" is RECOMMENDED for use in documentation or as examples.

2.2.  ".invalid"

   ".invalid" is intended for use in online construction of domain names
   that are sure to be invalid, and for which it is obvious at a glance
   that they are invalid.  Applications MAY treat ".invalid" as what the
   name says.




Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 3]

Internet-Draft        Reserved Top Level DNS Names             June 2008


2.3.  ".localhost"

   The ".localhost" TLD has traditionally been statically defined in
   host DNS implementations as having an A record pointing to the loop
   back IP address and is reserved for such use.  Any other use would
   conflict with widely deployed code which assumes this use.

2.4.  ".test"

   ".test" is RECOMMENDED for use in testing of current or new DNS
   related code.  Applications SHOULD treat ".test" like any other TLD,
   a special handling could defeat the purpose of a test.


3.  Reserved Example Second Level Domain Names

   The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) also reserves the
   three second level domain names ".example.com", ".example.net", and
   ".example.org" which can be used in examples as explained in
   Section 2.1.

   When TLDs offer further second level domains for examples, the TLD
   administrators are encouraged to publish the relevant policies in
   their TLD as informational RFC.

   The second level domain names "nic", "whois", and "www" are often
   reserved or used for the purposes of the TLD administration.  As with
   second level domains for examples this can be an issue in the case of
   a transfer to a new administration.


4.  Acknowledgments

   This memo contains major parts of [RFC2606] written by Donald E.
   Eastlake and Aliza R. Panitz.  John C. Klensin suggested to clarify
   the guidelines for examples in RFCs.


5.  Internationalization Considerations

   In 2007 IANA created eleven TLDs for tests of Internationalized
   Domain Names (IDN).  The A-labels and corresponding languages are
   listed below, see [RFC3490] or its successor for details about IDN.
   Applications SHOULD treat these IDN test TLDs as explained in
   Section 2.4.






Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 4]

Internet-Draft        Reserved Top Level DNS Names             June 2008


       ".xn--0zwm56d"        Chinese (simplified)
       ".xn--11b5bs3a9aj6g"  Hindi
       ".xn--80akhbyknj4f"   Russian
       ".xn--9t4b11yi5a"     Korean
       ".xn--deba0ad"        Yiddish
       ".xn--g6w251d"        Chinese (traditional)
       ".xn--hgbk6aj7f53bba" Persian
       ".xn--hlcj6aya9esc7a" Tamil
       ".xn--jxalpdlp"       Greek
       ".xn--kgbechtv"       Arabic
       ".xn--zckzah"         Japanese


6.  Security Considerations

   Confusion and conflict can be caused by the use of a current or
   future top level domain name in experimentation or testing, as an
   example in documentation, to indicate invalid names, or as a synonym
   for the loop back address.  Test and experimental software can escape
   and end up being run against the global operational DNS.  Even
   examples used "only" in documentation can end up being coded and
   released or cause conflicts due to later real use and the possible
   acquisition of intellectual property rights in such "example" names.

   The reservation of several top level domain names for these purposes
   minimizes such confusion and conflict.


7.  IANA Considerations

   IANA reserves the TLDs ".example", ".invalid", ".localhost", ".test",
   and eleven IDN test TLDs as noted above.  IANA reserves the second
   level domains ".example.com", ".example.net", and ".example.org".

   IANA creates a public registry of reserved TLDs, this can be done
   alongside existing IANA TLD registries at the discretion of IANA.
   Additional reserved TLDs require IETF review as specified in
   [RFC5226] in conjunction with [RFC2860].


8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an



Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 5]

Internet-Draft        Reserved Top Level DNS Names             June 2008


              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008.

8.2.  Informative References

   [RFC1034]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
              STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.

   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.

   [RFC1591]  Postel, J., "Domain Name System Structure and Delegation",
              RFC 1591, March 1994.

   [RFC2606]  Eastlake, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS
              Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999.

   [RFC2860]  Carpenter, B., Baker, F., and M. Roberts, "Memorandum of
              Understanding Concerning the Technical Work of the
              Internet Assigned Numbers Authority", RFC 2860, June 2000.

   [RFC3490]  Faltstrom, P., Hoffman, P., and A. Costello,
              "Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)",
              RFC 3490, March 2003.

   [RFC3696]  Klensin, J., "Application Techniques for Checking and
              Transformation of Names", RFC 3696, February 2004.


Appendix A.  Document History

   Changes in version 00:

   o  Derived from [RFC2606] to resolve a dispute about the use of
      e-mail addresses in RFC examples, adding the eleven new IDN test
      TLDs.


Author's Address

   Frank Ellermann
   xyzzy
   Hamburg, Germany

   Email: hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com
   URI:   http://purl.net/xyzzy/





Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 6]

Internet-Draft        Reserved Top Level DNS Names             June 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Acknowledgment

   This document was produced using xml2rfc v1.33 (of
   http://xml.resource.org/) from a source in RFC-2629 XML format.





Ellermann               Expires December 7, 2008                [Page 7]



PAFTECH AB 2003-20242024-04-16 17:14:18