One document matched: draft-wu-pwe3-p2mp-pw-accounting-extensions-00.txt
Networking Working Group B. Wu
Internet-Draft R. Chen
Intended status: Standards Track J. Luo
Expires: April 19, 2010 ZTE Corporation
October 16, 2009
P2MP PW Accounting Extensions
draft-wu-pwe3-p2mp-pw-accounting-extensions-00
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 19, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
Abstract
This specification defines a method for P2MP PW accounting data.
Simple extensions to the P2MP PW related protocol to allow.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. P2MP PW accounting operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. P2MP PW statistic TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. How to use P2MP PW accounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.1. Normative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
1. Introduction
Draft draft-martini-pwe3-p2mp-pw-00 [Root-Initiated P2MP PW]and
Draft-jounay-niger-pwe3-source-initiated-p2mp-pw-01 [Source-Initiated
P2MP PW] both propose to extend LDP protocol to support source
initiated P2MP signaling. The difference between these two drafts is
the latter one needs root PE to get all leaf TAIIs, than send LDP FEC
map message to build a P2MP tree, And the former one does not need
TAII.
Draft-jounay-niger-pwe3-source-initiated-p2mp-pw-01 is useful for
accounting all egress PE attached CE information, but this makes the
protocol more complex. Draft draft-martini-pwe3-p2mp-pw-00 is
efficient in P2MP PW signaling, but using this mechanism requires NMS
data to be correlated from multiple leaf PEs.
This draft proposes a mechanism to convey P2MP PW accounting
information. This proposal allows a single router to be queried to
obtain accounting information for a P2MP tree as a whole.
This draft adds a new LDP Status TLV type to the LDP Notification
message.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
2. Conventions used in this document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119.
2.1. Terminology
FEC: Forwarding Equivalence Class
LDP: Label Distribution Protocol
PE: Provider Edge
PW: Pseudowire
P2MP: Point to multi-point
SAII: Source Attachment Individual Identifier
TAII: Target Attachment Individual Identifier
AC: Attached Circuit
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
3. P2MP PW accounting operation
3.1. P2MP PW statistic TLV
This draft specifies no new LDP message.
This draft proposes a new statistic TLV to be used with LDP
notification.
An leaf PE Puts the statistic information in LDP notification message
to allow the root PE maintain a particular P2MP PW accounting
information, indicated by containing a statistic TLV. The new
statistic TLV format is as follows:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Res| PW statistic (TBD) | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PW statistic |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: PW Statistic Message Format
The first 2 bits are reserved, and MUST be set to zero on transmit,
and ignored on receive.
PW statistic contains a particular P2MP PW statistic information
within one leaf PE, information includes: AC numbers, the effective
MTU, the minimum speed link and maximum speed link.
3.2. How to use P2MP PW accounting
In order to support the proposed mechanism, a node must be able of
handling PW statistic advertisement.
Once an egress PE successfully processes a Label Mapping Message for
a P2MP PW, or it fails to accept the signaling for interface
parameters not matching, it should send appropriate PW statistic
information to notify the root PE of the PW ACs status.
Once an new AC attached to an egress PE for a P2MP PW, or an existed
AC detached, the egress PE should update the statistic and send
updated statistic TLV along with notification message.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
When the root PE receives the leaf PE statistic reporting, it can
store the values and combine the local information it has with
received reporting information.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
4. IANA Considerations
This document uses a new LDP TLV types; IANA already maintains a
registry of name "TLV TYPE NAME SPACE" defined by RFC5036. A value
of 0x096D is suggested for assignment with this TLV.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
5. Security Considerations
This section will be added in a future version.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
6. References
6.1. Normative references
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4446] Martini, L., "IANA Allocations for Pseudowire Edge to Edge
Emulation (PWE3)", BCP 116, RFC 4446, April 2006.
[RFC4447] Martini, L., Rosen, E., El-Aawar, N., Smith, T., and G.
Heron, "Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label
Distribution Protocol (LDP)", RFC 4447, April 2006.
[RFC5036] Andersson, L., Minei, I., and B. Thomas, "LDP
Specification", RFC 5036, October 2007.
6.2. Informative References
[P2MP PW Requirements]
Niger, P., Kamite, Y., Delord, S., Wang, L., Heron, G.,
and L. Martini, "Requirements for Point-to-Multipoint
Pseudowire", July 2009.
[PIM Population Count]
Farinacci, D., Shepherd, G., and Y. Cai, "Population Count
Extensions to PIM", July 2009.
[Root-Initiated P2MP PW]
Martini, L., Konstantynowicz, M., Boutros, S., and S.
Sivabalan, "Signaling Root-Initiated Point-to-Multipoint
Pseudowires using LDP", June 2009.
[Source-Initiated P2MP PW]
Niger, P., Kamite, Y., Delord, S., Jin, L., Ciavaglia, L.,
and M. Vigoureux, "LDP Extensions for Source-initiated
Point-to-Multipoint Pseudowire", July 2009.
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft P2MP PW Accounting Extensions October 2009
Authors' Addresses
Bo Wu
ZTE Corporation
4F,RD Building 2,Zijinghua Road
Yuhuatai District,Nanjing 210012
P.R.China
Phone: +86 025 52877276
Email: wu.bo@zte.com.cn
Ran Chen
ZTE Corporation
4F,RD Building 2,Zijinghua Road
Yuhuatai District,Nanjing 210012
P.R.China
Phone: +86 025 52878135
Email: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
Jian Luo
ZTE Corporation
RD Building 1,Zijinghua Road
Yuhuatai District,Nanjing 210012
P.R.China
Phone: +86 025 52870622
Email: luo.jian@zte.com.cn
Wu, et al. Expires April 19, 2010 [Page 10]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 01:47:58 |