One document matched: draft-newman-mime-textpara-00.txt
Network Working Group C. Newman
Internet Draft: The Text/Paragraph Media Type N. Freed
Document: draft-newman-mime-textpara-00.txt Innosoft
February 1998
The Text/Paragraph Media Type
Status of this memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
progress."
To view the entire list of current Internet-Drafts, please check
the "1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts
Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net
(Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East
Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
Introduction
The text/plain media type is defined to represent plain text where
the CRLF sequence represents a line break [MIME-IMT]. Many modern
computer systems have a different concept of ``plain text'' from
the systems where the text/plain media type originated. These
modern systems usually use a proportional-spaced font and use CRLF
to represent paragraph breaks. Numerous software products have
erroneously labelled this media type as text/plain. In order to
correct this interoperability problem, the text/paragraph media
type is defined.
[NOTE: This proposal may be discussed publicly on the ietf-
822@imc.org mailing list. The subscription address is ietf-822-
request@imc.org.]
1. Conventions Used in this Document
Newman [Page 1]
Internet Draft The Text/Paragraph Media Type February 1998
The key words "REQUIRED", "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD
NOT", and "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described
in "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels"
[KEYWORDS].
2. The text/paragraph Media Type
MIME media type name: text
MIME subtype name: paragraph
Required parameters: none
Optional parameters: charset
Encoding considerations:
The text/paragraph media type is likely to include paragraphs
longer than 1000 characters (including the terminating CRLF
characters). Therefore the quoted-printable content transfer
encoding is usually necessary for transport over systems with line
length limits such as SMTP [SMTP]. If all paragraphs fit within
the line length limits of the underlying transport, then the 7-bit
or 8-bit content transfer encoding may be used if appropriate for
the specified charset.
Security considerations:
This media type has the same security considerations as text/plain.
Interoperability considerations:
An agent which receives text/paragraph and doesn't understand it is
REQUIRED to display it as text/plain by MIME [MIME-CONF] -- this
could result in paragraphs being displayed as long lines which
extend outside the visible display area, but many clients offer the
ability to wrap such lines. This is an improvement over the
current practice where the text/paragraph media type is mislabelled
as text/plain and therefore the user agent has a choice between
risking the previous problem or damaging text/plain content by word
wrapping it.
It is simple to convert text/paragraph to text/plain (by word
wrapping near the 72nd character column), but there is no
algorithmic method to reliably create a text/paragraph media type
from a text/plain media type. There is also no algorithmic way to
distinguish text/plain from text/paragraph when they are
Newman [Page 2]
Internet Draft The Text/Paragraph Media Type February 1998
unlabelled. Heuristics can often produce satifactory results in
these cases, but when the heuristics fail, the results can be
unpleasant.
Published specification:
The text/paragraph media follows the definition of the text/plain
media type as specified in [MIME-IMT] except that a CRLF represents
the end of a paragraph rather than the end of a line.
Additional information:
Magic Number(s): none
File extension(s):
No clear distinction is made between text/plain and text/paragraph
for file extensions. The ".txt" extension is used for both (this
internet draft is text/plain). The ".asc" or ".ascii" extension is
traditionally used for text/plain with the US-ASCII character set.
Macintosh File Type Code(s): TEXT
NOTE: the TEXT file type on MacOS is used for both text/paragraph
and text/plain. The system application "SimpleText" generates
a text/paragraph file with type TEXT (which also may contain
MacOS-specific out-of-band markup in the resource fork). Text
editors such as those which come with compilers use text/plain.
Intended usage: COMMON
3. User-Visible Differences between text/plain and text/paragraph
The text/plain media type is not intended to be word wrapped. In
fact, word wrapping text/plain can make the text difficult to read,
as it results in situations like the following:
The text/plain media type is not intended to be word wrapped.
In
fact, word wrapping text/plain can make the text difficult to
read,
as it results in situations like the following:
The text/plain media type is not intended to be
word wrapped.
In
fact, word wrapping text/plain can make the text difficult
to
read,
Newman [Page 3]
Internet Draft The Text/Paragraph Media Type February 1998
as it results in situations like the following:
...
The text/paragraph media type, on the other hand, is intended to be
word wrapped for display and will not cause this problem.
There is an unwritten convention that text/plain is displayed in a
fixed-width font, thus permitting the use of ASCII-art to represent
graphics and tables. The text/paragraph media type is suitable for
display in a proportional width font and for line-wrapping, and
thus it is not suitable for ASCII-art (such as is commonly used in
message signatures).
A common convention in Internet messages with the text/plain media
type is to use the ">" character at the beginning of a line to
quote text from a previous text/plain message when generating a
reply. Agents receiving text/paragraph in a message MAY wish to
consider this convention when displaying it.
It is important to note that the conversion from text/paragraph to
text/plain is algorithmicly a one-way process and thus is not to be
done when unnecessary.
4. Requirements
User agents MUST offer an option to display text/plain without line
wrapping and SHOULD display it in a fixed-width font. User agents
MAY offer an option to word wrap text/plain to deal with the
unfortunately common practice of mislabelling text/paragraph as
text/plain.
User agents SHOULD word wrap text/paragraph on display and MAY
display it in either a proportional or fixed-width font. Because
the algorithm for quality word wrapping can vary by language,
generating agents SHOULD include a Content-Language header [LANG].
Non-Internet mail systems often use paragraph-based text formats.
A gateway from such a system MUST NOT label paragraph-based text as
text/plain. Instead, it MAY label such paragraph-based text as
text/paragraph (or a suitable markup format) or convert to
text/plain by word wrapping near the 72nd column.
5. Security Considerations
This media type introduces no security considerations beyond those
Newman [Page 4]
Internet Draft The Text/Paragraph Media Type February 1998
which apply to text/plain. Considerations that apply to both
follow.
Some text display processors will scan text media types for
recognizable sequences such as URLs or even nonstandard embedded
commands. Embedded commands can have the same sorts of security
issues as PostScript. (The discussion of the
"application/PostScript" media type [MIME-IMT] considers these
risks in detail.) In general, it may be possible to specify
commands that perform unauthorized file operations or, make changes
to the display processor's environment that affect subsequent
operations. Such nonstandard commands are often added for
debugging purposes. However, implementors should never assume that
existance of such command can be kept secret and as such should
make sure that any nonstandard commands with the potential to cause
harm are disabled by default.
Plain text (or other subtypes of text displayed as plain text) can
contain embedded control characters and escape sequences which also
have the potential to change the display processor environment in
ways that adversely affect subsequent operations. Possible effects
include, but are not limited to, locking the keyboard, changing
display parameters so subsequent displayed text is unreadable, or
even changing display parameters to deliberately obscure or distort
subsequent displayed material so that its meaning is lost or
altered. Display processors should either filter such material
from displayed text or else make sure to reset all important
settings after a given display operation is complete.
Some terminal devices have keys whose output when pressed can be
changed by sending the display processor a character sequence. If
this is possible the display of a text object containing such
character sequences could reprogram keys to perform some illicit or
dangerous action when the key is subsequently pressed by the user.
In some cases not only can keys be programmed, they can be
triggered remotely, making it possible for a text display operation
to directly perform some unwanted action. As such, the ability to
program keys should be blocked either by filtering or by disabling
the ability to program keys entirely.
6. References
[KEYWORDS] Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, Harvard University, March 1997.
[LANG] Alvestrand, H., "Tags for the Identification of Languages",
RFC 1766, UNINETT, March 1995.
Newman [Page 5]
Internet Draft The Text/Paragraph Media Type February 1998
[MIME-IMT] Freed, Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046, Innosoft, First
Virtual, November 1996.
[MIME-CONF] Freed, Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part Five: Conformance Criteria and Examples",
RFC 2046, Innosoft, First Virtual, November 1996.
[SMTP] Postel, "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 821,
Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.
7. Author's Address
Chris Newman
Innosoft International, Inc.
1050 Lakes Drive
West Covina, CA 91790 USA
Email: chris.newman@innosoft.com
Ned Freed
Innosoft International, Inc.
1050 Lakes Drive
West Covina, CA 91790 USA
Email: ned.freed@innosoft.com
Newman [Page 6]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 04:12:46 |