One document matched: draft-masinter-media-features-00.txt
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Europe),
munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or
ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1997). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This specification grew out of work in the HTTP working group to allow
for HTTP clients and servers to negotiate elements of the presentation
of documents that were not naturally captured by the MIME Media
Type. However, the applicability of media features is important in a
number of broader contexts, including document distribution, facsimile
transmission, push technology. The document [FEATURES] defines the
framework for document features, and the document [REG] defines the
registration procedures for them. This specification establishes
a small number of generally useful feature descriptions.
Introduction
This work was originally motivated by the requirements from web
browsers. The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is protocol for
distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. At
present the server relies on the client's ability to present visual
information in a usable fashion without information about the client's
display characteristics. The presence of large images, video, and
other visual information in HTML documents has strained this model.
HTML documents suitable for a certain video monitor size are often
less usable on displays of much smaller or larger resolution, such as
PDA's and high-resolution printers.
This specification defines feature tags [5]. These tags are the means
by which a recipient may inform a sender as to the characteristics of
its message handling. The sender may then provide the variant of the
message that is most suitable for the recipient.
Different variants would typically be higher or lower resolution
images (for example) as appropriate. In the case of a sending to a
printer, the result would be higher quality output. In the case of a
small screen device (cellphone, portable digital assistant), the
result would be faster transmission.
Feature tags may be used in many different protocol situations. Those
defined in this specification can indicate the display or printer
dimensions (in pixels), display resolution (in pixels/inch), color
capability and bit-depth, and display media type. The physical
dimensions of the display can be inferred from the display size and
display resolution. In the case of paper output, the paper size may be
expressed as a token from a list of certain standard paper sizes.
These are presented formally in the Notation section.
pix-x<=n
pix-y<=m
These features indicate the maximum display size that the recipient
can conveniently display or print, measured in pixels; they indicate
horizontal (n) and vertical (m) dimensions.
res<=n
This feature indicates the maximum resolution that the recipient
can display or print without loss, measured in pixels per inch.
For example: res<=72. Certain resources such as images may have
similar total pixel size but differing data size and quality
depending on degree of compression. UA-res can be used to resolve
a preferred image in this case.
While English units are not universal, it is preferable to avoid
multiple unit definitions.
res-x<=n
res-y<=m
In cases where non-square aspect ratio is supported, these
features can be used instead.
UA-media=token
This feature indicates the recipients device media, indicated with
an simple token. Basic token values are: screen, stationary,
transparency, envelope, or continuous-long. Other values may be
defined. Except for `screen', these tokens are a subset of the
Printer MIB MediaType set defined in RFC-1759 [6]. Other tokens
may be registered and used as needed.
They are defined as:
screen: a refreshable display
screen-paged: a refreshable display which cannot scroll
stationary: separately cut sheets of an opaque material
transparency: separately cut sheets of a transparent material
envelope: envelopes that can be used for conventional
mailing purposes
continuous-short: continuously connected sheets of an opaque
material connected along the short edge
papersize=token
For ua-media types such as stationary, it is often useful to have
information about the size of display used. While it is more
precise and predictable to use absolute resolution and pixel sizes,
some applications find it useful to provide paper size in lieu of
or in addition to this information. Paper sizes names and
definitions are taken from the the Printer MIB RFC [6].
Examples of paper size tokens, with names from [6], are:
na-letter: 8.5x11.0 inches
iso-A4: 210x297 mm
iso-B4: 250x353 mm
iso-A3: 297x420 mm
na-legal: 8.5x14 inches
color<=n
grey<=n
The color capabilities of the recipient are indicated with feature
tag and a parameter describing the number of color channel bits
available. Values of n are typically (but not limited to) 2, 8, or
24. For example: grey=8 indicates a display capable of
representing an image in 256 levels of a single color, while
color=8 indicates a display capable of representing an image with a
palette of 256 colors.
Examples
pix-x<=1024
pix-y<=768
indicates a 1024x768 display
res<=72
indicates a 72 dpi display
UA-media=stationery
indicates the display is a cut sheet of opaque material, such as
paper.
papersize=iso-a4
indicates the display size is 210x297mm.
color<=24
indicates the display supports 24-bit (8-bit/channel) color.
Future work and other issues
Acknowledgments
This document is based on a previous draft co-authored with Lou
Montoulli, Koen Holtman and Andy Mutz. It had benefited from the
comments of Ho John Lee, Brian Behlendorf, and Jeff Mogul.
References
[1] T. Berners-Lee. "Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW." A
Unifying Syntax for the Expression of Names and Addresses of Objects
on the Network as used in the World-Wide Web." RFC 1630, CERN, June
1994.
[2] T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, M. McCahill.
"Uniform Resource Locators (URL)." RFC 1738, CERN, Xerox PARC,
University of Minnesota, December 1994.
[3] T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, H. Frystyk.
"Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0." RFC 1945." MIT/LCS, UC
Irvine, May 1996.
[4] T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding,I J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H.
Frystyk. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1" MIT/LCS,
UC Irvine, May 1996.
[5] K. Holtman, A. Mutz, "Transparent Content Negotiation in HTTP"
IETF Internet Draft draft-holtman-http-negotiation-04.txt, Nov. 1996.
[6] R. Smith, F. Wright, T. Hastings, S. Zilles, J. Gyllenskog.
"Printer MIB." RFC 1759." IETF, March 1995
[7] K. Holtman, A. Mutz, "Feature Tag Registration Procedures" IETF
Internet Draft draft-ietf-http-feature-reg-00.txt, October 1996.
Author's Addresses
Larry Masinter
Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
3333 Coyote Hill Road
Palo Alto CA 94304
Fax +1 415 812 4333
Email: masinter@parc.xerox.com
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-22 23:00:31 |