One document matched: draft-josefsson-rfc4648-impl-report-00.txt
Network Working Group S. Josefsson
Internet-Draft SJD AB
Intended status: Informational May 28, 2009
Expires: November 29, 2009
RFC 4648 Implementation Report
draft-josefsson-rfc4648-impl-report-00
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 29, 2009.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Abstract
This is an implementation report of RFC4648, for the purpose of
advancing the document to Draft Standard.
Josefsson Expires November 29, 2009 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RFC 4648 Implementation Report May 2009
See <http://josefsson.org/base-encoding/> for more information.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Implementations Tested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5.1. GNU Coreutils: base64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Josefsson Expires November 29, 2009 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RFC 4648 Implementation Report May 2009
1. Introduction
This is an implementation report of The Base16, Base32, and Base64
Data Encodings [RFC4648] document. It follows the outline suggested
by [I-D.dusseault-impl-reports].
2. Summary
The "base64" encoding have a long history of being used in Internet
protocols, the earliest use in the RFC series appears to be
[RFC0989]. It has been widely implemented as part of MIME [RFC2045],
which is already a Draft Standard. The "base64url" alphabet does not
appear to be widely deployed.
The "base32" encoding is not as widely used as base64, but has
applications in the case insensitive systems. The "base32" encoding
is used by [I-D.ietf-sasl-gs2]. The "base32hex" encoding is used by
[RFC5155], and a restricted form is used by [RFC2938].
The "base16" encoding is usually referred to as hexadecimal, or hex
encoding, and is used in many protocols and informally in technical
documents.
3. Methodology
We identified that we wanted to test the following encodings: base64,
base64url, base32, base32hex, base16.
The primary test is of course that basic encoding and decoding works
and lead to expected results.
Section 3 of RFC 4648 discuss some implementation discrepancies of
base encoding. To possibly find interoperability problems, we
checked and documented these corner-cases separately. In particular:
how line feeds are handled during encoding and decoding [LF], whether
padding is done correctly [PAD], how non-alphabetical characters are
handled [NONALPHA], whether pad bits are zero or not [ZEROBITS].
A useful test case whether pad bit handling is appropriate is "YR=="
which is a non-canonical encoding of "a" (ASCII 0x61) that normally
is encoded as "YQ==".
4. Exceptions
Encoding and decoding of data interoperate well.
Josefsson Expires November 29, 2009 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft RFC 4648 Implementation Report May 2009
Some tools accepted non-canonical encodings, but none appeared to
ever generate them. This is consistent with the requirements in
section 3.5 of RFC 4648.
We acknowledge that many implementations of base64 were written for a
general purpose, and thus may not follow some of the guidelines
(e.g., related to line feeds) in RFC 4648 strictly. However we
believe this should not be a reason against Draft Standard status
because the document is clear on the issues and the minor variations
does not appear to lead to any problem.
5. Implementations Tested
5.1. GNU Coreutils: base64
There is a "base64" command line tool, written in C, included in GNU
Coreutils [GNU-Coreutils-Base64]. It supports the "base64" alphabet.
[LF]: On encoding, it wraps output after 76 characters (same as
MIME). On decoding, it accepts line-wrapped input.
[PAD]: It appears to pad data properly.
[NONALPHA]: It appears to return a non-zero error code if the input
contains non-alphabetical characters.
[ZEROBITS]: On encoding, the pad bits are zero. On decoding, it
appears to accept non-zero pad bits.
6. Acknowledgements
TBA
7. Security Considerations
See RFC 4648 for security considerations.
8. IANA Considerations
This document has no actions for IANA.
9. References
Josefsson Expires November 29, 2009 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft RFC 4648 Implementation Report May 2009
9.1. Normative References
[RFC4648] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
Encodings", RFC 4648, October 2006.
9.2. Informative References
[I-D.dusseault-impl-reports]
Dusseault, L. and R. Sparks, "Guidance on Interoperation
and Implementation Reports",
draft-dusseault-impl-reports-02 (work in progress),
May 2009.
[RFC0989] Linn, J. and IAB Privacy Task Force, "Privacy enhancement
for Internet electronic mail: Part I: Message encipherment
and authentication procedures", RFC 989, February 1987.
[RFC2045] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message
Bodies", RFC 2045, November 1996.
[RFC2938] Klyne, G. and L. Masinter, "Identifying Composite Media
Features", RFC 2938, September 2000.
[RFC5155] Laurie, B., Sisson, G., Arends, R., and D. Blacka, "DNS
Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of
Existence", RFC 5155, March 2008.
[I-D.ietf-sasl-gs2]
Josefsson, S. and N. Williams, "Using GSS-API Mechanisms
in SASL: The GS2 Mechanism Family", draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-13
(work in progress), May 2009.
[GNU-Coreutils-Base64]
Josefsson, S., "GNU Coreutils "base64" tool version 7.2",
WWW http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/, May 2009.
Author's Address
Simon Josefsson
SJD AB
Email: simon@josefsson.org
Josefsson Expires November 29, 2009 [Page 5]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-21 08:09:54 |