One document matched: draft-jesske-dispatch-reason-in-responses-02.txt
Differences from draft-jesske-dispatch-reason-in-responses-01.txt
dispatch R. Jesske
Internet-Draft L. Liess
Intended status: Informational Deutsche Telekom
Expires: October 1, 2010 March 30, 2010
Reason header filed in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) responses
draft-jesske-dispatch-reason-in-responses-02
Abstract
Although the use of the Reason header field in responses is
considered in RFC3326, doing so is not specified for any existing
response code. Nonetheless, the Reason header field has been widely
used in responses to carry Q.850 reason codes for failure responses
to INVITEs that have been gatewayed to PSTN systems. This document
specifies and formally permits the use of the Reason header field in
SIP responses to carry Q.850 reason codes for this and other
purposes.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on October 1, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Reason Header March 2010
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Reason Header March 2010
Table of Contents
1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Overall Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Procedures at the UA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Procedures at a SIP proxy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.3. Procedures at an application server . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Procedures at an interworking point with ISUP . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Reason Header March 2010
1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
This document uses terms from [RFC3261].
2. Overview
Within [draft-jesske-dispatch-requirements-reason-in-responses-00]
the reasoning and requirements for the use of the Reason Header
within Responses is described. Based upon this document describes
the procedures for the use of the Reason header within responses.
3. Overall Applicability
The SIP procedures specified in this document are foreseen for
networks providing simulation services and/or interworking to the
PSTN/ISDN.
The document is describing the use of the Reason header in SIP
responses. These procedures are only valuable if the reason
contained in the element "protocol" is "Q.850". A inclusion of a SIP
reason (protocol="SIP") is not helpful due to the fact that the
response already provides the SIP reason. The Release Causes are
described within [Q.850]. (Note: The ETSI specifications can be
downloaded under http://pda.etsi.org/pda/queryform.asp free of
charge.)
The appearance of the Reason header is applicable to final responses
3xx, 4xx, 5xx and 6xx and 18x and 199 provisional responses
[I-D.ietf-sipcore-199].
4. Procedures
4.1. Procedures at the UA
A UA that supports the Reason header field can process the [Q.850]
Cause Value and display it or an equivalent text. The inclusion of a
Reason header field by UA is only for B2B UA interworking with the
PSTN/ISDN or providing services foreseen.
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Reason Header March 2010
4.2. Procedures at a SIP proxy
SIP proxies that receive a response containing a Reason header field
is forwarding the response without changing the reason.
A SIP proxy receiving a request that includes a Reason header field
can route the request to an application server for further analysis
and base services on it.
Based on network policy a Proxy can remove a Reason header field send
from a UAC.
4.3. Procedures at an application server
An application server that receives a SIP request that contains a
response including a Reason header MAY analyze the SIP Reason and
base further procedures on this analyses.
For Example the application server could use the reason for sending a
announcement towards the originating entity of the session.
As an example the Anonymous Communication Rejection (ACR) service
defined by ETSI Telecommunications and Internet converged Services
and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN)
5. Procedures at an interworking point with ISUP
For interoperability reasons the Q.850 Cause Value of a Release shall
be mapped to the Reason Header.
6. Security Considerations
The presence of the Reason header in a response does not affect the
treatment of the response.
Including such a header by an untrusted entity could adulterate the
reactions of the originating entities. E.G. sending back a cause
value "87" can cause an announcement within the PSTN/ISDN saying that
the call was rejected due to the Closed User Group service.
Therefore it is RECOMMENDED to include the Reason header information
in Responses only by trusted entities as it is described within
[RFC3325].
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Reason Header March 2010
7. IANA Considerations
This document describes the use of the Reason header field described
within [RFC3326] . No additional SIP elements are defined within
this document. Therefore, this document does not provide any action
to IANA.
8. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-sipcore-199]
Holmberg, C., "Response Code for Indication of Terminated
Dialog", draft-ietf-sipcore-199-00 (work in progress),
April 2009.
[Q.850] "Usage of cause and location in the Digital Subscriber
Signalling System No. 1 and the Signalling System No. 7
ISDN User Part [ITU-T Recommendation Q.850]",
ITU Recommendation Q.850, April 1998.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
June 2002.
[RFC3325] Jennings, C., Peterson, J., and M. Watson, "Private
Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for
Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks", RFC 3325,
November 2002.
[RFC3326] Schulzrinne, H., Oran, D., and G. Camarillo, "The Reason
Header Field for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",
RFC 3326, December 2002.
[draft-jesske-dispatch-requirements-reason-in-responses-00]
Jesske, R. and L. Liess, "Requirements for the use of the
Reason header filed in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
responses]", , March 2010.
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Reason Header March 2010
Authors' Addresses
Roland Jesske
Deutsche Telekom
Heinrich-Hertz-Strasse 3-7
Darmstadt, 64307
Germany
Phone: +4961516282766
Email: r.jesske@telekom.de
Laura Liess
Deutsche Telekom
Heinrich-Hertz-Strasse 3-7
Darmstadt, 64307
Germany
Phone: +4961516282761
Email: Laura.Liess@telekom.de
Jesske & Liess Expires October 1, 2010 [Page 7]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 22:12:03 |