One document matched: draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-00.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfc1034 PUBLIC ''
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1034.xml'>
<!ENTITY rfc1035 PUBLIC ''
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1035.xml'>
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC ''
'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
]>
<rfc category="exp" ipr="trust200902"
docName="draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-00">
<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<front>
<title abbrev="Resource Records for EUI-48, EUI-64">Resource Records
for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS</title>
<author initials='J.' surname="Abley" fullname='Joe Abley'>
<organization>TekSavvy Solutions, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>470 Moore Street</street>
<city>London</city>
<region>ON</region>
<code>N6C 2C2</code>
<country>Canada</country>
</postal>
<phone>+1 519 670 9327</phone>
<email>jabley@teksavvy.ca</email>
</address>
</author>
<date day="18" month="March" year="2013"/>
<abstract>
<t>EUI-48 and EUI-64 are address formats specified by the IEEE
for use in various layer-2 networks, e.g. ethernet.</t>
<t>This document defines two new DNS resource record types,
EUI48 and EUI64, for encoding ethernet addresses in the DNS.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<middle>
<section title="Introduction">
<t>The Domain Name System (DNS) is described in <xref
target="RFC1034"/> and <xref target="RFC1035"/>. This
base specification defines many Resource Record Types
(RRTypes), and subsequent specifications have defined
others. Each defined RRType provides a means of encoding
particular data in the DNS.</t>
<t><xref target="EUI48">EUI-48</xref> and
<xref target="EUI64">EUI-64</xref> are address formats
specified by the IEEE for use in various layer-2 networks,
e.g. ethernet.</t>
<t>This document defines two new Resource Record Types
(RRTypes), EUI48 and EUI64 for encoding EUI-48 and
EUI-64 addresses in the DNS.</t>
</section>
<section title="Terminology">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
</section>
<section title="Presentation Format Considerations">
<t>Various representations of EUI-48 and EUI-64 addresses
are used in common implementations, depending on application
and vendor preference. For example, the EUI-48 address
7cd1c3e8102f might reasonably be represented as any of the
following:
<list style="symbols">
<t>7cd1c3e8102f</t>
<t>7c:d1:c3:e8:10:2f</t>
<t>7c-d1-c3-e8-10-2f</t>
<t>7cd1.c3e8.102f</t>
</list>
There is no canonical representation defined by the IEEE.</t>
<t>The use of a single representation for use in the DNS
promotes ease of implementation and information retrieval,
and this document specifies (see <xref target="eui48pres"/>,
<xref target="eui64pres"/>) that the second representation
on this list be used, that of two-digit hexadecimal numbers
separated by colons. The digits A through F may be represented
in either upper or lower case.</t>
</section>
<section title="The EUI48 Resource Record">
<t>The EUI48 RR is used to store EUI-48 addresses in the DNS.</t>
<t>The Type value for the EUI48 RRType is XXTBA1.</t>
<t>The EUI48 RR is class-independent.</t>
<t>The EUI48 RR has no special TTL requirements.</t>
<section title="EUI48 RDATA Wire Format">
<t>The RDATA for an EUI48 RR consists of a single, 6-octet
EUI48-Address field, encoded in network (big-endian) order.</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| EUI48-Address |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section title="EUI48 RR Presentation Format" anchor="eui48pres">
<t>The Address field MUST be represented as six two-digit
hexadecimal numbers separated by colons. The hexadecimal
digits "A" through "F" MAY be represented in either upper
or lower case.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section title="The EUI64 Resource Record" anchor="eui64rr">
<t>The EUI64 RR is used to store EUI-64 addresses in the DNS.</t>
<t>The Type value for the EUI64 RR is XXTBA2.</t>
<t>The EUI64 RR is class-independent.</t>
<t>The EUI64 RR has no special TTL requirements.</t>
<section title="EUI64 RDATA Wire Format">
<t>The RDATA for an EUI48 RR consists of a single, 8-octet
Address field, encoded in network (big-endian) order.</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| EUI-64 Address |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section title="EUI64 RR Presentation Format" anchor="eui64pres">
<t>The Address field MUST be represented as eight two-digit
hexadecimal numbers separated by colons. The hexadecimal
digits "A" through "F" may be represented in either upper
or lower case.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section title="Examples">
<t>The following EUI48 RR stores the EUI-48 address
7c:d1:c3:e8:10:2f.</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
host.example. 86400 IN EUI48 7c:d1:c3:e8:10:2f
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>The following EUI64 RR stores the EUI-64 address
7c:d1:c3:ff:fe:e8:10:2f.</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
host.example. 86400 IN EUI64 7c:d1:c3:ff:fe:e8:10:2f
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section title="IANA Considerations">
<t>This document directs the IANA to assign two entries in the
"Resource Record (RR) TYPEs" subregistry as follows:</t>
<texttable>
<ttcol>Type</ttcol>
<ttcol>Value</ttcol>
<ttcol>Meaning</ttcol>
<ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
<c>EUI48</c>
<c>XXTBA1</c>
<c>an EUI-48 address</c>
<c>this document</c>
<c>EUI64</c>
<c>XXTBA2</c>
<c>an EUI-64 address</c>
<c>this document</c>
</texttable>
</section>
<section title="Security Considerations">
<t>The specification presented in this document presents no
additional threat to the Internet.</t>
</section>
<section title="Acknowledgements">
<t>Your name here, etc.</t>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<references title="Normative References">
&rfc1034;
&rfc1035;
&rfc2119;
<reference anchor="EUI48">
<front>
<title>Guidelines for use of a 48-bit Extended Unique
Identifier (EUI-48)</title>
<author>
<organization>IEEE</organization>
<address/>
</author>
</front>
<format type="PDF" target="http://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/tut/eui48.pdf"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="EUI64">
<front>
<title>Guidelines for use of a 64-bit Extended Unique
Identifier (EUI-64)</title>
<author>
<organization>IEEE</organization>
<address/>
</author>
</front>
<format type="PDF" target="http://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/tut/eui64.pdf"/>
</reference>
</references>
<section title="Editorial Notes">
<t>This section (and sub-sections) to be removed prior to
publication.</t>
<section title="RRType Parameter Allocation Template">
<figure>
<artwork>
DNS RRTYPE PARAMETER ALLOCATION TEMPLATE
A. Submission Date: 2013-03-18
B.1 Submission Type: [X] New RRTYPE [ ] Modification to RRTYPE
B.2 Kind of RR: [X] Data RR [ ] Meta-RR
C. Contact Information for submitter (will be publicly posted):
Name: Joe Abley
Email Address: joe.abley@icann.org
International telephone number: +1 519 670 9327
Other contact handles:
D. Motivation for the new RRTYPE application.
The purpose of this RRTYPE application is to allow EUI-48
and EUI-64 addresses to be stored in the DNS. EUI-48
addresses are those used, for example, in ethernet.
E. Description of the proposed RR type.
See draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes for a full
description.
F. What existing RRTYPE or RRTYPEs come closest to filling that
need and why are they unsatisfactory?
The TXT record can be used to store arbitrary, unstructured
data in the DNS and hence could be used to store EUI-48 and
EUI-64 addresses. This approach is unsatisfactory for the
usual reasons, i.e. there is no opportunity for validating
data before it is stored, and typographical errors must
consequently be detected after data retrieval.
G. What mnemonic is requested for the new RRTYPE (optional)?
EUI48 for EUI-48 addresses; EUI64 for EUI-64 addresses.
H. Does the requested RRTYPE make use of any existing IANA
registry or require the creation of a new IANA sub-registry
in DNS Parameters? If so, please indicate which registry is
to be used or created. If a new sub-registry is needed, specify
the allocation policy for it and its initial contents. Also
include what the modification procedures will be.
No.
I. Does the proposal require/expect any changes in DNS
servers/resolvers that prevent the new type from being processed
as an unknown RRTYPE (see [RFC3597])?
No.
J. Comments:
See draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes for a complete
specification.
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section title="Change History">
<t>
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="00">Initial idea, circulated for the purposes of
entertainment.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 02:53:59 |