One document matched: draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-eidrefs-00.txt




DTN Research Group                                             P. Lovell
Internet-Draft                                              SPARTA, Inc.
Expires: April 29, 2009                                 October 26, 2008


                    DTN EID References Specification
                   draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-eidrefs-00

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on April 29, 2009.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).















Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


Abstract

   This document describes a convention for storing references to Delay-
   Tolerant Networking (DTN) Bundle Protocol (BP) endpoint identifiers
   [EIDs] within extension blocks of bundles.


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2.  Storage Convention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     2.1.  EID Reference List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   3.  Dictionary Revision  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   4.  IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   5.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     5.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     5.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
   Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 10
































Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


1.  Introduction

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [1].

   This document defines an optional method for extensions to the DTN
   bundle protocol [2] to store references to endpoint addresses in the
   bundle dictionary.  EIDs and the reference format are described in
   [2] section 3.5.

   The primary block of each bundle contains a "dictionary" byte array.
   The text values of the endpoint identifiers in the primary block,
   such as source and destination, are stored in the dictionary and
   references to them are stored in specific places in the primary
   block.

   DTN protocol extensions may also add endpoint identifiers to the
   dictionary and store references within their extension blocks.

   The bundle protocol agent at each node may wish to remove any
   dictionary entries for which references no longer exist and, to do
   so, must be able to locate all existing EID references in a bundle.




























Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


2.  Storage Convention

   All extension blocks use the Canonical Bundle Block Format as defined
   in the Bundle Protocol Specification.  Each is comprised of the
   following elements:

      - Block type code

      - Block processing control flags

      - Block EID reference list (optional)

      - Block data length

      - Block-type-specific data fields

   The type, flags, list and length fields are common to all extension
   blocks and are known collectively as the "preamble".


   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |type       |      flags (SDNV)                 |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |            length  (SDNV)                     |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |  block body data                              |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   =     (continues ... )                          =
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |  block body data                              |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

   General block layout (without list)

                                 Figure 1

   EID references MUST be stored in the EID reference list

2.1.  EID Reference List

   The EID reference list is a composite field and may optionally be
   present in any extension block.  It consists of a count field
   followed by that number of references.  The count is an SDNV as
   described in [2] section 3.1.  Each reference is a ordered pair of
   SDNVs as described in [2] section 3.5, containing:

      - the offset, within the dictionary, of the first character of the
      referenced endpoint ID's scheme name



Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


      - the offset, within the dictionary, of the first character of the
      referenced endpoint ID's SSP

   Presence of the field is indicated by the setting of bit 0x40 of the
   block processing control flags.

   If bit 0x40 is not set then there is no EID reference list field, and
   neither count nor references may appear.


   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |type       |      flags (SDNV)                 |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |           EID reference count (SDNV)          |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |  ref_scheme_1 (SDNV)  |    ref_ssp_1 (SDNV)   |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |  ref_scheme_2 (SDNV)  |    ref_ssp_2 (SDNV)   |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |            length  (SDNV)                     |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |  block-type-specific data                     |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   =    (continues ... )                           =
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
   |  block-type-specific data                     |
   +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

   A sample block layout showing two EID references

                                 Figure 2

   Extension blocks may contain EID addresses as text within their
   block-type-specific data section.  There is no restriction on where
   or how these are stored.

   A block MUST NOT contain references in its block-type-specific data
   section













Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


3.  Dictionary Revision

   Bundle nodes MUST support the EID reference scheme described above in
   Section 2.1.















































Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


4.  IANA Considerations

   None at this time.  If the bundle protocol becomes a standards track
   protocol, then we may want to consider having IANA establish a
   register of block types, and in particular for this specification a
   separate register of block formats.













































Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 7]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

   [1]  Bradner, S. and J. Reynolds, "Key words for use in RFCs to
        Indicate Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, October 1997.

   [2]  Scott, K., "Bundle Protocol Specification",
        draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-spec-06.txt , August 2006.

   [3]  Symington, S., Farrell, S., Weiss, H., and P. Lovell, "Bundle
        Security Protocol Specification",
        draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-security-03.txt , March 2007.

5.2.  Informative References

   [4]  Cerf, V., "Delay-Tolerant Network Architecture",
        draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-07.txt , October 2006,
        <draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch-07.txt>.

   [5]  Farrell, S., Symington, S., and H. Weiss, "Delay-Tolerant
        Network Security Overview",
        draft-irtf-dtnrg-sec-overview-02.txt , October 2006.




























Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 8]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


Author's Address

   Peter Lovell
   SPARTA, Inc.
   7110 Samuel Morse Drive
   Columbia, MD  21046
   US

   Phone: +1-443-430-8052
   Email: peter.lovell@sparta.com









































Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                 [Page 9]

Internet-Draft               EID references                 October 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).





Lovell                   Expires April 29, 2009                [Page 10]


PAFTECH AB 2003-20262026-04-24 09:00:07