One document matched: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-02.xml


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- edited with XMLSPY v5 rel. 3 U (http://www.xmlspy.com)
     by Daniel M Kohn (private) -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
]>
<rfc category="std"
     docName="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-02.txt"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>

  <?rfc toc="yes" ?>

  <?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>

  <?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>

  <?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>

  <?rfc strict="yes" ?>

  <front>
    <title abbrev="RTCP XR Burst/Gap Discard">RTCP XR Report Block for
    Burst/Gap Discard metric Reporting</title>

    <author fullname="Geoff Hunt" initials="G." surname="Hunt">
      <organization>Unaffiliated</organization>

      <address>
        <email>r.geoff.hunt@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Alan Clark" initials="A." surname="Clark">
      <organization abbrev="Telchemy">Telchemy Incorporated</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280</street>

          <city>Duluth</city>

          <region>GA</region>

          <code>30097</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>alan.d.clark@telchemy.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Rachel Huang" initials="R" surname="Huang">
      <organization abbrev="Huawei">Huawei Technologies Co.,
      Ltd.</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District</street>

          <city>Nanjing</city>

          <region>Jiangsu</region>

          <code>210012</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>Rachel@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Qin Wu" initials="Q." role="editor" surname="Wu">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District</street>

          <city>Nanjing</city>

          <region>Jiangsu</region>

          <code>210012</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>sunseawq@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date month="January" year="2012" />

    <area>Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area</area>

    <workgroup>Audio/Video Transport Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>RFC</keyword>

    <keyword>Request for Comments</keyword>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <keyword>Real Time Control Protocol</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines an RTCP XR Report Block that allows the
      reporting of Burst and Gap Discard metrics for use in a range of RTP
      applications.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <section title="Burst and Gap Discard Report Block">
        <t>This draft defines a new block type to augment those defined in
        <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> for use in a range of RTP applications.
        The new block type supports the reporting of the proportion of packets
        discarded by the receiver due to jitter. The discards during discard
        bursts are reported, together with the number of bursts and additional
        data allowing the calculation of statistical parameters (mean and
        variance) of the distribution of burst lengths. This block is intended
        to be used in conjunction with <xref target="DISCARD"></xref> which
        provides the total packets discarded, and on which this block
        therefore depends. However the metric in <xref
        target="DISCARD"></xref> may be used independently of the metrics in
        this block.</t>

        <t>This block provides information on transient IP problems. Burst/Gap
        metrics are typically used in Cumulative reports however MAY be used
        in Interval reports. The burstiness of packet discard affects user
        experience, may influence any sender strategies to mitigate the
        problem, and may also have diagnostic value.</t>

        <t>The metric belongs to the class of transport-related terminal
        metrics defined in <xref target="MONARCH"></xref> (work in
        progress).</t>

        <t>The definitions of Burst, Gap, Loss and Discard are consistent with
        definitions in <xref target="RFC3611"></xref>. To accommodate the
        range of jitter buffer algorithms and packet discard logic that may be
        used by implementors, the method used to distinguish between bursts
        and gaps may be an equivalent method to that defined in<xref
        target="RFC3611"></xref> .</t>
      </section>

      <section title="RTCP and RTCP XR Reports">
        <t>The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in <xref
        target="RFC3550"></xref>. <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> defined an
        extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended Report (XR).
        This draft defines a new Extended Report block that MUST be used as
        defined in <xref target="RFC3550"></xref> and <xref
        target="RFC3611"></xref>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Performance Metrics Framework">
        <t>The Performance Metrics Framework <xref target="RFC6390"></xref>
        provides guidance on the definition and specification of performance
        metrics. Metrics described in this draft either reference external
        definitions or define metrics generally in accordance with the
        guidelines in <xref target="RFC6390"></xref>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Applicability">
        <t>These metrics are applicable to a range of RTP applications.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Terminology">
      <section title="Standards Language">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
        document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
        target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>

        <t>In addition, the following terms are defined:</t>

        <t><list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="Received, Lost and Discarded"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />A packet shall be regarded as lost if it fails to
            arrive within an implementation-specific time window. A packet
            that arrives within this time window but is too early or late to
            be played out shall be regarded as discarded. A packet shall be
            classified as one of received (or OK), discarded or lost. <vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Bursts and Gaps"><vspace blankLines="1" />The terms
            Burst and Gap are used in a manner consistent with that of RTCP XR
            [RFC3611]. RTCP XR views a RTP stream as being divided into
            bursts, which are periods during which the loss rate is high
            enough to cause noticeable quality degradation (generally over 5
            percent loss rate), and gaps, which are periods during which lost
            packets are infrequent and hence quality is generally acceptable.
            <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>
          </list></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Burst/Gap Discard Block">
      <t>Metrics in this block report on Burst/Gap Discard in the stream
      arriving at the RTP system.</t>

      <section title="Report Block Structure">
        <t>Burst/Gap Discard metrics block<figure
            title="Figure 1: Report Block Structure">
            <artwork>
       0               1               2               3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |    BT=NBGD    |I|   resv.     |      block length = 3         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        SSRC of Source                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Threshold     |         Packets Discarded in Bursts           |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       Total Packets expected in bursts        |   Reserved.   | 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="Definition of Fields in Burst/Gap Loss Report Block">
        <t><list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="Block type (BT): 8 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" />A
            Burst/Gap Discard Report Block is identified by the constant
            NBGD.<vspace blankLines="1" />[Note to RFC Editor: please replace
            NBGD with the IANA provided RTCP XR block type for this
            block.]<vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Interval Metric flag (I): 1 bit"><vspace
            blankLines="1" /> This field is used to indicate whether the
            Packet Delay Variation metrics block is an Interval or a
            Cumulative report, that is, whether the reported values apply to
            the most recent measurement interval duration between successive
            metrics reports (I=1) (the Interval Duration) or to the
            accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements
            (I=0) (the Cumulative Duration). <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Reserved (resv): 7 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />These bits are reserved. They SHOULD be set to
            zero by senders and MUST be ignored by receivers.<vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="block length: 16 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" /> The
            length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one. For the
            Delay block, the block length is equal to 3.<vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="SSRC of source: 32 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" />As
            defined in Section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC3611"></xref>.<vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Threshold: 8 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" />The
            Threshold is equivalent to Gmin in <xref target="RFC3611"></xref>,
            i.e. the number of successive packets that must be received prior
            to and following a lost packet in order for this lost packet to be
            regarded as part of a gap. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Packets lost in bursts: 24 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />The total number of packets lost during loss
            bursts.<vspace blankLines="1" />If the measured value exceeds
            0xFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFE SHOULD be reported to indicate an
            over-range measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the
            value 0xFFFFFF SHOULD be reported. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Total packets expected in bursts: 24 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />The total number of packets expected during loss
            bursts (that is, the sum of received packets and lost packets).
            <vspace blankLines="1" />If the measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFD,
            the value 0xFFFFFE SHOULD be reported to indicate an over-range
            measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFF
            SHOULD be reported. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Reserved (resv): 8 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />These bits are reserved. They SHOULD be set to
            zero by senders and MUST be ignored by receivers.<vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section title="Derived metrics based on reported metrics">
        <t>The metrics described here are intended to be used as described in
        this section, in conjunction with information from the Measurement
        Information block <xref target="MEASID"></xref>, discard block <xref
        target="DISCARD"></xref> (which MUST be present in the same RTCP
        packet as the Burst/Gap Discard block).</t>

        <t>These metrics provides the following information relevant to
        statistical parameters, including:<list style="symbols">
            <t>The fraction of packets discarded during bursts (burst discard
            rate in <xref target="SUMSTAT"></xref>)</t>

            <t>The fraction of packets discarded during gaps (gap discard rate
            in <xref target="SUMSTAT"></xref>)</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The details on calculation these parameters in the metrics are
        described in <xref target="SUMSTAT"></xref>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Considerations for Voice-over-IP applications">
      <t>This metric block is applicable to a broad range of RTP applications.
      Where the metric is used with a Voice-overIP (VoIP) application, the
      following considerations apply.</t>

      <t>RTCP XR views a call as being divided into bursts, which are periods
      during which the loss rate is high enough to cause noticeable call
      quality degradation (generally over 5 percent loss rate), and gaps,
      which are periods during which lost packets are infrequent and hence
      call quality is generally acceptable.</t>

      <t>If Voice Activity Detection is used the Burst and Gap Duration shall
      be determined as if silence frames had been sent, i.e. a period of
      silence in excess of Gmin frames MUST terminate a burst condition.</t>

      <t>The recommended value for the threshold Gmin in [RFC3611] results in
      a Burst being a period of time during which the call quality is degraded
      to a similar extent to a typical PCM Severely Errored Second <xref
      target="PSES"></xref>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="SDP Signaling">
      <t>[RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol) <xref
      target="RFC4566"></xref> for signaling the use of XR blocks. XR blocks
      MAY be used without prior signaling.</t>

      <t>This section augments the SDP <xref target="RFC4566"></xref>
      attribute "rtcp-xr" defined in <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> by
      providing an additional value of "xr-format" to signal the use of the
      report block defined in this document.<figure>
          <artwork>
rtcp-xr-attrib = "a=" "rtcp-xr" ":" [xr-format *(SP xr-format)] CRLF

(defined in [RFC3611])

xr-format =/ xr-bgd-block

xr-bgd-block = "brst-gap-dscrd"
</artwork>
        </figure></t>
    </section>

    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For
      general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to <xref
      target="RFC3611"></xref>.</t>

      <section title="New RTCP XR Block Type value">
        <t>This document assigns the block type value NDEL in the IANA "RTCP
        XR Block Type Registry" to the "Burst/Gap Discard Metrics Block".</t>

        <t>[Note to RFC Editor: please replace NBGD with the IANA provided
        RTCP XR block type for this block.]</t>
      </section>

      <section title="New RTCP XR SDP Parameter">
        <t>This document also registers a new parameter "brst-gap-dscrd" in
        the "RTCP XR SDP Parameters Registry".</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Contact information for registrations">
        <t><figure>
            <artwork>
The contact information for the registrations is:

Geoff Hunt (r.geoff.hunt@gmail.com)

Orion 2 PP3, Adastral Park, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 3RE, United
Kingdom
</artwork>
          </figure><vspace blankLines="1" /></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>It is believed that this proposed RTCP XR report block introduces no
      new security considerations beyond those described in <xref
      target="RFC3611"></xref>. This block does not provide per-packet
      statistics so the risk to confidentiality documented in Section 7,
      paragraph 3 of <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> does not apply.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Contributors">
      <t>The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments and contributions
      made by Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Bob Biskner, Kevin
      Connor, Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Jim Frauenthal, Albert
      Higashi, Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith
      Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa, Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi
      Raviraj, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Changes from previous version">
      <t>Changed BNF for SDP following Christian Groves' and Tom Taylor's
      comments (4th and 5th May 2009), now aligned with RFC 5234 section 3.3
      "Incremental Alternatives".</t>

      <t>Updated references.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <reference anchor="RFC2119">
        <front>
          <title abbrev="RFC Key Words">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
          Requirement Levels</title>

          <author fullname="Scott Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
            <organization>Harvard University</organization>

            <address>
              <postal>
                <street>1350 Mass. Ave.</street>

                <street>Cambridge</street>

                <street>MA 02138</street>
              </postal>

              <phone>- +1 617 495 3864</phone>

              <email>sob@harvard.edu</email>
            </address>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="1997" />

          <area>General</area>

          <keyword>keyword</keyword>

          <abstract>
            <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to
            signify the requirements in the specification. These words are
            often capitalized. This document defines these words as they
            should be interpreted in IETF documents. Authors who follow these
            guidelines should incorporate this phrase near the beginning of
            their document: <list>
                <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
                "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
                "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described
                in RFC 2119.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>Note that the force of these words is modified by the
            requirement level of the document in which they are used.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC3611">
        <front>
          <title>RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)</title>

          <author fullname="T. Friedman" initials="T." surname="Friedman">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="R. Caceres" initials="R." surname="Caceres">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="A. Clark" initials="A." surname="Clark">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="November" year="2003" />

          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines the Extended Report (XR) packet type for
            the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP), and defines how the use of XR
            packets can be signaled by an application if it employs the
            Session Description Protocol (SDP). XR packets are composed of
            report blocks, and seven block types are defined here. The purpose
            of the extended reporting format is to convey information that
            supplements the six statistics that are contained in the report
            blocks used by RTCP's Sender Report (SR) and Receiver Report (RR)
            packets. Some applications, such as multicast inference of network
            characteristics (MINC) or voice over IP (VoIP) monitoring, require
            other and more detailed statistics. In addition to the block types
            defined here, additional block types may be defined in the future
            by adhering to the framework that this document provides.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC4566">
        <front>
          <title>SDP: Session Description Protocol</title>

          <author fullname="M. Handley" initials="M." surname="Handley">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="V. Jacobson" initials="V." surname="Jacobson">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="C. Perkins" initials="C." surname="Perkins">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2006" />

          <abstract>
            <t>This memo defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP). SDP
            is intended for describing multimedia sessions for the purposes of
            session announcement, session invitation, and other forms of
            multimedia session initiation. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC3550">
        <front>
          <title>RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications</title>

          <author fullname="Henning Schulzrinne" initials="H."
                  surname="Schulzrinne">
            <organization>Columbia University</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2003" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3550" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <reference anchor="DISCARD">
        <front>
          <title>RTCP XR Report Block for Discard metric Reporting</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Hunt" initials="G." surname="Hunt">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="December" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ID" value="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-01" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="SUMSTAT">
        <front>
          <title>RTCP XR for Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting</title>

          <author fullname="Glen Zorn" initials="G." surname="Zorn">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ID" value="draft-zorn-xrblock-rtcp-xr-al-stat-03" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="MEASID">
        <front>
          <title>Measurement Identity and information Reporting using SDES
          item and XR Block</title>

          <author fullname="Qin Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ID"
                    value="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-meas-identity-01" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="MONARCH">
        <front>
          <title>Monitoring Architectures for RTP</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Hunt" initials="G." surname="Hunt">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="August" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ID" value="draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-04" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC6390">
        <front>
          <title>Framework for Performance Metric Development</title>

          <author fullname="Alan Clark" initials="A." surname="Clark">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="Benoit Claise " initials="B." surname="Claise">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6390" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="PSES">
        <front>
          <title>URL</title>

          <author>
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name=""
                    value="http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/projects/devglossary/_severely_errored_second.html" />
      </reference>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>

PAFTECH AB 2003-20262026-04-23 06:01:32