One document matched: draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-09.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-09"
ipr="trust200902">
<front>
<title abbrev="TURN server auto disc">TURN Server Auto Discovery</title>
<author fullname="Prashanth Patil" initials="P." surname="Patil">
<organization abbrev="Cisco">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street></street>
<street></street>
<city>Bangalore</city>
<country>India</country>
</postal>
<email>praspati@cisco.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Tirumaleswar Reddy" initials="T." surname="Reddy">
<organization abbrev="Cisco">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Cessna Business Park, Varthur Hobli</street>
<street>Sarjapur Marathalli Outer Ring Road</street>
<city>Bangalore</city>
<region>Karnataka</region>
<code>560103</code>
<country>India</country>
</postal>
<email>tireddy@cisco.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Dan Wing" initials="D." surname="Wing">
<organization abbrev="Cisco">Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>170 West Tasman Drive</street>
<city>San Jose</city>
<region>California</region>
<code>95134</code>
<country>USA</country>
</postal>
<email>dwing@cisco.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<date />
<workgroup>TRAM</workgroup>
<abstract>
<t>Current Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) server discovery
mechanisms are relatively static and limited to explicit configuration.
These are usually under the administrative control of the application or
TURN service provider, and not the enterprise, ISP, or the network in
which the client is located. Enterprises and ISPs wishing to provide
their own TURN servers need auto discovery mechanisms that a TURN client
could use with no or minimal configuration. This document describes
three such mechanisms for TURN server discovery.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<middle>
<section anchor="introduction" title="Introduction">
<t>TURN <xref target="RFC5766"></xref> is a protocol that is often used
to improve the connectivity of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) applications (as
defined in section 2.7 of <xref target="RFC5128"></xref>). TURN allows a
connection to be established when one or both sides are incapable of a
direct P2P connection. It is an important building block for
interactive, real-time communication using audio, video, collaboration
etc.</t>
<t>While TURN services are extensively used today, the means to auto
discover TURN servers do not exist. TURN clients are usually explicitly
configured with a well known TURN server. To allow TURN applications to
operate seamlessly across different types of networks and encourage the
use of TURN without the need for manual configuration, it is important
that there exists an auto discovery mechanism for TURN services. Web
Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) <xref
target="I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview"></xref> usages and related extensions,
which are mostly based on web applications, need TURN server discovery
mechanisms.</t>
<t>This document describes three discovery mechanisms, so as to maximize
opportunity for discovery, based on the network in which the TURN client
finds itself. The three discovery mechanisms are:</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>A resolution mechanism based on straightforward Naming Authority
Pointer (S-NAPTR) resource records in the Domain Name System (DNS).
<xref target="RFC5928"></xref> describes details on retrieving a
list of server transport addresses from DNS that can be used to
create a TURN allocation.</t>
<t>DNS Service Discovery</t>
<t>A mechanism based on anycast address for TURN.</t>
</list>In general, if a client wishes to communicate using one of its
interfaces using a specific IP address family, it SHOULD query the TURN
server(s) that has been discovered for that specific interface and
address family. How to select an interface and IP address family is out
of the scope of this document.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="term" title="Terminology">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
target="RFC2119"></xref>.</t>
</section>
<section title="Discovery Procedure">
<t>TURN clients, by default, discover TURN server(s) by means of local
or manual TURN configuration (i.e., TURN servers configured at the
system level). For example, in case of Web Real-Time Communication
(WebRTC) <xref target="I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview"></xref> usages and
related extensions, which are based on web applications, a Java Script
specified TURN server MUST be considered as local configuration. An
implementation MAY give the user an opportunity (e.g., by means of
configuration file options or menu items) to specify a TURN server for
each address family. A client can choose auto-discovery in the absence
of local configuration, if local configuration doesn’t work or in
addition to local configuration. This document does not offer a
recommendation on server selection.</t>
<t>A TURN client that implements the auto discovery algorithm, to
discover TURN servers in the attached network, uses the following
mechanisms for discovery:</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Service Resolution : The TURN client attempts to perform TURN
service resolution using the host's DNS domain.</t>
<t>DNS SD: DNS Service Discovery.</t>
<t>Anycast : Send TURN allocate request to the assigned TURN anycast
request for each combination of interface and address family.</t>
</list></t>
<t>Not all TURN servers may be discovered using NAPTR records or DNS SD;
Similarly, not all TURN servers may support anycast. For best results, a
client SHOULD implement all discovery mechanisms described above.</t>
<t>The document does not prescribe a strict order that a client must
follow for discovery. An implementation may choose to perform all the
above steps in parallel for discovery OR choose to follow any desired
order and stop the discovery procedure if a mechanism succeeds.</t>
<t>On hosts with more than one interface or address family (IPv4/v6),
the TURN server discovery procedure has to be performed for each
combination of interface and address family. A client MAY optionally
choose to perform the discovery procedure only for a desired
interface/address combination if the client does not wish to discover a
TURN server for all combinations of interface and address family.</t>
</section>
<section title="Discovery using Service Resolution">
<t>This mechanism is performed in two steps:</t>
<t>1. A DNS domain name is retrieved for each combination of interface
and address family.</t>
<t>2. Retrieved DNS domain names are then used for S-NAPTR lookups as
per <xref target="RFC5928"></xref>. Further DNS lookups may be necessary
to determine TURN server IP address(es).</t>
<section title="Retrieving Domain Name">
<t>A client has to determine the domain in which it is located. The
following sections provide two possible mechanisms to learn the domain
name, but other means of retrieving domain names may be used, which
are outside the scope of this document e.g. local configuration.</t>
<t>Implementations may allow the user to specify a default name that
is used if no specific name has been configured.</t>
<section title="DHCP">
<t>DHCP can be used to determine the domain name related to an
interface's point of network attachment. Network operators may
provide the domain name to be used for service discovery within an
access network using DHCP. Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of <xref
target="RFC5986"></xref> define DHCP IPv4 and IPv6 access network
domain name options to identify a domain name that is suitable for
service discovery within the access network. <xref
target="RFC2132"></xref> defines the DHCP IPv4 domain name option;
while this option is less suitable, it may still be useful if the
options defined in <xref target="RFC5986"></xref> are not
available.</t>
<t>For IPv6, the TURN server discovery procedure MUST try to
retrieve DHCP option 57 (OPTION_V6_ACCESS_DOMAIN). If no such option
can be retrieved, the procedure fails for this interface. For IPv4,
the TURN server discovery procedure MUST try to retrieve DHCP option
213 (OPTION_V4_ACCESS_DOMAIN). If no such option can be retrieved,
the procedure SHOULD try to retrieve option 15 (Domain Name). If
neither option can be retrieved the procedure fails for this
interface. If a result can be retrieved it will be used as an input
for S-NAPTR resolution.</t>
</section>
<section title="From own Identity">
<t>For a TURN client with an understanding of the protocol mechanics
of calling applications, the client may wish to extract the domain
name from its own identity i.e canonical identifier used to reach
the user.</t>
<t><figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[Example
SIP : 'sip:alice@example.com'
Bare JID : 'alice@example.com'
email : 'alice@example.com'
'example.com' is retrieved from the above examples.]]></artwork>
</figure></t>
<t>The means to extract the domain name may be different based on
the type of identifier and is outside the scope of this
document.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section title="Resolution">
<t>Once the TURN discovery procedure has retrieved domain names, the
resolution mechanism described in <xref target="RFC5928"></xref> is
followed. An S-NAPTR lookup with 'RELAY' application service and the
desired protocol tag is made to obtain information necessary to
connect to the authoritative TURN server within the given domain.</t>
<t>In the example below, for domain 'example.net', the resolution
algorithm will result in IP address, port, and protocol tuples as
follows:</t>
<t><figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[ example.net.
IN NAPTR 100 10 "" RELAY:turn.udp "" example.net.
example.net.
IN NAPTR 100 10 S RELAY:turn.udp "" _turn._udp.example.net.
_turn._udp.example.net.
IN SRV 0 0 3478 a.example.net.
a.example.net.
IN A 192.0.2.1
IN AAAA 2001:db8:8:4::2
+-------+----------+------------------+------+
| Order | Protocol | IP address | Port |
+-------+----------+------------------+------+
| 1 | UDP | 192.0.2.1 | 3478 |
+-------+----------+------------------+------+
| 2 | UDP | 2001:db8:8:4::2 | 3478 |
+-------+----------+------------------+------+
]]></artwork>
</figure>If no TURN-specific S-NAPTR records can be retrieved, the
discovery procedure fails for this domain name (and the corresponding
interface and IP protocol version). If more domain names are known,
the discovery procedure may perform the corresponding S-NAPTR lookups
immediately. However, before retrying a lookup that has failed, a
client MUST wait a time period that is appropriate for the encountered
error (NXDOMAIN, timeout, etc.).</t>
</section>
</section>
<section title="DNS Service Discovery">
<t>DNS-based Service Discovery (DNS-SD) <xref target="RFC6763"></xref>
and Multicast DNS (mDNS) <xref target="RFC6762"></xref> provide generic
solutions for discovering services available in a local network.
DNS-SD/mDNS define a set of naming rules for certain DNS record types
that they use for advertising and discovering services.</t>
<t>Section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC6763"></xref> specifies that a
service instance name in DNS-SD has the following structure:</t>
<t><Instance> . <Service> . <Domain></t>
<t>The <Domain> portion specifies the DNS sub-domain where the
service instance is registered. It may be "local.", indicating the mDNS
local domain, or it may be a conventional domain name such as
"example.com.". The <Service> portion of the TURN service instance
name MUST be "_turn._udp" or "_turn._tcp" or "_turns._udp" or
"_turns._tcp".</t>
<t>For example, the following DNS records would be used for a TURN
server with instance name "exampleco TURN Server" providing TURN service
over UDP on port 5030:</t>
<t><figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[ _turn._udp.local.
PTR "exampleco TURN Server"._turn._udp.local.
"exampleco TURN Server"._turn._udp.local.
SRV 0 0 5030 example-turn-server.local.
example-turn-server.local.
A 198.51.100.2
example-turn-server.local.
AAAA 2001:db8:8:4::2]]></artwork>
</figure></t>
<section title="mDNS">
<t>A TURN client tries to discover the TURN servers being advertised
in the site by multicasting a PTR query "_turn._udp.local." or
"_turn._tcp.local" or "_turns._udp.local." or "_turns._tcp.local" or
the TURN server can send out gratuitous multicast DNS answer packets
whenever it starts up, wakes from sleep, or detects a chance in
network configuration. TURN clients receive these gratuitous packet
and cache the information contained in it.</t>
<t><figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[ +------+ +-------------+
| TURN | | TURN Server |
|Client| | |
+------+ +-------------+
| |
| PTR query "_turn._udp.local." |
|--------------------------------------------->|
| PTR reply |
|<---------------------------------------------|
| SRV query |
|--------------------------------------------->|
| SRV reply |
|<---------------------------------------------|
| A/AAAA query reply |
|--------------------------------------------->|
| TURN Request |
|--------------------------------------------->|
| TURN Response |
|<---------------------------------------------|
Figure 1: TURN Server Discovery using mDNS]]></artwork>
</figure></t>
</section>
</section>
<section title="Discovery using Anycast">
<t>IP anycast can also be used for TURN service discovery. A packet sent
to an anycast address is delivered to the "topologically nearest"
network interface with the anycast address. Using the TURN anycast
address, the only two things that need to be deployed in the network are
the two things that actually use TURN.</t>
<t>When a client requires TURN services, it sends a TURN allocate
request to the assigned anycast address. The TURN anycast server
responds with a 300 (Try Alternate) error as described in <xref
target="RFC5766"></xref>; The response contains the TURN unicast address
in the ALTERNATE-SERVER attribute. For subsequent communication with the
TURN server, the client uses the responding server's unicast address.
This has to be done because two packets addressed to an anycast address
may reach two different anycast servers. The client, thus, also needs to
ensure that the initial request fits in a single packet. An
implementation may choose to send out every new request to the anycast
address to learn the closest TURN server each time.</t>
</section>
<section title="Deployment Considerations">
<section title="Mobility and Changing IP addresses">
<t>A change of IP address on an interface may invalidate the result of
the TURN server discovery procedure. For instance, if the IP address
assigned to a mobile host changes due to host mobility, it may be
required to re-run the TURN server discovery procedure without relying
on earlier gained information. New requests should be made to the
newly learned TURN servers learned after TURN discovery re-run.
However, if an earlier learned TURN server is still accessible using
the new IP address, procedures described for mobility using TURN
defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-tram-turn-mobility"></xref> can be
used for ongoing streams.</t>
</section>
<section title="Recursively Encapsulated TURN">
<t>WebRTC endpoints SHOULD treat any TURN server discovered through
the mechanims described in this specification as an enterprise/gateway
server, in accordance with Recursively Encapsulated TURN <xref
target="I-D.ietf-rtcweb-return"></xref>.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
<section title="Anycast">
<t>IANA should allocate an IPv4 and an IPv6 well-known TURN anycast
address. 192.0.0.0/24 and 2001:0000::/48 are reserved for IETF
Protocol Assignments, as listed at</t>
<t><http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/>
and</t>
<t><http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/></t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="security" title="Security Considerations">
<t>Use of Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) <xref
target="RFC5389"></xref> authentication is OPTIONAL for TURN servers
provided by the local network or by the access network. A network
provided TURN server MAY be configured to accept Allocation requests
without STUN authentication, and a TURN client MAY be configured to
accept Allocation success responses without STUN authentication from a
network provided TURN server. In order to protect against
man-in-the-middle attacks when accepting a TURN allocation response
without STUN authentication, it is RECOMMENDED that the TURN client use
one of the following techniques with (D)TLS to validate the TURN
server:</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>For certificate-based authentication, a pre-populated trust
anchor store <xref target="RFC6024"></xref> allows a TURN client to
perform path validation for the server certificate obtained during
the (D)TLS handshake. If the client used a domain name to discover
the TURN server, that domain name also provides a mechanism for
validation of the TURN server. The client MUST use the rules and
guidelines given in section 6 of <xref target="RFC6125"></xref> to
validate the TURN server identity.</t>
<t>For TURN servers that don't have a certificate trust chain (e.g.,
because they are on a home network or a corporate network), a
configured list of TURN servers can contain the Subject Public Key
Info (SPKI) fingerprint of the TURN servers. The public key is used
for the same reasons HTTP pinning <xref target="RFC7469"></xref>
uses the public key.</t>
<t>Raw public key-based authentication, as defined in <xref
target="RFC7250"></xref>, could also be used to authenticate a TURN
server.</t>
</list></t>
<t>An auto-discovered TURN server is considered to be only as trusted as
the path between the client and the TURN server. In order to safely use
auto-discovered TURN servers for sessions with 'strict privacy'
requirements, the user needs to be able to define privacy criteria (e.g.
a trusted list of servers, networks, or domains) that are considered
acceptable for such traffic. Any discovered TURN server outside the
criteria is considered untrusted and is not used for privacy sensitive
communication.</t>
<t>In some auto-discovery scenarios, it might not be possible for the
TURN client to use (D)TLS authentication to validate the TURN server.
However, fall-back to clear text in such cases could leave the TURN
client open to on-path injection of spoofed TURN messages. Instead, a
TURN client SHOULD fall-back to encryption-only (D)TLS when (D)TLS
authentication is not available. Another reason to fall-back to
encryption-only is for privacy, which is analogous to SMTP opportunistic
encryption <xref target="RFC7435"></xref> where one does not require
privacy but one desires privacy when possible.</t>
<t>It is suggested that a TURN client attempt (D)TLS with authentication
and encryption, falling back to encryption-only if the TURN server
cannot be authenticated via (D)TLS. The TURN server could fall back to
clear text if it does not support unauthenticated (D)TLS, but fallback
to clear text is NOT RECOMMENDED because it makes the client more
susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks and on-path packet
injection.</t>
<section title="Service Resolution">
<t>The primary attack against the methods described in this document
is one that would lead to impersonation of a TURN server. An attacker
could attempt to compromise the S-NAPTR resolution. Security
considerations described in <xref target="RFC5928"></xref> are
applicable here as well.</t>
<t>In addition to considerations related to S-NAPTR, it is important
to recognize that the output of this is entirely dependent on its
input. An attacker who can control the domain name can also control
the final result. Because more than one method can be used to
determine the domain name, a host implementation needs to consider
attacks against each of the methods that are used.</t>
<t>If DHCP is used, the integrity of DHCP options is limited by the
security of the channel over which they are provided. Physical
security and separation of DHCP messages from other packets are
commonplace methods that can reduce the possibility of attack within
an access network; alternatively, DHCP authentication <xref
target="RFC3188"></xref> can provide a degree of protection against
modification. When using DHCP discovery, clients are encouraged to use
unicast DHCP INFORM queries instead of broadcast queries which are
more easily spoofed in insecure networks.</t>
</section>
<section title="DNS Service Discovery">
<t>Since DNS-SD is just a specification for how to name and use
records in the existing DNS system, it has no specific additional
security requirements over and above those that already apply to DNS
queries and DNS updates. For DNS queries, DNS Security Extensions
(DNSSEC) <xref target="RFC4033"></xref> should be used where the
authenticity of information is important. For DNS updates, secure
updates <xref target="RFC2136"></xref><xref target="RFC3007"></xref>
should generally be used to control which clients have permission to
update DNS records.</t>
<t>For mDNS, in addition to what has been described above, a principal
security threat is a security threat inherent to IP multicast routing
and any application that runs on it. A rogue system can advertise that
it is a TURN server. Discovery of such rogue systems as TURN servers,
in itself, is not a security threat if there is a means for the TURN
client to authenticate and authorize the discovered TURN servers.</t>
</section>
<section title="Anycast">
<t>In a network without any TURN server that is aware of the TURN
anycast address, outgoing TURN requests could leak out onto the
external Internet, possibly revealing information.</t>
<t>Using an IANA-assigned well-known TURN anycast address enables
border gateways to block such outgoing packets. In the default-free
zone, routers should be configured to drop such packets. Such
configuration can occur naturally via BGP messages advertising that no
route exists to said address.</t>
<t>Sensitive clients that do not wish to leak information about their
presence can set an IP TTL on their TURN requests that limits how far
they can travel into the public Internet.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
<t>The authors would like to thank Simon Perrault, Paul Kyzivat, Troy
Shields, Eduardo Gueiros, Ted Hardie, Bernard Aboba, Karl Stahl, Brian
Weis, Ralph Dromes and Brandon Williams for their review and valuable
comments. Thanks to Adam Roach for his detailed review and suggesting
DNS Service Discovery as an additional discovery mechanism.</t>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<references title="Normative References">
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5766"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5986"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2132"
?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.1035"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5928"
?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.6762"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.6763"
?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5198"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4033"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5389"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2136"
?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.3007"
?>
</references>
<references title="Informative References">
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.3188"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.5128"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.6024"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.6125"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7469"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7250"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7435"?>
<?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview'?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-tram-turn-mobility"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-rtcweb-return"?>
<!---->
</references>
<section title="Change History">
<t>[Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section prior to
publication.]</t>
<section title="Change from draft-patil-tram-serv-disc-00 to -01">
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Added IP address (Section 4.1.2) and Own identity (4.1.3) as
new means to obtain domain names</t>
<t>New Section 4.2.1 SOA (inspired by draft-kist-alto-3pdisc)</t>
<t>300 (Try Alternate) response for Anycast</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section title="Change from draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-01 to 02">
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Removed sections that describe reverse IP lookup</t>
<t>Added DNS Service Discovery as an additional discovery
mechanism</t>
</list></t>
</section>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 01:50:16 |