One document matched: draft-ietf-pana-preauth-03.txt
Differences from draft-ietf-pana-preauth-02.txt
PANA Working Group Y. Ohba
Internet-Draft Toshiba
Expires: April 27, 2009 October 24, 2008
Pre-authentication Support for PANA
draft-ietf-pana-preauth-03
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 27, 2009.
Abstract
This document defines an extension to the Protocol for carrying
Authentication for Network Access (PANA) for proactively establishing
a PANA SA (Security Association) between a PaC in one access network
and a PAA in another access network to which the PaC may move. The
proposed method operates across multiple administrative domains.
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Specification of Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminogy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Pre-authentication Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. PANA Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5. Authorization and Accounting Considerations . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 10
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
1. Introduction
The Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA)
[RFC5191] carries EAP messages between a PaC (PANA Client) and a PAA
(PANA Authentication Agent) in the access network. If the PaC is a
mobile device and is capable of moving one access network to another
while running its applications, it is critical for the PaC to perform
a handover seamlessly without degrading the performance of the
applications during the handover period. When the handover requires
the PaC to establish a PANA session with the PAA in the new access
network, the signaling to establish the PANA session should be
completed as fast as possible.
This document defines an extension to the PANA protocol [RFC5191]
used for proactively executing EAP authentication and establishing a
PANA SA (Security Association) between a PaC in an access network and
a PAA in another access network to which the PaC may move. The
proposed method operates across multiple AAA domains. The extension
to the PANA protocol is designed to realize direct pre-authentication
defined in [I-D.ietf-hokey-preauth-ps].
1.1. Specification of Requirements
In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements
of the specification. These words are often capitalized. The key
words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
"SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document
are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Terminogy
The following terms are used in this document in addition to the
terms defined in [RFC5191].
Serving PAA (SPAA): A PAA that resides in the serving network and
provides network access authentication for a particular PaC. For
simplicity, this document assumes that there is only one SPAA in
the serving network while the pre-authentication mechanism
described in this document is generally applicable to the case
where there are two or more SPAAs in the serving network.
Candidate PAA (CPAA): A PAA that resides in a candidate network to
which the PaC may move. A CPAA for a particular PaC may be a SPAA
for another PaC.
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
Pre-authentication: Pre-authentication refers to EAP pre-
authentication and defined as the utilization of EAP to pre-
establish EAP keying material on an authenticator prior to arrival
of the peer at the access network served by that authenticator
[I-D.ietf-hokey-preauth-ps]. In this draft, EAP pre-
authentication is performed between a PaC and a CPAA.
Pre-authorization: An authorization for a PaC, made by a CPAA for
the PaC at the time of pre-authentication.
Post-authorization: An authorization for a PaC, made by a CPAA for
the PaC when the CPAA becomes the SPAA for the PaC.
Pre-authorization SA: A PANA SA established between a PaC and its
CPAA.
Post-authorization SA: A PANA SA established between the PaC and its
SPAA.
3. Pre-authentication Procedure
A PaC that supports pre-authentication may establish a PANA session
for each CPAA.
There may be several mechanisms for a PaC and a CPAA to discover each
other. However, such mechanisms are out of the scope of this
document.
There may be a number of criteria for CPAA selection, the timing to
start pre-authentication and the timing to make a pre-authorization
SA a post-authorization SA (and hence the CPAA becomes the SPAA).
Such criteria can be implementation specific and thus are outside the
scope of this document.
Pre-authentication may be initiated by both a PaC and a CPAA. A new
'E' (prE-authentication) bit is defined in the PANA header. When
pre-authentication is performed, the 'E' (prE-authentication) bit of
PANA messages are set in order to indicate whether this PANA run is
for pre-authentication. Use of pre-authentication is negotiated as
follows.
o When a PaC initiates pre-authentication, it sends a PANA-Client-
Initiation (PCI) message with the 'E' (prE-authentication) bit
set. The PCI message MUST be unicast. The CPAA responds with a
PANA-Start-Request (PSR) message with the 'S' (Start) and 'E'
(prE-authentication) bits set only if it supports pre-
authentication. Otherwise, it MUST silently discard the message.
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
o When a CPAA initiates pre-authentication, it sends a PSR message
with the 'S' (Start) and 'E' (prE-authentication) bits set. The
PaC responds with a PANA-Start-Answer (PSA) message with the 'S'
(Start) and 'E' (prE-authentication) bits set only if it supports
pre-authentication. Otherwise, it MUST silently discard the
message.
o Once the PaC and CPAA have agreed on performing pre-authentication
using the 'S' (Start) and 'E' (prE-authentication) bits, the
subsequent PANA messages exchanged between them MUST have the 'E'
(prE-authentication) bit set.
When a CPAA with which the PaC has a pre-authorization SA becomes the
SPAA due to, e.g., movement of the PaC, the PaC performs an IP
address update procedure defined in Section 5.6 of [RFC5191] in order
to update the SPAA with the PaC's new address obtained from the new
serving network. PANA-Notification-Request (PNR) and PANA-
Notification-Answer (PNA) messages with 'P' (Ping) bit set are used
for this purpose. The completion of the IP address update procedure
will change the pre-authorization SA to a post-authorization SA. In
this case, the 'E' MUST NOT be set in the PNR and PNA messages and
subsequent PANA messages.
If there is another CPAA with which the PaC has a pre-authorization
SA and the PaC wants to keep the pre-authorization SA after the
change of SPAA, the PaC also performs an IP address update procedure
defined in Section 5.6 of [RFC5191] in order to update the CPAA with
the PaC's new address. PNR and PNA messages with 'P' (Ping) bit set
is used for this purpose. In this case, the 'E' (prE-authentication)
bit MUST be set in the PNR and PNA messages and subsequent PANA
messages. The IP address update procedure with the CPAA will not
change the pre-authorization SA to a post-authorization SA.
The pre-authorization SA and the corresponding PANA session between
the PaC and a CPAA is deleted by entering the termination phase of
the PANA protocol.
Example call flows for PaC-initiated pre-authentication and PAA-
initiated pre-authentication are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2,
respectively.
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
PaC CPAA
| |
+------------------+ |
|Pre-authentication| |
|trigger | |
+------------------+ |
| PCI w/'E' bit set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
| PAR w/'S' and 'E' bits set |
|<------------------------------------------------|
| PAN w/'S' and 'E' bits set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
| PAR-PAN exchange w/'E' bit set |
|<----------------------------------------------->|
| +------------------+
| |pre-authorization |
| +------------------+
| PAR w/'C' and 'E' bits set |
|<------------------------------------------------|
| PAN w/'C' and 'E' bits set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
. . .
. . .
+----------+ |
| Movement | |
+----------+ |
| PNR w/ 'P' bit set and w/o 'E' bit set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
| +-------------------+
| |post-authorization |
| |(CPAA becomes SPAA)|
| +-------------------+
| PNA w/ 'P' bit set and w/o 'E' bit set |
|<------------------------------------------------|
| |
Figure 1: PaC-initiated Pre-authentication Call Flow
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
PaC CPAA
| |
| +------------------+
| |Pre-authentication|
| |trigger |
| +------------------+
| PAR w/'S' and 'E' bits set |
|<------------------------------------------------|
| PAN w/'S' and 'E' bits set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
| PAR-PAN exchange w/'E' bit set |
|<----------------------------------------------->|
| +------------------+
| |pre-authorization |
| +------------------+
| PAR w/'C' and 'E' bits set |
|<------------------------------------------------|
| PAN w/'C' and 'E' bits set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
. . .
. . .
+----------+ |
| Movement | |
+----------+ |
| PNR w/ 'P' bit set and w/o 'E' bit set |
|------------------------------------------------>|
| +-------------------+
| |post-authorization |
| |(CPAA becomes SPAA)|
| +-------------------+
| PNA w/ 'P' bit set and w/o 'E' bit set |
|<------------------------------------------------|
| |
Figure 2: PAA-initiated Pre-authentication Call Flow
4. PANA Extensions
A new 'E' (prE-authentication) bit is defined in Flags field of PANA
header as follows.
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|R S C A P I E r r r r r r r r r|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
E(PrE-authentication) When pre-authentication is performed, the 'E'
(prE-authentication) bit of PANA messages are set in order to
indicate whether this PANA run is for establishing a pre-
authorization SA. The exact usage of this bit is described in
Section 3. This bit is to be assigned by IANA.
5. Authorization and Accounting Considerations
A pre-authorization and a post-authorization for the PaC may have
different authorization policies. For example, the pre-authorization
policy may not allow the PaC to sent or receive packets through an
Enforcement Point (EP) that is under control of the CPAA, while both
the pre-authorization and post-authorization policies may allow
installing credentials to the EP, where the credentials are used for
establishing a security association for per-packet cryptographic
filtering.
In an access network where accounting is performed, accounting starts
when the pre-authorization SA becomes the post-authorization SA by
default. Depending on the pre-authorization policy, accounting may
start immediately after the pre-authorization SA is established.
6. Security Considerations
Since the mechanism described in this document is designed to work
across multiple access networks, each EP in the serving network
SHOULD be configured to allow PANA messages to be forwarded between a
PaC and a CPAA only if the PaC has a post-authorization SA with the
SPAA in order to avoid an unauthorized PaC to initiate pre-
authentication. Also, each access network that supports pre-
authentication SHOULD block pre-authentication attempts from networks
from which a handover is not likely to occur.
When pre-authentication is initiated by a CPAA, it is possible that
the PaC simultaneously communicates with multiple CPAAs initiating
pre-authentication. In order to avoid possible resource consumption
attacks on the PaC caused by a blind attacker initiating pre-
authentication for the PaC by changing source addresses, the PaC
SHOULD limit the maximum number of CPAAs allowed to communicate.
The pre-authentication mechanism defined in this document does not
have an issue on context binding in which link-layer independent
context carried over pre-authentication signaling is bound to the
link-layer specific context [I-D.ietf-hokey-preauth-ps], because the
same EAP transport protocol (i.e., PANA) is used for normal
authentication and pre-authentication in the candidate network.
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
7. IANA Considerations
As described in Section 4, bit 6 of the Flags field of PANA Header
needs to be assigned by IANA for the 'E' (prE-authentication) bit.
8. Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Alper Yegin, Ashutosh Dutta, Julien
Bournelle and Sasikanth Bharadwaj for their valuable comments.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC5191] Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., and A.
Yegin, "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network
Access (PANA)", RFC 5191, May 2008.
[I-D.ietf-hokey-preauth-ps]
Ohba, Y., "EAP Pre-authentication Problem Statement",
draft-ietf-hokey-preauth-ps-04 (work in progress),
September 2008.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Author's Address
Yoshihiro Ohba
Toshiba America Research, Inc.
1 Telcordia Drive
Piscateway, NJ 08854
USA
Phone: +1 732 699 5305
Email: yohba@tari.toshiba.com
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Pre-authentication Support for PANA October 2008
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Ohba Expires April 27, 2009 [Page 10]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 04:12:27 |