One document matched: draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-25.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc docName="draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-25" ipr="trust200902" category="std">
<front>
<title abbrev="YANG Routing Management">A YANG Data Model for
Routing Management</title>
<author initials="L." surname="Lhotka" fullname="Ladislav Lhotka">
<organization>CZ.NIC</organization>
<address>
<email>lhotka@nic.cz</email>
</address>
</author>
<author initials="A." surname="Lindem" fullname="Acee Lindem">
<organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
<address>
<email>acee@cisco.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<date day="03" month="November" year="2016"/>
<area>Operations and Management</area>
<workgroup>NETMOD Working Group</workgroup>
<abstract>
<t>This document contains a specification of three YANG modules
and one submodule. Together they form the core routing data
model which serves as a framework for configuring and managing a
routing subsystem. It is expected that these modules will be
augmented by additional YANG modules defining data models for
control plane protocols, route filters and other functions. The core
routing data model provides common building blocks for such
extensions -- routes, routing information bases (RIB), and
control plane protocols.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<middle>
<section anchor="sec.introduction" title="Introduction">
<t>This document contains a specification of the following YANG
modules:
<list style="symbols">
<t>Module "ietf-routing" provides generic components of a
routing data model.</t>
<t>Module "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing" augments the
"ietf-routing" module with additional data specific to IPv4
unicast.</t>
<t>Module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" augments the
"ietf-routing" module with additional data specific to IPv6
unicast. Its submodule "ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements" also
augments the "ietf-interfaces" <xref target="RFC7223"/> and
"ietf-ip" <xref target="RFC7277"/> modules with IPv6 router
configuration variables required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>
</list></t>
<t>These modules together define the so-called core routing data
model, which is intended as a basis for future data model
development covering more sophisticated routing systems. While
these three modules can be directly used for simple IP devices
with static routing (see <xref target="app.minimum"/>), their
main purpose is to provide essential building blocks for more
complicated data models involving multiple control plane protocols,
multicast routing, additional address families, and advanced
functions such as route filtering or policy routing. To this
end, it is expected that the core routing data model will be
augmented by numerous modules developed by other IETF working
groups.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.term-not" title="Terminology and Notation">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
in this document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
<t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC6241"/>:
<list style="symbols">
<t>client,</t>
<t>message,</t>
<t>protocol operation,</t>
<t>server.</t>
</list></t>
<t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC7950"/>:
<list style="symbols">
<t>action,</t>
<t>augment,</t>
<t>configuration data,</t>
<t>container,</t>
<t>container with presence,</t>
<t>data model,</t>
<t>data node,</t>
<t>feature,</t>
<t>leaf,</t>
<t>list,</t>
<t>mandatory node,</t>
<t>module,</t>
<t>schema tree,</t>
<t>state data,</t>
<t>RPC operation.</t>
</list></t>
<section anchor="sec.new-terms" title="Glossary of New Terms">
<t><list style="hanging">
<t hangText="core routing data model:"> YANG data model
comprising "ietf-routing", "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing" and
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" modules.</t>
<t hangText="direct route:">a route to a directly connected
network.</t>
<t hangText="routing information base (RIB):">An object
containing a list of routes together with other
information. See <xref target="sec.rib"/> for details.</t>
<t hangText="system-controlled entry:">An entry of a list in
state data ("config false") that is created by the system
independently of what has been explicitly configured. See
<xref target="sec.system-user"/> for details.</t>
<t hangText="user-controlled entry:">An entry of a list in
state data ("config false") that is created and deleted as a
direct consequence of certain configuration changes. See
<xref target="sec.system-user"/> for details.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.tree-symbols" title="Tree Diagrams">
<t>A simplified graphical representation of the complete data
tree is presented in <xref target="app.data-tree"/>, and similar
diagrams of its various subtrees appear in the main text.</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Brackets "[" and "]" enclose list keys.</t>
<t>Curly braces "{" and "}" contain names of optional features that
make the corresponding node conditional.</t>
<t>Abbreviations before data node names: "rw" means configuration
(read-write), "ro" state data (read-only), "-x" RPC operations or
actions, and "-n" notifications.</t>
<t>Symbols after data node names: "?" means an optional node, "!" a
container with presence, and "*" denotes a "list" or "leaf-list".</t>
<t>Parentheses enclose choice and case nodes, and case nodes are
also marked with a colon (":").</t>
<t>Ellipsis ("...") stands for contents of subtrees that are not
shown.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.prefixes" title="Prefixes in Data Node Names">
<t>In this document, names of data nodes, actions and other
data model objects are often used without a prefix, as long as
it is clear from the context in which YANG module each name is
defined. Otherwise, names are prefixed using the standard prefix
associated with the corresponding YANG module, as shown in <xref target="tab.prefixes"/>.</t>
<texttable anchor="tab.prefixes" title="Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules">
<ttcol>Prefix</ttcol>
<ttcol>YANG module</ttcol>
<ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
<c>if</c><c>ietf-interfaces</c><c><xref target="RFC7223"/></c>
<c>ip</c><c>ietf-ip</c><c><xref target="RFC7277"/></c>
<c>rt</c><c>ietf-routing</c><c><xref target="sec.mod-rt"/></c>
<c>v4ur</c><c>ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing</c>
<c><xref target="sec.mod-v4ur"/></c>
<c>v6ur</c><c>ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing</c>
<c><xref target="sec.mod-v6ur"/></c>
<c>yang</c><c>ietf-yang-types</c><c><xref target="RFC6991"/></c>
<c>inet</c><c>ietf-inet-types</c><c><xref target="RFC6991"/></c>
</texttable>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.objectives" title="Objectives">
<t>The initial design of the core routing data model was driven by
the following objectives:
<list style="symbols">
<t>The data model should be suitable for the common address
families, in particular IPv4 and IPv6, and for unicast and
multicast routing, as well as Multiprotocol Label Switching
(MPLS).</t>
<t>A simple IP routing system, such as one that uses only
static routing, should be configurable in a simple way,
ideally without any need to develop additional YANG
modules.</t>
<t>On the other hand, the core routing framework must allow
for complicated implementations involving multiple routing
information bases (RIB) and multiple control plane protocols, as
well as controlled redistributions of routing information.</t>
<t>Device vendors will want to map the data models built on this
generic framework to their proprietary data models and
configuration interfaces. Therefore, the framework should be
flexible enough to facilitate such a mapping and accommodate
data models with different logic.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.design" title="The Design of the Core Routing Data Model">
<t>The core routing data model consists of three YANG modules
and one submodule. The first module, "ietf-routing", defines the
generic components of a routing system. The other two modules,
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing" and "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing",
augment the "ietf-routing" module with additional data nodes
that are needed for IPv4 and IPv6 unicast routing,
respectively. Module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" has a
submodule, "ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements", that augments the
"ietf-interfaces" <xref target="RFC7223"/> and "ietf-ip" <xref target="RFC7277"/> modules with configuration variables for IPv6
router advertisements as required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>. Figures <xref target="fig.confdata" format="counter"/> and <xref target="fig.statedata" format="counter"/> show abridged views of the configuration and
state data hierarchies. See <xref target="app.data-tree"/> for
the complete data trees.</t>
<figure anchor="fig.confdata" title="Configuration data hierarchy.">
<artwork>
+--rw routing
+--rw router-id?
+--rw control-plane-protocols
| +--rw control-plane-protocol* [type name]
| +--rw type
| +--rw name
| +--rw description?
| +--rw static-routes
| +--rw v6ur:ipv6
| | ...
| +--rw v4ur:ipv4
| ...
+--rw ribs
+--rw rib* [name]
+--rw name
+--rw address-family?
+--rw description?
</artwork>
</figure>
<figure anchor="fig.statedata" title="State data hierarchy.">
<artwork>
+--ro routing-state
+--ro router-id?
+--ro interfaces
| +--ro interface*
+--ro control-plane-protocols
| +--ro control-plane-protocol* [type name]
| +--ro type
| +--ro name
+--ro ribs
+--ro rib* [name]
+--ro name
+--ro address-family
+--ro default-rib?
+--ro routes
| +--ro route*
| ...
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>As can be seen from Figures <xref target="fig.confdata" format="counter"/> and <xref target="fig.statedata" format="counter"/>, the core routing data model introduces
several generic components of a routing framework: routes, RIBs
containing lists of routes, and control plane protocols. <xref target="sec.building-blocks"/> describes these components in
more detail.</t>
<section anchor="sec.system-user" title="System-Controlled and User-Controlled List Entries">
<t>The core routing data model defines several lists in the
schema tree, such as "rib", that have to be populated with at
least one entry in any properly functioning device, and
additional entries may be configured by a client.</t>
<t>In such a list, the server creates the required item as a
so-called system-controlled entry in state data, i.e., inside
the "routing-state" container.</t>
<t>An example can be seen in <xref target="app.get-reply"/>: the
"/routing-state/ribs/rib" list has two
system-controlled entries named "ipv4-master" and
"ipv6-master".</t>
<t>Additional entries may be created in the configuration by
a client, e.g., via the NETCONF protocol. These are so-called
user-controlled entries. If the server accepts a configured
user-controlled entry, then this entry also appears in the
state data version of the list.</t>
<t>Corresponding entries in both versions of the list (in
state data and configuration) have the same value of the list
key.</t>
<t>A client may also provide supplemental configuration of
system-controlled entries. To do so, the client creates a new
entry in the configuration with the desired contents. In order
to bind this entry to the corresponding entry in the state
data list, the key of the configuration entry has to be set to
the same value as the key of the state entry.</t>
<t>Deleting a user-controlled entry from the configuration list
results in the removal of the corresponding entry in the
state data list. In contrast, if a system-controlled
entry is deleted from the configuration list, only the extra
configuration specified in that entry is removed but the
corresponding state data entry remains in the list.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.building-blocks" title="Basic Building Blocks">
<t>This section describes the essential components of the core
routing data model.</t>
<section anchor="sec.route" title="Route">
<t>Routes are basic elements of information in a routing
system. The core routing data model defines only the following
minimal set of route attributes:
<list style="symbols">
<t>"destination-prefix": address prefix specifying the set
of destination addresses for which the route may be
used. This attribute is mandatory.</t>
<t>"route-preference": an integer value (also known as
administrative distance) that is used for selecting a
preferred route among routes with the same destination
prefix. A lower value means a more preferred route.</t>
<t>"next-hop": determines the outgoing interface and/or
next-hop address(es), other operation to be performed with a
packet.</t>
</list>
</t>
<t>Routes are primarily state data that appear as entries of
RIBs (<xref target="sec.rib"/>) but they may also be found in
configuration data, for example as manually configured static
routes. In the latter case, configurable route attributes are
generally a subset of attributes defined for RIB routes.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.rib" title="Routing Information Base (RIB)">
<t>Every implementation of the core routing data model manages
one or more routing information bases (RIB). A RIB is a list
of routes complemented with administrative data. Each RIB
contains only routes of one address family. An address family
is represented by an identity derived from the
"rt:address-family" base identity.</t>
<t>In the core routing data model, RIBs are state data
represented as entries of the list
"/routing-state/ribs/rib". The contents of
RIBs are controlled and manipulated by control plane protocol
operations which may result in route additions, removals and
modifications. This also includes manipulations via the
"static" and/or "direct" pseudo-protocols, see <xref target="sec.pseudoproto"/>.</t>
<t>For every supported address family, exactly one RIB MUST be
marked as the so-called default RIB. Its role is explained in
<xref target="sec.proto"/>.</t>
<t>Simple router implementations that do not advertise the
feature "multiple-ribs" will typically create one
system-controlled RIB per supported address family, and mark
it as the default RIB.</t>
<t>More complex router implementations advertising the
"multiple-ribs" feature support multiple RIBs per address
family that can be used for policy routing and other
purposes.</t>
<t>The following action (see Section 7.15 of <xref target="RFC7950"/>) is defined for the "rib" list:
<list style="symbols">
<t>active-route -- return the active RIB route for the
destination address that is specified as the action's input
parameter.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.proto" title="Control Plane Protocol">
<t>The core routing data model provides an open-ended
framework for defining multiple control plane protocol
instances, e.g., for Layer 3 routing protocols. Each control
plane protocol instance MUST be assigned a type, which is an
identity derived from the "rt:control-plane-protocol" base
identity. The core routing data model defines two identities
for the direct and static pseudo-protocols (<xref target="sec.pseudoproto"/>).</t>
<t>Multiple control plane protocol instances of the same type MAY be
configured.</t>
<section anchor="sec.pseudoproto" title="Routing Pseudo-Protocols">
<t>The core routing data model defines two special routing
protocol types -- "direct" and "static". Both are in fact
pseudo-protocols, which means that they are confined to the
local device and do not exchange any routing information
with adjacent routers.</t>
<t>Every implementation of the core routing data model MUST
provide exactly one instance of the "direct" pseudo-protocol
type. It is the source of direct routes for all configured
address families. Direct routes are normally supplied by the
operating system kernel, based on the configuration of
network interface addresses, see <xref target="sec.ietf-ip"/>.</t>
<t>A pseudo-protocol of the type "static" allows for specifying
routes manually. It MAY be configured in zero or multiple
instances, although a typical configuration will have exactly
one instance.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.newproto" title="Defining New Control Plane Protocols">
<t>It is expected that future YANG modules will create data
models for additional control plane protocol types. Such a new
module has to define the protocol-specific configuration and
state data, and it has to integrate it into the core routing
framework in the following way:
<list style="symbols">
<t>A new identity MUST be defined for the control plane protocol
and its base identity MUST be set to "rt:control-plane-protocol",
or to an identity derived from "rt:control-plane-protocol".</t>
<t>Additional route attributes MAY be defined, preferably in
one place by means of defining a YANG grouping. The new
attributes have to be inserted by augmenting the definitions
of the nodes
<figure>
<artwork>
/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route
</artwork>
</figure>
and
<figure>
<artwork>
/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:output/rt:route,
</artwork>
</figure>
and possibly other places in the configuration, state
data, notifications, and input/output parameters of
actions or RPC operations.</t>
<t>Configuration parameters and/or state data for the new
protocol can be defined by augmenting the
"control-plane-protocol" data node under both "/routing"
and "/routing-state".</t>
</list></t>
<t>By using a "when" statement, the augmented configuration
parameters and state data specific to the new protocol
SHOULD be made conditional and valid only if the value of
"rt:type" or "rt:source-protocol" is equal to (or derived
from) the new protocol's identity.</t>
<t>It is also RECOMMENDED that protocol-specific data nodes
be encapsulated in an appropriately named container with
presence. Such a container may contain mandatory data nodes
that are otherwise forbidden at the top level of an
augment.</t>
<t>The above steps are implemented by the example YANG module
for the RIP routing protocol in <xref target="app.rip"/>.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.4861" title="Parameters of IPv6 Router Advertisements">
<t>YANG module "ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements" (<xref target="sec.mod-v6ra"/>), which is a submodule of the
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" module, augments the configuration
and state data of IPv6 interfaces with definitions of the
following variables as required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>,
sec. 6.2.1:
<list style="symbols">
<t>send-advertisements,</t>
<t>max-rtr-adv-interval,</t>
<t>min-rtr-adv-interval,</t>
<t>managed-flag,</t>
<t>other-config-flag,</t>
<t>link-mtu,</t>
<t>reachable-time,</t>
<t>retrans-timer,</t>
<t>cur-hop-limit,</t>
<t>default-lifetime,</t>
<t>prefix-list: a list of prefixes to be advertised.<vspace blankLines="1"/>The
following parameters are associated with each prefix in the
list:
<list style="symbols">
<t>valid-lifetime,</t>
<t>on-link-flag,</t>
<t>preferred-lifetime,</t>
<t>autonomous-flag.</t>
</list></t>
</list></t>
<t>NOTES:</t>
<t><list style="numbers">
<t>The "IsRouter" flag, which is also required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>, is implemented in the "ietf-ip" module
<xref target="RFC7277"/> (leaf "ip:forwarding").</t>
<t>The original specification <xref target="RFC4861"/>
allows the implementations to decide whether the
"valid-lifetime" and "preferred-lifetime" parameters remain
the same in consecutive advertisements, or decrement in real
time. However, the latter behavior seems problematic because
the values might be reset again to the (higher) configured
values after a configuration is reloaded. Moreover, no
implementation is known to use the decrementing
behavior. The "ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements" submodule
therefore stipulates the former behavior with constant
values.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.interactions" title="Interactions with Other YANG Modules">
<t>The semantics of the core routing data model also depends on
several configuration parameters that are defined in other YANG
modules.</t>
<section anchor="sec.ietf-if" title="Module "ietf-interfaces"">
<t>The following boolean switch is defined in the
"ietf-interfaces" YANG module <xref target="RFC7223"/>:
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:enabled">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a network layer
interface, then all routing and forwarding functions MUST
be disabled on that interface.
</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.ietf-ip" title="Module "ietf-ip"">
<t>The following boolean switches are defined in the "ietf-ip"
YANG module <xref target="RFC7277"/>:
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:enabled">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a network layer
interface, then all IPv4 routing and forwarding functions
MUST be disabled on that interface.
</t>
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:forwarding">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a network layer
interface, then the forwarding of IPv4 datagrams through
this interface MUST be disabled. However, the interface MAY
participate in other IPv4 routing functions, such as routing
protocols.
</t>
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:enabled">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a network layer
interface, then all IPv6 routing and forwarding functions
MUST be disabled on that interface.
</t>
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:forwarding">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a network layer
interface, then the forwarding of IPv6 datagrams through
this interface MUST be disabled. However, the interface MAY
participate in other IPv6 routing functions, such as routing
protocols.
</t>
</list>
</t>
<t>In addition, the "ietf-ip" module allows for configuring IPv4
and IPv6 addresses and network prefixes or masks on network
layer interfaces. Configuration of these parameters on an
enabled interface MUST result in an immediate creation of the
corresponding direct route. The destination prefix of this route
is set according to the configured IP address and network
prefix/mask, and the interface is set as the outgoing interface
for that route.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.mod-rt" title="Routing Management YANG Module">
<t>RFC Editor: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX'
with the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-routing@2016-11-03.yang"
module ietf-routing {
yang-version "1.1";
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing";
prefix "rt";
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Lou Berger
<mailto:lberger@labn.net>
WG Chair: Kent Watsen
<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
Editor: Acee Lindem
<mailto:acee@cisco.com>";
description
"This YANG module defines essential components for the management
of a routing subsystem.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and
'OPTIONAL' in the module text are to be interpreted as described
in RFC 2119 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.";
revision 2016-11-03 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* Features */
feature multiple-ribs {
description
"This feature indicates that the server supports user-defined
RIBs.
Servers that do not advertise this feature SHOULD provide
exactly one system-controlled RIB per supported address family
and make them also the default RIBs. These RIBs then appear as
entries of the list /routing-state/ribs/rib.";
}
feature router-id {
description
"This feature indicates that the server supports configuration
of an explicit 32-bit router ID that is used by some routing
protocols.
Servers that do not advertise this feature set a router ID
algorithmically, usually to one of configured IPv4 addresses.
However, this algorithm is implementation-specific.";
}
/* Identities */
identity address-family {
description
"Base identity from which identities describing address
families are derived.";
}
identity ipv4 {
base address-family;
description
"This identity represents IPv4 address family.";
}
identity ipv6 {
base address-family;
description
"This identity represents IPv6 address family.";
}
identity control-plane-protocol {
description
"Base identity from which control plane protocol identities are
derived.";
}
identity routing-protocol {
base control-plane-protocol;
description
"Identity from which Layer 3 routing protocol identities are
derived.";
}
identity direct {
base routing-protocol;
description
"Routing pseudo-protocol that provides routes to directly
connected networks.";
}
identity static {
base routing-protocol;
description
"Static routing pseudo-protocol.";
}
/* Type Definitions */
typedef route-preference {
type uint32;
description
"This type is used for route preferences.";
}
/* Groupings */
grouping address-family {
description
"This grouping provides a leaf identifying an address
family.";
leaf address-family {
type identityref {
base address-family;
}
mandatory "true";
description
"Address family.";
}
}
grouping router-id {
description
"This grouping provides router ID.";
leaf router-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description
"A 32-bit number in the form of a dotted quad that is used by
some routing protocols identifying a router.";
reference
"RFC 2328: OSPF Version 2.";
}
}
grouping special-next-hop {
description
"This grouping provides a leaf with an enumeration of special
next-hops.";
leaf special-next-hop {
type enumeration {
enum blackhole {
description
"Silently discard the packet.";
}
enum unreachable {
description
"Discard the packet and notify the sender with an error
message indicating that the destination host is
unreachable.";
}
enum prohibit {
description
"Discard the packet and notify the sender with an error
message indicating that the communication is
administratively prohibited.";
}
enum receive {
description
"The packet will be received by the local system.";
}
}
description
"Special next-hop options.";
}
}
grouping next-hop-content {
description
"Generic parameters of next-hops in static routes.";
choice next-hop-options {
mandatory "true";
description
"Options for next-hops in static routes.
It is expected that further cases will be added through
augments from other modules.";
case simple-next-hop {
description
"This case represents a simple next hop consisting of the
next-hop address and/or outgoing interface.
Modules for address families MUST augment this case with a
leaf containing a next-hop address of that address
family.";
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Name of the outgoing interface.";
}
}
case special-next-hop {
uses special-next-hop;
}
case next-hop-list {
container next-hop-list {
description
"Container for multiple next-hops.";
list next-hop {
key "index";
description
"An entry of a next-hop list.
Modules for address families MUST augment this list
with a leaf containing a next-hop address of that
address family.";
leaf index {
type string;
description
"An user-specified identifier utilised to uniquely
reference the next-hop entry in the next-hop list.
The value of this index has no semantic meaning
other than for referencing the entry.";
}
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Name of the outgoing interface.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping next-hop-state-content {
description
"Generic parameters of next-hops in state data.";
choice next-hop-options {
mandatory "true";
description
"Options for next-hops in state data.
It is expected that further cases will be added through
augments from other modules, e.g., for recursive
next-hops.";
case simple-next-hop {
description
"This case represents a simple next hop consisting of the
next-hop address and/or outgoing interface.
Modules for address families MUST augment this case with a
leaf containing a next-hop address of that address
family.";
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-state-ref;
description
"Name of the outgoing interface.";
}
}
case special-next-hop {
uses special-next-hop;
}
case next-hop-list {
container next-hop-list {
description
"Container for multiple next-hops.";
list next-hop {
description
"An entry of a next-hop list.
Modules for address families MUST augment this list
with a leaf containing a next-hop address of that
address family.";
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-state-ref;
description
"Name of the outgoing interface.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
grouping route-metadata {
description
"Common route metadata.";
leaf source-protocol {
type identityref {
base routing-protocol;
}
mandatory "true";
description
"Type of the routing protocol from which the route
originated.";
}
leaf active {
type empty;
description
"Presence of this leaf indicates that the route is preferred
among all routes in the same RIB that have the same
destination prefix.";
}
leaf last-updated {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time stamp of the last modification of the route. If the
route was never modified, it is the time when the route was
inserted into the RIB.";
}
}
/* State data */
container routing-state {
config "false";
description
"State data of the routing subsystem.";
uses router-id {
description
"Global router ID.
It may be either configured or assigned algorithmically by
the implementation.";
}
container interfaces {
description
"Network layer interfaces used for routing.";
leaf-list interface {
type if:interface-state-ref;
description
"Each entry is a reference to the name of a configured
network layer interface.";
}
}
container control-plane-protocols {
description
"Container for the list of routing protocol instances.";
list control-plane-protocol {
key "type name";
description
"State data of a control plane protocol instance.
An implementation MUST provide exactly one
system-controlled instance of the 'direct'
pseudo-protocol. Instances of other control plane
protocols MAY be created by configuration.";
leaf type {
type identityref {
base control-plane-protocol;
}
description
"Type of the control plane protocol.";
}
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the control plane protocol instance.
For system-controlled instances this name is persistent,
i.e., it SHOULD NOT change across reboots.";
}
}
}
container ribs {
description
"Container for RIBs.";
list rib {
key "name";
min-elements "1";
description
"Each entry represents a RIB identified by the 'name' key.
All routes in a RIB MUST belong to the same address
family.
An implementation SHOULD provide one system-controlled
default RIB for each supported address family.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the RIB.";
}
uses address-family;
leaf default-rib {
if-feature "multiple-ribs";
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"This flag has the value of 'true' if and only if the RIB
is the default RIB for the given address family.
By default, control plane protocols place their routes
in the default RIBs.";
}
container routes {
description
"Current content of the RIB.";
list route {
description
"A RIB route entry. This data node MUST be augmented
with information specific for routes of each address
family.";
leaf route-preference {
type route-preference;
description
"This route attribute, also known as administrative
distance, allows for selecting the preferred route
among routes with the same destination prefix. A
smaller value means a more preferred route.";
}
container next-hop {
description
"Route's next-hop attribute.";
uses next-hop-state-content;
}
uses route-metadata;
}
}
action active-route {
description
"Return the active RIB route that is used for the
destination address.
Address family specific modules MUST augment input
parameters with a leaf named 'destination-address'.";
output {
container route {
description
"The active RIB route for the specified destination.
If no route exists in the RIB for the destination
address, no output is returned.
Address family specific modules MUST augment this
container with appropriate route contents.";
container next-hop {
description
"Route's next-hop attribute.";
uses next-hop-state-content;
}
uses route-metadata;
}
}
}
}
}
}
/* Configuration Data */
container routing {
description
"Configuration parameters for the routing subsystem.";
uses router-id {
if-feature "router-id";
description
"Configuration of the global router ID. Routing protocols
that use router ID can use this parameter or override it
with another value.";
}
container control-plane-protocols {
description
"Configuration of control plane protocol instances.";
list control-plane-protocol {
key "type name";
description
"Each entry contains configuration of a control plane
protocol instance.";
leaf type {
type identityref {
base control-plane-protocol;
}
description
"Type of the control plane protocol - an identity derived
from the 'control-plane-protocol' base identity.";
}
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name of the control plane protocol
instance.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the control plane protocol
instance.";
}
container static-routes {
when "derived-from-or-self(../type, 'rt:static')" {
description
"This container is only valid for the 'static' routing
protocol.";
}
description
"Configuration of the 'static' pseudo-protocol.
Address-family-specific modules augment this node with
their lists of routes.";
}
}
}
container ribs {
description
"Configuration of RIBs.";
list rib {
key "name";
description
"Each entry contains configuration for a RIB identified by
the 'name' key.
Entries having the same key as a system-controlled entry
of the list /routing-state/ribs/rib are used for
configuring parameters of that entry. Other entries define
additional user-controlled RIBs.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"The name of the RIB.
For system-controlled entries, the value of this leaf
must be the same as the name of the corresponding entry
in state data.
For user-controlled entries, an arbitrary name can be
used.";
}
uses address-family {
description
"Address family of the RIB.
It is mandatory for user-controlled RIBs. For
system-controlled RIBs it can be omitted, otherwise it
must match the address family of the corresponding state
entry.";
refine "address-family" {
mandatory "false";
}
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the RIB.";
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.mod-v4ur" title="IPv4 Unicast Routing Management YANG Module">
<t>RFC Editor: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX'
with the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing@2016-11-03.yang"
module ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing {
yang-version "1.1";
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing";
prefix "v4ur";
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Lou Berger
<mailto:lberger@labn.net>
WG Chair: Kent Watsen
<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
Editor: Acee Lindem
<mailto:acee@cisco.com>";
description
"This YANG module augments the 'ietf-routing' module with basic
configuration and state data for IPv4 unicast routing.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and
'OPTIONAL' in the module text are to be interpreted as described
in RFC 2119 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.";
revision 2016-11-03 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* Identities */
identity ipv4-unicast {
base rt:ipv4;
description
"This identity represents the IPv4 unicast address family.";
}
/* State data */
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"This leaf augments an IPv4 unicast route.";
leaf destination-prefix {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
description
"IPv4 destination prefix.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route/"
+ "rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:simple-next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in IPv4 unicast routes.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route/"
+ "rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:next-hop-list/"
+ "rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"This leaf augments the 'next-hop-list' case of IPv4 unicast
routes.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment
"/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/rt:input" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast RIBs.";
}
description
"This augment adds the input parameter of the 'active-route'
action.";
leaf destination-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 destination address.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"This augment adds the destination prefix to the reply of the
'active-route' action.";
leaf destination-prefix {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
description
"IPv4 destination prefix.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/"
+ "rt:simple-next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in the reply to the
'active-route' action.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/"
+ "rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v4ur:ipv4-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"Augment 'next-hop-list' case in the reply to the
'active-route' action.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
/* Configuration data */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes" {
description
"This augment defines the configuration of the 'static'
pseudo-protocol with data specific to IPv4 unicast.";
container ipv4 {
description
"Configuration of a 'static' pseudo-protocol instance
consists of a list of routes.";
list route {
key "destination-prefix";
description
"A list of static routes.";
leaf destination-prefix {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
mandatory "true";
description
"IPv4 destination prefix.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the route.";
}
container next-hop {
description
"Configuration of next-hop.";
uses rt:next-hop-content {
augment "next-hop-options/simple-next-hop" {
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in IPv4 static
routes.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment "next-hop-options/next-hop-list/next-hop-list/"
+ "next-hop" {
description
"Augment 'next-hop-list' case in IPv4 static
routes.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.mod-v6ur" title="IPv6 Unicast Routing Management YANG Module">
<t>RFC Editor: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX'
with the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing@2016-11-03.yang"
module ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing {
yang-version "1.1";
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing";
prefix "v6ur";
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
include ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements {
revision-date 2016-11-03;
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Lou Berger
<mailto:lberger@labn.net>
WG Chair: Kent Watsen
<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
Editor: Acee Lindem
<mailto:acee@cisco.com>";
description
"This YANG module augments the 'ietf-routing' module with basic
configuration and state data for IPv6 unicast routing.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and
'OPTIONAL' in the module text are to be interpreted as described
in RFC 2119 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.";
revision 2016-11-03 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* Identities */
identity ipv6-unicast {
base rt:ipv6;
description
"This identity represents the IPv6 unicast address family.";
}
/* State data */
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"This leaf augments an IPv6 unicast route.";
leaf destination-prefix {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"IPv6 destination prefix.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route/"
+ "rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:simple-next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in IPv6 unicast routes.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route/"
+ "rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:next-hop-list/"
+ "rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"This leaf augments the 'next-hop-list' case of IPv6 unicast
routes.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment
"/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/rt:input" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast RIBs.";
}
description
"This augment adds the input parameter of the 'active-route'
action.";
leaf destination-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 destination address.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"This augment adds the destination prefix to the reply of the
'active-route' action.";
leaf destination-prefix {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"IPv6 destination prefix.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/"
+ "rt:simple-next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in the reply to the
'active-route' action.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/"
+ "rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop" {
when "derived-from-or-self(../../../../../rt:address-family, "
+ "'v6ur:ipv6-unicast')" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"Augment 'next-hop-list' case in the reply to the
'active-route' action.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
/* Configuration data */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes" {
description
"This augment defines the configuration of the 'static'
pseudo-protocol with data specific to IPv6 unicast.";
container ipv6 {
description
"Configuration of a 'static' pseudo-protocol instance
consists of a list of routes.";
list route {
key "destination-prefix";
description
"A list of static routes.";
leaf destination-prefix {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
mandatory "true";
description
"IPv6 destination prefix.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the route.";
}
container next-hop {
description
"Configuration of next-hop.";
uses rt:next-hop-content {
augment "next-hop-options/simple-next-hop" {
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in IPv6 static
routes.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
augment "next-hop-options/next-hop-list/next-hop-list/"
+ "next-hop" {
description
"Augment 'next-hop-list' case in IPv6 static
routes.";
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next-hop.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS></artwork>
</figure>
<section anchor="sec.mod-v6ra" title="IPv6 Router Advertisements Submodule">
<t>RFC Editor: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX'
with the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements@2016-11-03.yang"
submodule ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements {
yang-version "1.1";
belongs-to ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing {
prefix "v6ur";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-ip {
prefix "ip";
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: Lou Berger
<mailto:lberger@labn.net>
WG Chair: Kent Watsen
<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
Editor: Acee Lindem
<mailto:acee@cisco.com>";
description
"This YANG module augments the 'ietf-ip' module with
configuration and state data of IPv6 router advertisements.
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and
'OPTIONAL' in the module text are to be interpreted as described
in RFC 2119 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for
full legal notices.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6).";
revision 2016-11-03 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* State data */
augment "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface/ip:ipv6" {
description
"Augment interface state data with parameters of IPv6 router
advertisements.";
container ipv6-router-advertisements {
description
"Parameters of IPv6 Router Advertisements.";
leaf send-advertisements {
type boolean;
description
"A flag indicating whether or not the router sends periodic
Router Advertisements and responds to Router
Solicitations.";
}
leaf max-rtr-adv-interval {
type uint16 {
range "4..1800";
}
units "seconds";
description
"The maximum time allowed between sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements from the interface.";
}
leaf min-rtr-adv-interval {
type uint16 {
range "3..1350";
}
units "seconds";
description
"The minimum time allowed between sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements from the interface.";
}
leaf managed-flag {
type boolean;
description
"The value that is placed in the 'Managed address
configuration' flag field in the Router Advertisement.";
}
leaf other-config-flag {
type boolean;
description
"The value that is placed in the 'Other configuration' flag
field in the Router Advertisement.";
}
leaf link-mtu {
type uint32;
description
"The value that is placed in MTU options sent by the
router. A value of zero indicates that no MTU options are
sent.";
}
leaf reachable-time {
type uint32 {
range "0..3600000";
}
units "milliseconds";
description
"The value that is placed in the Reachable Time field in
the Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. A
value of zero means unspecified (by this router).";
}
leaf retrans-timer {
type uint32;
units "milliseconds";
description
"The value that is placed in the Retrans Timer field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. A value
of zero means unspecified (by this router).";
}
leaf cur-hop-limit {
type uint8;
description
"The value that is placed in the Cur Hop Limit field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. A value
of zero means unspecified (by this router).";
}
leaf default-lifetime {
type uint16 {
range "0..9000";
}
units "seconds";
description
"The value that is placed in the Router Lifetime field of
Router Advertisements sent from the interface, in seconds.
A value of zero indicates that the router is not to be
used as a default router.";
}
container prefix-list {
description
"A list of prefixes that are placed in Prefix Information
options in Router Advertisement messages sent from the
interface.
By default, these are all prefixes that the router
advertises via routing protocols as being on-link for the
interface from which the advertisement is sent.";
list prefix {
key "prefix-spec";
description
"Advertised prefix entry and its parameters.";
leaf prefix-spec {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"IPv6 address prefix.";
}
leaf valid-lifetime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"The value that is placed in the Valid Lifetime in the
Prefix Information option. The designated value of all
1's (0xffffffff) represents infinity.
An implementation SHOULD keep this value constant in
consecutive advertisements except when it is
explicitly changed in configuration.";
}
leaf on-link-flag {
type boolean;
description
"The value that is placed in the on-link flag ('L-bit')
field in the Prefix Information option.";
}
leaf preferred-lifetime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
description
"The value that is placed in the Preferred Lifetime in
the Prefix Information option, in seconds. The
designated value of all 1's (0xffffffff) represents
infinity.
An implementation SHOULD keep this value constant in
consecutive advertisements except when it is
explicitly changed in configuration.";
}
leaf autonomous-flag {
type boolean;
description
"The value that is placed in the Autonomous Flag field
in the Prefix Information option.";
}
}
}
}
}
/* Configuration data */
augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6" {
description
"Augment interface configuration with parameters of IPv6 router
advertisements.";
container ipv6-router-advertisements {
description
"Configuration of IPv6 Router Advertisements.";
leaf send-advertisements {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"A flag indicating whether or not the router sends periodic
Router Advertisements and responds to Router
Solicitations.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvSendAdvertisements.";
}
leaf max-rtr-adv-interval {
type uint16 {
range "4..1800";
}
units "seconds";
default "600";
description
"The maximum time allowed between sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements from the interface.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
MaxRtrAdvInterval.";
}
leaf min-rtr-adv-interval {
type uint16 {
range "3..1350";
}
units "seconds";
must ". <= 0.75 * ../max-rtr-adv-interval" {
description
"The value MUST NOT be greater than 75 % of
'max-rtr-adv-interval'.";
}
description
"The minimum time allowed between sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements from the interface.
The default value to be used operationally if this leaf is
not configured is determined as follows:
- if max-rtr-adv-interval >= 9 seconds, the default value
is 0.33 * max-rtr-adv-interval;
- otherwise it is 0.75 * max-rtr-adv-interval.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
MinRtrAdvInterval.";
}
leaf managed-flag {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"The value to be placed in the 'Managed address
configuration' flag field in the Router Advertisement.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvManagedFlag.";
}
leaf other-config-flag {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"The value to be placed in the 'Other configuration' flag
field in the Router Advertisement.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvOtherConfigFlag.";
}
leaf link-mtu {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"The value to be placed in MTU options sent by the router.
A value of zero indicates that no MTU options are sent.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvLinkMTU.";
}
leaf reachable-time {
type uint32 {
range "0..3600000";
}
units "milliseconds";
default "0";
description
"The value to be placed in the Reachable Time field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. A value
of zero means unspecified (by this router).";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvReachableTime.";
}
leaf retrans-timer {
type uint32;
units "milliseconds";
default "0";
description
"The value to be placed in the Retrans Timer field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. A value
of zero means unspecified (by this router).";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvRetransTimer.";
}
leaf cur-hop-limit {
type uint8;
description
"The value to be placed in the Cur Hop Limit field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. A value
of zero means unspecified (by this router).
If this parameter is not configured, the device SHOULD use
the value specified in IANA Assigned Numbers that was in
effect at the time of implementation.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvCurHopLimit.
IANA: IP Parameters,
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ip-parameters";
}
leaf default-lifetime {
type uint16 {
range "0..9000";
}
units "seconds";
description
"The value to be placed in the Router Lifetime field of
Router Advertisements sent from the interface, in seconds.
It MUST be either zero or between max-rtr-adv-interval and
9000 seconds. A value of zero indicates that the router is
not to be used as a default router. These limits may be
overridden by specific documents that describe how IPv6
operates over different link layers.
If this parameter is not configured, the device SHOULD use
a value of 3 * max-rtr-adv-interval.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvDefaultLifeTime.";
}
container prefix-list {
description
"Configuration of prefixes to be placed in Prefix
Information options in Router Advertisement messages sent
from the interface.
Prefixes that are advertised by default but do not have
their entries in the child 'prefix' list are advertised
with the default values of all parameters.
The link-local prefix SHOULD NOT be included in the list
of advertised prefixes.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvPrefixList.";
list prefix {
key "prefix-spec";
description
"Configuration of an advertised prefix entry.";
leaf prefix-spec {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"IPv6 address prefix.";
}
choice control-adv-prefixes {
default "advertise";
description
"The prefix either may be explicitly removed from the
set of advertised prefixes, or parameters with which
it is advertised may be specified (default case).";
leaf no-advertise {
type empty;
description
"The prefix will not be advertised.
This can be used for removing the prefix from the
default set of advertised prefixes.";
}
case advertise {
leaf valid-lifetime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
default "2592000";
description
"The value to be placed in the Valid Lifetime in
the Prefix Information option. The designated
value of all 1's (0xffffffff) represents
infinity.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvValidLifetime.";
}
leaf on-link-flag {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"The value to be placed in the on-link flag
('L-bit') field in the Prefix Information
option.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvOnLinkFlag.";
}
leaf preferred-lifetime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
must ". <= ../valid-lifetime" {
description
"This value MUST NOT be greater than
valid-lifetime.";
}
default "604800";
description
"The value to be placed in the Preferred Lifetime
in the Prefix Information option. The designated
value of all 1's (0xffffffff) represents
infinity.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvPreferredLifetime.";
}
leaf autonomous-flag {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"The value to be placed in the Autonomous Flag
field in the Prefix Information option.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvAutonomousFlag.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.iana" title="IANA Considerations">
<t>RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with
the actual RFC number (and remove this note).</t>
<t>This document registers the following namespace URIs in the
IETF XML registry <xref target="RFC3688"/>:</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>This document registers the following YANG modules in the YANG
Module Names registry <xref target="RFC6020"/>:</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing
prefix: rt
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing
prefix: v4ur
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
prefix: v6ur
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>This document registers the following YANG submodule in the YANG
Module Names registry <xref target="RFC6020"/>:</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements
parent: ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
reference: RFC XXXX
--------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-cons" title="Security Considerations">
<t>Configuration and state data conforming to the core routing
data model (defined in this document) are designed to be
accessed via a management protocol with secure transport layer,
such as NETCONF <xref target="RFC6241"/>. The NETCONF access
control model <xref target="RFC6536"/> provides the means to
restrict access for particular NETCONF users to a pre-configured
subset of all available NETCONF protocol operations and
content.</t>
<t>A number of configuration data nodes defined in the YANG
modules belonging to the core routing data model are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., "config true" in YANG terms,
which is the default). These data nodes may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write
operations to these data nodes, such as "edit-config" in
NETCONF, can have negative effects on the network if the
protocol operations are not properly protected.</t>
<t>The vulnerable "config true" parameters and subtrees are the
following:
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="/routing/control-plane-protocols/control-plane-protocol:">This
list specifies the control plane protocols configured on a
device.</t>
<t hangText="/routing/ribs/rib:">This list
specifies the RIBs configured for the device.</t>
</list>
Unauthorised access to any of these lists can adversely affect the
routing subsystem of both the local device and the network. This
may lead to network malfunctions, delivery of packets to
inappropriate destinations and other problems.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="acknowledgments" title="Acknowledgments">
<t>The authors wish to thank Nitin Bahadur, Martin Bjorklund,
Dean Bogdanovic, Jeff Haas, Joel Halpern, Wes Hardaker,
Sriganesh Kini, David Lamparter, Andrew McGregor, Jan Medved,
Xiang Li, Stephane Litkowski, Thomas Morin, Tom Petch,
Yingzhen Qu, Bruno Rijsman, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Phil Shafer,
Dave Thaler, Yi Yang, Derek Man-Kit Yeung and Jeffrey Zhang for
their helpful comments and suggestions.</t>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<references title="Normative References">
<reference anchor="RFC2119" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
<front>
<title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
<author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="S. Bradner"><organization/></author>
<date year="1997" month="March"/>
<abstract><t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC3688" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688">
<front>
<title>The IETF XML Registry</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Mealling" fullname="M. Mealling"><organization/></author>
<date year="2004" month="January"/>
<abstract><t>This document describes an IANA maintained registry for IETF standards which use Extensible Markup Language (XML) related items such as Namespaces, Document Type Declarations (DTDs), Schemas, and Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schemas.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="81"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3688"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3688"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC4861" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861">
<front>
<title>Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)</title>
<author initials="T." surname="Narten" fullname="T. Narten"><organization/></author>
<author initials="E." surname="Nordmark" fullname="E. Nordmark"><organization/></author>
<author initials="W." surname="Simpson" fullname="W. Simpson"><organization/></author>
<author initials="H." surname="Soliman" fullname="H. Soliman"><organization/></author>
<date year="2007" month="September"/>
<abstract><t>This document specifies the Neighbor Discovery protocol for IP Version 6. IPv6 nodes on the same link use Neighbor Discovery to discover each other's presence, to determine each other's link-layer addresses, to find routers, and to maintain reachability information about the paths to active neighbors. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4861"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4861"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6020" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020">
<front>
<title>YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<date year="2010" month="October"/>
<abstract><t>YANG is a data modeling language used to model configuration and state data manipulated by the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF), NETCONF remote procedure calls, and NETCONF notifications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6020"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6020"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6991" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991">
<front>
<title>Common YANG Data Types</title>
<author initials="J." surname="Schoenwaelder" fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<date year="2013" month="July"/>
<abstract><t>This document introduces a collection of common data types to be used with the YANG data modeling language. This document obsoletes RFC 6021.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6991"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6991"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6241" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241">
<front>
<title>Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)</title>
<author initials="R." surname="Enns" fullname="R. Enns" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<author initials="J." surname="Schoenwaelder" fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="A. Bierman" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<date year="2011" month="June"/>
<abstract><t>The Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) defined in this document provides mechanisms to install, manipulate, and delete the configuration of network devices. It uses an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based data encoding for the configuration data as well as the protocol messages. The NETCONF protocol operations are realized as remote procedure calls (RPCs). This document obsoletes RFC 4741. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6241"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6241"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7223" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7223">
<front>
<title>A YANG Data Model for Interface Management</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund"><organization/></author>
<date year="2014" month="May"/>
<abstract><t>This document defines a YANG data model for the management of network interfaces. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models augment the generic interfaces data model defined in this document. The data model includes configuration data and state data (status information and counters for the collection of statistics).</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7223"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7223"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7277" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7277">
<front>
<title>A YANG Data Model for IP Management</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund"><organization/></author>
<date year="2014" month="June"/>
<abstract><t>This document defines a YANG data model for management of IP implementations. The data model includes configuration data and state data.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7277"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7277"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7950" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950">
<front>
<title>The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund" role="editor"><organization/></author>
<date year="2016" month="August"/>
<abstract><t>YANG is a data modeling language used to model configuration data, state data, Remote Procedure Calls, and notifications for network management protocols. This document describes the syntax and semantics of version 1.1 of the YANG language. YANG version 1.1 is a maintenance release of the YANG language, addressing ambiguities and defects in the original specification. There are a small number of backward incompatibilities from YANG version 1. This document also specifies the YANG mappings to the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF).</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7950"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7950"/>
</reference>
</references>
<references title="Informative References">
<reference anchor="RFC6087" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6087">
<front>
<title>Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents</title>
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="A. Bierman"><organization/></author>
<date year="2011" month="January"/>
<abstract><t>This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of Standards Track specifications containing YANG data model modules. Applicable portions may be used as a basis for reviews of other YANG data model documents. Recommendations and procedures are defined, which are intended to increase interoperability and usability of Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) implementations that utilize YANG data model modules. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6087"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6087"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6536" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6536">
<front>
<title>Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model</title>
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="A. Bierman"><organization/></author>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund"><organization/></author>
<date year="2012" month="March"/>
<abstract><t>The standardization of network configuration interfaces for use with the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) requires a structured and secure operating environment that promotes human usability and multi-vendor interoperability. There is a need for standard mechanisms to restrict NETCONF protocol access for particular users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol operations and content. This document defines such an access control model. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6536"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6536"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7895" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7895">
<front>
<title>YANG Module Library</title>
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="A. Bierman"><organization/></author>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund"><organization/></author>
<author initials="K." surname="Watsen" fullname="K. Watsen"><organization/></author>
<date year="2016" month="June"/>
<abstract><t>This document describes a YANG library that provides information about all the YANG modules used by a network management server (e.g., a Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) server). Simple caching mechanisms are provided to allow clients to minimize retrieval of this information.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7895"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7895"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC7951" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951">
<front>
<title>JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG</title>
<author initials="L." surname="Lhotka" fullname="L. Lhotka"><organization/></author>
<date year="2016" month="August"/>
<abstract><t>This document defines encoding rules for representing configuration data, state data, parameters of Remote Procedure Call (RPC) operations or actions, and notifications defined using YANG as JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) text.</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7951"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7951"/>
</reference>
</references>
<section anchor="app.data-tree" title="The Complete Data Trees">
<t>This appendix presents the complete configuration and
state data trees of the core routing data model.
See <xref target="sec.tree-symbols"/> for an explanation of the
symbols used. Data type of every leaf node is shown near the right
end of the corresponding line.</t>
<section anchor="app.config-tree" title="Configuration Data">
<figure>
<artwork>
+--rw routing
+--rw router-id? yang:dotted-quad
+--rw control-plane-protocols
| +--rw control-plane-protocol* [type name]
| +--rw type identityref
| +--rw name string
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw static-routes
| +--rw v6ur:ipv6
| | +--rw v6ur:route* [destination-prefix]
| | +--rw v6ur:destination-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix
| | +--rw v6ur:description? string
| | +--rw v6ur:next-hop
| | +--rw (v6ur:next-hop-options)
| | +--:(v6ur:simple-next-hop)
| | | +--rw v6ur:outgoing-interface?
| | | +--rw v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | +--:(v6ur:special-next-hop)
| | | +--rw v6ur:special-next-hop? enumeration
| | +--:(v6ur:next-hop-list)
| | +--rw v6ur:next-hop-list
| | +--rw v6ur:next-hop* [index]
| | +--rw v6ur:index string
| | +--rw v6ur:outgoing-interface?
| | +--rw v6ur:next-hop-address?
| +--rw v4ur:ipv4
| +--rw v4ur:route* [destination-prefix]
| +--rw v4ur:destination-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix
| +--rw v4ur:description? string
| +--rw v4ur:next-hop
| +--rw (v4ur:next-hop-options)
| +--:(v4ur:simple-next-hop)
| | +--rw v4ur:outgoing-interface?
| | +--rw v4ur:next-hop-address?
| +--:(v4ur:special-next-hop)
| | +--rw v4ur:special-next-hop? enumeration
| +--:(v4ur:next-hop-list)
| +--rw v4ur:next-hop-list
| +--rw v4ur:next-hop* [index]
| +--rw v4ur:index string
| +--rw v4ur:outgoing-interface?
| +--rw v4ur:next-hop-address?
+--rw ribs
+--rw rib* [name]
+--rw name string
+--rw address-family? identityref
+--rw description? string
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="app.state-tree" title="State Data">
<figure>
<artwork>
+--ro routing-state
| +--ro router-id? yang:dotted-quad
| +--ro interfaces
| | +--ro interface* if:interface-state-ref
| +--ro control-plane-protocols
| | +--ro control-plane-protocol* [type name]
| | +--ro type identityref
| | +--ro name string
| +--ro ribs
| +--ro rib* [name]
| +--ro name string
| +--ro address-family identityref
| +--ro default-rib? boolean {multiple-ribs}?
| +--ro routes
| | +--ro route*
| | +--ro route-preference? route-preference
| | +--ro next-hop
| | | +--ro (next-hop-options)
| | | +--:(simple-next-hop)
| | | | +--ro outgoing-interface?
| | | | +--ro v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | | | +--ro v4ur:next-hop-address?
| | | +--:(special-next-hop)
| | | | +--ro special-next-hop? enumeration
| | | +--:(next-hop-list)
| | | +--ro next-hop-list
| | | +--ro next-hop*
| | | +--ro outgoing-interface?
| | | +--ro v6ur:address?
| | | +--ro v4ur:address?
| | +--ro source-protocol identityref
| | +--ro active? empty
| | +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro v6ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix
| | +--ro v4ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv4-prefix
| +---x active-route
| +---w input
| | +---w v6ur:destination-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | +---w v4ur:destination-address? inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro output
| +--ro route
| +--ro next-hop
| | +--ro (next-hop-options)
| | +--:(simple-next-hop)
| | | +--ro outgoing-interface?
| | | +--ro v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | | +--ro v4ur:next-hop-address?
| | +--:(special-next-hop)
| | | +--ro special-next-hop? enumeration
| | +--:(next-hop-list)
| | +--ro next-hop-list
| | +--ro next-hop*
| | +--ro outgoing-interface?
| | +--ro v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | +--ro v4ur:next-hop-address?
| +--ro source-protocol identityref
| +--ro active? empty
| +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro v6ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix
| +--ro v4ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv4-prefix
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="app.minimum" title="Minimum Implementation">
<t>Some parts and options of the core routing model, such as
user-defined RIBs, are intended only for advanced routers. This
appendix gives basic non-normative guidelines for implementing a
bare minimum of available functions. Such an implementation may
be used for hosts or very simple routers.</t>
<t>A minimum implementation does not support the feature
"multiple-ribs". This means that a single system-controlled RIB
is available for each supported address family - IPv4, IPv6 or
both. These RIBs are also the default RIBs. No user-controlled
RIBs are allowed.</t>
<t>In addition to the mandatory instance of the "direct"
pseudo-protocol, a minimum implementation should support
configuring instance(s) of the "static" pseudo-protocol.</t>
<t>For hosts that are never intended to act as routers, the
ability to turn on sending IPv6 router advertisements (<xref target="sec.4861"/>) should be removed.</t>
<t>Platforms with severely constrained resources may use
deviations for restricting the data model, e.g., limiting the
number of "static" control plane protocol instances.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="app.rip" title="Example: Adding a New Control Plane Protocol">
<t>This appendix demonstrates how the core routing data model
can be extended to support a new control plane protocol. The YANG
module "example-rip" shown below is intended as an illustration
rather than a real definition of a data model for the RIP
routing protocol. For the sake of brevity, this module does not
obey all the guidelines specified in <xref target="RFC6087"/>. See also <xref target="sec.newproto"/>.</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
module example-rip {
yang-version "1.1";
namespace "http://example.com/rip";
prefix "rip";
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
identity rip {
base rt:routing-protocol;
description
"Identity for the RIP routing protocol.";
}
typedef rip-metric {
type uint8 {
range "0..16";
}
}
grouping route-content {
description
"This grouping defines RIP-specific route attributes.";
leaf metric {
type rip-metric;
}
leaf tag {
type uint16;
default "0";
description
"This leaf may be used to carry additional info, e.g. AS
number.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route" {
when "derived-from-or-self(rt:source-protocol, 'rip:rip')" {
description
"This augment is only valid for a routes whose source
protocol is RIP.";
}
description
"RIP-specific route attributes.";
uses route-content;
}
augment "/rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:active-route/"
+ "rt:output/rt:route" {
description
"RIP-specific route attributes in the output of 'active-route'
RPC.";
uses route-content;
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol" {
when "derived-from-or-self(rt:type,'rip:rip')" {
description
"This augment is only valid for a routing protocol instance
of type 'rip'.";
}
container rip {
presence "RIP configuration";
description
"RIP instance configuration.";
container interfaces {
description
"Per-interface RIP configuration.";
list interface {
key "name";
description
"RIP is enabled on interfaces that have an entry in this
list, unless 'enabled' is set to 'false' for that
entry.";
leaf name {
type if:interface-ref;
}
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default "true";
}
leaf metric {
type rip-metric;
default "1";
}
}
}
leaf update-interval {
type uint8 {
range "10..60";
}
units "seconds";
default "30";
description
"Time interval between periodic updates.";
}
}
}
}
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="app.get-reply" title="Data Tree Example">
<t>This section contains an example instance data tree in the
JSON encoding <xref target="RFC7951"/>,
containing both configuration and state data. The data conforms
to a data model that is defined by the following YANG library
specification <xref target="RFC7895"/>:
<figure>
<artwork>
{
"ietf-yang-library:modules-state": {
"module-set-id": "c2e1f54169aa7f36e1a6e8d0865d441d3600f9c4",
"module": [
{
"name": "ietf-routing",
"revision": "2016-11-03",
"feature": [
"multiple-ribs",
"router-id"
],
"namespace": "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing",
"conformance-type": "implement"
},
{
"name": "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing",
"revision": "2016-11-03",
"namespace":
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing",
"conformance-type": "implement"
},
{
"name": "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing",
"revision": "2016-11-03",
"namespace":
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing",
"conformance-type": "implement"
},
{
"name": "ietf-interfaces",
"revision": "2014-05-08",
"namespace": "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces",
"conformance-type": "implement"
},
{
"name": "ietf-inet-types",
"namespace": "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-inet-types",
"revision": "2013-07-15",
"conformance-type": "import"
},
{
"name": "ietf-yang-types",
"namespace": "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-types",
"revision": "2013-07-15",
"conformance-type": "import"
},
{
"name": "iana-if-type",
"namespace": "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-if-type",
"revision": "",
"conformance-type": "implement"
},
{
"name": "ietf-ip",
"revision": "2014-06-16",
"namespace": "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ip",
"conformance-type": "implement"
}
]
}
}
</artwork>
</figure></t>
<t>A simple network set-up as shown in <xref target="fig.exnet"/> is assumed: router "A" uses static default
routes with the "ISP" router as the next-hop. IPv6 router
advertisements are configured only on the "eth1" interface and
disabled on the upstream "eth0" interface.</t>
<figure anchor="fig.exnet" title="Example network configuration">
<artwork>
+-----------------+
| |
| Router ISP |
| |
+--------+--------+
|2001:db8:0:1::2
|192.0.2.2
|
|
|2001:db8:0:1::1
eth0|192.0.2.1
+--------+--------+
| |
| Router A |
| |
+--------+--------+
eth1|198.51.100.1
|2001:db8:0:2::1
|
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>The instance data tree could then be as follows:</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
{
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "eth0",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"description": "Uplink to ISP.",
"ietf-ip:ipv4": {
"address": [
{
"ip": "192.0.2.1",
"prefix-length": 24
}
],
"forwarding": true
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"address": [
{
"ip": "2001:0db8:0:1::1",
"prefix-length": 64
}
],
"forwarding": true,
"autoconf": {
"create-global-addresses": false
}
}
},
{
"name": "eth1",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"description": "Interface to the internal network.",
"ietf-ip:ipv4": {
"address": [
{
"ip": "198.51.100.1",
"prefix-length": 24
}
],
"forwarding": true
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"address": [
{
"ip": "2001:0db8:0:2::1",
"prefix-length": 64
}
],
"forwarding": true,
"autoconf": {
"create-global-addresses": false
},
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6-router-advertisements": {
"send-advertisements": true
}
}
}
]
},
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces-state": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "eth0",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"phys-address": "00:0C:42:E5:B1:E9",
"oper-status": "up",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2015-10-24T17:11:27+02:00"
},
"ietf-ip:ipv4": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "192.0.2.1",
"prefix-length": 24
}
]
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "2001:0db8:0:1::1",
"prefix-length": 64
}
],
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6-router-advertisements": {
"send-advertisements": true,
"prefix-list": {
"prefix": [
{
"prefix-spec": "2001:db8:0:2::/64"
}
]
}
}
}
},
{
"name": "eth1",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"phys-address": "00:0C:42:E5:B1:EA",
"oper-status": "up",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2015-10-24T17:11:29+02:00"
},
"ietf-ip:ipv4": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "198.51.100.1",
"prefix-length": 24
}
]
},
"ietf-ip:ipv6": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "2001:0db8:0:2::1",
"prefix-length": 64
}
],
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6-router-advertisements": {
"send-advertisements": true,
"prefix-list": {
"prefix": [
{
"prefix-spec": "2001:db8:0:2::/64"
}
]
}
}
}
}
]
},
"ietf-routing:routing": {
"router-id": "192.0.2.1",
"control-plane-protocols": {
"control-plane-protocol": [
{
"type": "ietf-routing:static",
"name": "st0",
"description":
"Static routing is used for the internal network.",
"static-routes": {
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:ipv4": {
"route": [
{
"destination-prefix": "0.0.0.0/0",
"next-hop": {
"next-hop-address": "192.0.2.2"
}
}
]
},
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6": {
"route": [
{
"destination-prefix": "::/0",
"next-hop": {
"next-hop-address": "2001:db8:0:1::2"
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
},
"ietf-routing:routing-state": {
"interfaces": {
"interface": [
"eth0",
"eth1"
]
},
"control-plane-protocols": {
"control-plane-protocol": [
{
"type": "ietf-routing:static",
"name": "st0"
}
]
},
"ribs": {
"rib": [
{
"name": "ipv4-master",
"address-family":
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:ipv4-unicast",
"default-rib": true,
"routes": {
"route": [
{
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:destination-prefix":
"192.0.2.1/24",
"next-hop": {
"outgoing-interface": "eth0"
},
"route-preference": 0,
"source-protocol": "ietf-routing:direct",
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T17:11:27+02:00"
},
{
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:destination-prefix":
"198.51.100.0/24",
"next-hop": {
"outgoing-interface": "eth1"
},
"source-protocol": "ietf-routing:direct",
"route-preference": 0,
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T17:11:27+02:00"
},
{
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:destination-prefix":
"0.0.0.0/0",
"source-protocol": "ietf-routing:static",
"route-preference": 5,
"next-hop": {
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:next-hop-address":
"192.0.2.2"
},
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00"
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "ipv6-master",
"address-family":
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6-unicast",
"default-rib": true,
"routes": {
"route": [
{
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:destination-prefix":
"2001:db8:0:1::/64",
"next-hop": {
"outgoing-interface": "eth0"
},
"source-protocol": "ietf-routing:direct",
"route-preference": 0,
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T17:11:27+02:00"
},
{
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:destination-prefix":
"2001:db8:0:2::/64",
"next-hop": {
"outgoing-interface": "eth1"
},
"source-protocol": "ietf-routing:direct",
"route-preference": 0,
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T17:11:27+02:00"
},
{
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:destination-prefix":
"::/0",
"next-hop": {
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:next-hop-address":
"2001:db8:0:1::2"
},
"source-protocol": "ietf-routing:static",
"route-preference": 5,
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="change-log" title="Change Log">
<t>RFC Editor: Remove this section upon publication as an RFC.</t>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -24 and -25">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Minor edits based on IETF Last Call reviews.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -23 and -24">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Fix paths in "when" expressions due to errata 4749 of
RFC 7950.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -22 and -23">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Removed "route-tag" feature.</t>
<t>Removed next-hop classifiers.</t>
<t>Fixed invalid when expressions in augments.</t>
<t>In simple-next-hop, an address, outgoing interface or
both can be specified.</t>
<t>RPC "fib-route" changed into RIB action
"active-route".</t>
<t>The requirement that direct routes be always placed in
default RIBs.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -21 and -22">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Added "next-hop-list" as a new case of the
"next-hop-options" choice.</t>
<t>Renamed "routing protocol" to "control plane
protocol" in both the YANG modules and I-D text.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -20 and -21">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Routing instances were removed.</t>
<t>IPv6 RA parameters were moved to the
"ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -19 and -20">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Assignment of L3 interfaces to routing instances is now
part of interface configuration.</t>
<t>Next-hop options in configuration were aligned with
state data.</t>
<t>It is recommended to enclose protocol-specific
configuration in a presence container.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -18 and -19">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>The leaf "route-preference" was removed from the
"routing-protocol" container in both "routing" and
"routing-state".</t>
<t>The "vrf-routing-instance" identity was added in
support of a common routing-instance type in addition to
the "default-routing-instance".</t>
<t>Removed "enabled" switch from "routing-protocol".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -17 and -18">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>The container "ribs" was moved under "routing-instance"
(in both "routing" and "routing-state").</t>
<t>Typedefs "rib-ref" and "rib-state-ref" were removed.</t>
<t>Removed "recipient-ribs" (both state and configuration).</t>
<t>Removed "connected-ribs" from "routing-protocol" (both
state and configuration).</t>
<t>Configuration and state data for IPv6 RA were moved
under "if:interface" and "if:interface-state".</t>
<t>Assignment of interfaces to routing instances now use
leaf-list rather than list (both config and state). The
opposite reference from "if:interface" to
"rt:routing-instance" was changed to a single leaf (an
interface cannot belong to multiple routing instances).</t>
<t>Specification of a default RIB is now a simple flag
under "rib" (both config and state).</t>
<t>Default RIBs are marked by a flag in state data.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -16 and -17">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Added Acee as a co-author.</t>
<t>Removed all traces of route filters.</t>
<t>Removed numeric IDs of list entries in state data.</t>
<t>Removed all next-hop cases except "simple-next-hop" and
"special-next-hop".</t>
<t>Removed feature "multipath-routes".</t>
<t>Augmented "ietf-interfaces" module with a leaf-list of
leafrefs pointing form state data of an interface entry to
the routing instance(s) to which the interface is
assigned.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -15 and -16">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Added 'type' as the second key component of
'routing-protocol', both in configuration and state
data.</t>
<t>The restriction of no more than one connected RIB per
address family was removed.</t>
<t>Removed the 'id' key of routes in RIBs. This list has
no keys anymore.</t>
<t>Remove the 'id' key from static routes and make
'destination-prefix' the only key.</t>
<t>Added 'route-preference' as a new attribute of routes
in RIB.</t>
<t>Added 'active' as a new attribute of routes in
RIBs.</t>
<t>Renamed RPC operation 'active-route' to 'fib-route'.</t>
<t>Added 'route-preference' as a new parameter of routing
protocol instances, both in configuration and state data.</t>
<t>Renamed identity 'rt:standard-routing-instance' to
'rt:default-routing-instance'.</t>
<t>Added next-hop lists to state data.</t>
<t>Added two cases for specifying next-hops indirectly -
via a new RIB or a recursive list of next-hops.</t>
<t>Reorganized next-hop in static routes.</t>
<t>Removed all 'if-feature' statements from state data.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -14 and -15">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Removed all defaults from state data.</t>
<t>Removed default from 'cur-hop-limit' in config.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -13 and -14">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Removed dependency of 'connected-ribs' on the
'multiple-ribs' feature.</t>
<t>Removed default value of 'cur-hop-limit' in state data.</t>
<t>Moved parts of descriptions and all references on IPv6 RA
parameters from state data to configuration.</t>
<t>Added reference to RFC 6536 in the Security section.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -12 and -13">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Wrote appendix about minimum implementation.</t>
<t>Remove "when" statement for IPv6 router interface
state data - it was dependent on a config value that
may not be present.</t>
<t>Extra container for the next-hop list.</t>
<t>Names rather than numeric ids are used for referring to
list entries in state data.</t>
<t>Numeric ids are always declared as mandatory and
unique. Their description states that they are ephemeral.</t>
<t>Descriptions of "name" keys in state data lists
are required to be persistent.</t>
<t/>
<t>Removed "if-feature multiple-ribs;" from connected-ribs.</t>
<t>"rib-name" instead of "name" is used as the name of
leafref nodes.</t>
<t>"next-hop" instead of "nexthop" or "gateway" used
throughout, both in node names and text.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -11 and -12">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Removed feature "advanced-router" and introduced two
features instead: "multiple-ribs" and "multipath-routes".</t>
<t>Unified the keys of config and state versions of
"routing-instance" and "rib" lists.</t>
<t>Numerical identifiers of state list entries are not keys
anymore, but they are constrained using the "unique" statement.</t>
<t>Updated acknowledgements.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -10 and -11">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Migrated address families from IANA enumerations to
identities.</t> <t>Terminology and node names aligned with
the I2RS RIB model: router -> routing instance, routing
table -> RIB.</t>
<t>Introduced uint64 keys for state lists: routing-instance,
rib, route, nexthop.</t>
<t>Described the relationship between system-controlled and
user-controlled list entries.</t>
<t>Feature "user-defined-routing-tables" changed into "advanced-router".</t>
<t>Made nexthop into a choice in order to allow for
nexthop-list (I2RS requirement).</t>
<t>Added nexthop-list with entries having priorities
(backup) and weights (load balancing).</t>
<t>Updated bibliography references.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -09 and -10">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Added subtree for state data ("/routing-state").</t>
<t>Terms "system-controlled entry" and "user-controlled
entry" defined and used.</t>
<t>New feature "user-defined-routing-tables". Nodes that are
useful only with user-defined routing tables are now conditional.</t>
<t>Added grouping "router-id".</t>
<t>In routing tables, "source-protocol" attribute of routes
now reports only protocol type, and its datatype is
"identityref".</t>
<t>Renamed "main-routing-table" to "default-routing-table".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -08 and -09">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Fixed "must" expression for "connected-routing-table".</t>
<t>Simplified "must" expression for "main-routing-table".</t>
<t>Moved per-interface configuration of a new routing
protocol under 'routing-protocol'. This also affects the
'example-rip' module.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -07 and -08">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Changed reference from RFC6021 to RFC6021bis.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -06 and -07">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>The contents of <get-reply> in <xref target="app.get-reply"/> was updated: "eth[01]" is used as
the value of "location", and "forwarding" is on for both
interfaces and both IPv4 and IPv6.</t>
<t>The "must" expression for "main-routing-table" was
modified to avoid redundant error messages reporting address
family mismatch when "name" points to a non-existent routing
table.</t>
<t>The default behavior for IPv6 RA prefix advertisements
was clarified.</t>
<t>Changed type of "rt:router-id" to "ip:dotted-quad".</t>
<t>Type of "rt:router-id" changed to "yang:dotted-quad".</t>
<t>Fixed missing prefixes in XPath expressions.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -05 and -06">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Document title changed: "Configuration" was replaced by
"Management".</t>
<t>New typedefs "routing-table-ref" and "route-filter-ref".</t>
<t>Double slashes "//" were removed from XPath expressions
and replaced with the single "/".</t>
<t>Removed uniqueness requirement for "router-id".</t>
<t>Complete data tree is now in <xref target="app.data-tree"/>.</t>
<t>Changed type of "source-protocol" from "leafref" to "string".</t>
<t>Clarified the relationship between routing protocol
instances and connected routing tables.</t>
<t>Added a must constraint saying that a routing table
connected to the direct pseudo-protocol must not be a main
routing table.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -04 and -05">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Routing tables are now global, i.e., "routing-tables" is
a child of "routing" rather than "router".</t>
<t>"must" statement for "static-routes" changed to "when".</t>
<t>Added "main-routing-tables" containing references to main
routing tables for each address family.</t>
<t>Removed the defaults for "address-family" and "safi" and
made them mandatory.</t>
<t>Removed the default for route-filter/type and made this
leaf mandatory.</t>
<t>If there is no active route for a given destination, the
"active-route" RPC returns no output.</t>
<t>Added "enabled" switch under "routing-protocol".</t>
<t>Added "router-type" identity and "type" leaf under
"router".</t>
<t>Route attribute "age" changed to "last-updated", its type
is "yang:date-and-time".</t>
<t>The "direct" pseudo-protocol is always connected to main
routing tables.</t>
<t>Entries in the list of connected routing tables renamed
from "routing-table" to "connected-routing-table".</t>
<t>Added "must" constraint saying that a routing table must
not be its own recipient.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -03 and -04">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Changed "error-tag" for both RPC operations from "missing
element" to "data-missing".</t>
<t>Removed the decrementing behavior for advertised IPv6
prefix parameters "valid-lifetime" and
"preferred-lifetime".</t>
<t>Changed the key of the static route lists from "seqno" to
"id" because the routes needn't be sorted.</t>
<t>Added 'must' constraint saying that "preferred-lifetime"
must not be greater than "valid-lifetime".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -02 and -03">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Module "iana-afn-safi" moved to I-D "iana-if-type".</t>
<t>Removed forwarding table.</t>
<t>RPC "get-route" changed to "active-route". Its output is
a list of routes (for multi-path routing).</t>
<t>New RPC "route-count".</t>
<t>For both RPCs, specification of negative responses was
added.</t>
<t>Relaxed separation of router instances.</t>
<t>Assignment of interfaces to router instances needn't be
disjoint.</t>
<t>Route filters are now global.</t>
<t>Added "allow-all-route-filter" for symmetry.</t>
<t>Added <xref target="sec.interactions"/> about
interactions with "ietf-interfaces" and "ietf-ip".</t>
<t>Added "router-id" leaf.</t>
<t>Specified the names for IPv4/IPv6 unicast main routing
tables.</t>
<t>Route parameter "last-modified" changed to "age".</t>
<t>Added container "recipient-routing-tables".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -01 and -02">
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Added module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing".</t>
<t>The example in <xref target="app.get-reply"/> now uses
IP addresses from blocks reserved for documentation.</t>
<t>Direct routes appear by default in the forwarding
table.</t>
<t>Network layer interfaces must be assigned to a router
instance. Additional interface configuration may be present.</t>
<t>The "when" statement is only used with "augment", "must" is
used elsewhere.</t>
<t>Additional "must" statements were added.</t>
<t>The "route-content" grouping for IPv4 and IPv6 unicast now
includes the material from the "ietf-routing" version via
"uses rt:route-content".</t>
<t>Explanation of symbols in the tree representation of data
model hierarchy.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -00 and -01">
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>AFN/SAFI-independent stuff was moved to the "ietf-routing"
module.</t>
<t>Typedefs for AFN and SAFI were placed in a separate
"iana-afn-safi" module.</t>
<t>Names of some data nodes were changed, in particular
"routing-process" is now "router".</t>
<t>The restriction of a single AFN/SAFI per router was
lifted.</t>
<t>RPC operation "delete-route" was removed.</t>
<t>Illegal XPath references from "get-route" to the datastore
were fixed.</t>
<t>Section "Security Considerations" was written.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 10:56:42 |