One document matched: draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-08.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY routing SYSTEM "ietf-routing.yangx">
<!ENTITY ipv4-unicast SYSTEM "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yangx">
<!ENTITY ipv6-unicast SYSTEM "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing.yangx">
<!ENTITY rip SYSTEM "example-rip.yang.aw">
<!ENTITY get-reply SYSTEM "sample-get-reply.xml.aw">
<!ENTITY routing-tree SYSTEM "routing-tree.txt.aw">
<!ENTITY routing-coll-tree SYSTEM "routing-coll-tree.txt.aw">
<!ENTITY static-routes-tree SYSTEM "static-routes-tree.txt.aw">
<!ENTITY diagram SYSTEM "diagram.txt.aw">
<!ENTITY example-net SYSTEM "example-net.txt.aw">
]>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<rfc ipr="trust200902" category="std" docName="draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-08">
<front>
<title abbrev="YANG Routing Management">A YANG Data Model for
Routing Management</title>
<author initials="L." surname="Lhotka" fullname="Ladislav Lhotka">
<organization>CZ.NIC</organization>
<address>
<email>lhotka@nic.cz</email>
</address>
</author>
<date day="11" month="February" year="2013"/>
<area>Operations and Management</area>
<workgroup>NETMOD</workgroup>
<abstract>
<t>This document contains a specification of three YANG modules.
Together they form the core routing data model which serves as a
framework for configuring and managing a routing subsystem. It
is expected that these modules will be augmented by additional
YANG modules defining data models for individual routing protocols
and other related functions. The core routing data model provides
common building blocks for such extensions - router instances,
routes, routing tables, routing protocols and route filters.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<middle>
<section anchor="sec.introduction" title="Introduction">
<t>This document contains a specification of the following YANG
modules:
<list style="symbols">
<t>Module "ietf-routing" provides generic components of a
routing data model.</t>
<t>Module "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing" augments the
"ietf-routing" module with additional data specific to IPv4
unicast.</t>
<t>Module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" augments the
"ietf-routing" module with additional data specific to IPv6
unicast, including the router configuration variables required
by <xref target="RFC4861"/>.</t>
</list></t>
<t>These modules together define the so-called core routing data
model, which is proposed as a basis for the development of data
models for configuration and management of more sophisticated
routing systems. While these three modules can be directly used
for simple IP devices with static routing, their main purpose is
to provide essential building blocks for more complicated setups
involving multiple routing protocols, multicast routing,
additional address families, and advanced functions such as route
filtering or policy routing. To this end, it is expected that the
core routing data model will be augmented by numerous modules
developed by other IETF working groups.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.term-not" title="Terminology and Notation">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
in this document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
<t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC6241"/>:
<list style="symbols">
<t>client</t>
<t>message</t>
<t>protocol operation</t>
<t>server</t>
</list></t>
<t>The following terms are defined in <xref target="RFC6020"/>:
<list style="symbols">
<t>augment</t>
<t>configuration data</t>
<t>data model</t>
<t>data node</t>
<t>mandatory node</t>
<t>module</t>
<t>state data</t>
<t>RPC operation</t>
</list></t>
<section anchor="sec.new-terms" title="Glossary of New Terms">
<t><list style="hanging">
<t hangText="active route:">a route which is actually used for
sending packets. If there are multiple candidate routes with a
matching destination prefix, then it is up to the routing
algorithm to select the active route (or several active routes
in the case of multi-path routing).</t>
<t hangText="core routing data model:"> YANG data model
resulting from the combination of "ietf-routing",
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing" and
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" modules.</t>
<t hangText="direct route:">a route to a directly connected
network.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.tree-symbols" title="Tree Diagrams">
<t>A simplified graphical representation of the complete data
tree is presented in <xref target="app.data-tree"/>, and similar
diagrams of its various subtrees appear in the main text. The
meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is as follows:
<list style="symbols">
<t>Brackets "[" and "]" enclose list keys.</t>
<t>Abbreviations before data node names: "rw" means
configuration (read-write) and "ro" state data
(read-only).</t>
<t>Symbols after data node names: "?" means an optional node and "*"
denotes a "leaf-list".</t>
<t>Parentheses enclose choice and case nodes, and case nodes
are also marked with a colon (":").</t>
<t>Ellipsis ("...") stands for contents of subtrees that are
not shown.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.prefixes" title="Prefixes in Data Node Names">
<t>In this document, names of data nodes, RPC methods and other
data model objects are used mostly without a prefix, as long as
it is clear from the context in which YANG module each name is
defined. Otherwise, names are prefixed using the standard prefix
associated with the corresponding YANG module, as shown in <xref target="tab.prefixes"/>.</t>
<texttable anchor="tab.prefixes" title="Prefixes and corresponding YANG modules">
<ttcol>Prefix</ttcol>
<ttcol>YANG module</ttcol>
<ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
<c>ianaaf</c><c>iana-afn-safi</c><c><xref target="IANA-IF-AF"/></c>
<c>if</c><c>ietf-interfaces</c><c><xref target="YANG-IF"/></c>
<c>ip</c><c>ietf-ip</c><c><xref target="YANG-IP"/></c>
<c>rt</c><c>ietf-routing</c><c><xref target="sec.mod-rt"/></c>
<c>v4ur</c><c>ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing</c>
<c><xref target="sec.mod-v4ur"/></c>
<c>v6ur</c><c>ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing</c>
<c><xref target="sec.mod-v6ur"/></c>
<c>yang</c><c>ietf-yang-types</c><c><xref target="RFC6021bis"/></c>
<c>inet</c><c>ietf-inet-types</c><c><xref target="RFC6021bis"/></c>
</texttable>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.objectives" title="Objectives">
<t>The initial design of the core routing data model was driven by
the following objectives:
<list style="symbols">
<t>The data model should be suitable for the common address
families, in particular IPv4 and IPv6, and for unicast and
multicast routing, as well as Multiprotocol Label Switching
(MPLS).</t>
<t>Simple routing setups, such as static routing, should be
configurable in a simple way, ideally without any need to develop
additional YANG modules.</t>
<t>On the other hand, the core routing framework must
allow for complicated setups involving multiple routing tables
and multiple routing protocols, as well as controlled
redistributions of routing information.</t>
<t>Device vendors will want to map the data models built on this
generic framework to their proprietary data models and
configuration interfaces. Therefore, the framework should be
flexible enough to facilitate such a mapping and accommodate
data models with different logic.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.design" title="The Design of the Core Routing Data Model">
<t>The core routing data model consists of three YANG modules. The
first module, "ietf-routing", defines the generic components of a
routing system. The other two modules, "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing"
and "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing", augment the "ietf-routing" module
with additional data nodes that are needed for IPv4 and IPv6
unicast routing, respectively. An abridged view of the data
hierarchy is given in <xref target="fig.yangdata"/>. See <xref target="app.data-tree"/> for the complete data tree.</t>
<figure anchor="fig.yangdata" title="Data hierarchy of the core routing data model.">
<artwork><![CDATA[
+--rw routing
+--rw router [name]
| +--rw name
| +--rw type?
| +--rw enabled?
| +--rw router-id?
| +--rw description?
| +--rw main-routing-tables
| | +--rw main-routing-table [address-family safi]
| | +--rw address-family
| | +--rw safi
| | +--rw name?
| +--rw interfaces
| | +--rw interface [name]
| | +--rw name
| | +--rw v6ur:ipv6-router-advertisements
| | ...
| +--rw routing-protocols
| +--rw routing-protocol [name]
| +--rw name
| +--rw description?
| +--rw enabled?
| +--rw type
| +--rw connected-routing-tables
| | ...
| +--rw static-routes
| ...
+--rw routing-tables
| +--rw routing-table [name]
| +--rw name
| +--rw address-family
| +--rw safi
| +--rw description?
| +--ro routes
| | +--ro route
| | ...
| +--rw recipient-routing-tables
| +--rw recipient-routing-table [name]
| ...
+--rw route-filters
+--rw route-filter [name]
+--rw name
+--rw description?
+--rw type
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>As can be seen from <xref target="fig.yangdata"/>, the core
routing data model introduces several generic components of a
routing framework: routers, routing tables containing lists of
routes, routing protocols and route filters. The following
subsections describe these components in more detail.</t>
<t>By combining the components in various ways, and possibly
augmenting them with appropriate contents defined in other
modules, various routing setups can be realized.</t>
<figure anchor="fig.exsetup" title="Example setup of a routing system">
<artwork><![CDATA[
+--------+
| direct | +---+ +--------------+ +---+ +--------------+
| routes |--->| F |--->| |<---| F |<---| |
+--------+ +---+ | main | +---+ | additional |
| routing | | routing |
+--------+ +---+ | table | +---+ | table |
| static |--->| F |--->| |--->| F |--->| |
| routes | +---+ +--------------+ +---+ +--------------+
+--------+ ^ | ^ |
| v | v
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
| F | | F | | F | | F |
+---+ +---+ +---+ +---+
^ | ^ |
| v | v
+----------+ +----------+
| routing | | routing |
| protocol | | protocol |
+----------+ +----------+
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>The example in <xref target="fig.exsetup"/> shows a typical
(though certainly not the only possible) organization of a more
complex routing subsystem for a single address family. Several of
its features are worth mentioning:
<list style="symbols">
<t>Along with the main routing table, which must always be
present, an additional routing table is configured.</t>
<t>Each routing protocol instance, including the "static" and
"direct" pseudo-protocols, is connected to one routing
table with which it can exchange routes (in both directions,
except for the "static" and "direct" pseudo-protocols).</t>
<t>Routing tables may also be connected to each other and
exchange routes in either direction (or both).</t>
<t>Route exchanges along all connections may be controlled by
means of route filters, denoted by "F" in <xref target="fig.exsetup"/>.</t>
</list></t>
<section anchor="sec.router" title="Router">
<t>Each router instance in the core routing data model
represents a logical router. The exact semantics of this term is left
to implementations. For example, router instances may be
completely isolated virtual routers or, alternatively, they may
internally share certain information.</t>
<t>An implementation MAY support multiple types of logical
routers simultaneously. Instances of all router types are
organized as entries of the same flat "router" list. In order to
discriminate router instances belonging to different types, the
"type" leaf is defined as a child of the "router" node.</t>
<t>An implementation MAY pose restrictions on allowed router
types and on the number of supported instances for each
type. For example, a simple router implementation may support
only one router instance of the default type "standard-router".</t>
<t>Each network layer interface has to be assigned to one or
more router instances in order to be able to participate in
packet forwarding, routing protocols and other operations of
those router instances. The assignment is accomplished by
creating a corresponding entry in the list of router interfaces
("rt:interface"). The key of the list entry MUST be the name of
a configured network layer interface, i.e., the value of a node
/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name defined in the
"ietf-interfaces" module <xref target="YANG-IF"/>.</t>
<t>In YANG terms, the list of router interfaces is modeled as
the "list" node rather than "leaf-list" in order to allow for
adding, via augmentation, other configuration or state data
related to the corresponding router interface.</t>
<t>Implementations MAY specify additional rules for the
assignment of interfaces to logical routers. For example, it may
be required that the sets of interfaces assigned to different
logical routers be disjoint.</t>
<section anchor="sec.4861" title="Configuration of IPv6 Router Interfaces">
<t>The module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" augments the
definition of the data node "rt:interface"
with definitions of the following configuration variables as
required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>, sec. 6.2.1:
<list style="symbols">
<t>send-advertisements,</t>
<t>max-rtr-adv-interval,</t>
<t>min-rtr-adv-interval,</t>
<t>managed-flag,</t>
<t>other-config-flag,</t>
<t>link-mtu,</t>
<t>reachable-time,</t>
<t>retrans-timer,</t>
<t>cur-hop-limit,</t>
<t>default-lifetime,</t>
<t>prefix-list: a list of prefixes to be advertised.<vspace blankLines="1"/>The
following parameters are associated with each prefix in the
list:
<list style="symbols">
<t>valid-lifetime,</t>
<t>on-link-flag,</t>
<t>preferred-lifetime,</t>
<t>autonomous-flag.</t>
</list></t>
</list>
The definitions and descriptions of the above parameters can be
found in the text of the module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing"
(<xref target="sec.mod-v6ur"/>).</t>
<t>NOTES:</t>
<t><list style="numbers">
<t>The "IsRouter" flag, which is also required by <xref target="RFC4861"/>, is implemented in the "ietf-ip" module
<xref target="YANG-IP"/> (leaf "ip:forwarding").</t>
<t>The original specification <xref target="RFC4861"/>
allows the implementations to decide whether the
"valid-lifetime" and "preferred-lifetime" parameters remain
the same in consecutive advertisements, or decrement in real
time. However, the latter behavior seems problematic because
the values might be reset again to the (higher) configured
values after a configuration is reloaded. Moreover, no
implementation is known to use the decrementing
behavior. The "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" module therefore
assumes the former behavior with constant values.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.routes" title="Routes">
<t>Routes are basic elements of information in a routing
system. The core routing data model defines only the following
minimal set of route attributes:
<list style="symbols">
<t>"dest-prefix": IP prefix specifying the set of
destination addresses for which the route may be used. This
attribute is mandatory.</t>
<t>"next-hop": IP address of an adjacent router or host to
which packets with destination addresses belonging to
"dest-prefix" should be sent.</t>
<t>"outgoing-interface": network interface that should be used
for sending packets with destination addresses belonging to
"dest-prefix".</t>
</list>
</t>
<t>The above list of route attributes suffices for a simple
static routing configuration. It is expected that future modules
defining routing protocols will add other route attributes such
as metrics or preferences.</t>
<t>Routes and their attributes are used both in configuration
data, for example as manually configured static routes, and in
state data, for example as entries in routing tables.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.rtables" title="Routing Tables">
<t>Routing tables are lists of routes complemented with
administrative data, namely:
<list style="symbols">
<t>"source-protocol": name of the routing protocol from which
the route was originally obtained.</t>
<t>"last-updated": the date and time when the route was last
updated, or inserted into the routing table.</t>
</list>
Each routing table must contain only routes of the same address
family. Address family information consists of two parameters -
"address-family" and "safi" (Subsequent Address Family
Identifier, SAFI). The permitted values for these two parameters
are defined by IANA and represented using YANG enumeration types
"ianaaf:address-family" and "ianaaf:subsequent-address-family"
<xref target="IANA-IF-AF"/>.</t>
<t>In the core routing data model, the "routing-table" node
represents configuration while the descendant list of routes is
defined as state data. The contents of route lists
are controlled and manipulated by routing protocol operations
which may result in route additions, removals and
modifications. This also includes manipulations via the "static"
and/or "direct" pseudo-protocols, see <xref target="sec.pseudoproto"/>.</t>
<t>In order to activate an address family for use within a
router instance, a client configures an entry of the list
/routing/router/main-routing-tables/main-routing-table. This
entry contains a reference to a routing table which henceforth
serves as the so-called main routing table for the router
instance and address family. <xref target="sec.proto"/> explains
the role of main routing tables.</t>
<t>Routing tables are global, which means that a configured
routing table may be used by any or all router instances.</t>
<t>Server implementations MAY pose restrictions regarding the
number of supported routing tables, and rules for configuration
and use of routing tables. For example:
<list style="symbols">
<t>A server may support no more than one routing table per
address family.</t>
<t>Router instances (of a certain type) may not be allowed to
share routing tables, i.e., each routing table is used by no
more than one router instance.</t>
</list>
For servers supporting multiple routing tables per address
family, additional tables can be configured by creating new
entries in the "routing-table" list, either as a part of
factory-default configuration, or by a client's action.</t>
<t>The way how a routing system uses information from routing
tables for actual packet forwarding is outside the scope of this
document.</t>
<t>Every routing table can serve as a source of routes for other
routing tables. To achieve this, one or more recipient routing
tables may be specified in the configuration of the source
routing table. Optionally, a route filter may be configured for
any or all recipient routing tables. Such a route filter then
selects and/or manipulates the routes that are passed between
the source and recipient routing table.</t>
<t>A routing table MUST NOT appear among its own recipient
routing tables. A recipient routing table also MUST be of the
same address family as its source routing table.</t>
<t/>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.proto" title="Routing Protocols">
<t>The core routing data model provides an open-ended framework
for defining multiple routing protocol instances within each
router instance. Each routing protocol instance MUST be assigned
a type, which is an identity derived from the
"rt:routing-protocol" base identity. The core routing data model
defines two identities for the direct and static
pseudo-protocols (<xref target="sec.pseudoproto"/>).</t>
<t>Each routing protocol instance is connected to exactly one
routing table for each address family that the routing protocol
instance supports. Routes learned from the network by a routing
protocol are normally installed into the connected routing
table(s) and, conversely, routes from the connected routing
table(s) are normally injected into the routing
protocol. However, routing protocol implementations MAY specify
rules that restrict this exchange of routes in either direction
(or both directions).</t>
<t>A routing table is connected to a routing protocol instance
by creating a corresponding entry in the
"connected-routing-table" list. If such an entry is not
configured for an address family, then the main routing table
MUST be used as the connected routing table for this address
family.</t>
<t>In addition, two independent route filters (see <xref target="sec.filters"/>) may be configured for each connected
routing table to apply client-defined policies controlling the
exchange of routes in both directions between the routing
protocol instance and the connected routing table:
<list style="symbols">
<t>import filter controls which routes are passed from the
routing protocol instance to the connected routing table,</t>
<t>export filter controls which routes the routing protocol
instance receives from the connected routing table.</t>
</list></t>
<t>Note that the terms import and export are used from the
viewpoint of a routing table.</t>
<section anchor="sec.pseudoproto" title="Routing Pseudo-Protocols">
<t>The core routing data model defines two special routing
protocol types - "direct" and "static". Both are in fact
pseudo-protocols, which means that they are confined to the
local device and do not exchange any routing information with
neighboring routers. Routes from both "direct" and "static"
protocol instances are passed to the connected routing table
(subject to route filters, if any), but an exchange in the
opposite direction is not allowed.</t>
<t>Every router instance MUST implement exactly one instance of
the "direct" pseudo-protocol type. The name of this instance
MUST also be "direct". It is the source of direct routes for all
configured address families. Direct routes are normally supplied
by the operating system kernel, based on the configuration of
network interface addresses, see <xref target="sec.ietf-ip"/>. The "direct" pseudo-protocol MUST always
be connected to the main routing tables of all supported address
families. Unlike other routing protocol types, this connection
cannot be changed in the configuration. Direct routes MAY be
filtered before they appear in the main routing table.</t>
<t>A pseudo-protocol of the type "static" allows for specifying
routes manually. It MAY be configured in zero or multiple
instances, although a typical configuration will have exactly
one instance per logical router.</t>
<t>Static routes are configured within the "static-routes"
container, see <xref target="fig.static-routes"/>.</t>
<figure anchor="fig.static-routes" title="Structure of "static-routes" subtree.">
<artwork><![CDATA[
+--rw static-routes
+--rw v4ur:ipv4
| +--rw v4ur:route [id]
| +--rw v4ur:id
| +--rw v4ur:description?
| +--rw v4ur:outgoing-interface?
| +--rw v4ur:dest-prefix
| +--rw v4ur:next-hop?
+--rw v6ur:ipv6
+--rw v6ur:route [id]
+--rw v6ur:id
+--rw v6ur:description?
+--rw v6ur:outgoing-interface?
+--rw v6ur:dest-prefix
+--rw v6ur:next-hop?
]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.newproto" title="Defining New Routing Protocols">
<t>It is expected that future YANG modules will create data
models for additional routing protocol types. Such a new
module has to define the protocol-specific configuration and
state data, and it has to fit it into the core routing
framework in the following way:
<list style="symbols">
<t>A new identity MUST be defined for the routing protocol
and its base identity MUST be set to "rt:routing-protocol",
or to an identity derived from "rt:routing-protocol".</t>
<t>Additional route attributes MAY be defined, preferably in
one place by means of defining a YANG grouping. The new
attributes have to be inserted as state data by augmenting
the definition of the node
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[
/rt:routing-tables/rt:routing-table/rt:route,
]]></artwork>
</figure>
and possibly to other places in the configuration, state
data and RPC input or output.</t>
<t>Per-interface configuration parameters can be added by
augmenting the data node "rt:interface" (the list of router
interfaces).</t>
<t>Other configuration parameters and state data can be
defined by augmenting the "routing-protocol" data node.</t>
</list></t>
<t>By using the "when" statement, the augmented per-interface
and other configuration parameters specific to the new
protocol SHOULD be made conditional and valid only if the
value of "rt:type" is equal to the new protocol's identity. It
is also RECOMMENDED that the protocol-specific data be
encapsulated in appropriately named containers.</t>
<t>The above steps are implemented by the example YANG module
for the RIP routing protocol in <xref target="app.rip"/>.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.filters" title="Route Filters">
<t>The core routing data model provides a skeleton for defining
route filters that can be used to restrict the set of routes
being exchanged between a routing protocol instance and a
connected routing table, or between a source and a recipient
routing table. Route filters may also manipulate routes, i.e.,
add, delete, or modify their attributes.</t>
<t>Route filters are global, which means that a configured route
filter may be used by any or all router instances.</t>
<t>By itself, the route filtering framework defined in this
document allows for applying only two extreme routing
policies which are represented by the following pre-defined
route filter types:
<list style="symbols">
<t>"deny-all-route-filter": all routes are blocked,</t>
<t>"allow-all-route-filter": all routes are permitted.</t>
</list>
Note that the latter type is equivalent to no route filter.</t>
<t>It is expected that more comprehensive route filtering
frameworks will be developed separately.</t>
<t>Each route filter is identified by a name which MUST be
unique within the entire configuration. Its type MUST be
specified by the "type" identity reference - this opens the
space for multiple route filtering framework
implementations.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.rpcs" title="RPC Operations">
<t>The "ietf-routing" module defines two RPC operations:
<list style="symbols">
<t>active-route: query the routing system for the active
route(s) that are currently used for sending datagrams to a
destination host whose address is passed as an input parameter.</t>
<t>route-count: retrieve the total number of entries in a
routing table.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.interactions" title="Interactions with Other YANG Modules">
<t>The semantics of the core routing data model also depend on
several configuration parameters that are defined in other YANG
modules.</t>
<section anchor="sec.ietf-if" title="Module "ietf-interfaces"">
<t>The following boolean switch is defined in the
"ietf-interfaces" YANG module <xref target="YANG-IF"/>:
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:enabled">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a given network layer
interface, the device MUST behave exactly as if that
interface was not assigned to any logical router at all.
</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.ietf-ip" title="Module "ietf-ip"">
<t>The following boolean switches are defined in the "ietf-ip"
YANG module <xref target="YANG-IP"/>:
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:enabled">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a given interface, then
all IPv4 routing functions related to that interface MUST be
disabled.
</t>
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:forwarding">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a given interface, then
the forwarding of IPv4 datagrams to and from this interface
MUST be disabled. However, the interface may participate in
other routing functions, such as routing protocols.
</t>
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:enabled">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a given interface, then
all IPv6 routing functions related to that interface MUST be
disabled.
</t>
<t hangText="/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:forwarding">
<vspace blankLines="1"/>
If this switch is set to "false" for a given interface, then
the forwarding of IPv6 datagrams to and from this interface
MUST be disabled. However, the interface may participate in
other routing functions, such as routing protocols.
</t>
</list>
</t>
<t>In addition, the "ietf-ip" module allows for configuring IPv4
and IPv6 addresses and network prefixes or masks on network
layer interfaces. Configuration of these parameters on an
enabled interface MUST result in an immediate creation of the
corresponding direct route. The destination prefix of this route
is set according to the configured IP address and network
prefix/mask, and the interface is set as the outgoing interface
for that route.</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.mod-rt" title="Routing YANG Module">
<t>RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with
the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<![CDATA[<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-routing@2013-02-11.yang"
module ietf-routing {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing";
prefix "rt";
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import iana-afn-safi {
prefix "ianaaf";
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: David Kessens
<mailto:david.kessens@nsn.com>
WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder
<mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
";
description
"This YANG module defines essential components that may be used
for configuring a routing subsystem.
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.
";
revision 2013-02-11 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* Identities */
identity router-type {
description
"Base identity from which router type identities are derived.
It is primarily intended for discriminating among different
types of logical routers or router virtualization.
";
}
identity standard-router {
base router-type;
description
"This identity represents a standard router.";
}
identity routing-protocol {
description
"Base identity from which routing protocol identities are
derived.";
}
identity direct {
base routing-protocol;
description
"Routing pseudo-protocol which provides routes to directly
connected networks.";
}
identity static {
base routing-protocol;
description
"Static routing pseudo-protocol.";
}
identity route-filter {
description
"Base identity from which all route filters are derived.";
}
identity deny-all-route-filter {
base route-filter;
description
"Route filter that blocks all routes.";
}
identity allow-all-route-filter {
base route-filter;
description
"Route filter that permits all routes.";
}
/* Type Definitions */
typedef router-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:router/rt:name";
}
description
"This type is used for leafs that reference a router
instance.";
}
typedef routing-table-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:routing-tables/rt:routing-table/rt:name";
}
description
"This type is used for leafs that reference a routing table.";
}
typedef route-filter-ref {
type leafref {
path "/rt:routing/rt:route-filters/rt:route-filter/rt:name";
}
description
"This type is used for leafs that reference a route filter.";
}
/* Groupings */
grouping afn-safi {
description
"This grouping provides two parameters specifying address
family and subsequent address family.";
leaf address-family {
type ianaaf:address-family;
mandatory "true";
description
"Address family.";
}
leaf safi {
type ianaaf:subsequent-address-family;
mandatory "true";
description
"Subsequent address family.";
}
}
grouping route-content {
description
"Generic parameters of routes.";
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Outgoing interface.";
}
}
/* RPC Methods */
rpc active-route {
description
"Return the active route (or multiple routes, in the case of
multi-path routing) to a destination address.
Parameters
1. 'router-name',
2. 'destination-address'.
If the router instance with 'router-name' doesn't exist, then
this operation SHALL fail with error-tag 'data-missing' and
error-app-tag 'router-not-found'.
If no active route for 'destination-address' exists, no output
is returned - the server SHALL send an <rpc-reply> containing
a single element <ok>.
";
input {
leaf router-name {
type router-ref;
mandatory "true";
description
"Name of the router instance whose forwarding information
base is being queried.";
}
container destination-address {
description
"Network layer destination address.
Address family specific modules MUST augment this
container with a leaf named 'address'.
";
uses afn-safi;
}
}
output {
list route {
description
"List of active routes.
Route contents specific for each address family is
expected be defined through augmenting.
";
uses afn-safi;
uses route-content;
}
}
}
rpc route-count {
description
"Return the current number of routes in a routing table.
Parameters:
1. 'routing-table-name'.
If the routing table with the name specified in
'routing-table-name' doesn't exist, then this operation SHALL
fail with error-tag 'data-missing' and error-app-tag
'routing-table-not-found'.
";
input {
leaf routing-table {
type routing-table-ref;
mandatory "true";
description
"Name of the routing table.";
}
}
output {
leaf number-of-routes {
type uint32;
mandatory "true";
description
"Number of routes in the routing table.";
}
}
}
/* Data Nodes */
container routing {
description
"Routing parameters.";
list router {
key "name";
description
"Each list entry is a container for configuration and state
data of a single (logical) router instance.
";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name of the router instance.";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base router-type;
}
default "rt:standard-router";
description
"This leaf specifies the router type.
It is primarily intended as a means for discriminating
among different types of logical routers, route
virtualization, master-slave arrangements etc., while
keeping all such router instances in the same flat list.
";
}
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"Enable/disable the router instance.
If this parameter is false, the parent router instance is
disabled, despite any other configuration that might be
present.
";
}
leaf router-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description
"Global router ID - 32-bit number in the form of a dotted
quad.
An implementation MAY select a value if this parameter is
not configured.
Routing protocols MAY override this global parameter
inside their configuration.
";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the router.";
}
container main-routing-tables {
description
"Main routing tables used by the router instance.";
list main-routing-table {
must "not(address-family!=/routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/name]/"
+ "address-family or safi!=/routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/name]/safi)" {
error-message "Address family mismatch.";
description
"The entry's address family MUST match that of the
referenced routing table.";
}
key "address-family safi";
description
"Each list entry specifies the main routing table for one
address family.
The main routing table is operationally connected to all
routing protocols for which a connected routing table
has not been explicitly configured.
The 'direct' pseudo-protocol is always connected to the
main routing table.
Address families that don't have their entry in this
list MUST NOT be used in the rest of the router instance
configuration.
";
uses afn-safi;
leaf name {
type routing-table-ref;
description
"Name of an existing routing table to be used as the
main routing table for the given router instance and
address family.";
}
}
}
container interfaces {
description
"Router interface parameters.";
list interface {
key "name";
description
"List of network layer interfaces assigned to the router
instance.";
leaf name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"A reference to the name of a configured network layer
interface.";
}
}
}
container routing-protocols {
description
"Container for the list of configured routing protocol
instances.";
list routing-protocol {
key "name";
description
"An instance of a routing protocol.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name of the routing protocol instance.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the routing protocol
instance.";
}
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"Enable/disable the routing protocol instance.
If this parameter is false, the parent routing
protocol instance is disabled, despite any other
configuration that might be present.
";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base routing-protocol;
}
mandatory "true";
description
"Type of the routing protocol - an identity derived
from the 'routing-protocol' base identity.";
}
container connected-routing-tables {
description
"Container for connected routing tables.
";
list connected-routing-table {
must "not(/routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/"
+ "preceding-sibling::connected-routing-table/"
+ "name]/address-family=/routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/name]/"
+ "address-family and /routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/"
+ "preceding-sibling::connected-routing-table/"
+ "name]/safi=/routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/name]/safi)" {
error-message "Duplicate address family for "
+ "connected routing tables.";
description
"For each AFN/SAFI pair there MUST NOT be more than
one connected routing table.";
}
key "name";
description
"List of routing tables to which the routing protocol
instance is connected (at most one routing table per
address family).
If no connected routing table is configured for an
address family, the routing protocol MUST be
operationally connected to the main routing table
for that address family.
";
leaf name {
type routing-table-ref;
must "../../../type != 'rt:direct' or "
+ "../../../../../main-routing-tables/ "
+ "main-routing-table/name=." {
error-message "The 'direct' protocol can be "
+ "connected only to a main routing "
+ "table.";
description
"For the 'direct' pseudo-protocol, the connected
routing table must always be a main routing
table.";
}
description
"Name of an existing routing table.";
}
leaf import-filter {
type route-filter-ref;
description
"Reference to a route filter that is used for
filtering routes passed from this routing protocol
instance to the routing table specified by the
'name' sibling node.
If this leaf is not present, the behavior is
protocol-specific, but typically it means that all
routes are accepted.
";
}
leaf export-filter {
type route-filter-ref;
description
"Reference to a route filter that is used for
filtering routes passed from the routing table
specified by the 'name' sibling node to this
routing protocol instance.
If this leaf is not present, the behavior is
protocol-specific - typically it means that all
routes are accepted.
The 'direct' and 'static' pseudo-protocols accept
no routes from any routing table.
";
}
}
}
container static-routes {
when "../type='rt:static'" {
description
"This container is only valid for the 'static'
routing protocol.";
}
description
"Configuration of 'static' pseudo-protocol.
Address family specific modules augment this node with
their lists of routes.
";
}
}
}
}
container routing-tables {
description
"Container for configured routing tables.";
list routing-table {
key "name";
description
"Each entry represents a routing table identified by the
'name' key. All routes in a routing table MUST belong to
the same address family.";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name of the routing table.";
}
uses afn-safi;
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the routing table.";
}
container routes {
config "false";
description
"Current contents of the routing table (state data).";
list route {
description
"A routing table entry. This data node MUST be
augmented with information specific for routes of each
address family.";
uses route-content;
leaf source-protocol {
type string;
mandatory "true";
description
'Routing protocol instance from which the route
originated.
It must be either "direct" or the name of a
configured routing protocol instance.
';
}
leaf last-updated {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time stamp of the last modification of the route. If
the route was never modified, it is the time when
the route was inserted into the routing table.";
}
}
}
container recipient-routing-tables {
description
"Container for recipient routing tables.";
list recipient-routing-table {
must "name != ../../name" {
error-message "Source and recipient routing tables "
+ "are identical.";
description
"A routing table MUST NOT appear among its recipient
routing tables.";
}
must "/routing/routing-tables/"
+ "routing-table[name=current()/name]/"
+ "address-family=../../address-family and /routing/"
+ "routing-tables/routing-table[name=current()/name]/"
+ "safi=../../safi" {
error-message "Address family mismatch.";
description
"Address family of the recipient routing table MUST
match the source table.";
}
key "name";
description
"List of routing tables that receive routes from this
routing table.";
leaf name {
type routing-table-ref;
description
"The name of the recipient routing table.";
}
leaf filter {
type route-filter-ref;
description
"A route filter which is applied to the routes passed
to the recipient routing table.";
}
}
}
}
}
container route-filters {
description
"Container for configured route filters.";
list route-filter {
key "name";
description
"Route filters are used for filtering and/or manipulating
routes that are passed between a routing protocol and a
routing table or vice versa, or between two routing
tables.
It is expected that other modules augment this list with
contents specific for a particular route filter type.
";
leaf name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name of the route filter.";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the route filter.";
}
leaf type {
type identityref {
base route-filter;
}
mandatory "true";
description
"Type of the route-filter - an identity derived from the
'route-filter' base identity.";
}
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.mod-v4ur" title="IPv4 Unicast Routing YANG Module">
<t>RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with
the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<![CDATA[<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing@2013-02-11.yang"
module ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing";
prefix "v4ur";
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: David Kessens
<mailto:david.kessens@nsn.com>
WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder
<mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
";
description
"This YANG module augments the 'ietf-routing' module with basic
configuration and state data for IPv4 unicast routing.
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.
";
revision 2013-02-11 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* Groupings */
grouping route-content {
description
"Parameters of IPv4 unicast routes.";
leaf dest-prefix {
type inet:ipv4-prefix;
description
"IPv4 destination prefix.";
}
leaf next-hop {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 address of the next hop.";
}
}
/* RPC Methods */
augment "/rt:active-route/rt:input/rt:destination-address" {
when "rt:address-family='ipv4' and rt:safi='nlri-unicast'" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"The 'address' leaf augments the 'rt:destination-address'
parameter of the 'rt:active-route' operation.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 destination address.";
}
}
augment "/rt:active-route/rt:output/rt:route" {
when "rt:address-family='ipv4' and rt:safi='nlri-unicast'" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"Contents of the reply to 'rt:active-route' operation.";
uses route-content;
}
/* Data nodes */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:router/rt:routing-protocols/"
+ "rt:routing-protocol/rt:static-routes" {
description
"This augment defines the configuration of the 'static'
pseudo-protocol with data specific for IPv4 unicast.";
container ipv4 {
description
"Configuration of a 'static' pseudo-protocol instance
consists of a list of routes.";
list route {
key "id";
ordered-by "user";
description
"A user-ordered list of static routes.";
leaf id {
type uint32 {
range "1..max";
}
description
"Numeric identifier of the route.
It is not required that the routes be sorted by their
'id'.
";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the route.";
}
uses rt:route-content;
uses route-content {
refine "dest-prefix" {
mandatory "true";
}
}
}
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:routing-tables/rt:routing-table/rt:routes/"
+ "rt:route" {
when "../../rt:address-family = 'ipv4' and ../../rt:safi = "
+ "'nlri-unicast'" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv4 unicast.";
}
description
"This augment defines the content of IPv4 unicast routes.";
uses route-content;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.mod-v6ur" title="IPv6 Unicast Routing YANG Module">
<t>RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with
the actual RFC number and all occurrences of the revision date
below with the date of RFC publication (and remove this note).</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
<![CDATA[<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing@2013-02-11.yang"
module ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing";
prefix "v6ur";
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
}
import ietf-ip {
prefix "ip";
}
organization
"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/>
WG List: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
WG Chair: David Kessens
<mailto:david.kessens@nsn.com>
WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder
<mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Editor: Ladislav Lhotka
<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>
";
description
"This YANG module augments the 'ietf-routing' module with basic
configuration and state data for IPv6 unicast routing.
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.
";
revision 2013-02-11 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management";
}
/* Groupings */
grouping route-content {
description
"Specific parameters of IPv6 unicast routes.";
leaf dest-prefix {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"IPv6 destination prefix.";
}
leaf next-hop {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 address of the next hop.";
}
}
/* RPC Methods */
augment "/rt:active-route/rt:input/rt:destination-address" {
when "rt:address-family='ipv6' and rt:safi='nlri-unicast'" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"The 'address' leaf augments the 'rt:destination-address'
parameter of the 'rt:active-route' operation.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 destination address.";
}
}
augment "/rt:active-route/rt:output/rt:route" {
when "rt:address-family='ipv6' and rt:safi='nlri-unicast'" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"Contents of the reply to 'rt:active-route' operation.";
uses route-content;
}
/* Data nodes */
augment "/rt:routing/rt:router/rt:interfaces/rt:interface" {
when "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name=current()/rt:name]/"
+ "ip:ipv6/ip:enabled='true'" {
description
"This augment is only valid for router interfaces with
enabled IPv6.";
}
description
"IPv6-specific parameters of router interfaces.";
container ipv6-router-advertisements {
description
"Parameters of IPv6 Router Advertisements.";
leaf send-advertisements {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"A flag indicating whether or not the router sends periodic
Router Advertisements and responds to Router
Solicitations.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvSendAdvertisements.";
}
leaf max-rtr-adv-interval {
type uint16 {
range "4..1800";
}
units "seconds";
default "600";
description
"The maximum time allowed between sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements from the interface.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
MaxRtrAdvInterval.";
}
leaf min-rtr-adv-interval {
type uint16 {
range "3..1350";
}
units "seconds";
must ". <= 0.75 * ../max-rtr-adv-interval" {
description
"The value MUST NOT be greater than 75 % of
'max-rtr-adv-interval'.";
}
description
"The minimum time allowed between sending unsolicited
multicast Router Advertisements from the interface.
The default value to be used operationally if this leaf is
not configured is determined as follows:
- if max-rtr-adv-interval >= 9 seconds, the default value
is 0.33 * max-rtr-adv-interval;
- otherwise it is 0.75 * max-rtr-adv-interval.
";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
MinRtrAdvInterval.";
}
leaf managed-flag {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"The boolean value to be placed in the 'Managed address
configuration' flag field in the Router Advertisement.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvManagedFlag.";
}
leaf other-config-flag {
type boolean;
default "false";
description
"The boolean value to be placed in the 'Other
configuration' flag field in the Router Advertisement.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvOtherConfigFlag.";
}
leaf link-mtu {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"The value to be placed in MTU options sent by the router.
A value of zero indicates that no MTU options are sent.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvLinkMTU.";
}
leaf reachable-time {
type uint32 {
range "0..3600000";
}
units "milliseconds";
default "0";
description
"The value to be placed in the Reachable Time field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. The
value zero means unspecified (by this router).";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvReachableTime.";
}
leaf retrans-timer {
type uint32;
units "milliseconds";
default "0";
description
"The value to be placed in the Retrans Timer field in the
Router Advertisement messages sent by the router. The
value zero means unspecified (by this router).";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvRetransTimer.";
}
leaf cur-hop-limit {
type uint8;
default "64";
description
"The default value to be placed in the Cur Hop Limit field
in the Router Advertisement messages sent by the router.
The value should be set to the current diameter of the
Internet. The value zero means unspecified (by this
router).
The default SHOULD be set to the value specified in IANA
Assigned Numbers that was in effect at the time of
implementation.
";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvCurHopLimit.
IANA: IP Parameters,
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ip-parameters
";
}
leaf default-lifetime {
type uint16 {
range "0..9000";
}
units "seconds";
description
"The value to be placed in the Router Lifetime field of
Router Advertisements sent from the interface, in seconds.
MUST be either zero or between max-rtr-adv-interval and
9000 seconds. A value of zero indicates that the router is
not to be used as a default router. These limits may be
overridden by specific documents that describe how IPv6
operates over different link layers.
If this parameter is not configured, a value of 3 *
max-rtr-adv-interval SHOULD be used.
";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvDefaultLifeTime.";
}
container prefix-list {
description
"A list of prefixes to be placed in Prefix Information
options in Router Advertisement messages sent from the
interface.
By default, all prefixes that the router advertises via
routing protocols as being on-link for the interface from
which the advertisement is sent.
Prefixes that do not have their entries in the child
'prefix' list are advertised with the default values of
all parameters.
The link-local prefix SHOULD NOT be included in the list
of advertised prefixes.
";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) -
AdvPrefixList.";
list prefix {
key "prefix-spec";
description
"Advertised prefix entry.";
leaf prefix-spec {
type inet:ipv6-prefix;
description
"IPv6 address prefix.";
}
choice control-adv-prefixes {
default "advertise";
description
"The prefix either may be explicitly removed from the
set of advertised prefixes, or parameters with which
it is advertised may be specified (default case).";
leaf no-advertise {
type empty;
description
"The prefix will not be advertised.
This can be used for removing the prefix from the
default set of advertised prefixes.
";
}
case advertise {
leaf valid-lifetime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
default "2592000";
description
"The value to be placed in the Valid Lifetime in
the Prefix Information option, in seconds. The
designated value of all 1's (0xffffffff)
represents infinity.
";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvValidLifetime.";
}
leaf on-link-flag {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"The value to be placed in the on-link flag
('L-bit') field in the Prefix Information
option.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvOnLinkFlag.";
}
leaf preferred-lifetime {
type uint32;
units "seconds";
must ". <= ../valid-lifetime" {
description
"This value MUST NOT be greater than
valid-lifetime.";
}
default "604800";
description
"The value to be placed in the Preferred Lifetime
in the Prefix Information option, in seconds. The
designated value of all 1's (0xffffffff)
represents infinity.
";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvPreferredLifetime.";
}
leaf autonomous-flag {
type boolean;
default "true";
description
"The value to be placed in the Autonomous Flag
field in the Prefix Information option.";
reference
"RFC 4861: Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6
(IPv6) - AdvAutonomousFlag.";
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:router/rt:routing-protocols/"
+ "rt:routing-protocol/rt:static-routes" {
description
"This augment defines the configuration of the 'static'
pseudo-protocol with data specific for IPv6 unicast.";
container ipv6 {
description
"Configuration of a 'static' pseudo-protocol instance
consists of a list of routes.";
list route {
key "id";
ordered-by "user";
description
"A user-ordered list of static routes.";
leaf id {
type uint32 {
range "1..max";
}
description
"Numeric identifier of the route.
It is not required that the routes be sorted by their
'id'.
";
}
leaf description {
type string;
description
"Textual description of the route.";
}
uses rt:route-content;
uses route-content {
refine "dest-prefix" {
mandatory "true";
}
}
}
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:routing-tables/rt:routing-table/rt:routes/"
+ "rt:route" {
when "../../rt:address-family = 'ipv6' and ../../rt:safi = "
+ "'nlri-unicast'" {
description
"This augment is valid only for IPv6 unicast.";
}
description
"This augment defines the content of IPv6 unicast routes.";
uses route-content;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec.iana" title="IANA Considerations">
<t>RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with
the actual RFC number (and remove this note).</t>
<t>This document registers the following namespace URIs in the
IETF XML registry <xref target="RFC3688"/>:</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
----------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
----------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
<t>This document registers the following YANG modules in the YANG
Module Names registry <xref target="RFC6020"/>:</t>
<figure>
<artwork>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing
prefix: rt
reference: RFC XXXX
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing
prefix: v4ur
reference: RFC XXXX
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
name: ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing
prefix: v6ur
reference: RFC XXXX
-------------------------------------------------------------------
</artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="sec-cons" title="Security Considerations">
<t>Configuration and state data conforming to the core routing
data model (defined in this document) are designed to be accessed
via the NETCONF protocol <xref target="RFC6241"/>. The lowest
NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the
mandatory-to-implement secure transport is SSH <xref target="RFC6242"/>.</t>
<t>A number of data nodes defined in the YANG modules belonging to
the core routing data model are writable/creatable/deletable
(i.e., "config true" in YANG terms, which is the default). These
data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some
network environments. Write operations to these data nodes, such
as "edit-config", can have negative effects on the network if the
protocol operations are not properly protected.</t>
<t>The vulnerable "config true" subtrees and data nodes are the
following:
<list style="hanging">
<t hangText="/routing/router/interfaces/interface">This
list assigns a network layer interface to a router instance and
may also specify interface parameters related to routing.</t>
<t hangText="/routing/router/routing-protocols/routing-protocol">This
list specifies the routing protocols configured on a device.</t>
<t hangText="/routing/route-filters/route-filter">This
list specifies the configured route filters which represent
administrative policies for redistributing and modifying routing
information.</t>
<t hangText="/routing/routing-tables/routing-table">This
list specifies the configured routing tables used by the device.</t>
</list>
Unauthorized access to any of these lists can adversely affect the
routing subsystem of both the local device and the network. This
may lead to network malfunctions, delivery of packets to
inappropriate destinations and other problems.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="acknowledgments" title="Acknowledgments">
<t>The author wishes to thank Martin Bjorklund, Joel Halpern,
Wes Hardaker, Andrew McGregor, Thomas Morin, Tom Petch,
Bruno Rijsman, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Phil Shafer, Dave Thaler and
Yi Yang for their helpful comments and suggestions.</t>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<references title="Normative References">
<reference anchor="IANA-IF-AF">
<front>
<title>IANA Interface Type and Address Family YANG Modules</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund">
<organization/>
</author>
<date month="June" day="5" year="2012"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-netmod-iana-if-type-04"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-iana-if-type-04"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC2119">
<front>
<title abbrev="RFC Key Words">Key words for use in RFCs to
Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
<author initials="S." surname="Bradner" fullname="S. Bradner">
<organization/>
</author>
<date year="1997" month="March"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
<format type="TXT" octets="4723" target="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2119.txt"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC3688">
<front>
<title>The IETF XML Registry</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Mealling" fullname="M. Mealling">
<organization/></author>
<date year="2004" month="January"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="81"/>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3688"/>
<format type="TXT" octets="17325" target="ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3688.txt"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC4861">
<front>
<title>Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)</title>
<author initials="T" surname="Narten" fullname="T. Narten">
<organization>IBM</organization>
</author>
<author initials="E." surname="Nordmark" fullname="E. Nordmark">
<organization>Sun Microsystems</organization>
</author>
<author initials="W." surname="Simpson" fullname="W. Simpson">
<organization>Daydreamer</organization>
</author>
<author initials="H." surname="Soliman" fullname="H. Soliman">
<organization>Elevate Technologies</organization>
</author>
<date month="September" year="2007"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4861"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6020">
<front>
<title>YANG - A Data Modeling Language for Network
Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)</title>
<author role="editor" initials="M" surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund">
<organization>Tail-f Systems</organization>
</author>
<date month="September" year="2010"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6020"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6020"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6021bis">
<front>
<title>Common YANG Data Types</title>
<author role="editor" initials="J." surname="Schoenwaelder" fullname="J. Schoenwaelder">
<organization/>
</author>
<date month="February" day="6" year="2013"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6241">
<front>
<title>NETCONF Configuration Protocol</title>
<author initials="R." surname="Enns" fullname="R. Enns">
<organization/>
</author>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund">
<organization/>
</author>
<author initials="J." surname="Schoenwaelder" fullname="J. Schoenwaelder">
<organization/>
</author>
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="A. Bierman">
<organization/>
</author>
<date year="2011" month="June"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6241"/>
<format type="TXT" octets="209465" target="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6241.txt"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="YANG-IF">
<front>
<title>A YANG Data Model for Interface Configuration</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund">
<organization/>
</author>
<date month="February" day="6" year="2013"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-09"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-09"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="YANG-IP">
<front>
<title>A YANG Data Model for IP Configuration</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Bjorklund" fullname="M. Bjorklund">
<organization/>
</author>
<date month="February" day="11" year="2012"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09"/>
</reference>
</references>
<references title="Informative References">
<reference anchor="RFC6087">
<front>
<title>Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model
Documents</title>
<author initials="A." surname="Bierman" fullname="Andy Bierman">
<organization/>
</author>
<date month="January" year="2011"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6087"/>
<format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6087"/>
</reference>
<reference anchor="RFC6242">
<front>
<title>Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Wasserman" fullname="M. Wasserman">
<organization/>
</author>
<date year="2011" month="June"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6242"/>
<format type="TXT" octets="22704" target="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6242.txt"/>
</reference>
</references>
<section anchor="app.data-tree" title="The Complete Data Tree">
<t>This appendix presents the complete data tree of the
core routing data model. See <xref target="sec.tree-symbols"/> for
an explanation of symbols. Data type of every leaf node is shown
near the right end of the corresponding line.</t>
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[
+--rw routing
+--rw router [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw type? identityref
| +--rw enabled? boolean
| +--rw router-id? yang:dotted-quad
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw main-routing-tables
| | +--rw main-routing-table [address-family safi]
| | +--rw address-family ianaaf:address-family
| | +--rw safi ianaaf:subsequent-address-family
| | +--rw name? routing-table-ref
| +--rw interfaces
| | +--rw interface [name]
| | +--rw name if:interface-ref
| | +--rw v6ur:ipv6-router-advertisements
| | +--rw v6ur:send-advertisements? boolean
| | +--rw v6ur:max-rtr-adv-interval? uint16
| | +--rw v6ur:min-rtr-adv-interval? uint16
| | +--rw v6ur:managed-flag? boolean
| | +--rw v6ur:other-config-flag? boolean
| | +--rw v6ur:link-mtu? uint32
| | +--rw v6ur:reachable-time? uint32
| | +--rw v6ur:retrans-timer? uint32
| | +--rw v6ur:cur-hop-limit? uint8
| | +--rw v6ur:default-lifetime? uint16
| | +--rw v6ur:prefix-list
| | +--rw v6ur:prefix [prefix-spec]
| | +--rw v6ur:prefix-spec inet:ipv6-prefix
| | +--rw (control-adv-prefixes)?
| | +--:(no-advertise)
| | | +--rw v6ur:no-advertise? empty
| | +--:(advertise)
| | +--rw v6ur:valid-lifetime? uint32
| | +--rw v6ur:on-link-flag? boolean
| | +--rw v6ur:preferred-lifetime? uint32
| | +--rw v6ur:autonomous-flag? boolean
| +--rw routing-protocols
| +--rw routing-protocol [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw enabled? boolean
| +--rw type identityref
| +--rw connected-routing-tables
| | +--rw connected-routing-table [name]
| | +--rw name routing-table-ref
| | +--rw import-filter? route-filter-ref
| | +--rw export-filter? route-filter-ref
| +--rw static-routes
| +--rw v4ur:ipv4
| | +--rw v4ur:route [id]
| | +--rw v4ur:id uint32
| | +--rw v4ur:description? string
| | +--rw v4ur:outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| | +--rw v4ur:dest-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix
| | +--rw v4ur:next-hop? inet:ipv4-address
| +--rw v6ur:ipv6
| +--rw v6ur:route [id]
| +--rw v6ur:id uint32
| +--rw v6ur:description? string
| +--rw v6ur:outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| +--rw v6ur:dest-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix
| +--rw v6ur:next-hop? inet:ipv6-address
+--rw routing-tables
| +--rw routing-table [name]
| +--rw name string
| +--rw address-family ianaaf:address-family
| +--rw safi ianaaf:subsequent-address-family
| +--rw description? string
| +--ro routes
| | +--ro route
| | +--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| | +--ro source-protocol string
| | +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
| | +--ro v4ur:dest-prefix? inet:ipv4-prefix
| | +--ro v4ur:next-hop? inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro v6ur:dest-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix
| | +--ro v6ur:next-hop? inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw recipient-routing-tables
| +--rw recipient-routing-table [name]
| +--rw name routing-table-ref
| +--rw filter? route-filter-ref
+--rw route-filters
+--rw route-filter [name]
+--rw name string
+--rw description? string
+--rw type identityref
]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="app.rip" title="Example: Adding a New Routing Protocol">
<t>This appendix demonstrates how the core routing data model can
be extended to support a new routing protocol. The YANG module
"example-rip" shown below is intended only as an illustration
rather than a real definition of a data model for the RIP routing
protocol. For the sake of brevity, we do not follow all the
guidelines specified in <xref target="RFC6087"/>. See also <xref target="sec.newproto"/>.</t>
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[
module example-rip {
namespace "http://example.com/rip";
prefix "rip";
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
}
identity rip {
base rt:routing-protocol;
description
"Identity for the RIP routing protocol.";
}
typedef rip-metric {
type uint8 {
range "0..16";
}
}
grouping route-content {
description
"This grouping defines RIP-specific route attributes.";
leaf metric {
type rip-metric;
}
leaf tag {
type uint16;
default "0";
description
"This leaf may be used to carry additional info, e.g. AS
number.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:routing-tables/rt:routing-table/rt:routes/"
+ "rt:route" {
description
"RIP-specific route attributes.";
uses route-content;
}
augment "/rt:active-route/rt:output/rt:route" {
description
"RIP-specific route attributes.";
uses route-content;
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:router/rt:interfaces/rt:interface" {
when "../../rt:routing-protocols/rt:routing-protocol/rt:type = "
+ "'rip:rip'" {
description
'This augment is only valid for a routing protocol instance
of type "rip".';
}
container rip {
description
"Per-interface RIP configuration.";
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
default "true";
}
leaf metric {
type rip-metric;
default "1";
}
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:router/rt:routing-protocols/"
+ "rt:routing-protocol" {
when "rt:type = 'rip:rip'" {
description
'This augment is only valid for a routing protocol instance
of type "rip".';
}
container rip {
description
"Global RIP configuration.";
leaf update-interval {
type uint8 {
range "10..60";
}
units "seconds";
default "30";
description
"Time interval between periodic updates.";
}
}
}
}
]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="app.get-reply" title="Example: NETCONF <get> Reply">
<t>This section contains a sample reply to the NETCONF <get>
message, which could be sent by a server supporting (i.e.,
advertising them in the NETCONF <hello> message) the
following YANG modules:
<list style="symbols">
<t>ietf-interfaces <xref target="YANG-IF"/>,</t>
<t>ietf-ip <xref target="YANG-IP"/>,</t>
<t>ietf-routing (<xref target="sec.mod-rt"/>),</t>
<t>ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing (<xref target="sec.mod-v4ur"/>),</t>
<t>ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing (<xref target="sec.mod-v6ur"/>).</t>
</list></t>
<t>We assume a simple network setup as shown in <xref target="fig.exnet"/>: router "A" uses static default routes with
the "ISP" router as the next hop. IPv6 router advertisements are
configured only on the "eth1" interface and disabled on the
upstream "eth0" interface.</t>
<figure anchor="fig.exnet" title="Example network configuration">
<artwork><![CDATA[
+-----------------+
| |
| Router ISP |
| |
+--------+--------+
|2001:db8:0:1::2
|192.0.2.2
|
|
|2001:db8:0:1::1
eth0|192.0.2.1
+--------+--------+
| |
| Router A |
| |
+--------+--------+
eth1|198.51.100.1
|2001:db8:0:2::1
|
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>A reply to the NETCONF <get> message sent by router "A"
would then be as follows:</t>
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rpc-reply
message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"
xmlns:v4ur="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing"
xmlns:v6ur="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing"
xmlns:if="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-interfaces"
xmlns:ip="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ip"
xmlns:rt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing">
<data>
<if:interfaces>
<if:interface>
<if:name>eth0</if:name>
<if:type>ethernetCsmacd</if:type>
<if:location>eth0</if:location>
<ip:ipv4>
<ip:address>
<ip:ip>192.0.2.1</ip:ip>
<ip:prefix-length>24</ip:prefix-length>
</ip:address>
<ip:forwarding>true</ip:forwarding>
</ip:ipv4>
<ip:ipv6>
<ip:address>
<ip:ip>2001:0db8:0:1::1</ip:ip>
<ip:prefix-length>64</ip:prefix-length>
</ip:address>
<ip:forwarding>true</ip:forwarding>
<ip:autoconf>
<ip:create-global-addresses>false</ip:create-global-addresses>
</ip:autoconf>
</ip:ipv6>
</if:interface>
<if:interface>
<if:name>eth1</if:name>
<if:type>ethernetCsmacd</if:type>
<if:location>eth1</if:location>
<ip:ipv4>
<ip:address>
<ip:ip>198.51.100.1</ip:ip>
<ip:prefix-length>24</ip:prefix-length>
</ip:address>
<ip:forwarding>true</ip:forwarding>
</ip:ipv4>
<ip:ipv6>
<ip:address>
<ip:ip>2001:0db8:0:2::1</ip:ip>
<ip:prefix-length>64</ip:prefix-length>
</ip:address>
<ip:forwarding>true</ip:forwarding>
<ip:autoconf>
<ip:create-global-addresses>false</ip:create-global-addresses>
</ip:autoconf>
</ip:ipv6>
</if:interface>
</if:interfaces>
<rt:routing>
<rt:router>
<rt:name>rtr0</rt:name>
<rt:router-id>192.0.2.1</rt:router-id>
<rt:description>Router A</rt:description>
<rt:main-routing-tables>
<rt:main-routing-table>
<rt:address-family>ipv4</rt:address-family>
<rt:safi>nlri-unicast</rt:safi>
<rt:name>ipv4-unicast</rt:name>
</rt:main-routing-table>
<rt:main-routing-table>
<rt:address-family>ipv6</rt:address-family>
<rt:safi>nlri-unicast</rt:safi>
<rt:name>ipv6-unicast</rt:name>
</rt:main-routing-table>
</rt:main-routing-tables>
<rt:interfaces>
<rt:interface>
<rt:name>eth0</rt:name>
</rt:interface>
<rt:interface>
<rt:name>eth1</rt:name>
<v6ur:ipv6-router-advertisements>
<v6ur:send-advertisements>true</v6ur:send-advertisements>
<v6ur:prefix-list>
<v6ur:prefix>
<v6ur:prefix-spec>2001:db8:0:2::/64</v6ur:prefix-spec>
</v6ur:prefix>
</v6ur:prefix-list>
</v6ur:ipv6-router-advertisements>
</rt:interface>
</rt:interfaces>
<rt:routing-protocols>
<rt:routing-protocol>
<rt:name>st0</rt:name>
<rt:description>
Static routing is used for the internal network.
</rt:description>
<rt:type>rt:static</rt:type>
<rt:static-routes>
<v4ur:ipv4>
<v4ur:route>
<v4ur:id>1</v4ur:id>
<v4ur:dest-prefix>0.0.0.0/0</v4ur:dest-prefix>
<v4ur:next-hop>192.0.2.2</v4ur:next-hop>
</v4ur:route>
</v4ur:ipv4>
<v6ur:ipv6>
<v6ur:route>
<v6ur:id>1</v6ur:id>
<v6ur:dest-prefix>::/0</v6ur:dest-prefix>
<v6ur:next-hop>2001:db8:0:1::2</v6ur:next-hop>
</v6ur:route>
</v6ur:ipv6>
</rt:static-routes>
</rt:routing-protocol>
</rt:routing-protocols>
</rt:router>
<rt:routing-tables>
<rt:routing-table>
<rt:name>ipv4-unicast</rt:name>
<rt:address-family>ipv4</rt:address-family>
<rt:safi>nlri-unicast</rt:safi>
<rt:routes>
<rt:route>
<v4ur:dest-prefix>192.0.2.1/24</v4ur:dest-prefix>
<rt:outgoing-interface>eth0</rt:outgoing-interface>
<rt:source-protocol>direct</rt:source-protocol>
<rt:last-updated>2012-10-02T17:11:27+01:00</rt:last-updated>
</rt:route>
<rt:route>
<v4ur:dest-prefix>198.51.100.0/24</v4ur:dest-prefix>
<rt:outgoing-interface>eth1</rt:outgoing-interface>
<rt:source-protocol>direct</rt:source-protocol>
<rt:last-updated>2012-10-02T17:11:27+01:00</rt:last-updated>
</rt:route>
<rt:route>
<v4ur:dest-prefix>0.0.0.0/0</v4ur:dest-prefix>
<rt:source-protocol>st0</rt:source-protocol>
<v4ur:next-hop>192.0.2.2</v4ur:next-hop>
<rt:last-updated>2012-10-02T18:02:45+01:00</rt:last-updated>
</rt:route>
</rt:routes>
</rt:routing-table>
<rt:routing-table>
<rt:name>ipv6-unicast</rt:name>
<rt:address-family>ipv6</rt:address-family>
<rt:safi>nlri-unicast</rt:safi>
<rt:routes>
<rt:route>
<v6ur:dest-prefix>2001:db8:0:1::/64</v6ur:dest-prefix>
<rt:outgoing-interface>eth0</rt:outgoing-interface>
<rt:source-protocol>direct</rt:source-protocol>
<rt:last-updated>2012-10-02T17:11:27+01:00</rt:last-updated>
</rt:route>
<rt:route>
<v6ur:dest-prefix>2001:db8:0:2::/64</v6ur:dest-prefix>
<rt:outgoing-interface>eth1</rt:outgoing-interface>
<rt:source-protocol>direct</rt:source-protocol>
<rt:last-updated>2012-10-02T17:11:27+01:00</rt:last-updated>
</rt:route>
<rt:route>
<v6ur:dest-prefix>::/0</v6ur:dest-prefix>
<v6ur:next-hop>2001:db8:0:1::2</v6ur:next-hop>
<rt:source-protocol>st0</rt:source-protocol>
<rt:last-updated>2012-10-02T18:02:45+01:00</rt:last-updated>
</rt:route>
</rt:routes>
</rt:routing-table>
</rt:routing-tables>
</rt:routing>
</data>
</rpc-reply>
]]></artwork>
</figure>
</section>
<section anchor="change-log" title="Change Log">
<t>RFC Editor: remove this section upon publication as an RFC.</t>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -07 and -08">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Changed reference from RFC6021 to RFC6021bis.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -06 and -07">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>The contents of <get-reply> in <xref target="app.get-reply"/> was updated: "eth[01]" is used as
the value of "location", and "forwarding" is on for both
interfaces and both IPv4 and IPv6.</t>
<t>The "must" expression for "main-routing-table" was
modified to avoid redundant error messages reporting address
family mismatch when "name" points to a non-existent routing
table.</t>
<t>The default behavior for IPv6 RA prefix advertisements
was clarified.</t>
<t>Changed type of "rt:router-id" to "ip:dotted-quad".</t>
<t>Type of "rt:router-id" changed to "yang:dotted-quad".</t>
<t>Fixed missing prefixes in XPath expressions.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -05 and -06">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Document title changed: "Configuration" was replaced by
"Management".</t>
<t>New typedefs "routing-table-ref" and "route-filter-ref".</t>
<t>Double slashes "//" were removed from XPath expressions
and replaced with the single "/".</t>
<t>Removed uniqueness requirement for "router-id".</t>
<t>Complete data tree is now in <xref target="app.data-tree"/>.</t>
<t>Changed type of "source-protocol" from "leafref" to "string".</t>
<t>Clarified the relationship between routing protocol
instances and connected routing tables.</t>
<t>Added a must constraint saying that a routing table
connected to the direct pseudo-protocol must not be a main
routing table.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -04 and -05">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Routing tables are now global, i.e., "routing-tables" is
a child of "routing" rather than "router".</t>
<t>"must" statement for "static-routes" changed to "when".</t>
<t>Added "main-routing-tables" containing references to main
routing tables for each address family.</t>
<t>Removed the defaults for "address-family" and "safi" and
made them mandatory.</t>
<t>Removed the default for route-filter/type and made this
leaf mandatory.</t>
<t>If there is no active route for a given destination, the
"active-route" RPC returns no output.</t>
<t>Added "enabled" switch under "routing-protocol".</t>
<t>Added "router-type" identity and "type" leaf under
"router".</t>
<t>Route attribute "age" changed to "last-updated", its type
is "yang:date-and-time".</t>
<t>The "direct" pseudo-protocol is always connected to main
routing tables.</t>
<t>Entries in the list of connected routing tables renamed
from "routing-table" to "connected-routing-table".</t>
<t>Added "must" constraint saying that a routing table must
not be its own recipient.</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -03 and -04">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Changed "error-tag" for both RPC methods from "missing
element" to "data-missing".</t>
<t>Removed the decrementing behavior for advertised IPv6
prefix parameters "valid-lifetime" and
"preferred-lifetime".</t>
<t>Changed the key of the static route lists from "seqno" to
"id" because the routes needn't be sorted.</t>
<t>Added 'must' constraint saying that "preferred-lifetime"
must not be greater than "valid-lifetime".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -02 and -03">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
<t>Module "iana-afn-safi" moved to I-D "iana-if-type".</t>
<t>Removed forwarding table.</t>
<t>RPC "get-route" changed to "active-route". Its output is
a list of routes (for multi-path routing).</t>
<t>New RPC "route-count".</t>
<t>For both RPCs, specification of negative responses was
added.</t>
<t>Relaxed separation of router instances.</t>
<t>Assignment of interfaces to router instances needn't be
disjoint.</t>
<t>Route filters are now global.</t>
<t>Added "allow-all-route-filter" for symmetry.</t>
<t>Added <xref target="sec.interactions"/> about
interactions with "ietf-interfaces" and "ietf-ip".</t>
<t>Added "router-id" leaf.</t>
<t>Specified the names for IPv4/IPv6 unicast main routing
tables.</t>
<t>Route parameter "last-modified" changed to "age".</t>
<t>Added container "recipient-routing-tables".</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -01 and -02">
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Added module "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing".</t>
<t>The example in <xref target="app.get-reply"/> now uses
IP addresses from blocks reserved for documentation.</t>
<t>Direct routes appear by default in the forwarding
table.</t>
<t>Network layer interfaces must be assigned to a router
instance. Additional interface configuration may be present.</t>
<t>The "when" statement is only used with "augment", "must" is
used elsewhere.</t>
<t>Additional "must" statements were added.</t>
<t>The "route-content" grouping for IPv4 and IPv6 unicast now
includes the material from the "ietf-routing" version via
"uses rt:route-content".</t>
<t>Explanation of symbols in the tree representation of data
model hierarchy.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
<section title="Changes Between Versions -00 and -01">
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>AFN/SAFI-independent stuff was moved to the "ietf-routing"
module.</t>
<t>Typedefs for AFN and SAFI were placed in a separate
"iana-afn-safi" module.</t>
<t>Names of some data nodes were changed, in particular
"routing-process" is now "router".</t>
<t>The restriction of a single AFN/SAFI per router was
lifted.</t>
<t>RPC operation "delete-route" was removed.</t>
<t>Illegal XPath references from "get-route" to the datastore
were fixed.</t>
<t>Section "Security Considerations" was written.</t>
</list></t>
</section>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-23 10:54:21 |