One document matched: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-05.txt

Differences from draft-ietf-avt-srtp-04.txt


 
 
   Internet Engineering Task Force                    Baugher, McGrew, 
   AVT Working Group                                      Oran (Cisco) 
   INTERNET-DRAFT                              Blom, Carrara, Naslund, 
   EXPIRES: December 2002                           Norrman (Ericsson) 
                                                             June 2002 
    
                The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol 
                      <draft-ietf-avt-srtp-05.txt> 
                                     
    
 
Status of this memo 
    
   This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with 
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. 
    
   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that 
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts. 
    
   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six 
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents 
   at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 
   material or cite them other than as "work in progress". 
    
   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/lid-abstracts.txt 
    
   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 
    
    
    
Abstract 
    
   This document describes the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol   
   (SRTP), a profile of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), which 
   can provide confidentiality, message authentication, and replay 
   protection to the RTP/RTCP traffic. 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   TABLE OF CONTENTS 
    
1. Introduction......................................................3 
1.1. Notational Conventions..........................................3 
2. Goals and Features................................................4 
3. SRTP Framework....................................................5 
 3.1 Secure RTP......................................................6 
 3.2 SRTP Cryptographic Contexts.....................................7 
   3.2.1 Transform-independent parameters............................7 
   3.2.2 Transform-dependent parameters..............................9 
   3.2.3 Mapping SRTP Packets to Cryptographic Contexts.............10 
 3.3 SRTP Packet Processing.........................................10 
   3.3.1 Packet Index Determination, and ROC, s_l Update............12 
   3.3.2 Replay Protection..........................................14 
 3.4 Secure RTCP....................................................15 
4. Pre-Defined Cryptographic Transforms.............................18 
 4.1 Encryption.....................................................18 
   4.1.1 AES in Counter Mode........................................20 
   4.1.2 AES in f8-mode.............................................21 
   4.1.3 NULL Cipher................................................23 
 4.2 Message Authentication and Integrity...........................23 
   4.2.1. HMAC-SHA1.................................................24 
 4.3 Key Derivation.................................................24 
   4.3.1 Key Derivation Algorithm...................................24 
   4.3.2 SRTCP Key Derivation.......................................26 
   4.3.3 AES-CM PRF.................................................26 
5. Default and mandatory-to-implement Transforms....................27 
 5.1 Encryption: AES-CM and NULL....................................27 
 5.2 Message Authentication/Integrity: HMAC-SHA1....................27 
 5.3 Key Derivation: AES-CM PRF.....................................27 
6. Adding SRTP Transforms...........................................27 
7. Rationale........................................................28 
 7.1 Key derivation.................................................28 
 7.2 Salting key....................................................29 
 7.3 Message Integrity from Universal Hashing.......................29 
 7.4 Data Origin Authentication Considerations......................29 
8. Key Management Considerations....................................30 
 8.1. Re-keying.....................................................31 
 8.2. Key Management parameters.....................................32 
9. Security Considerations..........................................33 
 9.1 SSRC collision and two-time pad................................33 
 9.2 Key Usage......................................................34 
 9.3 Confidentiality of the RTP Payload.............................35 
 9.4 Confidentiality of the RTP Header..............................36 
 9.5 Integrity of the RTP payload and header........................36 
10. Interaction with Forward Error Correction mechanisms............37 
11. Scenarios.......................................................37 
 11.1 Unicast.......................................................37 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 2] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
 11.2 Multicast.....................................................38 
   11.2.1 Small multicast with one sender...........................38 
   11.2.2 Large multicast with one sender...........................39 
 11.3 Re-keying and access control..................................40 
 11.4 Summary of basic scenarios....................................40 
12. IANA Considerations.............................................41 
13. Acknowledgements................................................41 
14. Author's Addresses..............................................42 
15. References......................................................42 
Appendix A: Pseudocode for Index Determination......................45 
Appendix B: Test Vectors............................................45 
 B.1 AES-f8 Test Vectors............................................45 
 B.2 AES-CM Test Vectors............................................46 
 B.3 Key Derivation Test Vectors....................................47 
      
    
1. Introduction 
 
   This document describes the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol   
   (SRTP), a profile of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), which 
   can provide confidentiality, message authentication, and replay 
   protection to the RTP/RTCP traffic. 
    
   SRTP provides a framework for encryption and message authentication 
   of RTP and RTCP streams (Section 3). SRTP defines a set of default 
   cryptographic transforms (Sections 4 and 5), and it allows new 
   transforms to be introduced in the future (Section 6).  With 
   appropriate key management (Sections 7 and 8), SRTP is secure 
   (Sections 9 and 10) for unicast and multicast RTP applications 
   (Section 11). 
    
   SRTP can achieve high throughput and low packet expansion. SRTP 
   proves to be a suitable protection for heterogeneous environments. 
   To get such features, default transforms are described, based on an 
   additive stream cipher for encryption, a keyed-hash based function 
   for message authentication, and an "implicit" index for 
   sequencing/synchronization based on the RTP sequence number for SRTP 
   and an index number for Secure RTCP (SRTCP). 
 
1.1. Notational Conventions 
    
   The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].  
   The terminology conforms to [RFC2828]. 
    
   By convention, the adopted representation is the network byte order, 
   i.e. the left most bit (octet) is the most significant one. By XOR 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 3] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   we mean bitwise addition modulo 2 of binary strings, and || denotes 
   concatenation. In other words, if C = A || B, then the most 
   significant bits of C are the bits of A, and the least significant 
   bits of C equal the bits of B. Hexadecimal numbers are prefixed by 
   0x. 
    
   The word "encryption" includes also use of the NULL algorithm (which 
   in practice does leave the data in the clear).  
    
   With slight abuse of notation, we use the terms "message 
   authentication" and "authentication tag" as is common practice even 
   though in some circumstances, e.g. group communication, the service 
   provided is actually only integrity protection and not data origin 
   authentication. 
    
    
2. Goals and Features 
    
   The security goals for SRTP are to ensure: 
    
   * the confidentiality of the RTP and RTCP payloads, and 
    
   * the integrity of the entire RTP and RTCP packets, together with  
     protection against replayed packets. 
    
   These security services are optional and independent from each 
   other, except that SRTCP integrity protection is mandatory 
   (malicious or erroneous alteration of RTCP messages could disrupt 
   the processing of the RTP stream). 
    
   Other, functional, goals for the protocol are: 
    
   * a framework that permits upgrading with new cryptographic   
     transforms, 
    
   * low bandwidth cost, i.e., a framework preserving RTP header  
     compression efficiency, 
    
   and, asserted by the pre-defined transforms: 
    
   * a low computational cost, 
    
   * a small footprint (i.e. small code size and data memory for keying 
     information and replay lists), 
    
   * limited packet expansion to support the bandwidth economy goal, 
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 4] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   * independence from the underlying transport, network, and physical 
     layers used by RTP, in particular high tolerance to packet loss 
     and re-ordering, and robustness to transmission bit-errors in the  
     encrypted payload. 
    
   These properties ensure that SRTP is a suitable protection scheme 
   for RTP/RTCP in both wired and wireless scenarios. 
    
2.1 Features 
    
   Besides the above mentioned direct goals, SRTP provides for some 
   additional features. They have been introduced to lighten the burden 
   on key management and to further increase security. They include: 
    
   *  A single "master key" provides keying material for    
     confidentiality and integrity protection, both for the SRTP stream 
     and the corresponding SRTCP stream. This is achieved due to a key  
     derivation function (see Section 4.3), providing "session keys" 
     for the respective security primitive, securely derived from  
     the master key. Under additional SSRC uniqueness requirements, a  
     single master key can even protect several SRTP streams, see  
     Section 9.1.  
    
   * In addition, the key derivation can be configured to periodically  
     "refresh" the session keys, which limits the amount of ciphertext  
     produced by a fixed key, available for an adversary to  
     cryptanalyze. 
    
   * "Salting keys" are used to protect against pre-computation attacks
     [MF00]. 
 
   Detailed rationale for these features can be found in Section 7. 
     
 
3. SRTP Framework 
    
   RTP is the Real-time Transport Protocol [RFC1889]. We define SRTP as 
   a profile of RTP, in a way analogous to RFC1890 which defines the 
   audio/video profile for RTP. Conceptually, we consider it to be a 
   "bump in the stack" implementation which resides between the RTP 
   application and the transport layer. SRTP intercepts RTP packets and 
   then forwards an equivalent SRTP packet on the sending side, and 
   which intercepts SRTP packets and passes an equivalent RTP packet up 
   the stack on the receiving side. 
    
   Secure RTCP (SRTCP) provides the same security services to RTCP as 
   SRTP does to RTP.  SRTCP message authentication is MANDATORY to 
   protect the RTCP messages and thereby protect the RTP session that 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 5] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   uses RTP fields to keep track of membership, provide feedback to RTP 
   senders, or maintain packet sequence counters.  SRTCP is described 
   in Section 3.4.  
    
3.1 Secure RTP 
    
   The format of an SRTP packet is illustrated in Figure 1.  
    
     0                   1                   2                   3 
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+ 
  |V=2|P|X|  CC   |M|     PT      |       sequence number         | | 
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
  |                           timestamp                           | | 
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
  |           synchronization source (SSRC) identifier            | | 
  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | 
  |            contributing source (CSRC) identifiers             | | 
  |                               ....                            | | 
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
  |                   RTP extension (OPTIONAL)                    | | 
+>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| |                          payload  ...                         | | 
| |                               +-------------------------------+ | 
| |                               | RTP padding   | RTP pad count | | 
+>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+ 
| ~                     SRTP MKI (OPTIONAL)                       ~ |  
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| ~                  authentication tag (OPTIONAL)                ~ | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
|                                                                   | 
+- Encrypted Portion*                      Authenticated Portion ---+ 
    
   Figure 1.  The format of an SRTP packet. *Encrypted Portion is the 
   same size as the plaintext for the Section 4 pre-defined transforms. 
    
   The Encrypted Portion of an SRTP packet consists of the encryption 
   of the RTP payload (including RTP padding when present) of the 
   equivalent RTP packet. (Note: the "Encrypted Portion" MAY be the 
   exact size of the plaintext or MAY be larger.  It is exact for the 
   pre-defined transforms and for NULL-encryption, which doesn't change 
   the payload in any way.)  
    
   The optional MKI and optional authentication tag are the only fields 
   defined by SRTP that are not in RTP. Only 8-bit alignment is 
   assumed. 
    
   MKI (Master Key Identifier): variable length, OPTIONAL 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 6] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
          The MKI is defined, signaled, and used by key management.   
          The MKI identifies the master key from which the session  
          key(s) were derived that authenticate and/or encrypt the  
          particular packet. Note that the MKI SHALL NOT identify the  
          SRTP cryptographic context, which is identified according to  
          Section 3.2.3. The MKI MAY be used by key management for the  
          purposes of re-keying, identifying a particular master key 
          within the cryptographic context (Section 3.2.1). 
    
   Authentication tag: variable length, OPTIONAL 
          The authentication tag is used to carry message 
          authentication data. The Authenticated Portion of an SRTP 
          packet consists of the RTP header followed by the Encrypted 
          Portion of the SRTP packet. Thus, note that if both 
          encryption and authentication are applied, encryption SHALL 
          be applied before authentication on the sender side and 
          conversely on the receiver side. The authentication tag 
          provides authentication of the RTP header and payload, and it 
          indirectly provides replay protection by authenticating the 
          sequence number. Note that the MKI is not integrity protected 
          as this does not provide any extra protection. 
      
     
3.2 SRTP Cryptographic Contexts 
    
   Each SRTP stream requires the sender and receiver to maintain 
   cryptographic state information. This information is called the 
   "cryptographic context". 
    
   SRTP uses two types of keys: session keys and master keys. By a 
   "session key", we mean a key which is used directly in a 
   cryptographic transform (e.g. encryption or message authentication), 
   and by a "master key", we mean a random bit string (given by the key 
   management protocol) from which session keys are derived in a 
   cryptographically secure way.  
    
3.2.1 Transform-independent parameters 
    
   "Transform-independent parameters" are present in the cryptographic 
   context independently of the particular encryption or authentication 
   transforms that are used. The transform-independent parameters of 
   the cryptographic context for SRTP consist of: 
    
   * a 32-bit unsigned rollover counter (ROC), which records how many  
     times the 16-bit RTP sequence number has been reset to zero after  
     passing through 65,535. Unlike the sequence number (SEQ), which  
     SRTP extracts from the RTP packet header, the ROC is maintained by 
     SRTP as described in Section 3.3.1.  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 7] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
     We define the index of the SRTP packet corresponding to a given  
     ROC and RTP sequence number to be the 48-bit quantity  
    
         i = 2^16 * ROC + SEQ.  
    
   * for the receiver only, a 16-bit sequence number s_l, which is the  
     highest received RTP sequence number (possibly authenticated, if  
     message authentication is provided),  
  
   * an identifier for the encryption algorithm, i.e., the cipher and  
     its mode of operation,  
    
   * an identifier for the message authentication algorithm (when  
     authentication is provided), 
    
   * a replay list, maintained by the receiver only (when  
     authentication and replay protection are provided), containing  
     indices of recently received and authenticated SRTP packets, 
    
   * an MKI indicator (0/1) as to whether an MKI is present in SRTP and 
     SRTCP packets, 
    
   * if the MKI indicator is set to one, the length (in octets) of the  
     MKI field, and (for the sender) the actual value of the currently  
     active MKI, (the value of the MKI indicator and length MUST be  
     kept fixed for the lifetime of the context), 
    
   * the master key(s), which MUST be random and kept secret, 
    
   * for each master key, there is a counter of the number of SRTP  
     packets that has been processed (sent) with that master key  
     (essential for security, see Sections 3.3.1 and 9),  
    
   * non-negative integers n_e, and n_a, determining the length of the  
     session keys for encryption, and message authentication. 
     
   In addition, for each master key, an SRTP stream MAY use the 
   following associated values: 
    
   * a master salt, to be used in the key derivation of session keys.  
     This value, when used, MUST be random, but MAY be public. Use of  
     master salt is strongly RECOMMENDED, see Section 9.2. A "NULL"  
     salt is treated as 00...0.  
    
   * an integer in the set {1,2,4,...,2^24}, the "key_derivation_rate", 
     where an unspecified value is treated as zero. The constraint to  
     be a power of 2  simplifies the implementation, see Section 4.3. 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 8] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
   * <"From", "To"> values, specifying the lifetime for a master key, 
    expressed in terms of the two 48-bit index values inside whose 
    range (including the range end-points) the master key is valid. 
    These values are absolute quantities, not relative. Whenever this 
    field is unspecified, the related master key is valid "from the 
    first observed packet" to "until further notice" (with maximum 
    lifetime as specified in Section 3.3.1). 
    
   SRTCP SHALL by default share the crypto context with SRTP and uses 
   the same cryptographic context parameters, except: 
    
   * no rollover counter and s_l-value need to be maintained as the  
     RTCP index is explicitly carried in each SRTCP packet, 
    
   * a separate replay list is maintained (when replay protection is  
     provided), 
    
   * SRTCP maintains a separate counter for its master key (even if the
     master key is the same as that for SRTP, see below), as a mean to
     maintain a count of the number of SRTCP packets that have been
     processed with that key.
    
   Note in particular that the master key(s) MAY be shared between SRTP 
   and SRTCP, if the pre-defined transforms (including the key 
   derivation) are used but the session key(s) MUST NOT be so shared. 
    
   In addition, there can be cases (see Sections 8 and 9.1) where 
   several SRTP streams, identified by their SSRCs, share most of the 
   crypto context parameters (including master keys). In such cases, 
   just as in the normal SRTP/SRTCP parameter sharing above, separate 
   replay lists and packet counters for each stream (SSRC) MUST still 
   be maintained, but the session keys MAY then be shared between SRTP 
   streams.  
    
   A summary of parameters, pre-defined transforms, and default values 
   for the above parameters (and other SRTP parameters) can be found in 
   Sections 5 and 8.2. 
 
3.2.2 Transform-dependent parameters 
    
   All encryption, authentication/integrity, and key derivation 
   parameters are defined in the transforms section (Section 4). 
   Typical examples of such parameters are block size of ciphers, 
   session keys, data for IV formation, etc. Future SRTP transform 
   specifications MUST include a section to list the additional 
   cryptographic context's parameters for that transform, if any.  
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                               [Page 9] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
3.2.3 Mapping SRTP Packets to Cryptographic Contexts 
    
   Recall that an RTP session for each participant is defined [RFC1889] 
   by a pair of destination transport addresses (one network address 
   plus a port pair for RTP and RTCP), and that a multimedia session is 
   defined as a collection of RTP sessions. For example, a particular 
   multimedia session could include an audio RTP session, a video RTP 
   session, and a text RTP session. 
    
   A cryptographic context SHALL be uniquely identified by the triplet 
   context identifier: 
    
   context id = <SSRC, destination network address, destination 
   transport port number> 
    
   where the destination network address and the destination transport 
   port are the ones in the current RTP packet (for the sender) or SRTP 
   packet (for the receiver). It is assumed that, when presented with 
   this information, the key management returns a context with the 
   information as described in Section 3.2. 
    
   As noted above, SRTP and SRTCP by default share the bulk of the 
   parameters in the cryptographic context. Thus, retrieving the crypto 
   context parameters for an SRTCP stream in practice may imply a 
   binding to the correspondent SRTP crypto context. It is up to the 
   implementation to assure such binding, since the RTCP port may not 
   be directly deducible from the RTP port only. Alternatively, the key 
   management may choose to provide separate SRTP- and SRTCP-contexts, 
   duplicating the common parameters (such as master key(s)). The 
   latter approach then also enables SRTP and SRTCP to use, e.g., 
   distinct transforms, if so desired. Similar considerations arise 
   when multiple SRTP streams share keys and other parameters. 
 
   If no valid context can be found for a packet corresponding to a 
   certain context identifier, that packet MUST be discarded from 
   further SRTP processing. 
    
3.3 SRTP Packet Processing 
    
   The following applies to SRTP. SRTCP is described in Section 3.4. 
    
   Assuming initialization of the cryptographic context(s) has taken 
   place via key management, the sender SHALL do the following to 
   construct an SRTP packet: 
    
   1. Determine which cryptographic context to use as described in 
   Section 3.2.3. 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 10] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   2. Determine the index of the SRTP packet using the rollover counter 
   in the cryptographic context and the sequence number in the RTP 
   packet, as described in Section 3.3.1. 
    
   3. Determine the master key and master salt. This is done using the 
   index determined in the previous step or the current MKI in the 
   cryptographic context.  
    
   4. Determine the session keys and session salt (if they are used by 
   the transform) as described in Section 4.3, using master key, master 
   salt, key_derivation_rate, and session key-lengths in the 
   cryptographic context with the index, determined in Steps 2 and 3. 
    
   5. Encrypt the RTP payload to produce the Encrypted Portion of the 
   packet (see Section 4.1, for the defined ciphers). This step uses 
   the encryption algorithm indicated in the cryptographic context, the 
   session encryption key and the session salt (if used) found in Step 
   4 together with the index found in Step 2. 
    
   6. If the MKI indicator is set to one, append the MKI to the packet. 
    
   7. If message authentication is provided, compute the authentication 
   tag for the Authenticated Portion of the packet, as described in 
   Section 4.2. This step uses the current rollover counter, the 
   authentication algorithm indicated in the cryptographic context, and 
   the session authentication key found in Step 4. Append the 
   authentication tag to the packet. 
    
   8. If necessary, update the ROC as in Section 3.3.1, using the 
   packet index determined in Step 2. 
    
   To authenticate and decrypt an SRTP packet, the receiver SHALL do 
   the following: 
    
   1. Determine which cryptographic context to use as described in 
   Section 3.2.3. 
    
   2. Estimate the index of the SRTP packet using the rollover counter 
   and highest sequence number in the cryptographic context with the 
   sequence number in the SRTP packet, as described in Section 3.3.1. 
    
   3. Determine the master key and master salt. If the MKI indicator in 
   the context is set to one, use the MKI in the SRTP packet, otherwise 
   use the index from the previous step. 
    
   4. Determine the session keys, and session salt (if used by the 
   transform) as described in Section 4.3, using master key, master 

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 11] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   salt, key_derivation_rate and session key-lengths in the 
   cryptographic context with the index, determined in Steps 2 and 3. 
    
   5. If message authentication and replay protection are provided, 
   first check if the packet has been replayed (Section 3.3.2), using 
   the Replay List and the index as determined in Step 2. If the packet 
   is judged to be replayed, then the packet MUST be discarded, and the 
   event SHOULD be logged. 
    
   Next, perform verification of the authentication tag, using the 
   rollover counter from Step 2, the authentication algorithm indicated 
   in the cryptographic context, and the session authentication key 
   from Step 4. If the result is "AUTHENTICATION FAILURE" (see Section 
   4.2), the packet MUST be discarded from further processing and the 
   event SHOULD be logged. 
    
   6. Decrypt the Encrypted Portion of the packet (see Section 4.1, for 
   the defined ciphers), using the decryption algorithm indicated in 
   the cryptographic context, the session encryption key and salt (if 
   used) found in Step 4 with the index from Step 2. 
    
   7. Update the rollover counter and highest sequence number, s_l, in 
   the cryptographic context as in Section 3.3.1, using the packet 
   index estimated in Step 2. If replay protection is provided, also 
   update the Replay List as described in Section 3.3.2. 
    
   8. When present, remove the MKI and authentication tag fields from   
   the packet. 
    
3.3.1 Packet Index Determination, and ROC, s_l Update 
    
   SRTP implementations use an "implicit" packet index for sequencing, 
   i.e., not all of the index is explicitly carried in the SRTP packet. 
   For the pre-defined transforms, the index i is used in replay 
   protection (Section 3.3.2), encryption (Section 4.1), message 
   authentication (Section 4.2), and for the key derivation (Section 
   4.3). The index MAY also be used to determine the correct master key 
   when <"From", "To"> values are used to represent key lifetime 
   (Section 3.2.1).  
 
   When the session starts, the sender side MUST set the rollover 
   counter, ROC, to zero. Each time the RTP sequence number, SEQ, wraps 
   modulo 2^16, the sender side MUST increment ROC by one, modulo 2^32 
   (see security aspects below). The sender's packet index is then 
   defined as  
    
      i = 2^16 * ROC + SEQ. 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 12] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   Receiver-side implementations use the RTP sequence number to estimate
   the correct index of a packet, which is the location of the packet in
   the sequence of all SRTP packets. A robust approach for the proper
   use of a rollover counter requires its handling and use to be well
   defined. In particular, out-of-order RTP packets with sequence
   numbers close to 2^16 or zero must be properly handled.   
    
   The index estimate is based on the receiver's locally maintained ROC
   and s_l values. At the setup of the session, ROC MUST be set to zero.
   Receivers joining an on-going session MUST be given the current ROC
   value using out of band signaling. Furthermore, the receiver SHALL
   initialize s_l to the RTP sequence number (SEQ) of the first observed
   SRTP packet (unless the initial value is provided by key management).
    
   On consecutive SRTP packets, the receiver SHOULD estimate the index 
   as  
    
         i = 2^16 * v + SEQ, 
    
   where v is chosen from the set { ROC-1, ROC, ROC+1 } (modulo 2^32)
   such that i is closest (in modulo 2^48 sense) to the value 2^16 * ROC
   + s_l.  
    
   After the packet has been processed using the estimated index, the
   receiver MUST decide if s_l and ROC should be updated. For instance,
   a simple (but not error robust) method is to simply set s_l to SEQ
   (if SEQ > s_l) and, if the value v = ROC+1 was used, to update ROC to
   v.
    
   After a re-keying occurs (changing to a new master key), the 
   rollover counter maintains its sequence of values, i.e., it MUST NOT 
   be reset to zero, to avoid inconsistencies in key lifetimes. 
     
   As the rollover counter is 32 bits long and the sequence number is 
   16 bits long, the maximum number of packets belonging to a given 
   SRTP stream that can be secured with the same key is 2^48 using the 
   pre-defined transforms. After that number of SRTP packets have been 
   sent with a given (master or session) key, the sender MUST NOT send 
   any more packets with that key. (There exists a similar limit for 
   SRTCP, which in practice may be more restrictive, see Section 9.2.) 
   This limitation enforces a security benefit by providing an upper 
   bound on the amount of traffic that can pass before cryptographic 
   keys are changed. Re-keying (see Section 8.1) MUST be triggered, 
   before this amount of traffic, and MAY be triggered earlier, e.g., 
   for increased security and access control to media. Recurring key 
   derivation by means of a non-zero key_derivation_rate (see Section 
   4.3), also gives stronger security but does not change the above 
   absolute maximum value.  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 13] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
   On the receiver side, there is a caveat to updating s_l and ROC: if 
   message authentication is not present, neither the initialization of 
   s_l, nor the ROC update can be made completely robust. The 
   receiver's "implicit index" approach works for the pre-defined 
   transforms as long as the reorder and loss of the packets are not 
   too great and bit-errors do not occur in unfortunate ways. In 
   particular, 2^15 packets would need to be lost, or a packet would 
   need to be 2^15 packets out of sequence before synchronization is 
   lost. Such drastic loss or reorder is likely to disrupt the RTP 
   application itself.  
    
   The algorithm for the index estimate and ROC update is a matter of 
   implementation, and should take into consideration the environment 
   (e.g., packet loss rate) and the cases when synchronisation is 
   likely to be lost, e.g. when the initial sequence number (randomly 
   chosen by RTP) is not known in advance (not sent in the key 
   management protocol) but may be near to wrap modulo 2^16. 
   A more elaborate and more robust scheme than the one given above is 
   the handling of RTP's own "rollover counter", see Appendix A.1 of  
   [RFC1889]. 
    
3.3.2 Replay Protection 
    
   Secure replay protection is only possible when integrity protection 
   is present. It is RECOMMENDED to use replay protection, both for RTP 
   and RTCP, as integrity protection alone cannot assure security 
   against replay attacks. 
    
   A packet is "replayed" when it is stored by an adversary, and then 
   re-injected into the network. When message authentication is 
   provided, SRTP protects against such attacks through a "Replay 
   List". Each SRTP receiver maintains a Replay List, which 
   conceptually contains the indices of all of the packets which have 
   been received and authenticated. In practice, the list can use a 
   "sliding window" approach, so that a fixed amount of storage 
   suffices for replay protection. Packet indices which lag behind the 
   packet index in the context by more than SRTP-WINDOW-SIZE can be 
   assumed to have been received, where SRTP-WINDOW-SIZE is a receiver-
   side, implementation-dependent parameter and MUST be at least 64, 
   but which MAY be set to a higher value.  
    
   The receiver checks the index of an incoming packet against the 
   replay list and the window. Only packets with index ahead of the 
   window, or, inside the window but not already received, SHALL be 
   accepted.  
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 14] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   After the packet has been authenticated (if necessary the window is 
   first moved ahead), the replay list SHALL be updated with the new 
   index. 
    
   The Replay List can be efficiently implemented by using a bitmap to 
   represent which packets have been received, as described in the 
   Security Architecture for IP [RFC2401]. 
    
    
3.4 Secure RTCP 
    
   0                   1                   2                   3 
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+ 
  |V=2|P|    RC   |   PT=SR or RR   |             length          | | 
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
  |                         SSRC of sender                        | | 
+>+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | 
| ~                          sender info                          ~ | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| ~                         report block 1                        ~ | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| ~                         report block 2                        ~ | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| ~                              ...                              ~ | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| |V=2|P|    SC   |  PT=SDES=202  |             length            | | 
| +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | 
| |                          SSRC/CSRC_1                          | | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| ~                           SDES items                          ~ | 
| +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | 
| ~                              ...                              ~ | 
+>+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ | 
| |E|                         SRTCP index                         | | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+ 
| ~                     SRTCP MKI (OPTIONAL)                      ~ | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
| :                     authentication tag                        : | 
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 
|                                                                   | 
+-- Encrypted Portion                    Authenticated Portion -----+ 
 
   Figure 2.  An example of the format of a Secure RTCP packet, 
   consisting of an underlying RTCP compound packet with a Report and 
   SDES packet. 
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 15] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   Secure RTCP follows the definition of Secure RTP. SRTCP adds three 
   mandatory new fields (the SRTCP index, an "encrypt-flag", and the 
   authentication tag) and one optional field (the MKI) to the RTCP 
   packet definition. The three mandatory fields MUST be appended to an 
   RTCP packet in order to form an equivalent SRTCP packet. The added 
   fields follow any other profile-specific extensions.  
    
   According to [RFC1889] there is a "recommended" packet format for 
   compound packets. SRTCP MUST be given packets according to that 
   recommendation in the sense that the first part MUST be a sender 
   report or a receiver report. However, the encryption prefix (Section 
   6.1 of [RFC1889]), a random 32-bit quantity intended to deter known 
   plaintext attacks, MUST NOT be used (see below). 
    
   The Encrypted Portion of an SRTCP packet consists of the encryption 
   (Section 4.1) of the RTCP payload of the equivalent compound RTCP 
   packet, from the first RTCP packet, i.e., from the ninth (9) octet 
   to the end of the compound packet. The Authenticated Portion of an 
   SRTCP packet consists of the entire equivalent (eventually compound) 
   RTCP packet, the E flag, and the SRTCP index (after any encryption 
   has been applied to the payload). 
 
   The added fields are: 
    
   E-flag: 1 bit, REQUIRED 
          The E-flag indicates if the current SRTCP packet is encrypted 
          or unencrypted. Section 9.1 of [RFC1889] allows the split of 
          a compound RTCP packet into two lower-layer packets, one to 
          be encrypted and one to be sent in the clear. The E bit set 
          to "1" indicates encrypted packet, and "0" indicates non-
          encrypted packet. 
           
  SRTCP index: 31 bits, REQUIRED 
          The SRTCP index is a 31-bit counter for the SRTCP packet. The 
          index is explicitly included in each packet, in contrast to 
          the "implicit" index approach used for SRTP. The SRTCP index 
          MUST be set to zero before the first SRTCP packet is sent, 
          and MUST be incremented by one, modulo 2^31, after each SRTCP 
          packet is sent. In particular, after a re-key, the SRTCP 
          index MUST NOT be reset to zero again (Section 3.3.1). 
           
   Authentication Tag: variable length, REQUIRED 
          The authentication tag is used to carry message 
          authentication data.  
    
   MKI: variable length, OPTIONAL 
          The MKI is the Master Key Indicator, and functions according 
          to the MKI definition in Section 3.  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 16] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
 
   SRTCP uses the cryptographic context parameters and packet 
   processing of SRTP by default, with the following changes: 
    
   * The receiver does not need to "estimate" the index, as it is 
   explicitly signaled in the packet. 
 
   * If the MKI indicator in the cryptographic context is zero, the 
   master key is determined by the current SRTCP index when that key is 
   shared between SRTP and SRTCP, even though SRTCP has its own index. 
   Since the SRTCP source as with any SSRC in an SRTP session has its 
   own sequence number space, the master key <"From", "To"> lifetime 
   MUST be based on the SRTP master key lifetime when the master key is 
   shared by both SRTP and SRTCP.  The concomitant re-keying issues are 
   discussed in sections 8 and 9.  
    
   * Pre-defined SRTCP encryption is as specified in Section 4.1, but 
   using the definition of the SRTCP Encrypted Portion given in this 
   section, and using the SRTCP index as the index i. The encryption 
   transform and related parameters SHALL by default be the same 
   selected for the protection of the associated SRTP stream(s), while 
   the NULL algorithm SHALL be applied to the RTCP packets not to be 
   encrypted. SRTCP may have a different encryption transform than the 
   one used by the corresponding SRTP. The expected use for this 
   feature is when the former has NULL-encryption and the latter has a 
   non NULL-encryption. 
    
   The E-flag is assigned a value by the sender depending on whether 
   the packet was encrypted or not. 
    
   * SRTCP decryption is performed as in Section 4, but only if the E 
   flag is equal to 1. If so, the Encrypted Portion is decrypted, using 
   the SRTCP index as the index i. In case the E-flag is 0, the payload 
   is simply left unmodified. 
    
   * SRTCP replay protection is as defined in Section 3.3.2, but using 
   the SRTCP index as the index i and a separate replay list that is 
   specific to SRTCP.  
    
   * The pre-defined SRTCP authentication tag is specified as in 
   Section 4.2, but with the Authenticated Portion of the SRTCP packet 
   given in this section (which includes the index). The authentication 
   transform and related parameters (e.g., key size) SHALL by default 
   be the same as selected for the protection of the associated SRTP 
   stream(s) (except when SRTP is not authenticated).  
    
   * In the last step of the processing, only the sender needs to
   update the value of the SRTCP index by incrementing it modulo 2^31
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 17] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   and for security reasons the sender MUST also check the number of  
   RTCP packets processed, see Section 9.2. 
    
   As noted, the encryption prefix (Section 6.1 of RFC1889]) SHALL NOT 
   be used, as it is not needed by the cryptographic mechanisms used in 
   SRTP. 
    
   Message authentication for RTCP is REQUIRED, as it is the control  
   protocol (e.g., it has a BYE packet) for RTP. 
    
   Precautions must be taken so that the packet expansion in SRTCP (due 
   to the added fields) does not cause SRTCP messages to use more than 
   their share of RTCP bandwidth. To avoid this, the following two 
   measures MUST be taken: 
    
   1. When initializing the RTCP variable "avg_rtcp_size" defined in 
   chapter 6.3 of [RFC1889], it MUST include the size of the fields 
   that will be added by SRTCP (index, E-bit, authentication tag, and 
   when present, the MKI). 
    
   2. When updating the "avg_rtcp_size" using the variable packet_size" 
   (section 6.3.3 of [RFC1889]), the value of "packet_size" MUST 
   include the size of the additional fields added by SRTCP.  
    
   With these measures in place the SRTCP messages will not use more 
   than the allotted bandwidth. The effect of the size of the added 
   fields on the SRTCP traffic will be that messages will be sent with 
   larger packet intervals. The increase in the intervals will be 
   directly proportional to size of the added fields. 
    
 
4. Pre-Defined Cryptographic Transforms 
 
   While there are numerous encryption and message authentication     
   algorithms that can be used in SRTP, we define below default   
   algorithms in order to avoid the complexity of specifying the  
   encodings for the signaling of algorithm and parameter identifiers.  
   The defined algorithms have been chosen as they fulfill the goals  
   listed in Section 2. Recommendations on how to extend SRTP with new  
   transforms are given in Section 6. 
 
4.1 Encryption 
    
   The following parameters are common to both pre-defined, non-NULL, 
   encryption transforms specified in this section. 
    
   * BLOCK_CIPHER-MODE indicates the block cipher used and its mode of 
    operation  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 18] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   * n_b is the bit-size of the block for the block cipher 
   * k_e is the session encryption key  
   * n_e is the bit-length of k_e  
   * k_s is the session salting key   
   * n_s is the bit-length of k_s   
   * SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH is the octet length of the keystream prefix, an 
    non-negative integer, specified by the message authentication code 
    in use. 
    
   The distinct session keys and salts for SRTP/SRTCP are by default 
   derived as specified in Section 4.3.  
    
   The encryption transforms defined in SRTP map the SRTP packet index 
   and secret key into a pseudorandom keystream segment. Each keystream 
   segment encrypts a single RTP packet. The process of encrypting a 
   packet consists of generating the keystream segment corresponding to 
   the packet, and then bitwise exclusive-oring that keystream segment 
   onto the payload of the RTP packet to produce the Encrypted Portion 
   of the SRTP packet. Decryption is done the same way, but swapping 
   the roles of the plaintext and ciphertext. 
    
   The definition of how the keystream is generated, given the index, 
   depends on the cipher and its mode of operation. Below, two such 
   keystream generators are defined. The NULL cipher is also defined, 
   to be used when encryption of RTP is not required. 
    
   +----+   +------------------+---------------------------------+ 
   | KG |-->| Keystream Prefix |          Keystream Suffix       |---+ 
   +----+   +------------------+---------------------------------+   | 
                                                                     | 
                               +---------------------------------+   v 
                               |     Payload of RTP Packet       |->(*) 
                               +---------------------------------+   | 
                                                                     | 
                               +---------------------------------+   | 
                               | Encrypted Portion of SRTP Packet|<--+ 
                               +---------------------------------+ 
    
   Figure 3: Default SRTP Encryption Processing. Here KG denotes the 
   keystream generator, and (*) denotes bitwise exclusive-or. 
    
    
   The SRTP definition of the keystream is illustrated in Figure 3. The 
   initial octets of each keystream segment MAY be reserved for use in 
   a message authentication code, in which case the keystream used for 
   encryption starts immediately after the last reserved octet. The 
   initial reserved octets are called the "keystream prefix" (not to be 
   confused with the "encryption prefix" of [RFC1889, Section 6.1]), 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 19] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   and the remaining octets are called the "keystream suffix". The 
   keystream prefix MUST NOT be used for encryption. The process is 
   illustrated in Figure 3. 
    
   The number of octets in the keystream prefix is denoted as 
   SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH. The keystream prefix is indicated by a positive, 
   non-zero value of SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH. This means that, even if 
   confidentiality is not to be provided, the keystream generator 
   output may still need to be computed for packet authentication, in 
   which case the default keystream generator (mode) SHALL be used.  
    
   The default cipher is the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), and we 
   define two modes of running AES, Segmented Integer Counter Mode AES 
   and AES in f8-mode. In the remainder of this section, let E(k,x) be 
   AES applied to key k and input block x.  
 
4.1.1 AES in Counter Mode  
    
   Conceptually, counter mode [AES-CTR] consists of encrypting 
   successive integers. The actual definition is somewhat more 
   complicated, in order to randomize the starting point of the integer 
   sequence. Each packet is encrypted with a distinct keystream 
   segment, which SHALL be computed as follows. 
    
   A keystream segment SHALL be the concatenation of the 128-bit output 
   blocks of the AES cipher in the encrypt direction, using key k = 
   k_e, in which the block indices are in increasing order. 
   Symbolically, each keystream segment looks like 
    
      E(k, IV) || E(k, IV + 1 mod 2^128) || E(k, IV + 2 mod 2^128) ... 
    
   where the 128-bit integer value IV SHALL be defined by the SSRC, the 
   SRTP packet index i, and the SRTP session salting key k_s, as below. 
  
        IV = (k_s * 2^16) XOR (SSRC * 2^64) XOR (i * 2^16) 
    
   Each of the three terms in the XOR-sum above is padded with as many 
   leading zeros as needed to make the operation well-defined, 
   considered as a 128-bit value. 
    
   The inclusion of the SSRC allows the use of the same key to protect 
   distinct SRTP streams (see the security caveats in Section 9.1).  
    
   In the case of SRTCP, the SSRC of the first header of the compound 
   packet MUST be used, i SHALL be the 31-bit SRTCP index and k_e, k_s 
   SHALL be replaced by the SRTCP session key and salt. 
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 20] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   Note that the initial value, IV, is fixed for each packet. The 
   number of blocks of keystream generated for any fixed value of IV 
   MUST NOT exceed 2^16. The AES has a block size of 128 bits, so 2^16 
   output blocks are sufficient to generate the 2^23 bits of keystream 
   needed to encrypt the largest possible RTP packet (except for IPv6 
   "jumbograms" [RFC2675], which are not likely to be used for RTP-
   based multimedia traffic). This restriction on the maximum bit-size 
   of the packet that can be encrypted ensures the security of the 
   encryption method by limiting the effectiveness of probabilistic 
   attacks [BDJR]. 
 
4.1.2 AES in f8-mode 
    
                    IV 
                    | 
                    | 
                    v 
                +------+ 
                |      | 
           +--->|  E   | 
           |    |      | 
           |    +------+ 
           |        | 
     m -> (*)       +-----------+-------------+--  ...     ------+ 
           |    IV' |           |             |                  | 
           |        |   j=1 -> (*)    j=2 -> (*)   ...  j=L-1 ->(*) 
           |        |           |             |                  | 
           |        |      +-> (*)       +-> (*)   ...      +-> (*) 
           |        |      |    |        |    |             |    | 
           |        v      |    v        |    v             |    v 
           |    +------+   | +------+    | +------+         | +------+ 
           |    |      |   | |      |    | |      |         | |      | 
    k_e ---+--->|  E   |   | |  E   |    | |  E   |         | |  E   | 
                |      |   | |      |    | |      |         | |      | 
                +------+   | +------+    | +------+         | +------+ 
                    |      |    |        |    |             |    | 
                    +------+    +--------+    +--  ...  ----+    | 
                    |           |             |                  | 
                    v           v             v                  v 
                   S(0)        S(1)          S(2)  . . .       S(L-1) 
    
     
   Figure 4. f8-mode of operation (asterisk, (*), denotes bitwise XOR). 
   The figure represents the KG in Figure 3, when AES-f8 is used. 
    
   To encrypt UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, as 3G 
   networks) data, a solution (see [f8-a], [f8-b]) known as the f8-
   algorithm has been developed. On a high level, the proposed scheme 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 21] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   is a variant of Output Feedback Mode (OFB) [HAC], with a more 
   elaborate initialization and feedback function. As in normal OFB, 
   the core consists of a block cipher. We also define here the use of 
   AES as a block cipher to be used in f8-mode for RTP encryption. The 
   AES f8-mode SHALL use the same default sizes for session key and 
   salt as AES counter mode. 
    
   Figure 4 shows the structure of block cipher, E, running in what we 
   shall call "f8-mode of operation".  
 
4.1.2.1 f8 Keystream Generation 
    
   The Initialization Vector (IV) SHALL be determined as described in 
   Section 4.1.2.2 (and in Section 4.1.2.3 for SRTCP). 
    
   Let IV', S(j), and m denote n_b-bit blocks. The keystream, S(0) || 
   ... || S(L-1), for an N-bit message SHALL be defined by setting IV' 
   = E(k_e XOR m, IV), and S(-1) = 00..0. For j = 0,1,..,L-1 where L = 
   N/n_b (rounded up to nearest integer) compute 
    
            S(j) = E(k_e, IV' XOR j XOR S(j-1)) 
    
   Notice that the IV is not used directly. Instead it is fed through E 
   under another key to produce an internal, "masked" value (denoted 
   IV') to prevent an attacker from gaining known input/output pairs. 
   The role of the internal counter, j, is to prevent short keystream 
   cycles. The value of the key mask m SHALL be 
    
           m = k_s || 0x555..5, 
    
   i.e. the session salting key, appended by the binary pattern 0101.. 
   to fill out the entire desired key size, n_e.  
    
   The sender SHOULD NOT generate more than 2^32 blocks, which is 
   sufficient to generate 2^39 bits of keystream. Unlike counter mode, 
   there is no absolute threshold above (below) which f8 is guaranteed 
   to be insecure (secure). The above bound has been chosen to limit, 
   with sufficient security margin, the probability of degenerative 
   behavior in the f8 keystream generation. 
    
4.1.2.2 f8 SRTP IV Formation 
    
   The purpose of the following IV formation is to provide a feature 
   which we call implicit header authentication (IHA), see Section 9.5. 
    
   The SRTP IV for 128-bit block AES-f8 SHALL be formed in the 
   following way: 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 22] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
        IV = 0x00 || M || PT || SEQ || TS || SSRC || ROC 
       
   M, PT, SEQ, TS, SSRC SHALL be taken from the RTP header; ROC is from 
   the cryptographic context. 
    
   The presence of the SSRC as part of the IV allows AES-f8 to be used 
   when a master key is shared between multiple streams, see Section 
   9.1.   
    
4.1.2.3 f8 SRTCP IV Formation 
    
   The SRTCP IV for 128-bit block AES-f8 SHALL be formed in the 
   following way: 
    
   IV = 0...0 || E || SRTCP index || V || P || RC || PT || length || 
   SSRC 
    
   where V, P, RC, PT, length, SSRC SHALL be taken from the first 
   header in the RTCP compound packet. E and SRTCP index are the 1-bit 
   and 31-bit fields added to the packet. 
    
4.1.3 NULL Cipher 
    
   The NULL cipher is used when no confidentiality for RTP/RTCP is 
   requested. The keystream can be thought of as "000..0", i.e. the 
   encryption SHALL simply copy the plaintext input into the ciphertext 
   output.  
    
4.2 Message Authentication and Integrity 
    
   Throughout this section, M will denote data to be integrity 
   protected: in the case of SRTP, M SHALL consist of the Authenticated 
   Portion of the packet (as specified in Figure 1) concatenated with 
   the ROC, M = Authenticated Portion || ROC; in the case of SRTCP, M 
   SHALL consist of the Authenticated Portion (as specified in Figure 
   2) only.  
    
   Common parameters: 
    
   * AUTH_ALG is the authentication algorithm 
   * k_a is the session message authentication key 
   * n_a is the bit-length of the authentication key  
   * n_tag is the bit-length of the output authentication tag  
   * SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH is the octet length of the keystream prefix as  
     defined above, a parameter of AUTH_ALG 
    
   The distinct session authentication keys for SRTP/SRTCP are by 
   default derived as specified in Section 4.3. 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 23] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
   The values of n_a, n_tag, and SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH MUST be fixed for 
   any particular fixed value of the key. 
    
   We describe the process of computing authentication tags as follows. 
   The sender computes the tag of M and appends it to the packet. The 
   SRTP receiver verifies a message/authentication tag pair by 
   computing a new authentication tag over M using the selected 
   algorithm and key, and then compares it to the tag associated with 
   the received message. If the two tags are equal, then the 
   message/tag pair is valid; otherwise, it is invalid and the error 
   audit message "AUTHENTICATION FAILURE" MUST be returned. 
    
4.2.1. HMAC-SHA1 
    
   The pre-defined authentication transform for SRTP is HMAC-SHA1. With 
   HMAC-SHA1, the SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH (Figure 3) SHALL be 0. For SRTP 
   (respectively SRTCP), the HMAC SHALL be applied to the session 
   authentication key and M as specifed above, i.e. HMAC(k_a, M). The 
   HMAC output SHALL then be truncated to the n_tag left-most bits.  
    
    
4.3 Key Derivation 
 
4.3.1 Key Derivation Algorithm 
    
   Regardless of the encryption or message authentication transform 
   that is employed (it may be an SRTP pre-defined transform or newly 
   introduced according to Section 6), interoperable SRTP 
   implementations MAY use the SRTP key derivation to generate session 
   keys. Once the key derivation rate is properly signaled at the start 
   of the session, there is no need for extra communication between the 
   parties that use SRTP key derivation. 
    
                            packet index ---+ 
                                            | 
                                            v 
                  +-----------+ master  +--------+ session encr_key 
                  | ext       | key     |        |----------> 
                  | key mgmt  |-------->|  key   | session auth_key 
                  | (optional |         | deriv  |----------> 
                  | rekey)    |-------->|        | session salt_key 
                  |           | master  |        |---------->  
                  +-----------+ salt    +--------+  
    
   Figure 5: SRTP key derivation. 
    
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 24] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   At least one initial key derivation SHALL be performed by SRTP, 
   i.e., the first key derivation is REQUIRED. Further applications of 
   the key derivation MAY be performed, according to the 
   "key_derivation_rate" value in the cryptographic context. The key 
   derivation function SHALL be initially invoked before the first 
   packet and then, if derivation rate is r > 0, further invoked on 
   every r-th packet, and produce session keys according to the non-
   zero key derivation rate. This can be thought of as "refreshing" the 
   session keys. The value of "key_derivation_rate" MUST be kept fixed 
   for the lifetime of the associated master key. 
    
   Interoperable SRTP implementations MAY also derive session salting 
   keys for encryption transforms, as is done in both of the pre-
   defined transforms. 
    
   Let m and n be positive integers. A pseudo-random function family is 
   a set of keyed functions {PRF_n(k,x)} such that for the (secret) 
   random key k, given m-bit x, PRF_n(k,x) is an n-bit string, 
   computationally indistinguishable from random n-bit strings, see 
   [HAC]. For the purpose of key derivation in SRTP, a secure PRF with 
   m = 128 (or more) is needed, and a default PRF transform is defined 
   in Section 4.3.3. 
    
   Let "a DIV t" denote integer division of a by t, rounded down, and 
   with the convention that "a DIV 0 = 0" for all a. We also make the 
   convention of treating "a DIV t" as a bit string of the same length 
   as a, and thus "a DIV t" will in general have leading zeros.  
    
   Key derivation SHALL be defined as follows in terms of <label>, an  
   8-bit constant (see below), master_salt and key_derivation_rate, as  
   determined in the cryptographic context, and index, the packet index 
   (i.e., the 48-bit ROC || SEQ for SRTP): 
    
   * Let r = index DIV key_derivation_rate (with DIV as defined above). 
    
   * Let key_id = <label> || r. 
    
   * Let x = key_id XOR master_salt, where key_id and master_salt are 
     aligned so that their least significant bits agree (right- 
     alignment). 
    
   The n-bit SRTP key (or salt) for this packet SHALL then be 
    
      PRF_n(k_master, x). 
    
   (The PRF may internally specify additional formatting and padding 
  of x, see e.g. Section 4.3.3 for the default PRF.) 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 25] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   The session keys and salt SHALL now be derived using: 
    
   - k_e (SRTP encryption): <label> = 0x00, n = n_e. 
    
   - k_a (SRTP message authentication): <label> = 0x01, n = n_a. 
    
   - k_s (SRTP salting key) <label> = 0x02, n = n_s.  
    
   where n_e, n_s, and n_a are from the cryptographic context. 
    
   The master key and master salting key MUST be random, but the master 
   salt MAY be public.  
    
   Note that for a key_derivation_rate of 0, the initial application of 
   the key derivation SHALL take place exactly once.  
   The definition of DIV above is purely for notational convenience. 
   For a non-zero t among the set of allowed key derivation rates, "a 
   DIV t" can be implemented as a right-shift by the base-2 logarithm 
   of t. The derivation operation is further facilitated if the rates 
   are chosen to be powers of 256, but that granularity was considered 
   too coarse to be a requirement of this specification. 
    
   The upper limit on the number of packets that can be secured using 
   the same master key (see Section 9.2) is independent of the key 
   derivation.  
    
4.3.2 SRTCP Key Derivation 
    
   SRTCP SHALL by default use the same master key (and master salt) as 
   SRTP. To do this securely, the following changes SHALL be done to 
   the definitions in Section 4.3.1 when applying session key 
   derivation for SRTCP. 
    
   Replace the SRTP index by the 32-bit quantity: 0 || SRTCP index 
   (i.e. excluding the E-bit, replacing it with a fixed 0-bit), and use 
   <label> = 0x03 for the SRTCP encryption key, <label> = 0x04 for the 
   SRTCP authentication key, and, <label> = 0x05 for the SRTCP salting 
   key. 
 
4.3.3 AES-CM PRF 
    
   The currently defined PRF, keyed by 128 to 256 bit master key, has 
   input block size m = 128 and can produce n-bit outputs for n up to 
   2^23. PRF_n(k_master,x) SHALL be AES in Counter Mode as described in 
   Section 4.1.1, applied to key k_master, and IV equal to (x*2^16), 
   and with the output keystream truncated to the n first (left-most) 
   bits. (Requiring n/128, rounded up, applications of AES.) 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 26] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
5. Default and mandatory-to-implement Transforms 
    
   The default transforms also are mandatory-to-implement transforms in 
   SRTP. Of course, "mandatory-to-implement" does not imply "mandatory-
   to-use". Table 1 summarizes the pre-defined transforms.  
 
    
                         mandatory-to-impl.   optional     default 
    
   encryption            AES-CM, NULL         AES-f8       AES-CM 
   message integrity     HMAC-SHA1              -          HMAC-SHA1 
   key derivation (PRF)  AES-CM                 -          AES-CM 
    
    
   Table 1: Mandatory-to-implement, optional and default transforms in 
   SRTP.  
 
5.1 Encryption: AES-CM and NULL 
    
   AES running in Segmented Integer Counter Mode, as defined in Section 
   4.1.1, SHALL be the default encryption algorithm. The default key 
   lengths SHALL be 128-bit for the session encryption key (n_e). The 
   default session salt key-length (n_s) SHALL be 112 bits.   
    
   The NULL cipher SHALL also be mandatory-to-implement. 
 
5.2 Message Authentication/Integrity: HMAC-SHA1 
       
   HMAC-SHA1, as defined in Section 4.2.1, SHALL be the default message 
   authentication code. The default session authentication key-length  
   (n_a) SHALL be 128 bits, the default authentication tag length  
   (n_tag) SHALL be 32 bits, and the SRTP_PREFIX_LENGTH SHALL be zero  
   for HMAC-SHA1. 
    
5.3 Key Derivation: AES-CM PRF 
    
   The AES Counter Mode based key derivation and PRF defined in 
   Sections 4.3.1 to 4.3.3, using a 128-bit master key, SHALL be the 
   default method for generating session keys. The default master salt 
   length SHALL be 112 bits and the default key-derivation rate SHALL 
   be zero.  
    
    
    
    
6. Adding SRTP Transforms 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 27] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   Section 4 provides examples of the level of detail needed for 
   defining transforms. Whenever a new transform is to be added to 
   SRTP, a companion standard track RFC MUST be written to exactly 
   define how the new transform can be used with SRTP (and SRTCP). Such 
   a companion RFC SHOULD avoid to overlap with the SRTP protocol 
   document. Note however, that it MAY be necessary to extend the SRTP 
   or SRTCP cryptographic context definition with new parameters 
   (including fixed or default values), or add steps to the packet 
   processing. The companion RFC SHALL explain any known issues 
   regarding interactions between the transform and other aspects of 
   SRTP. 
    
   Each new transform document SHOULD specify its key attributes, e.g., 
   size of keys (minimum, maximum, recommended), format of keys, 
   recommended/required processing of input keying material, 
   requirements/recommendations on re-keying and key derivation, etc. 
    
    
7. Rationale 
 
7.1 Key derivation 
    
   Key derivation reduces the burden on the key establishment. As many
   as six different keys are needed to protect the RTP/RTCP session
   (SRTP and SRTCP encryption keys and salts, SRTP and SRTCP
   authentication keys), but these are derived from a single master key
   in a cryptographically secure way. Thus, the key management protocol
   needs to exchange only one master key (plus master salt when
   required), and then SRTP itself derives all the necessary session
   keys (via the first, mandatory application of the key derivation
   function). Note however that the key management protocol may provide
   SRTP with more than one master key in advance, e.g., multiple
   distinct master keys with their respective lifetime. Each of these
   lifetimes MUST NOT be overlapping with the lifetime of the other
   master keys, so that one and only one master key is active at each
   point in time. Providing arrays of master keys in advance is for
   example used when a certain rate of re-keying is wanted.  
    
   Multiple applications of the key derivation function are optional, 
   but will give security benefits when enabled. They prevent an 
   attacker from obtaining large amounts of ciphertext produced by a 
   single fixed session key. If the attacker was able to collect a 
   large amount of ciphertext for a certain session key, he might be 
   helped in mounting certain attacks.  
    
   Multiple applications of the key derivation function provide 
   backwards and forward security in the sense that a compromised 
   session key does not compromise other session keys derived from the 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 28] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   same master key. This means that the attacker who is able to recover 
   a certain session key, is anyway not able to have access to messages 
   secured under previous and later session keys (derived from the same 
   master key). (Note that, of course, a leaked master key reveals all 
   the session keys derived from it.)   
    
   Considerations arise with high-rate key-refresh, especially in large 
   multicast settings, see Section 11.  
    
7.2 Salting key 
    
   The master salt guarantees security against off-line key-collision 
   attacks on the key derivation that might otherwise reduce the 
   effective key size. 
    
   The derived session salting key used in the encryption, has been 
   introduced to protect against some attacks on additive stream 
   ciphers, see Section 9.2. The explicit inclusion method of the salt 
   in the IV has been selected for ease of hardware implementation. 
     
7.3 Message Integrity from Universal Hashing  
    
   The particular definition of the keystream given in Section 4.1 (the 
   keystream prefix) is to give provision for particular universal hash 
   functions, suitable for message authentication in the Wegman-Carter 
   paradigm [WC81]. Such functions are provably secure, simple, quick, 
   and especially appropriate for Digital Signal Processors and other 
   processors with a fast multiply operation. 
    
   No authentication transforms are currently provided in SRTP other 
   than HMAC-SHA1. Future transforms, like the above mentioned 
   universal hash functions, MAY be added following the guidelines in 
   Section 6. 
 
7.4 Data Origin Authentication Considerations 
    
   Note that in unicast, integrity and data origin authentication are 
   provided together. However, in group scenarios where the keys are 
   shared between members, the MAC tag only proves that a member of the 
   group sent the packet, but does not prevent against a member 
   impersonating another. Data origin authentication (DOA) for 
   multicast and group RTP sessions is a hard problem that needs a 
   solution; while some promising proposals are being investigated 
   [PCST1, PCST2], more work is needed to rigorously specify these 
   technologies. Thus SRTP data origin authentication in groups is for 
   further study. 
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 29] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   DOA can be done otherwise using signatures. However, this has high 
   impact in terms of bandwidth and processing time, therefore we do 
   not offer this form of authentication in the pre-defined packet-
   integrity transform. 
    
   The presence of mixers and translators does not allow data origin 
   authentication in case the RTP payload and/or the RTP header are 
   manipulated. Note that these types of middle entities also disrupt 
   end-to-end confidentiality (as the IV formation depends e.g. on the 
   RTP header preservation). A certain trust model may choose to trust 
   the mixers/translators to decrypt/re-encrypt the media (this would 
   imply breaking the end-to-end security, with related security 
   implications).  
    
    
8. Key Management Considerations 
    
   For initialization, an interoperable SRTP implementation SHOULD be 
   given the SSRC and MAY be given the initial RTP sequence number for 
   the RTP stream by key management (thus, key management has a 
   dependency on RTP operational parameters). Sending the RTP sequence 
   number in the key management may be useful e.g. when the initial 
   sequence number is close to wrapping (to avoid synchronization 
   problems), and to communicate the current sequence number to a 
   joining endpoint (to properly initialise its replay list). 
    
   If the pre-defined transforms are used, a particular key management 
   system might allow different RTP sessions to share the same 
   cryptographic master keys. The SRTP sender and receiver typically 
   share a master key to derive session keys for encryption/decryption 
   and authentication; SRTCP sources will typically derive keys from 
   the same master key used by the correspondent SRTP. Sharing also 
   between SRTP streams is secure if the design of the synchronization 
   mechanism, i.e., the IV, avoids keystream re-use (the two-time pad, 
   Section 9.1). If this feature is used, the SSRCs MUST be unique 
   between all the RTP streams sharing the same master key. In other 
   words, when a master key is shared among RTP sessions, SRTP/SRTCP 
   cryptographic transforms are vulnerable to unfortunate SSRC 
   collisions owing to normal operation of a compliant RTP 
   implementation. SRTP implementations that share master keys 
   introduce a non-standard constraint on RTP operation: SSRC values 
   must be unique among RTP sessions that share an SRTP master key (see 
   Section 9.1).  
    
   The same considerations apply to message authentication: SRTP 
   streams authenticated under the same key MUST have a distinct SSRC. 
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 30] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   Whenever uniqueness between the SSRCs can not be guaranteed, the 
   same master key MUST NOT be shared among the streams.  
    
   To share master keys between two SRTP streams, they MUST use  
   distinct SSRCs. Note that this is not guaranteed by standard RTP     
   operation, unless they belong to the same RTP session. However,     
   the fact that an SRTP stream and its associated SRTCP stream both 
   carry the same SSRC does not constitute a problem for the two time 
   pad due to the key derivation. Thus, SRTP and SRTCP corresponding to 
   one RTP session MAY share master keys. 
    
8.1. Re-keying 
     
   A particular key management system might choose to provide re-key: 
    
   - by associating a master key for a crypto context with an MKI,  
    
   or  
    
   - by associating a master key for a crypto context directly with a 
   pair of index (sequence number and ROC) values, <"From", "To">. In 
   this case, the MKI is not included. Note that the range <"From", 
   "To"> gives also the lifetime of the master key itself. <"From", 
   "To"> are specified in the crypto context for a given master key, or 
   the default values, "from the first observed packet" and "until 
   further notice", respectively, are used. Also, in case the default 
   values are used, the SRTP implementation MUST never exceed the 
   maximum limit of SRTP/SRTCP packets sent for each given 
   master/session key.  
    
   The first method (using the MKI) has the advantage of easier master 
   key retrieval (see Scenarios in Section 11), but has the 
   disadvantage of adding extra bits to each packet. Using the MKI does 
   not exclude using <"From", "To"> key lifetime simultaneously. This 
   can for instance be useful to signal at which point in time an MKI 
   is to be made active. 
    
   The key management specification may therefore require the SRTP 
   implementation to check the index of an incoming SRTP packet against 
   the interval for the master key in the context before using the key. 
    
   SRTP senders SHALL count the amount of SRTP and SRTCP traffic being 
   used for a master key and invoke key management to re-key if needed. 
   These interactions are defined by the key management interface to 
   SRTP and are not defined by this protocol specification.   
    
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 31] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
8.2. Key Management parameters 
    
    
   The table below lists all SRTP parameters that key management may 
   need to supply. For reference, it also provides a summary of the 
   default and mandatory-to-support values for an SRTP implementation 
   as described in Section 5.  
    
    
   Parameter                     Mandatory-to-support    Default 
   ---------                     --------------------    ------- 
    
   SRTP and SRTCP encr transf.       AES_CM, NULL         AES_CM 
   (Other possible values: AES_f8)  
    
   SRTP and SRTCP auth transf.       HMAC-SHA1           HMAC-SHA1
    
   SRTP and SRTCP auth params: 
     n_tag (tag length)                 32                 32 
     SRTP prefix_length                  0                  0 
 
  Key derivation PRF                 AES_CM              AES_CM   
     
   Key material params  
   (for each master key): 
     master key                                             
     master key length                 128                128 
     n_e (encr session key length)     128                128 
     n_a (auth session key length)     128                128 
     master salt key                                       
     length of the master salt         112                112 
     n_s (session salt key length)     112                112 
     key derivation rate                 0                  0 
     <"From", "To">                                           
     MKI indicator                       0                  0  
     length of the MKI                   0                  0 
     value of the MKI                                      
    
   Crypto context index params:  
     SSRC value 
     ROC 
     SEQ  
     SRTCP Index 
     Transport address 
     Port number     
    
   Relation to other RTP profiles: 
     sender's order between FEC and SRTP               FEC-SRTP 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 32] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
 
9. Security Considerations 
 
9.1 SSRC collision and two-time pad 
    
   Any fixed keystream output, generated from the same key and index 
   should only be used to encrypt once. Re-using such keystream 
   (jokingly called a "two-time pad" system by cryptographers), can 
   seriously compromise security. The NSA's VENONA project [C99] 
   provides a historical example of such a compromise. In SRTP, a "two- 
   time pad" is avoided by requiring the key, or some other parameter 
   of cryptographic significance, to be unique per RTP stream and 
   packet. The pre-defined SRTP transforms accomplish packet-uniqueness 
   by including the packet index and stream-uniqueness by inclusion of 
   the SSRC.  
    
   The pre-defined transforms (AES-CM and AES-f8) allow master keys to 
   be shared across streams by the inclusion of the SSRC in the IV. 
   Sharing a key among RTP sessions, however, requires the added 
   constraint that SSRC values be unique across RTP sessions (see 
   Section 8). 
    
   Thus, the SSRC MUST be unique between all the RTP streams and 
   sessions sharing the same master key. It is incumbent upon SRTP 
   implementations to ensure SSRC uniqueness across RTP streams that 
   share a master key, to avoid unfortunate IV combinations and end up 
   in a two-time pad. Even with distinct SSRCs, extensive use of the 
   same key might improve chances of probabilistic collision and time-
   memory-tradeoff attacks succeeding. 
    
   It is RECOMMENDED that RTP senders on different hosts not use the 
   same master key to send.  When a local host shares a master key 
   among its RTP/RTCP streams to an RTP session, it MUST check for 
   collisions among the SSRCs it is using at the time of SSRC 
   generation and generate a unique SSRC before sending the value in an 
   SRTP or SRTCP message.  When a local host shares a master key among 
   RTP/RTCP streams in multiple RTP sessions (e.g. in a multimedia 
   session), it MUST check for collisions among the SSRCs it is using 
   for those sessions and enforce SSRC uniqueness even though SSRC 
   uniqueness among RTP sessions is not an RTP requirement.  When 
   master keys are shared between RTP hosts, the effect of an eventual 
   RTP SSRC collision detection MUST be taken into account, as a 
   collision could duplicate the SSRC leading temporarily to a two-time 
   pad before the collision is detected. SRTP implementations SHOULD 
   obtain unique SSRCs from key management when they share a master 
   key. Failing this, an SRTP implementation MUST obtain a new master 
   key from key management for any session that experiences an SSRC 
   collision.  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 33] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
   Manual keying SHOULD NOT be used in SRTP. 
    
 
9.2 Key Usage 
    
   The effective key size is determined (upper bounded) by the size of 
   the master key and, for encryption, the size of the salting key. Any 
   additive stream cipher is vulnerable to attacks that use statistical 
   knowledge about the plaintext source to enable key collision and 
   time-memory tradeoff attacks [MF00,H80]. These attacks take 
   advantage of commonalities among plaintexts, and provide a way for a 
   cryptanalyst to amortize the computational effort of decryption over 
   many keys, thus reducing the effective key size of the cipher. A 
   detailed analysis of these attacks and their applicability to the 
   encryption of Internet traffic is provided in [MF00]. In summary, 
   the effective key size of SRTP when used in a security system in 
   which m distinct keys are used, is equal to the key size of the 
   cipher less the logarithm (base two) of m. Protection against such 
   attacks can be provided simply by increasing the size of the keys 
   used, which here can be accomplished by the use of the salting key. 
   Note that the salting key MUST be random but MAY be public. A salt 
   size of (the suggested) size 112 bits protects against attacks in 
   scenarios where at most 2^112 keys are in use. This is sufficient 
   for all practical purposes. 
    
   Implementations SHOULD use keys that are as large as possible. 
   Please note that in many cases increasing the key size of a cipher 
   does not affect the throughput of that cipher. 
    
   The use of the SRTP and SRTCP indexes in the pre-defined transforms 
   fixes the maximum number of packets that can be secured with the 
   same key. This limit is fixed to 2^48 SRTP packets for an SRTP 
   stream, and 2^31 SRTCP packets, when SRTP and SRTCP are considered 
   independently. Due to for example re-keying, reaching this limit may 
   or may not coincide with wrapping of the indices, and thus the 
   sender MUST keep packet counts. However, when the session keys for 
   related SRTP and SRTCP streams are derived from the same master key 
   (the default behavior, Section 4.3), the upper bound that has to be 
   considered is in practice the minimum of the two quantities. That 
   is, when 2^48 SRTP packets or 2^31 SRTCP packets have been secured 
   with the same key (whichever occurs before), the key management MUST 
   be called to provide new master key(s) (previously stored and used 
   keys MUST NOT be used again), or the session MUST be terminated. If 
   a sender of RTCP discovers that the sender of SRTP (or SRTCP) has 
   not updated the master or session key prior to sending 2^48 SRTP (or 
   2^31 SRTCP) packets belonging to the same SRTP (SRTCP) stream, it is 
   up to the security policy of the RTCP sender how to behave, e.g. 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 34] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   whether an RTCP BYE-packet should be sent and/or if the event should 
   be logged.  
    
   Note: in most typical applications (assuming at least one RTCP 
   packet for every 128,000 RTP packets), it will be the SRTCP index 
   that first reaches the upper limit, although the time until this 
   occurs is very long: even at 200 SRTCP packets/sec, the 2^31 index 
   space of SRTCP is enough to secure approximately 4 months of 
   communication. 
    
   Note that if the master key is to be shared between SRTP streams 
   having distinct SSRCs (Section 9.1), although the above bounds are 
   on a per stream (i.e. per SSRC) basis, the sender MUST base re-key 
   decision on the stream whose sequence number space is the first to 
   be exhausted.  
    
   Key derivation limits the amount of plaintext that is encrypted with 
   a fixed session key, and made available to an attacker for analysis, 
   but key derivation does not extend the master key's lifetime. To see 
   this, simply consider our requirements to avoid two-time pad: two  
   distinct packets MUST either be processed with distinct IVs, or with 
   distinct session keys, and both the distinctness of IV and of the  
   session keys are (for the pre-defined transforms) dependent on the  
   distinctness of the packet indicies. 
    
9.3 Confidentiality of the RTP Payload 
    
   SRTP's pre-defined ciphers are "seekable" stream ciphers, i.e. 
   ciphers able to efficiently seek to arbitrary locations in their 
   keystream (so that the encryption or decryption of one packet does 
   not depend on preceding packets). By using "seekable" stream 
   ciphers, SRTP avoids the denial of service attacks that are possible 
   on stream ciphers that lack this property. It is important to be 
   aware that, as with any stream cipher, the exact length of the 
   payload is revealed by the encryption. This means that it may be 
   possible to deduce certain "formatting bits" of the payload, as the 
   length of the codec output might vary due to certain parameter 
   settings etc. This, in turn, implies that the corresponding bit of 
   the keystream can be deduced. However, if the stream cipher is 
   secure (counter mode and f8 are provably secure under certain 
   assumptions [BDJR,KSYH]), knowledge of a few bits of the keystream 
   will not aid an attacker in predicting subsequent keystream bits. 
   Thus, the payload length (and information deducible from this) will 
   leak, but nothing else. 
    
   As some RTP packet could contain highly predictable data, e.g. SID, 
   it is important to use a cipher designed to resist known plaintext 
   attacks (which is the current practice). 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 35] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
9.4 Confidentiality of the RTP Header 
    
   In SRTP, RTP headers are sent in the clear to allow for header 
   compression. This means that data such as payload type, 
   synchronization source identifier, and timestamp are available to an 
   eavesdropper. Moreover, since RTP allows for future extensions of 
   headers, we cannot foresee what kind of possibly sensitive 
   information might also be "leaked". 
    
   SRTP is a low-cost method, which allows header compression to reduce 
   bandwidth. It is up to the endpoints' policies to decide about the 
   security protocol to employ. If one really needs to protect headers, 
   and is allowed to do so by the surrounding environment, then one 
   should also look at alternatives, e.g., IPsec.  
 
9.5 Integrity of the RTP payload and header 
    
   Additive stream ciphers do not provide any security service other 
   than confidentiality. In particular, they do not provide message 
   authentication (see [RK99] or [HAC] for a discussion of this 
   security service). SRTP uses a message authentication code to 
   provide a message authentication service. 
    
   HMAC is a well-studied message authentication code that is based on 
   a provably secure construction. The security against MAC forgery 
   depends on the key-size and the size of the output tags (or for some 
   attacks, half the size of the tag due to the "birthday-paradox"). 
    
   The default tag size for SRTP HMAC is 32 bits. Other size values MAY 
   be chosen (via the key management protocol). The use of a truncated 
   size is motivated by the fact that it may be desirable, e.g., in 
   wireless environments, to save bandwidth. The choice of such a 
   truncation MUST be evaluated to the reduction in security it 
   implies. The default 32-bit size is a compromise, offering a 
   reasonable level of security, taking into account the real-time 
   aspects of the protected protocol. High security applications SHOULD 
   however use larger tags. 
    
   The fact that message authentication is optional (for SRTP) is 
   motivated by the fact that, while the function is typically highly 
   desired, there are certain cases (notably in cellular environments) 
   where it has an impact in terms of cost, e.g. for bandwidth 
   consumption. Also, independently of the tag length, a single 
   transmission bit error in the protected part of the packet or in the 
   tag itself forces the entire packet to be dropped. Given a fixed 
   quality of service, it implies the necessity of higher protection of 

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 36] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   the transmitted unit, hence higher cost. In those cases, it is up to 
   the user's security profile to request authentication.  
    
   The use of error detection mechanism (e.g., Unequal Error Detection, 
   UED and UEP) is compatible with SRTP and the pre-defined encryption 
   transforms, since stream ciphers operate on each bit individually. 
   However, the use of UED/UEP may be difficult to combine with 
   authentication because any bit error will cause authentication to 
   fail.  
    
   The IV formation of the f8-mode gives implicit authentication (IHA) 
   of the RTP header, even if no cryptographic integrity protection is 
   present. This means that modifying bits of the RTP header will cause 
   the decryption process at the receiver to produce essentially random 
   garbage. 
    
    
10. Interaction with Forward Error Correction mechanisms 
    
   The default processing when using Forward Error Correction (e.g. RFC 
   2733) processing with SRTP SHALL be to perform FEC processing prior 
   to SRTP processing on the sender side and to perform SRTP processing 
   prior to FEC processing on the receiver side.  Any change to this 
   ordering (reversing it, or, placing FEC between SRTP encryption and 
   SRTP authentication) SHALL be signaled out of band. 
 
    
11. Scenarios 
 
   SRTP can be used as security protocol for the RTP/RTCP traffic in   
   many different scenarios. SRTP has a number of configuration  
   options, and can have impact on the total performance of the  
   application according to the way it is used. Hence, the use of SRTP 
   is dependent on the kind of scenario and application it is used  
   with. In the following, we briefly illustrate some use cases for  
   SRTP, and give some guidelines for recommended setting of its  
   options. 
    
11.1 Unicast  
 
   A typical example would be a voice call or video-on-demand 
   application. 
    
   Consider one bi-directional RTP stream. It is possible for the two 
   parties to share the same master key in the two directions. The 
   first round of the key derivation splits the master key into any or 
   all of the following session keys (according to the provided 
   security functions):  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 37] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
   SRTP_encr_key, SRTP_auth_key, SRTCP_encr_key, and SRTCP_auth key. 
    
   (For simplicity, we omit discussion of the salts, which are also 
   derived.) In this scenario, it will in most cases suffice to have a 
   single master key with unspecified lifetime (i.e. unrestricted key 
   lifetime, not using explicit <"From", "To"> values). This guarantees 
   sufficiently long lifetime of the keys and a minimum set of keys in 
   place for most practical purposes. Also, in this case RTCP 
   protection can be applied smoothly. Under these assumptions, use of 
   the MKI can be omitted. As the key-derivation in combination with 
   large difference in the packet rate in the respective directions may 
   require simultaneous storage of several session keys, if storage is 
   an issue, we recommended to use low-rate key derivation.  
 
   The same considerations can be extended to the unicast scenario with 
   multiple RTP sessions sharing the master key if particular care is   
   taken to guarantee unique SSRCs for the streams.  
 
11.2 Multicast  
    
   Just as with (unprotected) RTP, a scalability issue arises in big 
   groups due to the possibly very large amount of SRTCP Receiver 
   Reports that the sender might need to process. In SRTP, the sender 
   may have to keep state (the cryptographic context) for each 
   receiver, or more precisely, for the SRTCP used to protect Receiver 
   Reports. The overhead increases proportionally to the size of the 
   group. In particular, re-keying requires special concern, see below. 
    
   We describe in the following multicast for small groups, and give   
   guidelines for use of SRTP/SRTCP with large group multicast. 
    
11.2.1 Small multicast with one sender  
    
   The sender secures his RTP stream using one cryptographic context. 
   The sender's RTP and RTCP are secured with the same master key. Key 
   derivation gives the necessary session keys, i.e.   
    
   SRTP_encr_key, SRTP_auth_key, SRTCP_encr_key, and SRTCP_auth key. 
    
   If there are multiple RTP streams, their SSRCs MUST (as noted) be 
   unique to avoid two-time pad (see Section 9.1), or else distinct 
   per-stream master keys MUST be used.  
    
   There are a few possible setups with the distribution of master keys
   among the receivers. One possibility is that the receivers share the
   same master key to secure all their respective RTCP traffic. This
   shared master key could then be the same one used by the sender to
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 38] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   protect its outbound traffic. Alternatively, it could be a master key
   shared only among the receivers and used solely for their SRTCP
   traffic. Both alternatives requires the receivers to trust each
   other.
    
   Considering SRTCP and key storage, it is recommended to use low-rate 
   (or zero) key_derivation (except the mandatory initial one), so that 
   the sender does not need to store too many session keys (each SRTCP 
   stream might otherwise have a different session key at a given point 
   in time, as the SRTCP sources send at different times). Thus, in 
   case key derivation is wanted for SRTP, the cryptographic context 
   for SRTP can be kept separate from the SRTCP crypto context, so that 
   it is possible to have a key_derivation_rate of 0 for SRTCP and a 
   non-zero value for SRTP.  
    
   Re-keying gives two problems: the number of master keys stored at 
   the sender side, and re-keying triggering. Forcing re-keying using 
   the <"From", "To"> fields creates the problem that the sender needs 
   to maintain multiple master keys, as the re-keying will typically 
   happen at different times on each SRTCP stream from the receivers 
   (because each SSRC defines a sequence number space). Also, problems 
   may occur in retrieving the current master key for the SRTCP packets 
   in some cases, since that is done based on SRTP index, not on the 
   SRTCP index. Use of the MKI for re-keying is recommended for most 
   applications (see Section 8.1).    
    
   If there are more than one outgoing SRTP stream sharing master key, 
   the upper limit of 2^48 SRTP packets / 2^31 SRTCP packets means 
   that, before one of the streams reaches such maximum number of 
   packets, re-keying MUST be triggered on ALL streams sharing the 
   master key. (From strict security point of view, only the stream 
   reaching the maximum would need to be re-keyed, but then the streams 
   would no longer be sharing master key, which is the intention.) A 
   local policy at the sender side should force rekeying in a way that 
   the maximum packet limit is not reached on any of the streams. The 
   MKI or <"From", "To"> fields may be employed for key synchronization 
   during changeover to a new key, see Section 11.3. 
 
11.2.2 Large multicast with one sender 
    
   The same considerations as for the small group multicast hold. The  
   biggest issue in this scenario is the additional load placed at the  
   sender side, due to the state (cryptographic contexts) that has to   
   be maintained for each receiver, sending back RTCP Receiver Reports. 
   At minimum, a replay window might need to be maintained for each  
   RTCP source. Therefore, with big groups and where the load at the  
   sender is considered not acceptable, an RTP sender may choose not to 
   authenticate or protect against replay for incoming SRTCP messages  
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 39] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   (nor to negotiate encryption for them). Of course, security impacts  
   of neglecting to authenticate certain packets MUST be carefully  
   considered. This is therefore strongly NOT RECOMMENDED from a  
   security point of view, but may appear a reasonable compromise in  
   order to have at least security guaranteed on the outgoing RTP  
   traffic. 
      
    
11.3 Re-keying and access control 
    
   Re-keying may occur due to access control (e.g., when a member is 
   removed during a multicast RTP session), or, for pure cryptographic 
   reasons (e.g. the key is at the end of its lifetime). When using 
   SRTP default transforms, the master key MUST be replaced before any 
   of the index spaces are exhausted for any of the streams protected 
   by one and the same master key.  
 
   How key management rekeys SRTP implementations is out of our scope, 
   but it is clear that there are straightforward ways to manage keys 
   for a multicast group. In one-sender multicast, for example, it is 
   typically the responsibility of the sender to determine when a new 
   key is needed. The sender is the one entity that can keep track of 
   when the maximum number of packets has been sent, as receivers may 
   join and leave the session at any time, there may be packet loss and 
   delay etc. In scenarios other than one-sender multicast, other 
   methods can be used. Here, one must take into consideration that key 
   exchange can be a costly operation, taking several seconds for a 
   single exchange. Hence, some time before the master key is 
   exhausted/expires, out-of-band key management is initiated, 
   resulting in a new master key shared with the receiver(s). In any 
   event, to maintain synchronization when switching to the new key, 
   group policy might choose between using  the MKI or the <"From", 
   "To">, as described in Section 8.1.  
    
   For access control purposes, the <"From", "To"> periods are set at 
   the desired granularity, dependent on the packet rate. High rate re-
   keying can be problematic for some large-group SRTP scenarios, with 
   SRTCP. There are potential problems in using the SRTP index, rather 
   than the SRTCP index, for determining the master key. In particular, 
   for short periods during switching of master keys, it may be the 
   case that SRTCP packets are not under the current master key of the 
   correspondent SRTP. Therefore, using the MKI for re-keying in such 
   scenarios is likely to produce better results. 
    
 
11.4 Summary of basic scenarios 
    

 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 40] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   The description of these scenarios highlights some recommendations 
   on the use of SRTP, mainly related to re-keying and large scale 
   multicast: 
    
   - Do not use SRTP for fast re-keying using the <"From", "To">  
     feature. It may, in particular, give problems in retrieving the  
     correct SRTCP key, if an SRTCP packet arrives close to the re- 
     keying time. The MKI SHOULD be used in this case. 
    
   - If multiple SRTP streams share the same master key, also moderate  
     rate re-keying MAY have the same problems, and the MKI SHOULD be  
     used. 
    
   - Carefully consider the additional load at the sender side in  
    multicast scenarios. Optionally, but NOT RECOMMENDED, SRTCP 
    Receiver Reports' authentication could be left unverified by the 
    sender (and SRTCP Receiver Reports' encryption not selected). 
    
   - Though offering increased security, a non-zero key_derivation_rate 
     is NOT RECOMMENDED when trying to minimize the number of keys in  
     use with multiple streams. 
 
    
12. IANA Considerations 
    
   The RTP specification establishes a registry of profile names for 
   use by higher-level control protocols, such as the Session 
   Description Protocol (SDP), to refer to transport methods. This 
   profile registers the name "RTP/SAVP". 
    
   SRTP uses cryptographic transforms, which a key management protocol 
   signals. It is the task of each particular key management protocol 
   to register the cryptographic transforms or suites of transforms 
   with IANA. The key management protocol conveys these protocol 
   numbers, not SRTP, and each key management protocol chooses the 
   numbering scheme and syntax that it requires. 
    
   Specification of a key management protocol for SRTP is out of scope 
   here. Section 8.2, however, provides guidance on the parameters that 
   need to be defined for the default and mandatory transforms. 
    
    
13. Acknowledgements 
    
   The authors would like to thank Magnus Westerlund, Brian Weis, 
   Robert Fairlie-Cuninghame, Adrian Perrig, and the AVT WG for their 
   reviews and comments. 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 41] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
    
14. Author's Addresses 
    
   Questions and comments should be directed to the authors and 
   avt@ietf.org: 
    
    
    
      Mark Baugher 
      Cisco Systems, Inc. 
      5510 SW Orchid Street     Phone:  +1 408-853-4418 
      Portland, OR 97219 USA    Email:  mbaugher@cisco.com 
    
      Rolf Blom 
      Ericsson Research 
      SE-16480 Stockholm     Phone:  +46 8 58531707 
      Sweden                 EMail:  rolf.blom@era.ericsson.se 
    
      Elisabetta Carrara 
      Ericsson Research 
      SE-16480 Stockholm     Phone:  +46 8 50877040 
      Sweden                 EMail:  elisabetta.carrara@era.ericsson.se 
    
      David A. McGrew 
      Cisco Systems, Inc. 
      San Jose, CA 95134-1706   Phone:  +1 301-349-5815 
      USA                       EMail:  mcgrew@cisco.com 
    
      Mats Naslund 
      Ericsson Research 
      SE-16480 Stockholm     Phone:  +46 8 58533739 
      Sweden                 EMail:  mats.naslund@era.ericsson.se 
    
      Karl Norrman 
      Ericsson Research 
      SE-16480 Stockholm     Phone:  +46 8 4044502 
      Sweden                 EMail:  karl.norrman@era.ericsson.se 
    
      David Oran 
      Cisco Systems, Inc. 
      San Jose, CA 95134-1706    
      USA                       EMail:  oran@cisco.com 
    
    
15. References 
 
   Normative 
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 42] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   [AES] NIST, "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)", FIPS PUB 197,  
         http://www.nist.gov/aes/ 
 
   [HMAC] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and Canetti, R.: "HMAC: Keyed- 
         hashing for message authentication". IETF RFC 2104, February 
         1997. 
    
   [RFC1889] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., Jacobson,V., 
           "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-time Applications", IETF 
           RFC 1889. 
    
   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate 
           Requirement Levels", IETF RFC 2119, March 1997. 
    
   [RFC2401] Kent, S., and R. Atkinson, "Security Architecture for IP", 
          IETF RFC 2401, November 1998. 
    
   [RFC2675] Borman, D., Deering, S., Hinden, R., "IPv6 Jumbograms", 
          IETF RFC 2675, August 1999. 
    
   [RFC2828] Shirey, R., "Internet Security Glossary", IETF RFC 2828, 
            May 2000. 
    
    
  Informative 
     
   [AES-CTR]  Lipmaa, H., Rogaway, P., Wagner, D., "CTR-Mode 
          Encryption", NIST, 
          http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/modes/workshop1/papers/ 
          lipmaa-ctr.pdf 
    
   [BDJR] Bellare, M., Desai, A., Jokipii, E., and Rogaway, P.,  
          "A Concrete Treatment of Symmetric Encryption: Analysis of 
            DES Modes of Operation", Proceedings 38th IEEE FOCS,  
          pp. 394-403, 1997. 
    
   [C99]  Crowell, W. P., "Introduction to the VENONA Project", 
          http://www.nsa.gov:8080/docs/venona/index.html. 
    
   [CTR] Morris Dworkin, NIST Special Publication 800-38A, 
          "Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Methods 
          and Techniques",  2001.  Online at 
          http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-38a/sp800- 
          38a.pdf. 
    
   [f8-a] 3GPP TS 35.201 V4.1.0 (2001-12) 
          Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; 
          Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 43] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
          3G Security; Specification of the 3GPP Confidentiality and 
          Integrity Algorithms; Document 1: f8 and f9 Specification 
          (Release 4). 
    
   [f8-b] 3GPP TR 33.908 V4.0.0 (2001-09) Technical Report 3rd 
          Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group 
          Services and System Aspects; 3G Security; General Report on 
          the Design, Specification and Evaluation of 3GPP Standard 
          Confidentiality and Integrity Algorithms (Release 4). 
           
   [HAC]  Menezes, A., Van Oorschot, P., and Vanstone, S., "Handbook of 
          Applied Cryptography", CRC Press, 1997, ISBN 0-8493-8523-7. 
    
   [H80]  Hellman, M. E., "A cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off",  
          IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, July 1980,  
          pp. 401-406. 
    
   [KSYH] Kang, J-S., Shin, S-U., Hong, D., and Yi, O., "Provable  
          Security of KASUMI and 3GPP Encryption Mode f8",  
          Proceedings Asiacrypt 2001, Springer Verlag LNCS 2248,  
          pp. 255-271, 2001. 
    
   [MF00] McGrew, D., and Fluhrer, S., "Attacks on Encryption of 
         Redundant Plaintext and Implications on Internet Security", 
         the Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Workshop on Selected 
         Areas in Cryptography (SAC 2000), Springer-Verlag. 
    
   [RK99] Rescorla, E., and Korver, B., "Guidelines for Writing RFC 
         Text on Security Considerations," draft-rescorla-sec-cons-
         00.txt 
    
   [PCST1] Perrig, A., Canetti, R., Tygar, D., Song, D., "Efficient and 
         Secure Source Authentication for Multicast", in Proc. of 
         Network and Distributed System Security Symposium NDSS 2001, 
         pp. 35-46, 2001. 
    
   [PCST2] Perrig, A., Canetti, R., Tygar, D., Song, D., "Efficient 
           Authentication and Signing of Multicast Streams over Lossy 
          Channels", in Proc. of IEEE Security and Privacy Symposium 
          S&P2000, pp. 56-73, 2000. 
    
   [WC81] M. N. Wegman and J. L. Carter, "New Hash Functions and Their 
         Use in Authentication and Set Equality", JCSS 22, 265-279, 
         1981. 
          
 
 
 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 44] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
Appendix A: Pseudocode for Index Determination 
     
   The following is an example of pseudocode for the algorithm to 
   determine the index i of an SRTP packet with sequence number SEQ. In 
   the following, signed arithmetic is assumed.  
    
              
         if (s_l < 32,768) 
            if (SEQ - s_l > 32,768) 
               set v to (ROC-1) mod 2^32 
            else 
               set v to ROC 
            endif 
         else 
            if (s_l - 32,768 > SEQ) 
               set v to (ROC+1) mod 2^32  
            else 
               set v to ROC 
            endif 
         endif 
         return SEQ + v*65,536 
 
    
    
Appendix B: Test Vectors 
 
   All values are in hexadecimal. 
    
B.1 AES-f8 Test Vectors 
 
    
   SRTP PREFIX LENGTH  :   0  
    
   RTP packet header   :   806e5cba50681de55c621599  
    
   RTP packet payload  :   70736575646f72616e646f6d6e657373  
                           20697320746865206e65787420626573  
                           74207468696e67  
    
   ROC                 :   d462564a  
   key                 :   234829008467be186c3de14aae72d62c  
   salt key            :   32f2870d  
   key-mask (m)        :   32f2870d555555555555555555555555  
   key XOR key-mask    :   11baae0dd132eb4d3968b41ffb278379  
    
   IV                  :   006e5cba50681de55c621599d462564a  
   IV'                 :   595b699bbd3bc0df26062093c1ad8f73  
    
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 45] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   j                   :   0  
   IV' XOR j           :   595b699bbd3bc0df26062093c1ad8f73  
   S(-1)               :   00000000000000000000000000000000  
   S(-1) XOR IV' XOR j :   595b699bbd3bc0df26062093c1ad8f73  
   S(0)                :   71ef82d70a172660240709c7fbb19d8e  
   plaintext           :   70736575646f72616e646f6d6e657373  
   ciphertext          :   019ce7a26e7854014a6366aa95d4eefd  
    
   j                   :   1  
   IV' XOR j           :   595b699bbd3bc0df26062093c1ad8f72  
   S(0)                :   71ef82d70a172660240709c7fbb19d8e  
   S(0) XOR IV' XOR j  :   28b4eb4cb72ce6bf020129543a1c12fc  
   S(1)                :   3abd640a60919fd43bd289a09649b5fc  
   plaintext           :   20697320746865206e65787420626573  
   ciphertext          :   1ad4172a14f9faf455b7f1d4b62bd08f  
    
   j                   :   2  
   IV' XOR j           :   595b699bbd3bc0df26062093c1ad8f70  
   S(1)                :   3abd640a60919fd43bd289a09649b5fc  
   S(1) XOR IV' XOR j  :   63e60d91ddaa5f0b1dd4a93357e43a8c  
   S(2)                :   584d14a591acfca846b3aa3a0ab50fec  
   plaintext           :   74207468696e67  
   ciphertext          :   2c6d60cdf8c29b  
      
    
    
B.2 AES-CM Test Vectors  
    
   Keystream segment length: 1044512 octets (65282 AES blocks) 
   Session Key:     2B7E151628AED2A6ABF7158809CF4F3C 
   Rollover Counter: 00000000 
   Sequence Number:  0000 
   SSRC:             00000000 
   Session Salt:     F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFD0000 (already shifted) 
   Offset:           F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFD0000 
    
   Counter                            Keystream 
    
   F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFD0000   E03EAD0935C95E80E166B16DD92B4EB4 
   F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFD0001   D23513162B02D0F72A43A2FE4A5F97AB 
   F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFD0002   41E95B3BB0A2E8DD477901E4FCA894C0 
   ...                                ... 
   F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFDFEFF   EC8CDF7398607CB0F2D21675EA9EA1E4 
   F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFDFF00   362B7C3C6773516318A077D7FC5073AE 
   F0F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9FAFBFCFDFF01   6A2CC3787889374FBEB4C81B17BA6C44 
    


 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 46] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
   Nota Bene: this test case is contrived so that the latter part of the
   keystream segment coincides with the test case in Section F.5.1 of
   [CTR]. 
 
B.3 Key Derivation Test Vectors 
    
   This section provides test data for the default key derivation 
   function, which uses AES-128 in Counter Mode. In the following, we 
   walk through the initial key derivation for the AES-128 Counter Mode 
   cipher, which requires a 16 octet session encryption key and a 14 
   octet session salt, and an authentication function which requires a 
   94-octet session authentication key. These values are called the 
   cipher key, the cipher salt, and the auth key in the following. 
   Since this is the initial key derivation, the value of (index DIV 
   key_derivation_rate) is zero (actually, a six-octet string of 
   zeros). In the following, we shorten key_derivation_rate to kdr. 
    
   The inputs to the key derivation function are the 16 octet master 
   key and the 14 octet master salt: 
    
      master key:  E1F97A0D3E018BE0D64FA32C06DE4139 
      master salt: 0EC675AD498AFEEBB6960B3AABE6 
    
   We first show how the cipher key is generated. The input block for 
   AES-CM is generated by exclusive-oring the master salt with the 
   concatenation of the encryption key label 0x00 with (index DIV kdr), 
   then padding on the right with two null octets (which implements the 
   multiply-by-2^16 operation, see Section 4.3.3). The resulting value 
   is then AES-CM- encrypted using the master key to get the cipher 
   key. 
    
      index DIV kdr:                 000000000000 
      label:                       00 
      master salt:   0EC675AD498AFEEBB6960B3AABE6 
      ----------------------------------------------- 
      xor:           0EC675AD498AFEEBB6960B3AABE6     (x, PRF input) 
    
      x*2^16:        0EC675AD498AFEEBB6960B3AABE60000 (AES-CM input) 
    
    
      cipher key:    C61E7A93744F39EE10734AFE3FF7A087 (AES-CM output) 
    
   Next, we show how the cipher salt is generated. The input block for 
   AES-CM is generated by exclusive-oring the master salt with the 
   concatenation of the encryption salt label. That value is padded 
   and encrypted as above. 
    
      index DIV kdr:                 000000000000 
 
 
 
Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 47] 
INTERNET-DRAFT                    SRTP                      June, 2002 
 
 
      label:                       02 
      master salt:   0EC675AD498AFEEBB6960B3AABE6 
    
      ---------------------------------------------- 
      xor:           0EC675AD498AFEE9B6960B3AABE6     (x, PRF input) 
     
      x*2^16:        0EC675AD498AFEE9B6960B3AABE60000 (AES-CM input) 
    
                     30CBBC08863D8C85D49DB34A9AE17AC6 (AES-CM ouptut) 
    
      cipher salt:   30CBBC08863D8C85D49DB34A9AE1 
    
   We now show how the auth key is generated. The input block for 
   AES-CM is generated as above, but using the authentication key 
   label. 
    
      index DIV kdr:                   000000000000 
      label:                         01 
      master salt:     0EC675AD498AFEEBB6960B3AABE6 
      ----------------------------------------------- 
      xor:             0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE6     (x, PRF input) 
    
      x*2^16:          0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60000 (AES-CM input) 
       
       
    
   Below, the auth key is shown on the left, while the corresponding 
   AES input blocks are shown on the right. 
    
   auth key                           AES input blocks 
   CEBE321F6FF7716B6FD4AB49AF256A15   0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60000 
   6D38BAA48F0A0ACF3C34E2359E6CDBCE   0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60001 
   E049646C43D9327AD175578EF7227098   0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60002 
   6371C10C9A369AC2F94A8C5FBCDDDC25   0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60003 
   6D6E919A48B610EF17C2041E47403576   0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60004 
   6B68642C59BBFC2F34DB60DBDFB2       0EC675AD498AFEEAB6960B3AABE60005  
   
 
 
   This Internet-Draft expires in December 2002. 
    


 
 








Baugher, et al.                                              [Page 48]

PAFTECH AB 2003-20262026-04-22 22:57:54