One document matched: draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap-01.txt
Differences from draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap-00.txt
Network Working Group B. Carpenter (ed)
Internet-Draft IBM
Expires: March 24, 2006 September 20, 2005
The IETF Process: a Roadmap
draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap-01
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 24, 2006.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
Abstract
This document describes a roadmap for various IETF process documents,
to support ongoing discussions about process reform.
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Outline of roadmap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Details of roadmap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Change log [RFC Editor: please remove this section] . . . . . 6
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 10
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
1. Introduction
BCP 9 [1] has been the basis for the IETF standards process for many
years. However, many other process documents exist, some of which
are partial updates to BCP 9. This situation is confusing and needs
to be resolved by a clear set of interlocking documents. The present
document suggests a structured way of looking at these documents, and
some commentary about what already exists or has been proposed.
It is difficult to linearise a complicated and interlocked process.
This document presents the roadmap in one particular order, but that
is not intended to imply priority or importance, and it cannot
capture all interactions between components.
2. Outline of roadmap
For readability of what follows, this section simply lists the
process document structure. The following section repeats this
structure with explanatory text.
General description of workflow in the IETF
Definition of standards track and related document types
Specifications
Information
Descriptors
Intellectual Property
Rights in Contributions
Rights in Technology
Trademarks
Review and approval process
Criteria for review
Criteria for approval
Appeal process
Bodies involved in the process
WG procedures
IESG
Review panel TBD
IAB
Liaison management
Nomcom
Conduct of participants
Publication process
Requirements
Format and mechanics for drafts
Format and mechanics for archival publications
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
Direct submissions to RFC Editor
Registration process
Requirements
Guidelines for authors
Assignment criteria
Format and mechanics
Administration
3. Details of roadmap
Note 1: RFC numbers have been used rather than BCP numbers, for
convenient lookup. Most of the cited RFCs are BCPs. Of course, many
of them may need updating.
Note 2: Where drafts are cited, it is not implied that they have
reached consensus. Internet-Draft citations have not been given in
detail; see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=search_id.
o General description of workflow in the IETF
This document does not exist, although the Tao (RFC 3160[20],
draft-hoffman-taobis) offers hints, but it is needed.
How ideas for new work enter the IETF, reach a BOF, enter IAB or
IRTF discussion, and possibly become material for a new or
existing WG. How WGs are chartered - the AD role. How specific
proposals become drafts and flow through the development, review
and approval process.
o Definition of standards track and related document types.
This material is currently embedded in RFC 2026[1]. The newtrk WG
is chartered to revise the standards track - multiple proposals
have been floated, most recently draft-carpenter-newtrk-twostep
and draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-all.
* Specifications
This material is currently embedded in RFC 2026[1], covering
standards track, BCP and experimental documents. A variance
procedure for down-level normative references is in RFC
3967[2].
* Information
This material is currently embedded in RFC 2026[1], covering
informational and historic documents. A distinction between
obsolete and deprecated documents should probably be added.
* Descriptors
See draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd and
draft-otis-newtrk-rfc-set.
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
o Intellectual Property
* Rights in Contributions
RFC 3978[3], draft-bradner-author-contributors,
draft-bradner-rfc-extracts
* Rights in Technology
RFC 3979[4] (Guidelines, RFC 3669[21])
* Trademarks
draft-ietf-ipr-trademarks
o Review and approval process
This material is currently embedded in RFC 2026[1].
* Criteria for review
Some material was in draft-carpenter-solution-sirs and a
version can be found at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/review-guidelines.html
* Criteria for approval
Material on current IESG practice can be found in
draft-iesg-discuss-criteria
+ Appeal process
This material is currently embedded in RFC 2026[1].
o Bodies involved in the process
Bodies involved, RFC 2028[5]; Defining the IETF, RFC 3233[6];
Mission Statement, RFC 3935[7].
* WG procedures
RFC 2418[8]
* IESG
RFC 3710[22]
* Proposed review panel
draft-klensin-stds-review-panel
* IAB
RFC 2850[9]
+ Liaison management
RFC 4052[10], RFC 4053[11],
draft-andersson-iab-liaison-guidelines
* Nomcom
RFC 3777[12] , draft-klensin-nomcom-term
* Relationship to ISOC
RFC 2031[23], RFC 3677[13]
o Conduct of participants
RFC 3005[14], RFC 3184[15], RFC 3683[16] , and also discussed in
RFC 2418[8] and in the Tao (RFC 3160[20], draft-hoffman-taobis).
o Publication process
* Requirements
This is intended to be the subject of the techspec BOF in
Vancouver.
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
* Format and mechanics for drafts
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.html
* Format and mechanics for archival publications
See draft-hoffman-rfc-author-guide for a minimalist version, or
draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis for a version including other
topics. RFC 2223[24] is the published version today.
* Direct submissions to RFC Editor
RFC 3932[17]
o Registration process
* Requirements
RFC 2860[25]
* Guidelines for authors
RFC 2434[18], draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis
* Assignment criteria
draft-klensin-iana-reg-policy
* Format and mechanics
Case by case at IANA web site.
o Administration
RFC 4071[19], draft-carpenter-bcp101-update,
draft-iab-iesg-iaoc-selection, draft-alvestrand-subpoena
4. Security Considerations
This document has no security implications for the Internet.
5. IANA Considerations
This document requires no action by the IANA. However, it does
mention how IANA's registration functions should be documented.
6. Acknowledgements
Useful comments on this document were made by: Harald Alvestrand,
Scott Bradner, Spencer Dawkins, Leslie Daigle, John Klensin,...
This document was produced using the xml2rfc tool[26].
7. Change log [RFC Editor: please remove this section]
draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap-01: minor additions, 2005-09-20
draft-carpenter-procdoc-roadmap-00: original version, 2005-08-22
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3",
BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[2] Bush, R. and T. Narten, "Clarifying when Standards Track
Documents may Refer Normatively to Documents at a Lower Level",
BCP 97, RFC 3967, December 2004.
[3] Bradner, S., "IETF Rights in Contributions", BCP 78, RFC 3978,
March 2005.
[4] Bradner, S., "Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology",
BCP 79, RFC 3979, March 2005.
[5] Hovey, R. and S. Bradner, "The Organizations Involved in the
IETF Standards Process", BCP 11, RFC 2028, October 1996.
[6] Hoffman, P. and S. Bradner, "Defining the IETF", BCP 58,
RFC 3233, February 2002.
[7] Alvestrand, H., "A Mission Statement for the IETF", BCP 95,
RFC 3935, October 2004.
[8] Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures",
BCP 25, RFC 2418, September 1998.
[9] Internet Architecture Board and B. Carpenter, "Charter of the
Internet Architecture Board (IAB)", BCP 39, RFC 2850, May 2000.
[10] Daigle, L. and Internet Architecture Board, "IAB Processes for
Management of IETF Liaison Relationships", BCP 102, RFC 4052,
April 2005.
[11] Trowbridge, S., Bradner, S., and F. Baker, "Procedures for
Handling Liaison Statements to and from the IETF", BCP 103,
RFC 4053, April 2005.
[12] Galvin, J., "IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall
Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees",
BCP 10, RFC 3777, June 2004.
[13] Daigle, L. and Internet Architecture Board, "IETF ISOC Board of
Trustee Appointment Procedures", BCP 77, RFC 3677,
December 2003.
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
[14] Harris, S., "IETF Discussion List Charter", BCP 45, RFC 3005,
November 2000.
[15] Harris, S., "IETF Guidelines for Conduct", BCP 54, RFC 3184,
October 2001.
[16] Rose, M., "A Practice for Revoking Posting Rights to IETF
mailing lists", BCP 83, RFC 3683, February 2004.
[17] Alvestrand, H., "The IESG and RFC Editor Documents:
Procedures", BCP 92, RFC 3932, October 2004.
[18] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998.
[19] Austein, R. and B. Wijnen, "Structure of the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA)", BCP 101, RFC 4071,
April 2005.
8.2. Informative References
[20] Harris, S., "The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the Internet
Engineering Task Force", RFC 3160, August 2001.
[21] Brim, S., "Guidelines for Working Groups on Intellectual
Property Issues", RFC 3669, February 2004.
[22] Alvestrand, H., "An IESG charter", RFC 3710, February 2004.
[23] Huizer, E., "IETF-ISOC relationship", RFC 2031, October 1996.
[24] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Instructions to RFC Authors",
RFC 2223, October 1997.
[25] Carpenter, B., Baker, F., and M. Roberts, "Memorandum of
Understanding Concerning the Technical Work of the Internet
Assigned Numbers Authority", RFC 2860, June 2000.
[26] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629,
June 1999.
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
Author's Address
Brian Carpenter (ed)
IBM
48 Avenue Giuseppe Motta
1211 Geneva 2,
Switzerland
Email: brc@zurich.ibm.com
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft The IETF Process: a Roadmap September 2005
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Carpenter (ed) Expires March 24, 2006 [Page 10]
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 06:46:59 |