One document matched: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-msid-01.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-msid-01"
ipr="trust200902">
<front>
<title abbrev="MSID in SDP">Signalling Media Stream ID in the Session
Description Protocol</title>
<author fullname="Harald Alvestrand" initials="H. T." surname="Alvestrand">
<organization>Google</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Kungsbron 2</street>
<city>Stockholm</city>
<region></region>
<code>11122</code>
<country>Sweden</country>
</postal>
<email>harald@alvestrand.no</email>
</address>
</author>
<date day="25" month="January" year="2012" />
<abstract>
<t>This document specifies how the association between the RTP concept
of SSRC and the WebRTC concept of "media stream" / "media stream track"
is carried using SDP signalling.</t>
<t>This document is an input document for discussion. It should be
discussed in the RTCWEB WG list, rtcweb@ietf.org.</t>
</abstract>
<note title="Requirements Language">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>
</note>
</front>
<middle>
<section title="Introduction">
<t>The W3C WebRTC API specification <xref
target="W3C.WD-webrtc-20111027"></xref> specifies that communication
between WebRTC entities is done via MediaStreams, which contain
MediaStreamTracks. A MediaStreamTrack is generally carried using a
single SSRC in an RTP session. There might possibly with additional
SSRCs, possibly within additional RTP sessions, in order to support
functionality like forward error correction or simulcast. This
complication is ignored below.</t>
<t>One SSRC may utilize multiple codecs, such as an audio track
switching between audio, comfort noise and DTMF. An SSRC MUST NOT switch
between media types (no switching between audio and video, for
instance)</t>
<t>In the RTP specification, media streams are identified using the SSRC
field. Streams are grouped into RTP Sessions, and also carry a CNAME.
Neither CNAME nor RTP session correspond to a MediaStream. Therefore,
the association of an RTP media stream to MediaStreams need to be
explicitly signalled.</t>
<t>The marking needs to be on a per-SSRC basis, since one RTP session
can carry media from multiple MediaStreams, and one MediaStream can have
media in multiple RTP sessions. This means that the <xref
target="RFC4574"></xref> "label" attribute, which is used to label RTP
sessions, is not usable for this purpose.</t>
<t>The marking needs to also carry the unique identifier of the RTP
media stream as a MediaStreamTrack within the media stream; this is done
using a single letter to identify whether it belongs in the video or
audio track list, and the MediaStreamTrack's position within that
array.</t>
</section>
<section title="Basic mechanism">
<t>Association of the MediaStream to the SSRC is done via an "msid"
attribute attached to the SSRC in the SDP description, using the "Source
Specific Media Attribute" mechanism <xref target="RFC5576"></xref>:</t>
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[ a=ssrc:1234 msid:examplefoo v1
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>The msid is a string of ASCII characters chosen from 0-9, a-z, A-Z
and - (hyphen), consisting of between 1 and 64 characters. The value
"default" (all lower case) has special meaning, and MUST NOT be
generated. Values starting with "example" (all lower case) are reserved
for documentation, and MUST NOT be generated by an implementation.</t>
<t>After the msid, there is a track identifier, denoting the index at
which this track appears in the respective track list. The track
identifier is prefixed with "a" for audio, or "v" for video.</t>
<t>ABNF<xref target="RFC5234"></xref> grammar:</t>
<t></t>
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[
msidattribute = "msid:" identifier " " trackid
identifier = 1*64 ("0".."9" / "a".."z" / "-")
trackid = ("v" / "a" "1".."9" *8("0".."9")
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>(Note: one possible generation algorithm is to generate 6 random
bytes, base64 encode them (giving 8 bytes), and prefixing with a letter
that is neither "d" nor "e". Another possibility is using some form of
UUID.)</t>
<t>The msid uniquely identifies a media stream within the scope of an
SDP description. When an SDP description is updated, a specific msid
continues to refer to the same media stream; an msid value MUST NOT be
reused for another media stream within an SDP session's lifetime.</t>
<t>The value of the msid corresponds to the "id" attribute of a
MediaStream. (note: as of Jan 11, 2012, this is called "label". The word
"label" means many other things, so the same word should not be
used.)</t>
<t>In a WebRTC-compatible SDP description, all SSRCs intending to be
sent from one peer will be identified in the SDP generated by that
entity.</t>
<t>The following are the rules for handling updates of the list of SSRCs
and their msid values.</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>When a new msid value occurs in the description, the recipient
can signal to its application that a new media stream has been
added.</t>
<t>When a description is updated to have more SSRCs with the same
msid value, the recipient can signal to its application that new
media stream tracks have been added to the media stream.</t>
<t>When a description is updated to no longer list the msid value on
a specific ssrc, the recipient can signal to its application that
the corresponding media stream track has been closed</t>
<t>When a description is updated to no longer list the msid value on
any ssrc, the recipient can signal to its application that the media
stream track has been closed.</t>
</list>OPEN ISSUE: Exactly when should the recipient signal that the
track is closed? When the msid value disappears from the description,
when a BYE packet is received, when a timeout passes with no media, any
of the above, or some combination of the above? </t>
</section>
<section title="Signalling muted and non-desired tracks">
<t>In addition to identifying the track, there is a need for specifying
whether or not a track is muted by the sender (that is, the track still
exists, but is not sending data at the moment), whether the track is
muted by the recipient (that is, the track is OK to receive, but it is
useless to send data on it now because the recipient is not listening,
or rejected by the recipient (that is, for some reason the recipient is
unwilling or unable to receive the track).</t>
<t>This is accomplished using the mechanisms from <xref
target="I-D.lennox-mmusic-sdp-source-selection"></xref>, in particular
these constructs:</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>a=remote-ssrc:<SSRC> recv:off - recipient does not wish to
receive data</t>
<t>a=SSRC:<SSRC> sending:off - sender is not currently sending
data</t>
<t>If some sources are present with a=remote-ssrc:<SSRC>
attributes, section 8 of the referenced draft states that the other
SSRCs SHOULD be regarded as rejected by the receiver.</t>
</list>An implementation compliant with this specification MUST also
comply with all requirements of <xref
target="I-D.lennox-mmusic-sdp-source-selection"></xref>.</t>
</section>
<section title="Handling of non-signalled tracks">
<t>Pre-WebRTC entities will not send msid. This means that there will be
some incoming RTP packets with SSRCs where the recipient does not know
about a corresponding MediaStream id.</t>
<t>Handling will depend on whether or not any SSRCs are signalled in the
relevant RTP session. There are two cases:</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>No SSRC is signalled with an msid attribute. The SDP session is
assumed to be a backwards-compatible session. All incoming SSRCs, on
all RTP sessions that are part of the SDP session, are assumed to
belong to a single media stream. The ID of this media stream is
"default".</t>
<t>Some SSRCs are signalled with an msid attribute. In this case,
the session is WebRTC compatible, and the newly arrived SSRCs are
either caused by a bug or by timing skew between the arrival of the
media packets and the SDP description. These packets MAY be
discarded, or they MAY be buffered for a while in order to allow
immediate startup of the media stream when the SDP description is
updated. The arrival of media packets MUST NOT cause a new
MediaStreamTrack to be created.</t>
</list>Note: This means that it is wise to include at least one
a=ssrc: line with an msid attribute, even when no media streams are yet
attached to the session. (Alternative: Mark the RTP session explicitly
as "I will signal the media stream tracks explicitly").</t>
<t>It follows from the above that media stream tracks in the "default"
media stream cannot be closed by signalling; the application must
instead signal these as closed when either an RTCP BYE packet or the
absence of media for a defined interval <what interval?> indicates
that the stream is gone.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
<t>This document requests IANA to register the "msid" attribute in the
"att-field (source level)" registry within the SDP parameters registry,
according to the procedures of <xref target="RFC5576"></xref></t>
<t>The required information is:</t>
<t><list style="symbols">
<t>Contact name, email: IETF, contacted via rtcweb@ietf.org, or a
successor address designated by IESG</t>
<t>Attribute name: msid</t>
<t>Long-form attribute name: Media Stream Identifier</t>
<t>The attribute value contains only ASCII characters, and is
therefore not subject to the charset attribute.</t>
<t>The attribute gives an association between a WebRTC MediaStream
and an SSRC.</t>
<t>The details of appropriate values are given in RFC XXXX.</t>
</list>IANA is requested to replace "RFC XXXX" with the RFC number of
this document upon publication.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
<t>An adversary with the ability to modify SDP descriptions has the
ability to switch around tracks between media streams. This is a special
case of the general security consideration that modification of SDP
descriptions needs to be confined to entities trusted by the
application.</t>
<t>No attacks that are relevant to the browser's security have been
identified that depend on this mechanism.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
<t>This note is based on sketches from, among others, Justin Uberti and
Cullen Jennings.</t>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<references title="Normative References">
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
<?rfc include='reference.RFC.5576'?>
<?rfc include='reference.RFC.5234'?>
<?rfc include='reference.W3C.WD-webrtc-20111027'?>
<?rfc include='reference.I-D.lennox-mmusic-sdp-source-selection'?>
</references>
<references title="Informative References">
<?rfc include='reference.RFC.4574'?>
</references>
<section title="Design considerations, open questions and and alternatives">
<t>This appendix should be deleted before publication as an RFC.</t>
<t>One suggested mechanism has been to use CNAME instead of a new
attribute. This was abandoned because CNAME identifies a synchronization
context; one can imagine both wanting to have tracks from the same
synchronization context in multiple media streams and wanting to have
tracks from multiple synchronization contexts within one media
stream.</t>
<t>Another suggestion has been to put the msid value within an attribute
of RTCP SR (sender report) packets. This doesn't offer the ability to
know that you have seen all the tracks currently configured for a media
stream.</t>
<t>There has been a suggestion that this mechanism could be used to mute
tracks too. This is not done at the moment.</t>
<t>The special value "default" and the reservation of "example*" seems
bothersome; apart from that, it's a random string. It's uncertain
whether "example" has any benefit.</t>
<t>An alternative to the "default" media stream is to let each new media
stream track without a msid attribute create its own media stream. Input
on this question is sought.</t>
<t>Discarding of incoming data when the SDP description isn't updated
yet (section 3) may cause clipping. However, the same issue exists when
crypto keys aren't available. Input sought.</t>
<t>There's been a suggestion that acceptable SSRCs should be signalled
in a response, giving a recipient the ability to say "no" to certain
SSRCs. This is not supported in the current version of this
document.</t>
</section>
<section title="Change log">
<t>This appendix should be deleted before publication as an RFC.</t>
<section title="Changes from -00 to -01">
<t>Added track identifier.</t>
<t>Added inclusion-by-reference of
draft-lennox-mmusic-source-selection for track muting.</t>
<t>Some rewording.</t>
</section>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
| PAFTECH AB 2003-2026 | 2026-04-24 02:40:50 |